textfiles/bbs/KEELYNET/BIOLOGY/quake1.asc

64 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This article was taken from USA TODAY.
Thursday, November 9, 1989
ANIMAL INSTINCTS AT CENTER OF QUAKE DEBATE
By Steven Jay
Special for USA TODAY
During the week before the October 17, 1989 San Francisco
earthquake, Dolores Denilla had a problem, snakes. They kept
slithering out of the creek near her Watsonville home; she had to kill
14.
"It was weird because maybe one comes out of the creek a year," she
said. In Vallejo, at Marine World Africa USA, the llamas were
restless October 17. When handler Jennifer Deffenbaugh tried taking
them for a walk, "they spit at me and tried to kick me."
In Santa Cruz, Beverly Strite's 6-year-old dachsund hid under the
bed six hours before the quake. Dozens of stories circulating like
these have produced the latest aftershock: renewed debate about
whether the earthquake predictors should be looking again to animals.
The federal government in the early 1980's stopped financing
research on the once-popular theory on grounds it was a crackpot idea
and not as helpful with long-term predictions. Yet the man drawing
most attention for predicting the Oct. 17 quake was Jim Berkland, a
Santa Clara County geologist who relies on animals. Although the
quake was bigger than he predicted - he forecast a 6.0, compared with
a 7.1 - his timing was on the money: between Oct. 14 and 21.
Berkland made his prediction on Oct. 13. He was put on
administrative leave because he's not supposed to make earthquake
predictions. "Nature has an awful lot to tell us but unless we have
our ears, eyes and minds open, we won't hear," he says.
Joan Gillespie of Campbell, Calif., claims his prediction saved her
up to $6,000 in china and crystal. "I don't care if he reads corns or
bunions. I listen because he's been right too often," Gillespie says.
But Roger Hunter, a U.S. Geological Survey geophysicist, studied
Berkland's findings and "concluded he wasn't doing better than
chance."
Some mainstream earthquake predictors are willing to consider
Berkland's approach.
In 1975, Chinese scientists successfully predicted a major quake on
the basis of snakes emerging from underground dens and strange dog
behavior.
Calvin Frederick, a UCLA psychiatric professor, has studied
household animals and thinks they react to building vibrations. Nick
Corini, a Morgan Hill pigeon-racing buff, lost 26 pigeons before the
quake.
"These are birds that don't lose their way. When someone comes
talking about lost dogs and cats you tend to be skeptical, but
(Berkland has) made a believer out of me."
Submitted for KeelyNet by : Ronald Barker