199 lines
9.9 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
9.9 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
___________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
|
|
| Co-Sysop : Ronald Barker | Voice : (214) 242-9346 |
|
|
| File Name : BRDN180.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 1031 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75149 |
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Why has Tom Bearden given up on Phase Conjagation?
|
|
|
|
For many years, Tom Bearden (the "father" of scalar electromagnetics) has
|
|
been touting "the way" to free energy, anti-gravity, etc. This was through
|
|
the use of phase conjugate principles.
|
|
|
|
Scalar effects are produced by phase conjugating a wave by 180 degrees to
|
|
cancel out the energy, yet it produces a "stress wave" that can have
|
|
physical effects.
|
|
|
|
Many of us who study or research this field have been fans and friends of
|
|
Bearden and were puzzled by his recent change to the "degenerate conductor"
|
|
theories as specified in "The Final Secret" documents.
|
|
|
|
How can "potential" ALONE drive circuits which we KNOW require CURRENT?
|
|
The basic premise of the "Final Secret" rely on the oozing of potential
|
|
(voltage) from the inside of a conductor to the outside edge. (Is it not
|
|
intriguing that DePalma and Tewari both tap this central shaft area of
|
|
stillness for the production of electrons, just as described by Keely,
|
|
Russell and others???)
|
|
|
|
We know that current only flows over the surface of a conductor, therefore,
|
|
as the electrons reach the surface, they take a right angle turn and
|
|
"translate" into CURRENT. Only at that point does the circuit truly DRAW
|
|
POWER.
|
|
|
|
Bearden says that when you draw a current from a power source that you are
|
|
actually destroying that source. However, if you draw only potential, then
|
|
you don't affect the source in such a self-defeating way.
|
|
|
|
A collector (capacitor or inductor) is used to collect and transfer
|
|
potential from the source....before the collector "fills up" and the
|
|
potential translates to current, BOTH contacts are switched into a load,
|
|
where it instantly discharges.
|
|
|
|
The collector is then re-connected to the source until it again recharges
|
|
and the discharge process into the load repeats. The speed of this
|
|
transaction determines the total energy supplied to the load. So, if you
|
|
make it happen fast enough, you will be able to sustain that load.
|
|
|
|
To date, I am not aware of anyone publicly demonstrating or releasing
|
|
information relating to such a WORKING circuit. The closest person is Lee
|
|
Trippett with his TOD circuit. It is a current amplifier with very
|
|
peculiar properties, yet will not sustain a load.
|
|
|
|
A most interesting extension of the TOD circuit is Bert Pool's modification
|
|
into his "FireFly" circuit that will source up to 6 LEDs (see FireFly on
|
|
KeelyNet). Although it appears to be running above unity if you rely on
|
|
digital meters, it really is not.
|
|
|
|
The unique point about the Firefly is that the LED's light AFTER the
|
|
battery has been switched out of the circuit. Presumably from the motion
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the electron wave through the wire. If this is so, then perhaps Bearden
|
|
is really onto something. However, the question is whether current is
|
|
actually being drawn. From Bert and Norm's description of the experiment,
|
|
specifically the use of amp meters to monitor the flow of current into the
|
|
wire in the first place, there is current drawn. But it is a very
|
|
interesting effect.
|
|
|
|
We are told there was a laser researcher who figured that energy could be
|
|
extracted from a properly conjugated laser cavity. He succeeded yet before
|
|
he could make the details of the process known, he was killed by short
|
|
range shotgun blasts as he left his home. The circumstances indicated
|
|
silence was the motive for the killing.
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
We took Tom Bearden, Ken MacNeill and Bill McMurtry to dinner Friday
|
|
evening with several others in our group. I mentioned to Tom how several
|
|
folks had wondered why he had given up on phase conjugation and done this
|
|
complete shift over to the degenerate conductor idea.
|
|
|
|
Tom says he has in no way given up on phase conjugate theory but that he
|
|
has gone as far as he could with what materials and research tools he has.
|
|
So, he decided to put some of his own observations out and those resulted
|
|
in the Final Secret treatise.
|
|
|
|
The work continues on these two primary fronts (i.e. phase conjugation and
|
|
degenerate conductors), but with the main focus being on the degenerate
|
|
conductor approach. According to Tom, there was nothing behind the change,
|
|
simply that he decided to share an additional approach based on some of his
|
|
own observations and thoughts.
