1044 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
1044 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
RIME CONFERENCE HOST GUIDE - Revised 09/15/1996
|
||
|
||
|
||
General Rime Conference Host Responsibilities
|
||
|
||
Check the contents of your conference frequently. If you must
|
||
be out of town or unable to access your conference for more than three
|
||
days, notify the Conference Administrator so that arrangements can be made
|
||
in advance to cover the conference during your absence. You may always
|
||
make your own arrangements for coverage but please make sure that the CA
|
||
(Conference Administrator) is notified of the name and routing directions
|
||
for your substitute.
|
||
|
||
Make every effort to see that users of the conference keep to
|
||
the topics that are the goal of your conference. Help to stimulate
|
||
conversation to benefit all users of the conference. Encourage others to
|
||
participate in the conference.
|
||
|
||
Try to insure that over quoting and the use of quote boxes is
|
||
kept to a minimum. This helps every sysop on the network, and will make
|
||
your conference easier to be in for the users.
|
||
|
||
Be able to answer general questions about the network and how to
|
||
make the most of it. Answer questions regarding the privacy of messages
|
||
on the network and how to route messages. Hosts should also keep a
|
||
recent copy of the RIME nodelist (RIMEYYMM.ZIP), the RIME users manual
|
||
(#RIMEMAN.ZIP) and other network documents so that they may answer
|
||
questions that arise about the availability of RIME nodes.
|
||
|
||
Inform the conference users of the general network rules and
|
||
whatever rules are specific for your conference on a regular basis. For
|
||
some conferences, this might be once a month, for others it might be
|
||
every few weeks. Use your best judgement. If you have many new users
|
||
in your conference, even in a quiet conference, you might post the rules
|
||
more often to help newer users get accommodated more quickly. In any
|
||
posting of the rules, please include the information that users wishing
|
||
to engage in discussions on the rules of the network or the conference
|
||
must carry out those discussions R/O and routed in the conference, or in
|
||
public in Relay Users.
|
||
|
||
Inform the conference users of whom they should contact in the
|
||
event of a problem in the conference. This includes making yourself
|
||
visible as the first person to contact in such an event.
|
||
|
||
Conference hosts set the tone of a conference and they provide
|
||
an example of what behavior is expected in the conference. While
|
||
conference hosts are free to participate in the conference they
|
||
moderate, a conference host should always use his/her best judgement
|
||
when doing so. If a conference host is participating in their own
|
||
conference, they must distinguish their "user" type messages from their
|
||
"official" type messages. A different signature on the message is
|
||
usually all that is needed.
|
||
|
||
Conference host behavior is always under scrutiny by the users
|
||
in the conference. As such you should always leave extremely courteous
|
||
messages to the users and never use language that could be construed as
|
||
attacking or belittling. It is never appropriate for a CH to call a
|
||
user stupid, childish, immature, disgusting etc.
|
||
|
||
What exactly makes a good conference host. To quote Jud Phillips
|
||
"When we attorneys evaluate judicial candidates, one of the things we
|
||
look for is what we refer to as judicial temperament. Judicial
|
||
temperament is one of those intangible qualities that is difficult to
|
||
describe. Basically, it's a combination of intelligence, knowledge of
|
||
the law, diplomatic skills, tact and grace. IMO, there is a good
|
||
parallel between a judgeship and being CH." Amen!
|
||
|
||
|
||
Why Do We Have Rules
|
||
(stolen from Dennis McCunney)
|
||
|
||
"Did you ever think about *why* various RIME rules exist? Every
|
||
legal system has some degree of flexibility built into it-- it has to,
|
||
to work at all. RIME's rules evolved from experience, and have two
|
||
basic purposes: to provide a framework in which a lot of very different
|
||
people can mingle and converse with a minimum of friction and conflict,
|
||
and to keep the burden on the participating Sysops who provide the
|
||
service as reasonable as possible in the process.
|
||
|
||
Part of the flexibility in RIME's rules comes from the general
|
||
nature of the rules: they are more a set of guidelines you can use as a
|
||
basin to make judgements than a detailed set of specifications for
|
||
exactly what is and is not allowed. The other part of the flexibility
|
||
comes from the Conference hosts, who can choose how to respond to rules
|
||
infractions.
|
||
|
||
Jaywalking happens to be illegal in many jurisdictions, for
|
||
instance, but how many cops on the beat do you suppose ever actually
|
||
write summonses about it? Few, if any--they have better things to do.
|
||
So it is with CH's. A user posts a message with a two line signature
|
||
that includes a BBS name and number. Am I going to moderate him on that
|
||
basis? No--the signature is legal, and the rule about BBS ads is
|
||
intended to step on much more glaring offenses, such as full screen ANSI
|
||
efforts in conferences that have nothing to do with BBSes. As a CH, I'm
|
||
expected to have the wit to recognize the distinction.
|
||
|
||
Taking a strict "letter of the law" approach, there are all
|
||
manner of things that could theoretically get a user moderated. Taking
|
||
a "spirit of the law" approach, things become a lot more reasonable.
|
||
There is also latitude involved in *how* you enforce rules when you do
|
||
deem enforcement needed. I've had good success with a low-key approach:
|
||
I send the user a *polite* and friendly note explaining that a rule was
|
||
violated, explain why the rule exists, *ask* for compliance, and, if
|
||
possible, suggest an alternate form of posting that accomplishes the
|
||
same intended end and is legal. I seldom have to ask twice, and I can
|
||
count the number of real problems I've had with recalcitrant users since
|
||
I've been a Host on the fingers of one hand and have fingers left over."
|
||
|
||
With this in mind first who's who and then the rules.
|
||
|
||
The Who's Who of RIME
|
||
|
||
RIME consists of one governing body: the Administrative Council.
|
||
|
||
Chief Administrator - Don Barba - 35 MOONDOG
|
||
First Administrator - Rex Hankins - 5 IBMNET
|
||
Conference Administrator - Garry Baker - 1279 BLAKGOLD
|
||
PR Administrator - Bob Sasso - 35 MOONDOG
|
||
Statistics Administrator - Roy Wilson - 35 MOONDOG
|
||
FTP Manager - Sue Moore - 5012 SVIS
|
||
FTSC Administrator - Rick Cowles - 5690 WRITERSBLOCK
|
||
|
||
You may leave messages in either the COMMON, NetAdmin or the
|
||
Conference Hosts conference.
