531 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
531 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : ALTSCI1.ASC | Online Date : 01/09/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
|
|
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
This file is composed of three USENET posts, all referring to claims made by a
|
|
certain James Stephens. Please bear with some of the claims and think about
|
|
some of the theories which he says are being used in devices. They are quite
|
|
remarkable and worthy of thought and experiment......>>> Jerry
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: Carolk@coombs.anu.edu.au (Carol Kavana)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
|
|
Subject: Help!!!
|
|
Date: 6 Sep 1995 23:49:12 GMT
|
|
Organization: Australian National University
|
|
|
|
Hello to all a.s.p.n-t regulars. I have been thinking where can I check
|
|
something out all night, when it suddenly occurred to me this may well be the
|
|
perfect place. There will be hard core scientists who post here.
|
|
|
|
O.K. well the first part of this will cause you all to roll eyes skywards I
|
|
know, but please bear with me.
|
|
|
|
In the sense that I tune in frequently and post very occasionally, I am a
|
|
regular on alt.alien.visitors. As you can imagine, that group is full of
|
|
people who either believe or want to believe in e.t's and lots of debunkers. I
|
|
admit up front that I belong to the former group. As you can also imagine, the
|
|
group has been abuzz with the screening of the Roswell incident pretty much
|
|
world wide last week, and this 'abuzz' has followed the usual pattern of the
|
|
group.
|
|
|
|
However, yesterday appeared a post dated 5 September 1995 from a James
|
|
Stephens, entitled 'GroomLake "Colonel" Reveals All' Now I don't know what,
|
|
who or where Groom Lake is, but I have never seen a post from someone called
|
|
James Stephens previously, although there could have been because I have only
|
|
been participating since early June. There was no reaction in the group to his
|
|
post yesterday, but there may well be today because most of the posters are
|
|
northern hemisphere, so they don't show up until the next day here in
|
|
Australia, and I haven't checked yet, I decided to post here first.
|
|
|
|
O.K. this guy James Stephens claims to have worked on the B2 bomber and its
|
|
more advanced cousins in the Air Force for twenty years. He says that not only
|
|
has there been contact between NASA and aliens, there has been and is advanced
|
|
experimentation going on with alien technology. He gives a few pages of very
|
|
technical and very scientific detail of this. I will give just a very small
|
|
selection of some of the things he says.
|
|
|
|
He starts off with a statement 'Excitation and accelerated time, less inertia,
|
|
gravity, and mass, are one in the same thing. Ships may travel hundred of
|
|
times faster than light without time dilation, and energy needed for this is
|
|
very little. Communications are also FTL.' The following is some snippets
|
|
from the long detailed section that follows: 'Some crafts we have do use
|
|
electromagnetism to nullify gravity,.....................(science detail)
|
|
|
|
This is a relatively simple and straightforward effect. And it is what
|
|
Einstein was attempting in Project Rainbow. We desperately wanted radar
|
|
invisibility. The Air Force feels it has nothing to worry about because nobody
|
|
would believe these things.........based entirely on relativity and simple
|
|
elegromagnetic laws. (Lots more scientific detail)......(pages of it) Ships
|
|
can travel faster than light. Time may be accelerated by excitation four
|
|
times. Then when we travel close enough to light, the ship simply regains the
|
|
mass or time it originally had, but it is travelling four times faster than
|
|
light when that happens.
|
|
|
|
(lots more) ......NASA's SETI is complete rubbish, coverup at its wrost. They
|
|
scan at one to ten gigahertz. No alien transmission occurs above a hundred
|
|
cycles and NASA knows this.........(lots more)
|
|
|
|
....Aliens have given clues along the way. After we conducted THE PHILADELPHIA
|
|
EXPERIMENT we were contacted......'Anyone wishing to know how our ships ae
|
|
powered would have to realize electrons cross what would in their terms be
|
|
millions of lightyears of space, and they leave in their wake a magnetic node,
|
|
or vortex.
|
|
|
|
....(loads more) In summary, the public has been misled contemptously.
|
|
.......(more)...Perhaps the United States government has reasons for keeping
|
|
this secret, but they are not in my opinion good ones...
|
|
|
|
O.K. you can see my problem, as a member of the I think and hope it's true
|
|
group, this seems so exciting. However, I have read enough scathing debunking
|
|
to not get my hopes up too much. Plus, the whole letter could be deliberate
|
|
bullshit. I am no science buff, and can't hope to glean whether there is
|
|
anything in this.