|
|
|
|
As of now, the next step in his own researches is the borrowing or buying
|
|
of two Calibration Standard Capacitors. Tom needs this for further work
|
|
with his recently patent applied for free energy circuit. If he can get
|
|
them, he thinks it will prove his circuit.
|
|
|
|
So, if you know where he could borrow a couple of these that you can loan
|
|
out or buy to help out, these things are about $2000 each, he would sure
|
|
appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Phase Conjugation is still a very viable approach and one that we here at
|
|
KeelyNet believe to be right on track ABOVE everything else. This follows
|
|
the work of Keely and the entire field of music and resonance. By creating
|
|
interference patterns (constructive or destructive), you can affect energy
|
|
or mass.
|
|
|
|
The ideal free energy device would use a tuned waveplate or a geometry that
|
|
produces such a wavefront that it would "interfere" with incoming energies
|
|
to produce side effects as specified in the NEUTRAL1 Aether Spectrum.
|
|
Those side effects would be collected or otherwise discharged for practical
|
|
use. Electricity, light or heat are all quite practical using this down
|
|
conversion method.
|
|
|
|
That is one of the reasons for our interest in "Magic Squares", because
|
|
they form the geometries that can act as kaleidoscopic multipliers or
|
|
dividers of these incoming energies or simply Aether/gravity to keep it
|
|
simple. Small replicative circuits that produce large quantities of the
|
|
desired energy.
|
|
|
|
An interesting quote made by John Keely was that a tuning fork or tuned bar
|
|
will excite another fork/bar of the same frequency.
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So if you place one thousand identically tuned bars in a room, then strike
|
|
a single bar, all the bars would vibrate and thus produce AUGMENTATION of
|
|
force!
|
|
|
|
That is what we currently think Barium is doing in the Sweet VTA. That is,
|
|
it is AUGMENTING FORCE simply from the excitation of a single barium atom!
|
|
|
|
Keely also indicates that in a DIFFERENTIATED MASS (such as a "conditioned"
|
|
magnet), all of the "knotholes" or nodes of interference are removed. Once
|
|
this is done, the mass becomes essentially superconducting because of the
|
|
instant communication of force throughout it's aggregate structure.
|
|
|
|
When that occurs, change of one single molecule will instantly change ALL
|
|
OTHER MOLECULES of like composition because the aggregrate has been attuned
|
|
to a harmonious or "differentiated" condition.
|
|
|
|
The point here is that phase conjugation is extremely important to our
|
|
quest for free energy devices because it defines the practical application
|
|
of frequency to produce effects.
|
|
|
|
Another interesting point, we were told that Barium Ferrite magnets are no
|
|
longer available in the U.S. This because the government decided that
|
|
Barium has toxic affects and is thus not "safe" for the public. Isn't it
|
|
odd that Barium is also necessary for duplication of the Sweet VTA?
|
|
|
|
Cold fusion also requires an unusual substance in the form of heavy water
|
|
and shortly after the Pons/Fleischmann release of the details, the largest
|
|
heavy water manufacturer in the world went "out of business".
|
|
|
|
Correlation here?? At the ISNE conference banquet, a book was shown that
|
|
was produced by the United States Coast Guard. It was titled "From 2012"
|
|
or something like that, can't find the note on it. But the title
|
|
definitely was 2012 and it was published in the last few years by the US
|
|
Coast Guard. The perspective of the book was FROM the year 2012,
|
|
describing extant conditions.
|
|
|
|
One whole chapter was devoted to energy generation and it WAS GIVEN THAT
|
|
ZPE/VACUUM devices would be in global use!! This means the government
|
|
either HAS the technology or something big is soon to break. The whole
|
|
impetus of GM and other auto manufacturers towards electric cars is trying
|
|
to tell us something.
|
|
|
|
So, we need to get this stuff INTO PRACTICAL DEVICES and posted EVERYWHERE
|
|
in the public domain BEFORE the technology can be monopolized or sealed up
|
|
through patents by the big conglomerates!
|
|
|
|
Like Dennis Weaver said at the Banquet,
|
|
|
|
Money is like Manure, the higher you pile it, the more it stinks.
|
|
|
|
But if you SPREAD IT AROUND, IT GROWS THINGS!
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
|
|
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|