|
||
|
||
Coordinating the conferences is a big job, and is currently
|
||
handled by several people. You should familiarize yourself with who
|
||
does what:
|
||
|
||
Greg Birosh (MOONDOG #35)is the Scouting Coordinator
|
||
and is responsible for issuing Scouting Numbers for
|
||
proposed conferences. He is the man to see if you want
|
||
to start a new conference.
|
||
|
||
Garry Baker (BLAKGOLD #1279) is the Chief Conference
|
||
Administrator (CCA), and is the person who handles
|
||
all intra-conference problems. If you are experiencing
|
||
some problem in a conference, he is the one to get in
|
||
touch with. If it has something to do with a
|
||
conference, Garry is the man to ask.
|
||
|
||
The Official Rules for Conference Problem Solving
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Steps in Handling Problems in RIME Conference
|
||
|
||
a. If a problem arises, the Conference Host shall approach the
|
||
user in a courteous fashion and ask the user to review the rules of the
|
||
conference and/or network and to please abide by them. This initial
|
||
message should be R/O, routed, if possible, however, the Conference Host
|
||
may elect to address the problem in a general public message in the
|
||
conference. Conference Hosts should maintain archival copies of ALL
|
||
moderation related messages (Both TO and FROM the participant) for
|
||
possible future review.
|
||
|
||
Depending on the severity of the matter and how quickly the problem
|
||
develops, it may be appropriate to notify the Conference Administrator
|
||
of RIME of the impending problem so that he/she may be abreast of the
|
||
situation and follow the contents of your conference. Keep in mind that
|
||
some BBS software may not allow the receiving of a private routed
|
||
message, and that turn-around time of messages may be as long as 3 days.
|
||
|
||
This is not considered a formal warning. (This is a head's up.)
|
||
|
||
b. If the problem continues, the next step is to issue a formal
|
||
warning to the user or users involved and to contact the SysOp of the
|
||
board from where the user's messages are originating and respectfully
|
||
ask for their cooperation and aid in handling the problem.
|
||
|
||
If you are thinking of issuing a final warning, ask for direct
|
||
intervention by the Chief Conference Administrator to help bring
|
||
the problem situation to closure if at all possible.
|
||
|
||
No final warning can be issued that is not approved, at least, minimally
|
||
by the Chief Conference Administrator.
|
||
|
||
c. If your formal warning and the intervention of the Sysop and
|
||
the CCA has not reversed the situation, the final step is to consult the
|
||
CCA for permission and guidance on the right to suspend and the length
|
||
of that suspension. Please include at least one message, if not a few,
|
||
that demonstrate why you feel there is a need for suspension of the user.
|
||
|
||
In most instances, step 1 is sufficient to handle most user problems.
|
||
|
||
d. Conference Hosts serve at the discretion of the CCA and AC and
|
||
are subject to the same rules of decorum and conduct as all other users.
|
||
|
||
e. All node Sysops are expected to adhere to the highest standards
|
||
of decorum and courtesy in their conference usage and participation. Of
|
||
course, all node Sysops are subject to AC accountability.
|
||
|
||
2. Disciplinary Action. Any suspensions must be with the approval of the<68>
|
||
CCA. Removal from the network must have the approval of the CCA and SC.<2E>
|
||
|
||
a. First offense. The user may be warned informally or formally.
|
||
Formal warnings are to be brought to the attention of the CCA. A formal
|
||
warning requires that you also notify the sysop of the board that the
|
||
user usually uses to leave messages.
|
||
|
||
b. Continued offense following a formal warning. The user is
|
||
subject to removal from the conference(s) for a minimum of ten days. If
|
||
the offense is considered serious enough, the user may be removed from
|
||
the conference for 30 days. A user who has been removed for 30 days for
|
||
a first offense is considered on probation upon his/her return to the
|
||
conference (see below).
|
||
|
||
A user who has been suspended from a conference, for any period of time,
|
||
and seeks to circumvent that moderation by returning to that conference
|
||
prematurely, either by using an alias or a different board, will be
|
||
immediately suspended for 6 months.
|
||
|
||
c. Second offense. The user should be issued a warning that he is
|
||
continuing to be in violation of the rules despite his previous
|
||
suspension and that he faces an immediate 30 day suspension for the next
|
||
rule violation. If the user continues, at the discretion of the CH, the
|
||
user is subjected to immediate removal from the conference. The CH must
|
||
then immediately notify the CCA, and the sysop involved, that the user
|
||
has been suspended for a second time.
|
||
|
||
At the discretion of the AC the user may at that time also be removed
|
||
from the network, if appropriate, for a minimum of thirty days.
|
||
|
||
After a 30-day suspension, whether for a second offense or a severe
|
||
first offense, has been served, that user is on probation for 90
|
||
additional days.
|
||
|
||
During those 90 days, any further messages which would result in a
|
||
formal warning is sufficient cause for a 6 month suspension from that
|
||
conference. A formal warning does not have to be issued prior to a 6
|
||
month suspension.
|
||
|
||
However, because of the serious nature of a 6 month suspension, a
|
||
single minor infraction should be brought to the users attention
|
||
immediately and the user should be warned that he is on probation and
|
||
facing a 6 month suspension if he does not alter his message style
|
||
immediately. However, if the user does not immediately respond in a
|
||
positive direction, no other warnings will be issued and the user will
|
||
be suspended for 6 months immediately upon another rule infraction.
|
||
|
||
d. Continuing offenses. The user is subject to removal from the
|
||
conference(s), or the network, if appropriate, permanently or until the
|
||
AC declares otherwise.
|
||
|
||
e. Appeals can be made R/O to Garry Baker (#1279) in the COMMON
|
||
Conference, (see above) or in either public or private in the
|
||
USERS conference. Suspensions from the network cannot be appealed.
|
||
Suspensions from the USERS conference cannot be appealed.
|
||
|
||
f. Sysops always have the discretion to remove their own users at
|
||
any time.
