textfiles/bbs/KEELYNET/ECOLOGY/wasteh20.asc
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

331 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 30, 1993
WASTEH20.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This file courtesy of the Double Helix BBS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WTIE -= Wastewater Treatment Information Exchange =- Node 2 11-25-92 21:43
Name: SAMMY FINKELMAN
Date: 05-14-91 (16:11) Number: 49 of 2699
To: ALL Refer#: NONE
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: HAS REPLIES
Subj: MAGNETICS & SEWAGE Status: SENDER PASSWORD
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
I would like any input on anyone who has information on using magnets for
water treatment. I visited a swimming pool where the owner claims that his
hardness and alkalinity problems were solved by the installation of a
magnet around the water line going to the showers in the bathhouse and
into the swimming pool. I have read that studies on magnets have shown
that they align the charge on ions in water. For wastewater studies, this
would be a benefit were a person using an UV light after a sand filter.
Before wastewater is processed through a UV light, the magnet could
decrease the amount of hardness and scaling in the UV reactor (i.e. the
teflon tube or quartz tube) Has anyone ever tried this before? I am
thinking of trying it, but I would like to obtain research funds to try
it? Can anyone help me on this ? Scaling could cause a buildup on the
exterior of a quartz tube or on the interior of a teflon tube which would
decrease the efficiency of the UV light. Magnet researchers make other
fabulous claims also, such as the strength of the magnet would have a
positive effect on the decrease of pathogenic material which would make
them easier to kill under a UV light ? Believe it or not ? Baloney or
remarkably true ( can I get this to be on UNSOLVED MYSTERIES on NBC ?)
Anyway, in all seriousness, please leave a message for me on this BBS if
you care to comment.
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 05-31-91 (17:40) Number: 59 of 2699
To: ALL Refer#: NONE
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: (N/A)
Subj: UV LIGHTS & MAGNETS Status: SENDER PASSWORD
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
I am currently considering adding onto a single resident sewage treatment
plant that I am building soon (when my regulatory agency approves the
permits) the use of a UV light as the primary disinfectant device.
Although I am worried about the build up of the scale and other debris on
the teflon tube over many years, I am going to use magnets to keep the
scale off. A large swimming pool nearby used a 11,000 gauss strength
Page 1
magent on the water main leading into his showers. After installation of
the magnets, the build up of scale decreased significantly. I am hoping
that the same will occur on the UV light that I am planning to use. I am
planning to use a Model 12L from Northland Technologies.
Anyone who has used this light for disinfection after a buried sand filter
should kindly leave a note of their own personal experiences with it.
Also, written research exists about the strength of magnets on water
treatment. I will be installing one between my septic tank and my dosing
tank which feeds wastewater into the buried sand filter. Maybe this will
assist with the activity level of the positive and negatively charged
particles entering into the sand filter. Separating the two charges out
before the sand filter may help the sand filter work better. (note: I am
using three 500 gallon septic tanks - the magnet will be in place on the
last septic tank) Anyway, this all may seem crazy, but I will keep
everyone informed. . .
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 06-17-92 (17:00) Number: 2112 of 3478
To: ALL Refer#: NONE
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: HAS REPLIES
Subj: RESULTS OF USING MAGNETS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
Some time ago I requested information on using magnets for wastewater
treatment. I was installing a new septic system for my home and I was
looking for ways to increase the efficiency of this proposed system. The
system has been installed since 11/91.
The system consists of 3 septic tanks, a dosing chamber with a sewage
pump, a sand filter, and a UV light which leads into an 810 foot discharge
line. Magnets were placed before the third septic tank. The third septic
tank also contains a ZABEL filter which helps reduce the solids going on
the sand filter. Magnets were also placed before and after the dosing
chamber. A magnet was also placed before the UV light. The results of the
first test as required on my NPDES permit are:
CBOD = 2 mg/l
Suspended Solids = 6 mg/l
ph = 7
fecal coliform = or < 10 colonies/100 ml of sample.
I am really pleased with the results of my test since they are about 85%
to 90% below the lower limits set for my effluents on my NPDES permits. I
give credit to my success partially to the magnets because I do think they
help reduce the solids and keep the UV reactor chamber clean so that the
UV light works properly. I will be asking how other systems which are
somewhat comparable to mine are doing. I would reccommend magnets to any
person or desinger because I do beleive they help reduce solids and they
maximize the amount of settling of solids in the septic tanks. The other
part of my system I would like to comment on is the UV light. It has
worked wonderfully. Compared to using chlorine tablets, it is more
effective, cheaper to operate, and nontoxic to the receiving stream which
carries away my wastewater. However, if anyone wants to use one, I would
suggest they overcompensate the flow on a UV light to allow for greater
kill of pathogens in the effluent coming from the sand filter. Another
nice thing about the UV light is that it is much more convient for the
homeowner. The homeowner never has to keep checking on the chlorine
tablets which can sometimes bridge up in the tablet chlorinator. Please
Page 2
feel free to leave any questions you may have on this topic on this
BBS...It was nice sharing this with everyone.
