507 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
507 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
STRATEGIES FOR A PERMANENT LUNAR BASE
|
||
|
||
Michael B. Duke, Wendell W. Mendell, and Barney B. Roberts
|
||
NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058
|
||
|
||
|
||
Abstract
|
||
|
||
Planned activities at a manned lunar base can be categorized as
|
||
supporting one or more of three possible objectives: scientific research,
|
||
exploration of lunar resources for use in building a space infrastructure,
|
||
or attainment of self-sufficiency in the lunar environment as a first step
|
||
in planetary habitation. Scenarios constructed around each of the three
|
||
goals have many common elements, particularly in the early phases. The
|
||
cost and the complexity of the base, as well as the structure of the Space
|
||
Transportation System, are functions of the chosen long-term strategy. A
|
||
real lunar base will manifest some combination of characteristics from
|
||
these idealized end members.
|
||
|
||
|
||
A MOON IN AMERICA'S FUTURE
|
||
|
||
The Earth is unique in the solar system, not only for harboring life,
|
||
but also for its relatively massive satellite. It is speculative that the
|
||
two attributes are somehow related, but certainly the Earth's companion
|
||
has left cultural and biological imprints on humanity. As cumulative
|
||
application of the scientific method has increased our understanding and
|
||
awareness of the physical universe, fascination with the habitability of
|
||
the Moon has blossomed. As late as the late century, newspaper stories
|
||
reported telescopic observations of the daily lives of lunar creatures.
|
||
The manned lunar landings of the last decade have dispelled such
|
||
romanticism forever but in turn have provided the technology and the
|
||
information necessary to fulfill a greater dream - the transport of
|
||
civilization beyond the confines of the Earth.
|
||
|
||
Cultural expansion is a recurring theme in human affairs. Motivations
|
||
for exploration or conquest vary from resource limitations (Mongol
|
||
invasions) to religion (Turkish probings of medieval Europe) to commerce
|
||
(global circumnavigations of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries).
|
||
American history especially is permeated by the doctrine of manifest
|
||
destiny. The concept of the frontier has come to symbolize for Americans
|
||
the exercise of individual freedom, which in collective expression leads
|
||
to social renewal. Contemporary popular writers cater to this mythos by
|
||
describing for an overpopulated and confused world the "high frontier" of
|
||
space. So far, the promise of space has been a reality for a few and only
|
||
a vicarious experience for most. However, humanity, and the United States
|
||
particularly, stands today at the threshold of a truly new world - the
|
||
Moon.
|
||
The promise of the Moon is not immediately evident from examination of
|
||
the current American space program. However, the space shuttle and the
|
||
proposed space station can be viewed as building blocks in a general
|
||
purpose space transportation infrastructure (fig. 1). To service
|
||
geosynchronous orbit, an upper stage is needed in addition to the shuttle.
|
||
If that upper stage is provided in the form of a reusable orbit-to-orbit
|
||
transfer vehicle docked at the space station, the transportation system
|
||
can be multipurpose. In particular, a rudimentary lunar transportation
|
||
system then will exist because the propulsion requirements for attaining
|
||
geosynchronous orbit and lunar orbit are essentially identical. A lunar
|
||
landing vehicle is required to place payloads on the lunar surface, but
|
||
its design can be a straightforward adaptation of the orbital transfer
|
||
vehicle (OTV). The space station and the reusable OTV constitute a natural
|
||
evolutionary path that, when achieved, will make accessible all near-Earth
|
||
space including the Moon. This "enabling technology" is a NASA target for
|
||
the mid 1990's.
|
||
|
||
When the requisite technology exists, the American political process
|
||
inevitably will include lunar surface activities as a major space
|
||
objective. In fact, some sort of declaration may well precede the actual
|
||
establishment of the space station. It is therefore prudent to consider
|
||
the nature of a permanent manned presence on the Moon and its potential
|
||
impact on the evolution of the Space Transportation System (STS).
|
||
|
||
Although the lunar base program is one in which the United States can
|
||
assert its leadership in space, it is inherently international in scope
|
||
and should involve as much participation as possible from other countries.