|
||
|
||
3. Emergency measures:
|
||
|
||
a. A CH in a conference where there has been flagrant disregard of
|
||
all rules of common sense to the point of conference disruption, may
|
||
suspend a participant in the conference immediately for a period of 10
|
||
days.
|
||
|
||
b. Upon suspension the CH must immediately notify the sysop of the
|
||
board that the message originated from and the following person:
|
||
|
||
Garry Baker - Chief Conference Administrator (->1279)
|
||
|
||
c. Immediate suspension is considered a grave event and should not
|
||
be undertaken lightly.
|
||
|
||
Applying the Rules
|
||
|
||
What to Moderate:
|
||
|
||
HIT AND RUN: (Quick posting of inappropriate or off-topic
|
||
message, such as a "for sale" message, by a person who does not
|
||
normally frequent the conference). For a Hit and Run type message
|
||
consider advising other hosts in HOST Conference.
|
||
|
||
PYRAMID SCHEMES: Since pyramid schemes are always illegal, they
|
||
should be moderated immediately. Consider advising other hosts in
|
||
the HOST conference, and notify the AC so they can issue a public
|
||
retraction in RIMENEWS.
|
||
|
||
INAPPROPRIATE TAGLINES: Moderating taglines can be difficult,
|
||
as many users have their readers randomly cycle through taglines.
|
||
If a tagline violates the rules of RIME, such as the use of
|
||
profanity or a personal attack, do not hesitate to moderate,
|
||
otherwise ignore taglines. Personalized taglines are therefore
|
||
not to moderated unless they do not stay within the rules of the
|
||
network.
|
||
|
||
INAPPROPRIATE SIGNATURES: Signatures that take up too many
|
||
lines or that are in ANSI should be moderated. Otherwise,
|
||
ignore signatures.
|
||
|
||
OVERQUOTING: While we recommend quoting of no more than 20%, use
|
||
your judgement. Sometimes it makes sense to quote more of a
|
||
message. However, it is extremely rare to need to quote a whole
|
||
message and even rarer to need to quote the signature and tagline
|
||
areas. Try to help users bring down the amount they quote by
|
||
setting an example, and by gentle reminders about the quoting rules.
|
||
|
||
OFF-TOPIC MESSAGES BY A NEW USER: New users may be confused by the
|
||
title of the conference. Offer new or confused users helpful
|
||
suggestions and inform them of the real purpose of the conference
|
||
with encouragement to continue.
|
||
|
||
SIDE CONVERSATIONS: Old hands in a conference may wander off the
|
||
topic of the conference. Help them get back on track lest the whole
|
||
conference move off topic along with them.
|
||
|
||
FORSALE AND BBS ADS: If your conference allows forsale ads,
|
||
let the conference users know this often. Otherwise, moderate any
|
||
forsale BBS ads left in your conference.
|
||
|
||
ILLEGAL ACTIVITY: Messages that promote illegal activity should
|
||
ALWAYS be moderated quickly and in public. Promotion of illegal
|
||
activity may qualify for an immediate suspension under the emergency
|
||
suspension rules. You must immediately inform the CA and the AC of
|
||
any message activity in your conference that deals with promotion of
|
||
illegal activity.
|
||
|
||
BAD LANGUAGE: Message that contain obscene, profane or vulgar
|
||
language must be moderated. Symbols that replace some of the
|
||
letters do not change a profane word into an acceptable word. If
|
||
you are moderating in public, do not quote the bad language back to
|
||
the user. If a user is quoting a respected source, such as a book or
|
||
a newspaper, and needs to maintain the integrity of the quote, some
|
||
leeway may be permitted here and symbols may be used to replace most
|
||
of the letters of a word that would normally be considered profane.
|
||
This is not supported for one user simply quoting another user in
|
||
the same conference!
|
||
|
||
PERSONAL ATTACKS: Always moderate personal attacks. Any person to
|
||
person attack is considered moderatable on this network. Do not,
|
||
however, EVER moderate ideas, only personal attacks.
|
||
|
||
|
||
What Not to Moderate:
|
||
|
||
THE TRUTH PATROL: Conference hosts are not the keeper of truth and
|
||
final judge of fact. We ask our CH's to refrain from making
|
||
judgements or offering official opinions on the ideas expressed in
|
||
messages.
|
||
|
||
TAGLINES: Do not moderate taglines or signatures unless they
|
||
specifically break a network rule. In general, ignore them. This
|
||
includes not encouraging discussions of taglines unless you are in
|
||
the Taglines conference.
|
||
|
||
ENGLISH AND GRAMMAR: We do not moderate folks on their sentence
|
||
structure, their spelling or their grammar. Do not correct folks as
|
||
if you were their personal english teacher.
|
||
|
||
OTHER FOLKS CONFERENCES: Do not moderate in other conferences
|
||
simply because you are a moderator. If you have discovered an
|
||
unmoderated conference, let our Chief Conference Administrator
|
||
know and volunteer to cover the conference temporarily. But
|
||
don't barge into other folk's territory, carrying your
|
||
six-shooter. You'd resent it, and so will they.
|
||
|
||
THE HELPFUL USER: Sometimes when a conference gets heated, a user
|
||
will take it upon himself/herself to tell others, in an obviously
|
||
friendly spirit, "hey guys...lighten up". Do not stomp down on that
|
||
user. Send them a friendly, private, routed message, thanking them
|
||
for their help and pointing out to them that you are on top of the
|
||
situation and that sometimes users get confused when too many folks
|
||
try to help get situations cooled down. If someone does this more
|
||
than once, perhaps you might suggest that they would like to be a
|
||
conference host themselves and send them to the Conference
|
||
Administrator. If someone does it chronically, then you might think
|
||
about moderation messages.
|
||
|
||
The Software and Private, Routed Messages:
|
||
|
||
To send a private, routed message you must know either the site
|
||
number or the IDCODE of the board you wish to reach. The IDCODE, which
|
||
is a group of up to 12 letters including some numbers, appears
|
||
immediately after the words POSTLINK version number in every tagline.
|
||
The site number then immediately follows the IDCODE and is preceded by
|
||
the # symbol. The # symbol is NOT part of the site number. You should
|
||
ignore it, it is just a signal that the site number follows directly.