|
|
|
|
So here it is, if one of more of the regulars here could and would check this
|
|
out and respond either here or there, as to the validity (if any) of this
|
|
posting, I would be exceedingly grateful.
|
|
|
|
Thanks in Advance
|
|
|
|
Carol Kavanagh
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: robert@wwa.com (Robert Stirniman )
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: Re: Could Brian Zeiler comment on James Stephens
|
|
Date: 7 Sep 1995 06:08:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Brian Zeiler (bdzeiler@students.wisc.edu) wrote:
|
|
: I'm not sure where it is or what it was about -- I tried looking back but
|
|
: couldn't find it. Could you repost it?
|
|
|
|
The message appeared two days ago and has already disappeared from my news
|
|
server. There was one follow on reply, which was not answered. It's a
|
|
startling and amazing message -- but hard to believe. Here it is.
|
|
==========================================================================
|
|
From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com (James Stephens )
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: GroomLake`Colonel`Reveals`All
|
|
Date: 5 Sep 1995 05:57:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
GroomLake `Colonel `Reveals `All
|
|
|
|
I tell how:
|
|
|
|
* Excitation and accelerated time, less inertia, gravity, and mass, are one
|
|
in the same thing.
|
|
* Ships may travel hundreds of times faster than light without time
|
|
dilation, and energy needed for this is very little. Communications are
|
|
also FTL.
|
|
* EEG waves from one to sixty cycles ARE telepathy, but they come from fast
|
|
time, so they are compressed in time or bandwidth. Ordinary radios are
|
|
not quick enough to detect the information. All we detect is this 60
|
|
cycle signal at lightspeed but information inside travels faster than
|
|
light. And an ordinary radio will reveal the signal when in an excited
|
|
state.
|
|
* Man left to himself dreams of a paradise where technology and nature are
|
|
in perfect harmony, where he is immortal and free of disease, needs, and
|
|
wants, and this can be done directly from mind to product this very day
|
|
using lightlines.
|
|
|
|
As someone who has worked on the B2 bomber and its more advanced cousins
|
|
in the Air Force for twenty years, I can tell you the whole story is
|
|
unbelievable. Twenty hours is too conservative a time estimate for complete
|
|
explanation. Some crafts we have do use electromagnetism to nullify gravity
|
|
and even extract hidden information from EEG waves, but these are not deployed
|
|
and will not be until they are needed. They pump electricity from inside
|
|
themselves into a sheet of electricity some distance away, exactly as the
|
|
earth is positive "ground" and the ionosphere a negative sheet. This sheet
|
|
bends parallel radar waves around the craft like a water droplet in a rainbow,
|
|
or just like the ionosphere bends radio waves, making for long distance
|
|
communications. This is a relatively simple and straightforward effect. And
|
|
it is what Einstein was attempting in Project Rainbow or the Philadelphia
|
|
Experiment. We desperately wanted radar invisibility. The Germans were
|
|
engaged in the same effort fifty years ago. But electric vacuum, the vortex
|
|
field, also causes excitation of atoms in it, which shifts waves in frequency
|
|
and accelerates time. I am willing to reveal all I know about these things
|
|
in full detail here.
|
|
|
|
The Air Force feels it has nothing to worry about because nobody would
|
|
believe these things, even though they require no special admission but are
|
|
based entirely on relativity and simple electromagnetic laws. First, I tell
|
|
how electrons are controlled in electromagnetic fields using physics and
|
|
Maxwell's equations. Then two systems are given for establishing a "permanent
|
|
excitation" in a volume. The practical system uses a magnetic vortex and weak
|
|
static field. Next temporal effects are described by contrasting how people
|
|
in gravity and then excitation fields perceive quanta. Then FTL travel and
|
|
communications are discussed, as well as how EEG waves are telepathy, but
|
|
information is compressed in time or bandwidth. By the end you will see there
|
|
is much more at stake in the government keeping this secret than gravity
|
|
alone.