|
||
Opportunities for international cooperation exist in the planning stages,
|
||
in the science and technology development, and in operations at the lunar
|
||
base. A legal framework will be needed to guarantee that potentially
|
||
profit-making ventures adequately consider the concerns of the
|
||
international community.
|
||
|
||
|
||
USES OF THE MOON
|
||
|
||
A manned lunar base can be discussed in terms of three distinct
|
||
functions. The first involves the scientific investigation of the Moon and
|
||
its environment and the application of special properties of the Moon to
|
||
research problems. The second produces the capability to utilize the
|
||
materials of the Moon for beneficial purposes throughout the Earth-Moon
|
||
system. The last, and perhaps the most intriguing, is to conduct research
|
||
and development leading to a self-sufficient and self-supporting lunar
|
||
base, the first extraterrestrial human colony. Although these activities
|
||
take place on the Moon, the developed technology and the established
|
||
capability will benefit society on Earth as well as the growing
|
||
industrialization of near-Earth space.
|
||
|
||
Scientific Research
|
||
A lunar base will create new opportunities for investigating the Moon
|
||
and its environment and for using the Moon as a platform for scientific
|
||
investigations. Analogous to the function of McMurdo Base in Antarctica,
|
||
the lunar base will provide logistical and supporting laboratory
|
||
capability to rapidly expand knowledge of lunar geology, geophysics,
|
||
environmental science, and resource potential through wide-ranging field
|
||
investigations, sampling, and placement of instrumentation. Access to
|
||
large, free vacuum volumes may enable new experimental facilities such as
|
||
macroparticle accelerators. The firm, fixed platform will enable new
|
||
astronomical interferometric measurements to be obtained (fig. 2). The
|
||
challenge of long-term, self-sufficient operations on the Moon can spur
|
||
scientific and technological advances in materials science, bioprocessing,
|
||
physics and chemistry based on lunar materials, and reprocessing systems.
|
||
These concepts are explored by other papers in this volume.
|
||
|
||
Exploitation of Lunar Resources
|
||
It has been argued that major industrialization of space cannot occur
|
||
without access to the resources of the Moon. Studies of immense projects
|
||
such as solar power satellites have demonstrated that at a sufficiently
|
||
large scale, it is reasonable to develop the resource potential of the
|
||
Moon to offset the high Earth-to-orbit transportation costs (Hearth,
|
||
1976). The lower gravitational field of the Moon and the absence of an
|
||
atmosphere that retards objects accelerated from the surface provides a
|
||
potential 20 to 30-fold advantage for launching from the Moon instead of
|
||
Earth. For example, at liftoff, about 1.5% of the space shuttle's mass is
|
||
payload. Most of the mass is propellant. From the Moon, approximately 50%
|
||
of the mass can be payload.
|
||
|
||
The commodity currently envisioned to be most in demand in Earth-Moon
|
||
space over the next three decades is liquid oxygen, which makes up 6/7 of
|
||
the mass of propellant utilized by cryogenic (hydrogen-oxygen) rockets,
|
||
such as the Centaur or postulated OTV's. Although it would appear unlikely
|
||
than an atmosphereless body is a source for oxygen, it is actually an
|
||
abundant element on the Moon (Arnold and Duke, 1978). It must be
|
||
extracted, however, from silicate and oxide minerals into its liquid form
|
||
for use as a propellant. Several processes have been suggested (Criswell,
|
||
1980) for accomplishing this, including reduction of raw soil by fluorine
|
||
(which is recovered) or reduction or iron-titanium oxide (ilmenite)
|
||
hydrogen (also recovered). Preliminary laboratory studies have verified
|
||
the concepts behind some of these processes.
|
||
|
||
Systems studies (e.g., Carrol et al., 1983) show that oxygen
|
||
production on the Moon could benefit STS in the early years of the next
|
||
century, even if the hydrogen component of the propellant needed to be
|
||
brought from Earth (fig. 3-5). Finding concentrations of water at the
|
||
lunar poles (Arnold, 1979) or extracting the dispersed solar wind-derived
|
||
hydrogen in the lunar regolith would greatly improve the economics of the
|
||
transportation system.