|
||
|
||
Here is a typical tagline:
|
||
|
||
* Collector's EDITION, Dallas, TX (214)351-9859/9871 14.4 <ASP> *
|
||
PostLink(tm) v1.04 EDITION (#79) : RelayNet(tm)
|
||
/^^^^^^^ ^^ \
|
||
/ \
|
||
/ \
|
||
This is the IDCODE This is the Site Number
|
||
EDITION 79
|
||
|
||
As you can see, the information you need in order to route
|
||
appears after the word "Postlink(tm) vX.XX in the tagline area. The
|
||
IDCODE immediately follows the Postlink version number and the SITE
|
||
number is preceded by the # symbol. Do NOT use the # symbol in your
|
||
routing information.
|
||
|
||
The symbol for routing is -> This is a hyphen immediately
|
||
followed by a greater than symbol or arrow pointing to the right. This
|
||
routing symbol must then be immediately followed by the site number or
|
||
the IDCODE. You do not need both the IDCODE and the site number.
|
||
|
||
This routing symbol must be placed in the extreme upper left
|
||
hand corner of the message, on the very first line. Do not start the
|
||
text of your message immediately after your routing symbol. Skip a line
|
||
or at least a few spaces before you start the body of your message. If
|
||
you were trying to reach me, it would look like one of these:
|
||
|
||
Either
|
||
|
||
->BLAKGOLD
|
||
|
||
or
|
||
|
||
->1279
|
||
|
||
You should send all moderation messages with a return receipt so
|
||
that you will know that the message actually arrived on the BBS and when
|
||
it arrived. To receive a "return receipt", place a backward routing
|
||
symbol <- immediately after the site number or the IDCODE. It might
|
||
look like this:
|
||
|
||
->1279<-
|
||
|
||
You may route a message to more than one site at the same time
|
||
by stacking the site number or IDCODE on the routing line, each route
|
||
separate by a space. This is called MULTICASTING. You may mix site
|
||
numbers and IDCODES and you may mix upper and lower cases for the
|
||
IDCODES. The IDCODE does not need to be in upper case. You should also
|
||
request a return receipts when multicasting, but realize you will
|
||
receive a return receipt from every system you have on your routing
|
||
line.
|
||
|
||
Here is an example of a multicasted message asking for a return
|
||
receipt:
|
||
|
||
->LOCKSOFT 547 modemzone 1121 687 3 1421 Earthzone<-
|
||
|
||
Network Sysop Messages:
|
||
|
||
A network sysop message is a specialized message. While the
|
||
message is addressed to NETWORK SYSOP at its point of origin, on import
|
||
the TO: field is changed to the individual sysop's name. You can not
|
||
identify a network sysop message versus a message where the individual
|
||
sysops name was actually entered in the TO: field as they look exactly
|
||
alike.
|
||
|
||
You should use NETWORK SYSOP messages when you are sending a
|
||
message to the sysop about some moderation and you do not know the name
|
||
of that sysop. You MUST route the message to the individual board where
|
||
you are trying to reach the sysop.
|
||
|
||
For moderation information to the sysop send the network sysop
|
||
message ROUTED to that particular board and the message will be
|
||
delivered only to that board. Use the COMMON conference for these
|
||
messages.
|
||
|
||
****If a board does NOT have a Postlink site number, messages may not
|
||
be routed to that board. In this event, contact the CCA for information
|
||
on the Sysop of the board and instructions on how to proceed.*******
|
||
|
||
|
||
When and How to Moderate:
|
||
|
||
Timing:
|
||
|
||
They say timing is everything. That is true for the conference
|
||
host as well. Do you let a situation go on, hoping it will just go away
|
||
or do you step in immediately to head it off before it is even clear it
|
||
is going to get out of hand? Depends on your conference. In a
|
||
technical conference, off-topic messages might be moderated more slowly
|
||
than they might be in the debate conference.
|
||
|
||
If you moderate every off topic message you will get a
|
||
reputation of being inflexible and a bully. If you never moderate
|
||
anything, particularly in an issues-oriented conference, your conference
|
||
might degenerate into nothing more than a slugfest. Imagine that all
|
||
users are interested in cooperating and tend to moderate themselves.
|
||
There are, of course, exceptions.
|
||
|
||
If you have had problems with a user, you must be extra careful
|
||
that you do not jump on them immediately simply because the user has
|
||
caused trouble before. Users do change.
|
||
|
||
Types of Messages:
|
||
|
||
Reminders:
|
||
|
||
A reminder is a gentle message. It reminds users that they are
|
||
wandering into breaking the rules territory. Like the head's up message
|
||
it is informational in content. Usually this is most effective for
|
||
those times when an experienced user has wandered off the topic of the
|
||
conference, when it is clear that a message destined for another
|
||
conference has inadvertently ended up in the wrong place, or a routed
|
||
message has gone unrouted. A reminder is a message that is not meant to
|
||
make a big deal about an infraction. Do not use reminder type messages
|
||
for blatant rules violations.
|
||
|
||
OOPS, Bob, your for sale ad for your 286 arrived today in
|
||
the DEBATE conference. It looks like you got lost when you sent
|
||
that message!
|
||
|
||
Joe, you're really drifting off here. Let's get back to
|
||
widgets, okay?
|
||
|
||
Head's Up Messages:
|
||
|
||
A head's up message is still informational in content. It
|
||
points out to the user that he has broken some rule, advises him of the
|
||
rule and is meant to help him get back on track. It is intended to
|
||
advise the user without making a big deal about what is going on.
|
||
|
||
A head's up message differs from a reminder in that it now takes
|
||
on the air of something official. It assumes that the user is on a path
|
||
to suspension and is an attempt to push the user off that path.
|
||
|
||
Send the user a friendly, head's up type message, pointing out
|
||
what the user is doing and invite him /her to join in a more appropriate
|
||
manner. Make sure the message is sent routed and private. Send the
|
||
message with a return, receipt requested.
|
||
|
||
Hi Joe, your discussion of widgets is quite interesting however
|
||
it is off topic for this conference which tries to focus more on
|
||
wachamacalleys. RIME does has a widget conference and you might
|
||
think about moving this particular thread over there or perhaps
|
||
join us in the discussion of wachamacalleys and their uses in
|
||
snizzling as you made some good points about that topic before
|
||
and I know I would be interested in hearing more about that.