|
|
|
|
There are three fields we can use to set up such an "electric vacuum" with
|
|
external electric sheet. These are
|
|
|
|
(1) static
|
|
(2) AC and
|
|
(3) PDC magnetic fields
|
|
|
|
and we need a description of electromagnetics to understand these. Imagine a
|
|
permanent magnet with north pole out of your monitor. Its flux can be
|
|
imagined as a large number of X marks on your screen. An electron moves in
|
|
the plane of the monitor from left to right. As it cuts flux Lorentz force F
|
|
= qvB deflects it downward. The electron actually spirals clockwise with
|
|
radius r = mv / qB, with B in teslas and all other measures in MKSA units. If
|
|
the electon came from opposite direction it would spiral same direction, or
|
|
clockwise as we see it.
|
|
|
|
Lorentz force derives from static magnetic fields when there is relative
|
|
motion between the field and electron. No force is felt when motion is
|
|
parallel to magnetic flux, only when flux lines are cut. And this static
|
|
field performs no work. The relevant Maxwell equation here is curl E = -
|
|
dB/dt, and since tesla density is static here, dB/dt is zero, curl E is zero,
|
|
and the field is by definition conservative. No work is done on electrons, so
|
|
we deduce electrons spiral but maintain the same velocity or kinetic energy.
|
|
|
|
Static electrons can also be accelerated by magnetic fields. In that case
|
|
curl E is nonzero and we see electrons must absorb energy, or be accelerated,
|
|
by the time-variant magnetic field. This case is actually the same as the
|
|
above case, but as current changes in the coil flux expands or collapses from
|
|
the coil. There is still relative motion and electrons still experience the
|
|
same Lorentz force. For example, sending pulsating instead of direct current
|
|
through the same coil in the same direction causes the same spiraling effect
|
|
on static electrons as the static field had on moving electrons. Sending AC
|
|
through causes periodic reversals of electrons. The field around the coil can
|
|
be given by E(r,t) = 1/2pir*dF/dt, where F is flux in webers. The electric
|
|
lines form concentric circles about the coil, and another way to say this is E
|
|
= f * B, where f is frequency in cps, B is average tesla density of a periodic
|
|
current, and E is volts per meter close to the coil. These three fields,
|
|
static, AC, and PDC make for any manipulation of electrons.
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to produce the sheet. Both require pumping electrons
|
|
from inside the ship into a sheet of electricity. The first does this from a
|
|
central magnetic pole. A strong static magnetic field is set up, and PDC is
|
|
sent oppositely through the pole to set up circular electric lines about it.
|
|
Electrons are accelerated circularly about the pole and as soon as they move
|
|
they experience an outward centrifugal deflection qvB. Each electron which
|
|
leaves the center of the ship creates a positive hole, and so there is also an
|
|
internal electric centripetal field F = knqq/rr, where n is the number of
|
|
electrons removed to the sheet. Each electron has potential energy - kq/r,
|
|
and the ship has the same potential energy, so it is excited, because
|
|
excitation is the only way matter absorbs electric energy without heating.
|
|
Also, one may view removing an electron from an atom as "exciting it past
|
|
ionization potential." The problem here is electrons are limited to speed of
|
|
light, and one may assume they gain lightspeed or close to it instantly in any
|
|
tangible electric field (by v=Eqt/electronmass provided collision time is high
|
|
enough). Thus speed of light acts to limit qvB centrifugal force and so limit
|
|
power in the field to around 40 megajoules, very marginal.
|
|
|
|
Another better way is to use a four-coil, two-phase ring, exactly as in
|
|
two-phase AC motor stators. Its field is in every way that of a real rotating
|
|
permanent magnet. Imagine such a magnet in the plane of your monitor. We can
|
|
show flux cuts electrons in such way Lorentz force creates unidirectional
|
|
electric lines through the monitor. That is, electrons are blown through the
|
|
screen as air molecules are blown through a circular fanblade. Now suppose we
|
|
set up the same magnet as above, a coil into the monitor. Its magnetic flux
|
|
is perpendicular to that of the rotating magnetic field. Electrons are sucked
|
|
from in front of the monitor, but since they are limited to lightspeed they
|
|
enter the static field only so far before assuming a circular orbit through
|
|
Lorentz deflection. Electrons are pulled from inside the ship parallel to
|
|
static lines, but when they begin to cut static lines just below your monitor
|
|
screen they spiral out to the same radius as above. Without velocity greater
|
|
than light they can go no farther. So lightspeed, once our enemy, now means
|
|
we can put almost any energy into the field we wish. No energy is lost in the
|
|
field except by collisions, which are minimal at higher electric frequencies,
|
|
and zero in vacuum. Field density is a function solely of magnetic vortex
|
|
frequency and tesla density, or electric field strength in volts per meter.