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 07-03-92 (11:30) Number: 2281 of 3478
To: JIM PAVLICEK Refer#: 2112
From: MATT RICKABY Read: 07-10-92 (13:17) HAS REPLIES
Subj: RESULTS OF USING MAGNETS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
Do you have any control data from the system obtained before you installed
the magnets? If so how does the data compare to the present setup? Why do
you feel the magnets are contributing to a lower solids loss in the
effluent? Why do you feel they contribute to a lower solids buildup on the
UV chamber walls? I'm interested in your results but still very skeptical.
I remember some salesman trying to sell these things for the fuel lines of
my furnace to " polarize " the molecules of fuel for a more efficient burn
but he could not supply any backup to his claims beyond presenting a vague
theory.
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 07-10-92 (13:17) Number: 2339 of 3478
To: MATT RICKABY Refer#: 2281
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: 07-12-92 (10:05) HAS REPLIES
Subj: RESULTS OF USING MAGNETS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
My answers to your questions are as follows:
1. Control Data consists of comparing similiar systems installed without
any magnets. These systems have a variable difference of 5 to 10
percent increase in solids over what my results are coming out with.
2. The electromagnetic field initiates a charge (note that the charge is
somewhat weak) on the effluent. The charge lines up all negative and
positive charges in a fashion that slows down the ongoing movement
between negative and positive charges in the various elements in the
effluent. Scaling on the reactor wall of the UV chamber takes place
because the reactor wall itself has charges on it which attract
minerals with opposite charges which leads to scaling which in turn
leads to the UV light from penetrating the effluent. Also, the
magnets I used were also placed on the septic tanks. The "lining up"
of charges in a large tank also contributes to increased flocullation
in the tank because the charges placed upon the effluent are only
small and somewhat temporary, BUT this temporary charge effect allows
all "unline charges" in the septic tank to cluster around the "lined
charges" which in turn leads to increased flocullation or clumping of
solids coming together.
This summer I was inspected by a PADER Inspector who is doing a summer
study on single resident sewage treatment plants. Her data being collected
on these systems seem to indicate that this addition of magnets seems to
assist in better performance of this single resident sewage treatment
plant. Her data has not all been collected yet. She will have a report
which will be done at the end of the summer.
You may think this is a vague theory, yet I was introduced to this concept
of magnetics and sewage through a few scientific journals devoted to the
study of electromagnetism. A friend of mine is a magnet hobbyist, and he
gave me the address of a man in Minnesasota who has all kinds of
information about magnets. I wrote to him about magnets and sewage, and
Page 3
his reponse was to send an article from a scientific journal which is
published in Germany. This journal (I can't give you the name of it
because it is in German) discussed research done on water treatment in
Russia. All of the concepts I have discussed here in this reply to you
were in this article.
BELIEVE IT OR NOT, I WAS VERY SKEPTICAL TOO..YET IT DOES SEEM TO WORK !!
How effiently it works is another question. If I had the resources, it
would be insteresting to note what effect would take place if one could
vary the strength of the electromagnetic charge..More Research needs to be
done. I hope this interests you.
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 07-12-92 (10:05) Number: 2356 of 3478
To: JIM PAVLICEK Refer#: 2339
From: MATT RICKABY Read: 07-23-92 (13:45) HAS REPLIES
Subj: RESULTS OF USING MAGNETS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
I am certainly interested but remain skeptical. May I have the address of
the guy in Minn. so I may contact for further information?
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 07-23-92 (13:45) Number: 2430 of 3478
To: MATT RICKABY Refer#: 2356
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: 07-26-92 (07:23)
Subj: RESULTS OF USING MAGNETS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
Yes, I will be happy to. I will have to research my files to access this
information. Can you leave your address on this BB so I can send you what
information I have ?
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 03-18-92 (17:15) Number: 1384 of 3478
To: ALL Refer#: NONE
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: (N/A)
Subj: QUESTIONS ON ADD OF BACTI Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
I would like to know if anyone has any experience with the addition of
commercially prepared bacteria used for assisting the digestion of sludge
in septic tank effluent. Doews it help at all in making the system work
better ? Also, I have a sand filter for filtering the septage. Will this
bacteria assist in establing a better culture of benefical bacteria which
will break down the wastewater components better ? Thanks for your help
and comments.
<<<>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 08-02-92 (15:09) Number: 2512 of 3478
To: JIM PAVLICEK Refer#: NONE
From: WAYNE GREER Read: 11-10-92 (17:02) HAS REPLIES
Subj: BACTREIA & SEPTIC TANKS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
I am new to this system. I Read your message dated 3-18-92, with questions
about bacteria additions to septic systems. I have information that you
would be interested in. 601-734-6081.
<<<>>>
Page 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 11-10-92 (17:02) Number: 3351 of 3478
To: WAYNE GREER Refer#: 2512
From: JIM PAVLICEK Read: 11-10-92 (20:02)
Subj: BACTREIA & SEPTIC TANKS Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: MAIN BOARD (0) Read Type: TEXT SCAN (+)
Can you send it to me ? Send it to Jim Pavlicek, RD#2, Box 242-A,
Cochranton, PA 16314. Sorry I took so long to reply...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5