|
||
Thanks.
|
||
|
||
Hi Bob, your message advertising your old 286 for sale is
|
||
considered off-topic in this conference. RIME has a very
|
||
active for-sale conferences and that would be the best place
|
||
for you to try and sell your equipment. Thanks.
|
||
|
||
Hi Tom, the discussion of abortion is off-topic in the debate
|
||
conference now. We have a conference devoted strictly to that
|
||
topic and if you are interested in continuing the discussion
|
||
about abortion, why not ask your sysop to pick up the abortion
|
||
conference where this discussion would be most welcome. It is
|
||
RIME number #411
|
||
|
||
If a user is engaged in personal attacks, this should be
|
||
moderated more quickly, before it has the potential to degenerate into a
|
||
round of name calling on everyone's part. Remember that a user who
|
||
responds to an attack with an attack should also be moderated. Saying
|
||
someone else started it is never an excuse for bad conference behavior.
|
||
|
||
Hi Joe, your message to Andrew which told Andrew that he was an
|
||
idiot is considered a personal attack on this network. We do
|
||
not allow personal attacks. We try to stick to the contents of
|
||
messages in this conference and we avoid making personal
|
||
comments about the writer of the message. Thanks for your
|
||
cooperation.
|
||
|
||
Hi Andrew, it seems you were upset about Joe's message which
|
||
called you an idiot, however, it is against the rules of this
|
||
network to respond to what is perceived as an attack with an
|
||
attack. Please do not call Joe, or anyone else, a jerk. Thanks
|
||
for your cooperation.
|
||
|
||
Obscene language must be moderated quickly as well. The
|
||
question of what is obscene seems to arise more in the issue oriented
|
||
conferences. Be clear. No four letter words either spelled out
|
||
directly or with symbols replacing letters. Nothing that you couldn't
|
||
say to your preacher/teacher or grandmother. No racial, religious or
|
||
sexual smears. Suggest alternatives to the user but do not quote the
|
||
offensive word or words.
|
||
|
||
Larry, we do not allow that kind of language on this network,
|
||
even if you star out some of the letters. Please do not use
|
||
this kind of language again. How about using the word "junk"
|
||
instead, it will keep all of us out of trouble, as the laws for
|
||
obscene language varies in the countries and states that
|
||
RIME goes to. Thanks.
|
||
|
||
All of the above are what are called head's up messages. They
|
||
are the first message you might send to a user. They are all examples
|
||
of messages that you might send if you have time and the conference
|
||
isn't degenerating around you. They are all polite and direct. They
|
||
state the offense, they state why it is an offense and they suggest a
|
||
remedy. None of them are confrontational and they all assume that the
|
||
user will respond in a positive direction.
|
||
|
||
|
||
How Many Head's Up Messages?:
|
||
|
||
If the problem in your conference is minor, respond with simple
|
||
head's up messages. Don't bring your baseball bat to swat a fly. If
|
||
the user continues, be sure that the user understood your message. If
|
||
you think that he might not have, send him another head's up message,
|
||
don't escalate to a formal warning.
|
||
|
||
Remember mail delay. Perhaps your message to the user arrived
|
||
after the user sent out his mail. Don't overreact. Your goal is to
|
||
help the user stay in the conference, not purge the conference of all
|
||
users.
|
||
|
||
Hi Bob. I see you are real interested in selling that old 286
|
||
of yours, but this is the debate conference and we don't allow
|
||
any for-sale ads in this conference. Please move your ad over
|
||
to the FOR SALE conference where it is appropriate. It is not
|
||
appropriate in this conference. If your BBS doesn't carry that
|
||
conference let me know and I will suggest some other boards in
|
||
your area. Or perhaps you could ask the sysop to pick it up for
|
||
you for awhile. Am most happy to help you out here, but we
|
||
really can't allow ads in this conference. Thanks.
|
||
|
||
Moving to Formal Warnings:
|
||
|
||
A formal warning is a more serious message. It means your
|
||
initial contact with the user has failed and the user has chosen to
|
||
ignore you. Do not issue a formal warning the same day that you issue a
|
||
head's up message. Do not issue a formal warning the next day after you
|
||
issue a head's up message. Remember that there is a turn around time to
|
||
your messages.
|
||
|
||
Because you sent your head's up message with a return receipt
|
||
you know when the message reached the board but that may not coincide
|
||
with when the user actually read the message. The user may have placed
|
||
more messages into the conference, at the same time he/she was
|
||
downloading your head's up message.
|
||
|
||
Always give the user the benefit of the doubt.
|
||
|
||
Who to Notify:
|
||
|
||
Formal warnings require that you notify the CCA (Garry Baker) and
|
||
the sysop of the board the user is accessing. You may decide to notify
|
||
the sysop when you send a user a head's up type message. That is fine.
|
||
But you MUST notify the sysop when you send a formal warning.
|
||
|
||
Consider the sysop your best friend. If a suspension is
|
||
necessary we will all need the cooperation of the sysop. Most sysops do
|
||
not want to have their board associated with users who have difficulty
|
||
following rules. Send the sysop a private, routed message, return
|
||
receipt, in the COMMON conference. All sysops should be reading the
|
||
COMMON conference for at least their own mail.
|
||
|
||
The Sysop is Gone:
|
||
|
||
Don't be dismayed if the sysop doesn't respond to you. Perhaps
|
||
the sysop just nodded his/her head in agreement and stored the
|
||
information away. Maybe the sysop is on vacation. However, if you
|
||
receive no response from the sysop, let the CCA know that you have
|
||
notified the sysop and that you have not yet received a response. This
|
||
is a head's up message to the CCA.
|
||
|
||
Maybe the sysop disagrees with your assessment of the situation.
|
||
That is the sysop's prerogative at this point as no suspension has been
|
||
formally issued yet. Maybe the sysop can provide you with information
|
||
that would help you make a decision about needing a suspension. Perhaps
|
||
you and the sysop can discuss your differences in either ADMIN or HOSTS.
|
||
That would help clarify the situation for both of you.