|
|
The stronger this electric field the more electrons are stripped from inside
|
|
the ship and more dense the electric sheet becomes. Very little energy is
|
|
needed at higher frequencies to produce sheets dense enough to bend light,
|
|
even with its high frequency.
|
|
|
|
Note here an oblate spheroid sheet of charge is formed which may become
|
|
very dense. Anything in it will be heated electrically. Inside there are
|
|
powerful electric fields, though these are no more dangerous than the 10 kV/m
|
|
field under a thundercloud, and there is no internal Joule heat because
|
|
electrons are held outside the ship. Charge in either hemisphere rotates
|
|
opposite to that in the other hemisphere. This can be seen by considering
|
|
Lorentz force. Electrons entering the static field from outside are deflected
|
|
one direction. Those leaving the static field from inside are deflected in
|
|
the opposite direction. This bears similarities to Coriolis force, and if so,
|
|
so be it. Let this be indicative of a gravitational connection.
|
|
|
|
We find this field also accelerates time, which can be seen as decreasing
|
|
gravity, mass, or inertia through relativity. One way to view this is as
|
|
follows. A ship near light has its time slow, and this may happen so much the
|
|
universe dies in a blink of these peoples' eyes. Since time is slower one may
|
|
say they see more cycles per second and frequencies are shifted up. But this
|
|
does not happen. Instead, they are not quick enough to perceive as much
|
|
information as we do. So according to Hartley's law their incoming
|
|
frequencies and bandwidths are compressed. People outside, on the other hand,
|
|
see these people moving extremely slowly so more information is available to
|
|
them, and they see bandwidth and frequencies boosted. This is only a relative
|
|
effect, because quantum energy is conserved, and so real information and
|
|
frequency of light are constants when absolutely figured. But different
|
|
temporal and excitation levels of the observer obviously change frequency
|
|
perception.
|
|
|
|
Excitation causes shifts opposite to gravity. For instance, if atoms are
|
|
excited electrons are farther from nuclei, and under less electric force.
|
|
They are more loosely bound. Now incoming quanta of the same hv energy cause
|
|
greater transistions than before, and so appear to have more quantum energy or
|
|
frequency. Waves from inside seem to be high in energy but low in energy or
|
|
frequency to people outside. Again, like gravity, this is a conservative
|
|
field, affecting only perception. However, its shift is opposite to
|
|
gravity's. Since gravity's effect on frequency derived from slowing of time
|
|
what effect other than accelerating of time does excitation derive from? Note
|
|
here excitation does not have to cause actual transistions to higher orbital
|
|
to give frequency shift effects. Given Schrodinger wave constraints such is
|
|
not possible. With electric vacuum suction on electrons incoming quanta still
|
|
take less energy to cause transistions.
|
|
|
|
The main problem we had was finding means for excitation without
|
|
relaxation, which normally releases all stored energy in ten billionths of a
|
|
second. Energy required for any significant frequency shift is enormous.
|
|
Setting up a weak static magnetic field allows a sort of resonance effect,
|
|
where massive amounts of energy are absorbed by the field without release.
|
|
Excitation and resonance are only obtainable when relaxation is eliminated as
|
|
it can be in the magnetic vortex system.
|
|
|
|
What uses are this? Ships can travel faster than light (FTL). Time may be
|
|
accelerated by excitation four times. Then when we travel close enough to
|
|
light, the ship simply regains the mass or time it originally had, but it is
|
|
travelling four times faster than light when that happens. Thus any star in
|
|
this or any other galaxy are within reach without time dilation and with very
|
|
little energy input. Remember, NO supplemental energy is needed in vacuum due
|
|
to infinite collision time. Another way to view FTL travel is the people in
|
|
the ship may accelerate to 200 meters per second in their seconds. Someone
|
|
outside has four seconds for one of theirs, so the ship seems to them to
|
|
travel at 800 meters per second to an external observer.
