45 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
45 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
>>Mr. Klass is former Avionics Editor of Aviation Week & Space Technology
|
||
Magazine, and widely recognized as the world's foremost UFO debunker.
|
||
----------------------
|
||
Although I am really much too busy working on my new book on "UFO
|
||
abductions," and my assignments for Aviation Week & Space Technology
|
||
magazine, I chanced to note your pernicious comment that you "envision in
|
||
the near future bumper stickers that say, `Kill a Believer for CSICOP.'"
|
||
|
||
What a dreadfully inaccurate comment from one who has attended a
|
||
CSICOP conference, where the "believers" are invited to present their
|
||
views -- in striking contrast to MUFON conferences. (At the recent first
|
||
general meeting of the National Capital Area Skeptics, Dr. Bruce Maccabee
|
||
was invited to present the pro-UFO side of `UFO-abductions' and given
|
||
equal time to my own. Did he invite me to speak at his FUFOR sponsored
|
||
MUFON conference later this month??)
|
||
|
||
As for your lament, "Ufology: After 40 Years, Still No Respect," the
|
||
same lament has been voiced by The Flat Earth Society, by those who
|
||
believe in "ancient astronauts," in ghosts and poltergeist -- and was
|
||
earlier voiced by the late Sir Arthur Conan Doyle when organized science
|
||
showed no interest in his photos and tales of fairies (the tiny variety).
|
||
|
||
The explanation is simple: The world's leading scientists are dum-
|
||
dums, which explains why our scientific knowledge has not advanced one
|
||
iota in the past 100 years!!!!!
|
||
|
||
If world-reknown [sic] scientists fail to be impressed by the evid-
|
||
ence that you and other UFOlogists find so impressive, then clearly it is
|
||
"they" and not you who are at fault. And "they" would be more open-minded
|
||
if it were not for the tiny handful of skeptics, such as Klass, Sheaffer,
|
||
and Oberg. Why is it that Hynek, McDonald, Maccabee, Sturrock, Westrum,
|
||
Truzzi, etc., all with Ph.D.'s, were/are not able to overcome the negativ-
|
||
ism of a tiny handful of skeptics without such academic pedigrees?
|
||
|
||
It never once occurs to UFO-proponents like yourself that perhaps--
|
||
perhaps--there is no UFO evidence that the world's great scientific minds
|
||
find impressive. That it is only impressive to those who have an overwhelm-
|
||
ing desire to believe, to the credulous and gullible.
|
||
|
||
But be of good cheer, at age 67 I do not have many more years ahead,
|
||
and Sheaffer and Oberg in time will pass. Then, with the three of us gone--
|
||
at long last the world's great scientists will "see the light" about UFOs.
|
||
And, for the first time, the cultists will have been proven right, and the
|
||
world's great scientific minds will admit they were wrong.
|
||
|