|
||
|
||
The Formal Warning:
|
||
|
||
A formal warning leaves no doubt that you mean business. Make
|
||
sure any formal warning you issue advises the user as to which rule was
|
||
broken, and that failure to comply with the formal warning will result
|
||
in a suspension. Once you issue a formal warning, you may not go back
|
||
and issue any more head's up messages. The next message after a formal
|
||
warning is a suspension - Period. Make sure that the user knows that
|
||
this is the last step before a suspension.
|
||
|
||
A formal warning requires that you notify the CCA and the AC as
|
||
well as the sysop. A formal warning is the last dialogue you have with
|
||
a user, on that infraction, before a suspension is issued. Do not issue
|
||
several formal warnings to the same user for the same offense. It makes
|
||
you look weak and ineffective.
|
||
|
||
Formal warnings are sent routed, r/o with a return receipt
|
||
requested whenever possible. Once you are at this stage, you should
|
||
make sure that you have copies of the messages that have presented a
|
||
problem in the conference. You may have to present those messages
|
||
in public in the USERS conference if the user issues a formal
|
||
protest to the final warning message or a subsequent suspension.
|
||
|
||
Bob, this is a formal warning. You have posted a number of
|
||
messages over the last 2 week trying to sell your 286 in this
|
||
conference. I have asked you to move your ad to the FOR SALE
|
||
conference. You have not done so in spite of my reminders. This
|
||
is against the rules of this network. The rule clearly states
|
||
"No for-sale advertisements are permitted in any conference
|
||
except the For Sale conference." You must immediately stop
|
||
posting your ad in this conference or face a 10 day suspension.
|
||
Your sysop, and the CCA have been notified. If you feel that
|
||
this is not a valid warning, you may discuss that in the USERS
|
||
conference only. Thank you.
|
||
|
||
Andrew, this is a formal warning. You have now continued your
|
||
harassment of Joe in spite of my asking you to cease. You
|
||
cannot attack folks on this network as it is against the rules
|
||
of this network. The rule clearly states " Do not abuse RIME
|
||
users in any conference(s) by sending foul or insulting
|
||
messages. No abuse of other users is allowed on the basis of
|
||
character, physical characteristics, religion, gender, sexual
|
||
orientation, intelligence quotient, or ethnicity. Messages that
|
||
are harassing or bullying are not allowed." You must
|
||
immediately stop referring to Joe as a first class jerk, or any
|
||
other derogatory term or you will face a 10 day suspension from
|
||
this conference. Please be advised that your sysop and the CCA
|
||
has been advised of this warning notice to you. If you feel
|
||
that this is not a valid warning, you may discuss that in the
|
||
USERS conference only. Thank you.
|
||
|
||
|
||
User Response to a Warning:
|
||
|
||
Hopefully the formal warning will do the trick, and the user
|
||
will calm down, or at least cease their messaging that has created the
|
||
problem. If that happens, that should close the chapter on the incident
|
||
and no more need be done.
|
||
|
||
In the time that it takes for the message to reach the user and
|
||
the user to decide his response, you should be in a dialogue with the CCA.
|
||
He will review the messaging and grant you permission to suspend if that
|
||
is deemed appropriate. If the infraction is more minor a 10 day suspension
|
||
will be approved. If the infraction is more major a 30 day suspension
|
||
will be approved.
|
||
|
||
A 30 days suspension is considered a grave event on this network
|
||
and results in a period of probation for the user when he returns to the
|
||
conference. Do not tell any user that they will be suspended for 30
|
||
days unless you have approval on a suspension of that duration.
|
||
|
||
Do not needle users who have been formally warned but are trying
|
||
to stay within the guidelines of the network. When the user responds to
|
||
a formal warning in a positive direction, consider it an accomplishment
|
||
of your ability to dialogue and drop the issue. If your formal warning
|
||
is meet by resistance, and the user goes ballistic on you, you must
|
||
immediately suspend. Do not delay on this at all. You have been given
|
||
final approval on a suspension and you should issue it, quickly and
|
||
decisively. Notify the sysop that the user has been suspended by a
|
||
routed, r/o, return receipt message in COMMON. Also immediately notify
|
||
the CCA of your actions and copy the message to him.
|
||
|
||
Suspensions:
|
||
|
||
A suspension is seen as a failure not as a success. It means
|
||
that the communication has broken down and that the user either cannot
|
||
or will not abide by the rules of the network. In your suspension
|
||
message you must inform the user of his appeal rights and how to
|
||
exercise them.
|
||
|
||
Bob, I am suspending you from the conference for 10 days. You
|
||
continued to post your ad for your 286 in this conference, even
|
||
following my formal warning to you. I have notified your sysop
|
||
to remove your access from this conference until March 27, 1996.
|
||
If you return to this conference, and post any ads, you will be
|
||
suspended, without another formal warning, for a period of 30
|
||
days. If you feel that this has not been handled correctly, we
|
||
may continue to talk about it in the USERS conference by public
|
||
mail, or you may appeal this decision, with the
|
||
CCA, as a public issue in that conference.
|
||
|
||
Andrew, I am suspending you from this conference for 30 days.
|
||
Your suspension has been approved for 30 days because you
|
||
responded to my formal warning about personal attacks by
|
||
escalating your public attacks, attacking not only John, but now
|
||
me, in those 22 public messages you left. I have notified your
|
||
sysop to remove your access to this conference until April 17,
|
||
1996. Upon your return to this conference you will be on
|
||
probation for 90 days. If you break any network rule during
|
||
those 90 days you will be suspended from this conference,
|
||
without a formal warning, for 6 months. Please review the
|
||
guidelines for probation in the RIME Users Manual. If you feel
|
||
that this has not been handled correctly, we may continue to
|
||
talk about it in the USERS conference or you may appeal this
|
||
decision, with the CCA, as a public issue in that conference.
|
||
Please be advised that the CCA has already given formal approval
|
||
for this 30 day suspension.
|
||
|
||
All sysops should be aware that a suspension means that the user
|
||
has lost all access to that conference. When a user is suspended we
|
||
expect, and demand, total cooperation from the sysop of the board that
|
||
the user was accessing. We do not wish to have suspended users
|
||
gathering up messages and responding to them, returning to the
|
||
conference after the suspension is served, and dropping down many
|
||
replies to what could then be stale topics.