|
|
|
|
Faster than light communications are also possible, but not without another
|
|
effect. Suppose we emit a 1 to 60 megacycle signal from a field where time is
|
|
accelerated one million times. This is possible because energy required
|
|
decays exponentially for faster times. The signal leaves and shifts down to 1
|
|
to 60 cycles. Anyone outside sees only this 60 cycle "magnetic wave"
|
|
travelling at light. The information inside is compressed in time or
|
|
bandwidth. But it does penetrate water and other matter very well. Another
|
|
antenna in the same one million field expands bandwidth, or is "quick" enough
|
|
to get at the original information. This again shows the interconvertibility
|
|
of time and bandwidth. And EEG waves from one to sixty cycles contain more
|
|
information than presently thought. The reason for FTL propagation is the
|
|
same as a stationary observer looking at light in a lightclock on a
|
|
relativistic ship. Light seems to travel faster in this ship and since
|
|
Einstein took lightspeed to be constant, he saw time must slow on the ship.
|
|
But this gravity field makes light travel faster relative to the temporal
|
|
state of the stationary observer (ref INSIDE RELATIVITY by Mook and Vargish).
|
|
In our case, the signal travels a million times faster than light because
|
|
gravity outside the ship is a million times greater.
|
|
|
|
Aliens do exist, but the public is taken for granted (to put it mildly).
|
|
NASA's SETI is complete rubbish, coverup at its worst. They scan at one to
|
|
ten gigahertz. No alien transmission occurs above a hundred cycles and NASA
|
|
knows this. They are all compressed in time, like subspace communication on
|
|
Startrek. Nothing else has comparable efficiency. Light takes perhaps
|
|
fifteen minutes to reach another planet, but is all but instantaneous with
|
|
compression. EEG wave telepathy is another coverup, even though brain-related
|
|
signals have never been detected anywhere else on our spectrum. By mutual
|
|
exchange of information links can be made through lightlines, which convey
|
|
force, energy, or information even through walls. This gives complete control
|
|
over reality itself, and it is hard to overstate its importance. Communication
|
|
with the dead, and eternal life are easy, so too manufacturing directly from
|
|
mind to product. Truth be told this planet will be socialist, but only when
|
|
matter is so ridiculously easy to manipulate anyone who says "pay me" will
|
|
have to mean it as a joke. Telepathy is only thought from fast time, or
|
|
excitation field (as in the brain), while matter is only thought frozen in
|
|
slow time, or gravity field; but since gravity and excitation are one spectrum
|
|
there is no separation between mind and reality, life or death.
|
|
|
|
Aliens have given clues along the way. After we conducted THE PHILADELPHIA
|
|
EXPERIMENT, we were mailed a book THE CASE FOR THE UFO: ANNOTATED EDITION with
|
|
quotes written in the margins by philosophical aliens who said: "Anyone
|
|
wishing to know how our ships are powered would have to realize electrons
|
|
cross what would in their terms be millions of lightyears of space, and they
|
|
leave in their wake a magnetic node, or vortex, as this one thing is variously
|
|
called. Realizing this, as Einstein did, it makes it clear how matter may be
|
|
made into energy, dissolute, or invisible." This book as well as George
|
|
Adamski's INSIDE THE FLYING SAUCERS were required reading for us in the Air
|
|
Force. Other truthful sources are found in THE FLYING SAUCER READER by Jay
|
|
David who said: "You wonder how our ships operate. They operate in resonating
|
|
electromagnetic fields, just as planetary bodies do." and BEYOND EARTH: MAN'S
|
|
CONTACTS WITH UFOS by Ralph and Judy Blum, who said "The ship is powered by
|
|
reversible electro-magnetism. Reversing magnetic and electric energies allows
|
|
us to nullify gravity and control matter." The greatest source of information
|
|
is Adamski's book though.
|
|
|
|
Taking these sources as accurate would have been all the public would have
|
|
needed to come to the conclusion excitation nullifies gravity. Look at it
|
|
this way. If gravity can be electromagnetically overcome, which is our only
|
|
practical way to ever hope to overcome gravity anyway, gravity has to be
|
|
electromagnetic. Then it must be acting on some electric or magnetic property
|
|
in matter, due to concept of dual poles. Otherwise no electro-magnetic force
|
|
could be coupled. This reduces the problem to finding the one magnetic or
|
|
electrical property intrinsic to all mass, because gravity acts on all mass.
|
|
Diamagnetism is that universally intrinsic property, but even that is related
|
|
to distance of electrons from nuclei by formula for magnetic moment M=IA, or
|
|
moment equals current times looparea. This does not tell whether proximity to
|
|
or distance from nuclei is antigravity, but directly suggests that
|
|
correspondence exists.