|
||
|
||
A suspension is a time for the user to cool down and to reflect
|
||
on his wish to continue to access the conference or not. We cannot
|
||
imagine that every user wants to be on this network in our conferences.
|
||
Some users would prefer ruleless networks and that is fine. However, if
|
||
a user desires to continue in this network, in our conferences, that
|
||
user must agree to abide by our rules. A suspension allows the user the
|
||
time to contemplate his/her options. It also allows the conference time
|
||
to recover from whatever effects the rule-breaking user caused in the
|
||
conference.
|
||
|
||
The only way to accomplish those two objectives is for the user
|
||
to lose both reading and writing access to the conference. No suspended
|
||
user may leave mail in a conference they have been suspended from.
|
||
|
||
If a sysop does not cooperate with a suspension, the conference
|
||
host has no further responsibility for the continued presence of the
|
||
suspended user. The conference host should immediately notify the
|
||
Chief Conference Administrator that a sysop has not removed the user
|
||
from the conference as per the suspension. The administration will
|
||
take the matter from there.
|
||
|
||
Probation:
|
||
|
||
When a user is on probation, special rules apply. If a user
|
||
returns from a 30 day suspension and continues along the same
|
||
destructive pathway, you do not have to issue a formal warning. You may
|
||
immediately issue a 6 month suspension from that conference.
|
||
|
||
Andrew, you are currently on probation following a 30 days
|
||
suspension, and in spite of that you have left 3 messages today
|
||
calling Joe a stupid idiot and an uninformed geek. As such you
|
||
are hereby suspended from this conference for 6 months. I have
|
||
notified your sysop to remove your access to this conference
|
||
until September 28, 1996. Upon your return to this conference
|
||
you will be on probation again for 90 days. If you break any
|
||
network rule during those 90 days you will be suspended from
|
||
this conference, and possibly this network, permanently and no
|
||
formal warning will be issued. This is a very serious matter
|
||
and I wish it had turned out differently. However, we cannot
|
||
tolerate personal attacks in this conference. If you feel that
|
||
this has not been handled correctly, we may continue to talk
|
||
about it in the USERS conference or you may appeal this decision
|
||
with the CCA, as an issue in that conference.
|
||
|
||
Because this is so serious, try to ignore very minor rule
|
||
infractions. Think of sending a friendly head's up message about
|
||
something that is very minor. Remind the user he is on probation and
|
||
that you are trying to work with him. However, do not send message
|
||
after message to the user. One minor infraction is all you should
|
||
tolerate. After that, think 6 month suspension.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Raging Bull:
|
||
|
||
Some users like to argue. They don't mind being moderated,
|
||
warned or suspended. In fact they rather like it. If you have followed
|
||
the guidelines presented above, the user returns and is in fact, worse
|
||
than before, you next step is to let the CCA know, for a possible network
|
||
suspension. A network suspension is not appealable. It is done by the
|
||
CCA only. Never threaten any user with a network wide suspension.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Emergency Suspension:
|
||
|
||
If there has been flagrant disregard of all rules of common
|
||
sense to the point of conference disruption, you may suspend a
|
||
participant for a period of 10 days. This is considered a grave event
|
||
and should not be undertaken lightly. Don't claim an emergency
|
||
suspension for a user who is simply arguing with you or being a general
|
||
pain in the neck. Reserve this for the user who is so off the wall that
|
||
there is no time for discussion, head's up messages, warnings and the
|
||
usual delays.
|
||
|
||
If you issue an emergency suspension you must also notify the
|
||
CCA and the sysop immediately.
|
||
|
||
Due Process:
|
||
|
||
We do not guarantee due process, however, we do offer to discuss
|
||
all decisions that CH's have made. While the CCA must approve all
|
||
suspensions, usually that is done with just a cursory investigation. If
|
||
a user appeals the suspension, the CCA will attempt a more thorough
|
||
investigation. If the CCA discovers during that investigation, that the
|
||
suspension was uncalled for, or handled improperly, the CCA will reverse
|
||
the suspension and "wipe it off the books."
|
||
|
||
If in the middle of a moderation cycle you realize that you have
|
||
made an error, correct it. Consider apologizing to the user for your
|
||
error. Never be afraid to admit an error. This is not a sign of
|
||
weakness, it is a sign of humanness!
|
||
|
||
|
||
How to Be a Great Conference Host
|
||
|
||
The most important attributes of a good conference host are to
|
||
be open, warm, friendly and interested. You don't have to be an expert
|
||
to moderate a conference, you just need a passing knowledge of the
|
||
conference topic, some goals in place for how you would like it to run
|
||
and a willingness to get it to that place.
|
||
|
||
Set a good example: In moderating a conference, you are the
|
||
example that all others will follow. You cannot moderate someone on
|
||
something you yourself are doing. If you try to moderate someone for
|
||
something you have done, the users will not respect you.
|
||
|
||
Be Fair: If you don't like a particular user that is fine. Just
|
||
don't let it show. If your opinion on an issue is different than
|
||
another user, don't moderate that user for his/her opinion. We don't
|
||
moderate on ideas, we moderate on rule violations. Be extra sure in
|
||
your own mind that a user has broken a rule if you don't like that user.
|
||
|
||
Admit faults: If you don't' know something, say so. No one
|
||
knows everything. If you have made an error, admit it in a friendly
|
||
manner. If you want a user to back down graciously, you must be able to
|
||
back down graciously as well.
|
||
|
||
Be helpful: You are the person everyone looks to for help
|
||
whether it on the network rules, how to effectively use the software, or
|
||
what is allowed in the conference. Make your presence known and make it
|
||
known that you are there, not as a police person, but as a guide and a
|
||
leader. Don't pick out favorite users and ignore everyone else.
|
||
|
||
Act quickly and decisively: If your conference begins to take a
|
||
turn for the worse, don't let it continue. Perhaps this is the time for
|
||
public moderation. Or simple restating of the rules. Or trying to get
|
||
a new discussion going. There are many techniques available but once
|
||
you start, follow through. If you need to moderate in public, do it but
|
||
don't waffle.
|
||
|
||
Be clear when you are acting as the Conference host: If you are
|
||
participating in your own conference, find a way to separate your
|
||
participatory messages from your official messages. Perhaps a signature
|
||
line that designates an official message from an unofficial message, or
|
||
start an official message with an announcement that this is an official
|
||
message from the CH.
|
||
|
||
Watch your own taglines: When you are sending official messages
|
||
to a user, make sure that your own tagline does not offend that user in
|
||
any way. As CH you are held to a higher standard and what might be an
|
||
innocent tagline, could be seen by the user as if you were waving a red
|
||
flag in front of a bull. Conference hosts should take special care to
|
||
insure that their taglines are not personal and not abusive; either
|
||
directly or when taken in the context of the message.
|
||
|
||
Periodically post the rules of your conference: One way to let
|
||
users know you are there, is to periodically post the rules of your
|
||
conference. You don't need to post all the rules of the network, over
|
||
and over. Gentle reminders of more important rules coupled with telling
|
||
users where they can obtain a complete set of rules and goals of the
|
||
network usually suffice. An example of a one message set of rules might
|
||
be:
|
||
|
||
Periodic Posting of RIME BBS Issues Conference Information
|
||
(Last Updated: 1 March 1996)
|
||
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
||
- Welcome to the BBS Issues Conference, a RIME conference echoed
|
||
worldwide. Our RIME channel number is #242. Here's our "charter",
|
||
the conference description as you'll find it in RIMECONF.ZIP, the
|
||
official RIME conference list:
|
||
|
||
DESCRIPTION: Discussion of issues and opinions relevant to
|
||
the operation of Bulletin Board Systems (BBS), designed
|
||
specifically to allow BBS callers and sysops to discuss issues
|
||
of common interest. Any thread relating to the operation of a
|
||
BBS or to how callers interact with a BBS is open in this
|
||
conference. The conference is NOT limited to RIME-related
|
||
issues.
|
||
|
||
- The first "rule" is to have fun talking about BBS Issues...
|
||
this should be the easiest rule to follow.
|
||
|
||
- This conference follows all rules specified in the RIME Bylaws and
|
||
RIME Conference Rules, both of which should be available at the
|
||
RIME node where you're reading this. Ask your sysop for more
|
||
information, and for copies of those files.
|
||
|
||
- There is one "rule of reason" which is insisted upon here. Put
|
||
simply, it is "DEBATE IDEAS, DON'T ATTACK PEOPLE". You're
|
||
welcome to call an idea stupid, as long as you take care not to
|
||
call the person advocating the idea stupid. The former may get
|
||
you an argument from other conference members, while the latter
|
||
will certainly earn you a "moderation" message.
|
||
|
||
- If all is going well, you'll see no public "moderation" messages from
|
||
me. RIME has a wonderful routed mail facility, which I prefer
|
||
to use to send "moderation" messages. Public "moderation" will
|
||
only be used when a topic has gone out of control, when group
|
||
moderation is needed, or in even more unusual cases.
|
||
|
||
- Please DON'T compound someone else's mistake by replying to it,
|
||
publicly re-quoting it, publicly asking what I'm doing about it,
|
||
or taking moderation into your own hands. It's likely that I'll
|
||
have already handled the problem privately.
|
||
|
||
- If you wish to discuss a moderation message, you have two
|
||
options under RIME rules. You can write me back in this
|
||
conference -- but it must be ROUTED to site CLIPHEAVEN2 (#896)
|
||
-- or you can write a public or routed message in the RIME
|
||
Users conference to me and/or to COUNCIL. Please consult the
|
||
RIME conference rules for more information on the latter option.
|
||
|
||
- This message will be posted as needed... at least once a
|
||
month.
|
||
|
||
Have fun, and thanks for joining us!
|
||
|
||
|
||
When You Need to Resign:
|
||
|
||
When you are burned out, or you have other commitments, please
|
||
let us know, don't just stop appearing in the conference. Give us some
|
||
warning if you can. Notify the Conference Administrator that you will
|
||
no longer be able to host your conference. If you have noticed some
|
||
users who you think might make good replacements, let the Conference
|
||
Administrator know their names.
|
||
|
||
Consider talking with the users of your conference about your
|
||
departure and perhaps explain to them why you are leaving. Nothing stops
|
||
rumors as quickly as the truth!
|
||
|
||
|
||
How To Revive a Dead Conference:
|
||
|
||
Sometimes, no matter how interesting the topic, a conference
|
||
goes through a slow period. The truth of the matter is that messages
|
||
beget messages. If your conference begins to slow down and it looks
|
||
like it will die on the vine, that is the time that your ingenuity will
|
||
be put most to the test.
|
||
|
||
Start an interesting discussion and encourage discussion: Either
|
||
pick out a few users who you think you can engage and talk with them.
|
||
Or introduce a new topic. Don't complain about lack of participation,
|
||
simply increase your own activity. In a technical conference, search
|
||
out some new information on your product and "announce" it. Discuss
|
||
some obscure features or bugs. Enlist a friendly soul to get into a
|
||
discussion with you and keep it going.
|
||
|
||
Advertise your conference: COMMON is a good place to watch the
|
||
messages and if you see something that pertains to your conference
|
||
respond to that user and invite him into your conference. Invite sysops
|
||
to pick up your conference. Mention topics that are currently being
|
||
discussed in your conference.
|
||
|
||
Broaden your topic: Be careful here. Do not intrude on topics
|
||
that are usually discussed in other conferences. However if you are in
|
||
a widget conference, you can discuss not only the manufacture of widgets
|
||
but perhaps the use of widgets, the evolution of widgets through the
|
||
years, why widgets are so expensive, and then, how thingamabobs work
|
||
with widgets (after noticing there is no thingamabob conference).
|
||
|
||
The Last Word:
|
||
|
||
How well your conference runs will depend on many factors, some
|
||
of which you can control and some of which you have no control over.
|
||
While your conference is in part a reflection of your abilities as a
|
||
conference host, it is also a reflection of the community of users who
|
||
access this network. Don't feel responsible for everything.
|
||
|
||
The most important thing to achieve from moderating a conference
|
||
is pleasure, for yourself and for the participants of the conference. So
|
||
most of all - enjoy!
|
||
|
||
|