|
|
|
|
In summary, the public has been misled contemptously. They have told you
|
|
aliens are not visiting the Earth and do not exist. Rather than spacecraft,
|
|
people are seeing the whole planet Venus fly across the sky. Then they start
|
|
an "effort" to find signals from intelligent beings, which they have already
|
|
detected below 100 cycles. There have been signals picked up even on the
|
|
frequencies they scan for, but all signals aliens normally use are below 100
|
|
cycles and can never be picked up with conventional equipment. Finally comes
|
|
the ultimate insult. The world can be better than science fiction has ever
|
|
dreampt of, with devices to beam information directly into brains for virtual
|
|
reality, access information from any source, which would make the internet
|
|
pale in comparison, derive energy from the sun through its lines, and
|
|
literally construct anything as if by magic. Everyone on this planet who has
|
|
died since 1967 did not have to, the only cure for AIDS, cancer, and
|
|
particularly genetic diseases lies in these lightlines. This is what the
|
|
public is being kept in the dark about. Perhaps the United States government
|
|
has reasons for keeping this secret, but they are not in my opinion good ones.
|
|
Ultimately it is not the Air Force's problem the public does not presently
|
|
enjoy these things, if you know what I mean. To be heard one has to make some
|
|
noise.
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
James Stephens
|
|
|
|
tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com (James Stephens )
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
|
|
Subject: UFO Excitation ESP?
|
|
Date: 27 Aug 1995 06:26:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
**************************************************************
|
|
* To: People of Planet Saras
|
|
* From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com
|
|
* Subject: UFO Excitation Fields, ESP, Antigravity
|
|
**************************************************************
|
|
|
|
Is it odd not how doctor Wilst could say what he did? Hasn't anyone out
|
|
there read George Adamski. Little wonder with the government conspiracy and
|
|
Lee Harvey Oswald. Too little time, Atlantia waters warming, polar ice caps
|
|
melting, weather changes, nude beaches, coverup, pole shift inevitable....
|
|
INEVITABLE.
|
|
|
|
In sum, we reach all stars in this galaxy easier than governers want us to
|
|
know, but they know as Einstein did. And same EXCITATION accelerates time and
|
|
allows FTL travel, communications, and upward frequency shifts to boot. Now
|
|
surpise: aliens transmit invariably below 100 cycles despite bandwidth
|
|
information constraints, because their waves are compressed in time itself,
|
|
and EEG waves from 1 to 60 cycles are telepathy we have never found. Ordinary
|
|
radios in "electric vacuum" fields pick it all out as broadcast, and there are
|
|
means I know to raise body frequency and use telepathy / clairvoyance in two
|
|
hours mentally, but all things minds can do machines do and vice versa because
|
|
there is no division but our belief between realms.
|
|
|
|
Something simple as orbital excitation nullifies gravity and speeds up
|
|
time. Three mind-stretching proofs:
|
|
|
|
(1) Since our only practical means to nullify gravity is electro-magnetic,
|
|
gravity must be electromagnetic and due to concept of dual poles acts
|
|
on an electrical or magnetic property of mass. The only universally
|
|
intrinsic EM property of mass is diamagnetism, but even this is related
|
|
to distance of electrons from nuclei (ie; excitation) by magnetic
|
|
moment M=IA. This logical or Greek method.
|
|
|
|
(2) Permeability and permittivity are directly propor. to distance of
|
|
electrons from nuclei, thus allowing external magnetic and electric
|
|
fields to more easily distort excited orbitals and store energy in the
|
|
atom. But according to Maxwell's Wave Equation speed of light is
|
|
determined by one over squareroot of permeability times permittivity in
|
|
ANY spatial region. So excitation must affect speed of light just as
|
|
relativistic gravity speeds light. This EM refract method.
|
|
|
|
(3) A ship near light has slow time, or great gravity / mass, than one
|
|
static. So people inside see the universe die in the blink of an eye.
|
|
How can they be quick enough to get as much information as we get? And
|
|
does this not through Hartley's Bandwidth=Information Law suggest
|
|
bandwidth AND frequencies have been divided by tau time-dilation? Aha!
|
|
This clear and present danger ironclad proof.
|
|
|
|
Now an excited atom. Its electrons are farther from nuclei, under less
|
|
electric force, and incoming quanta of same E=hv quantum energy or frequency
|
|
now cause greater transistions than in unexcited atoms. So person in an
|
|
excited field perceive incoming waves as higher frequency, and several waves,
|
|
boosted in bandwidth or information content as well. Hartley's
|
|
Law===>bandwith=information.
|
|
|
|
So since gravity compressed bandwidth by slowing time, excitation here must
|
|
be accelerating time, or converting mass into energy. Here we see excitation
|
|
overcomes gravity, mass, and time in not one but THREE independent proofs with
|
|
yet another coming later. But consider great potential use.
|
|
|
|
There are several uses for this. A ship of hydrogen excited into n=2
|
|
orbital. Time accelerates four times using E=hv calculations. It can now go
|
|
four times faster than light before regaining its original gravity or mass!
|
|
Proxima Centauri is one year away. But this takes 1o eV per atom. With only
|
|
3.6 eV more we totally ionize hydrogen (ie; frequency shift it to infinity).
|
|
Thus we are not limited by distance or time in travel as Relativity suggests,
|
|
because energy needed is not linear but exponentially decays for higher
|
|
speeds.
|
|
|
|
Or another application based on frequency shift. We have never picked up
|
|
telepathic signals, but have picked up EEG waves at 1 to 6o cycles. If these
|
|
enter an excited region they shift up in frequency (or relatively perceived
|
|
quantum energy), expanding bandwidth, and baring their original information
|
|
content, beautiful like goat's milk. This is surprises. Thought reigns as
|
|
physical as we are, but it operates from faster time; likewise, matter is only
|
|
thought frozen in slow time. Thus we shall be using a mental energy before we
|
|
can reach the nearest star. This paragraph alone has significant
|
|
implications because
|
|
|
|
(1) machines can be built to control reality directly
|
|
(2) the human mind from my experience can produce these fields when
|
|
certain rites of gestured belief are performed and
|
|
(3) if brains produce energy for such great downshift energy to travel
|
|
between stars must be meager indeed.
|
|
|
|
All these things derive from excitation, a simple quantum mechanical
|
|
occurence, but how do we produce excitation without heat or normal 0.01
|
|
microsecond relaxation? Means to produce permanent electric vacuum is needed,
|
|
for as long as the field is applied. This can be done using two-phase four-
|
|
coil system (precisely as in AC motor stator but higher frequency) to create a
|
|
rotating magnetic field. An orthogonal static magnetic field then limits
|
|
electron flux to spherical surface some distance from ship, which adds
|
|
potential energy to these electrons (and contrawise the ship). There is no
|
|
heating of crew because electron flux is outside ship but they are exposed to
|
|
high electric fields as under thunderclouds.
|
|
|
|
Earth operates in such magnetic vortex. It explains the earth's positive
|
|
ground charge, its negative ionosphere layer, and Coriolis force. The last is
|
|
explained because Lorentz deflection in above electric vacuum system is in
|
|
opposite directions in north and south fieldsphere hemisphere, so electrons in
|
|
different hemispheres revolve in opposite directions about the ship. High
|
|
frequencies are needed to provide sufficient voltage and increase collision
|
|
time for electrons so energy is not wasted. Again electrons are responsible
|
|
for inertia, causing water to lag in different directions in different
|
|
hemispheres. The electric sheet has force and inertia but the ship does not.
|
|
And this is another proof for antigravity.
|
|
|
|
Yet another use presents itself. The ionosphere bends radio waves
|
|
depending on their angle and frequency because they travel at different speed
|
|
through this highly charged region. This was alluded to in permeability and
|
|
permittivity. Why not create such intense field around a ship parallel radar
|
|
or light rays are bent around the ship, like water droplets in a Rainbow.
|
|
This could be done if the field were intense enough and right distance from
|
|
the ship. And it is invisibility, though anyone in such fields could escape
|
|
faster than we perceive, because their time is faster. The science is sound
|
|
(more or less).
|
|
|
|
Then what are we waiting for! Let's go find Adamski's Firkon of Mars and
|
|
ask directions to the nearest starbase. I have plenty more rolling around in
|
|
my head, and will readily go into fine technical detail in any area
|
|
aforementioned. Give me feedback, most if not all is too technically
|
|
abbreviated here to realize without more depth discussion. They said I was
|
|
too unstable, and kicked me out of prison because of my theories, but now my
|
|
views are sared. Join me and the other ben men of the universe to build a
|
|
better tomorrow on planet Saras. And E-mail me at tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|