|
||
|
||
Other commodities also could be produced. Metals, such as iron or
|
||
titanium, can be extracted from the lunar soil or from specific rocks or
|
||
minerals with differing degrees of difficulty. For example, small
|
||
quantities of metal (primarily iron) from meteorites can be concentrated
|
||
with a magnetic device from large amounts of lunar soil, or, with much
|
||
larger energy inputs, titanium can be obtained from ilmenite. These
|
||
products could find applications in large space structures. Lunar titania
|
||
or alumina might be used to produce aerobrakes (heat shields) used in
|
||
OTV's. In the long term, at relatively high levels of development,
|
||
production of components for solar electric power generation in space
|
||
(e.g., solar power satellites) could be made feasible (Bock, 1979).
|
||
|
||
Lunar Autarky
|
||
A self-sufficient lunar base is a possible long-term objective that
|
||
creates new challenges in planning and development. In the near term,
|
||
emplacement of a controlled environment capsule on the Moon involves known
|
||
technology. The initial concept for a lunar habitat module is simply an
|
||
extension of the design experience from Apollo, Skylab, the space shuttle,
|
||
and space station (fig. 6). A different perspective is required to plan
|
||
systems that can utilize the Moon's native materials and energy sources to
|
||
produce a self-sufficient capability.
|
||
|
||
Most of the generic technologies for an advanced system are similar to
|
||
those employed in general space operations (life support, power, thermal
|
||
control, communications, logistics, and transportation, etc.), but they
|
||
must be modified to utilize lunar materials for growth and extension.
|
||
Ultimately, the desire to minimize or to eliminate the resupply link from
|
||
Earth required a host of applications, new to the space program, carried
|
||
to new levels of system reliability. Exploration of technologies such as
|
||
lunar metallurgy, ceramics, manufacturing processes, power systems, and
|
||
others, will reveal whether autarky is a realistic objective and can
|
||
prepare the way for achieving it an operational base. Perhaps this is the
|
||
most compelling rationale for a lunar system, as it promises eventual
|
||
self-sufficiency elsewhere in the solar system.
|
||
|
||
|
||
PHASED EVOLUTION OF A LUNAR BASE
|
||
|
||
We loosely define three scenarios, each based on one of the long-term
|
||
rationales described above: scientific research, production, and
|
||
self-sufficiency (Tables 1-3). Each scenario passes through several
|
||
phases, some of which are common to the other scenarios. The distinction
|
||
among the three views lies with the culminating phase of each.
|
||
|
||
Precursor Exploration. Because the scientific data base is incomplete,
|
||
particularly in the polar regions, the first step in Phase I is global
|
||
mapping of the Moon, both with relatively high resolution imagery and with
|
||
remote-sensing measurements to determine the chemical variability. This
|
||
task can be accomplished with an unmanned satellite, a Lunar Geochemical
|
||
Orbiter or LGO (Minear et al., 1977), which is a proposed mission in
|
||
NASA's planetary program and could be flown in the 1990-1992 time frame.
|
||
The LGO is in the Planetary Observer mission class, a low-cost approach to
|
||
planetary exploration recommended by the report of the Solar System
|
||
Exploration Committee (1983). Secondly, Phase I should include research on
|
||
technologies necessary to exploit lunar surfaces. Technology development
|
||
in resource problems on Earth is typically a long lead time process. At
|
||
the conclusion of Phase I, the initial site for a base will have been
|
||
defined and planned activities understood in some detail. Concurrently
|
||
with this preliminary phase in the lunar program, development of a space
|
||
station and on OTV capable of supporting a lunar base would be carried out
|
||
in NASA's STS program.
|
||
|
||
Research Output. At Phase II, an initial surface facility would
|
||
establish limited research capability for science, materials processing,
|
||
or lunar surface operations. Depending on the long-term objectives of the
|
||
lunar base program, the detailed studies and the experimental plans start
|
||
to diverge at this phase for the different scenarios. A focus on lunar
|
||
science and astronomy would result in local geological exploration, the
|
||
establishment of a small astronomical laboratory, and emplacement of
|
||
automated instruments. If production were to be the focus, a pilot plant
|
||
for lunar oxygen extractions could be set up instead, and study of the
|
||
fabrication of aerobrakes from lunar material could be initiated. If the
|
||
program goal pointed to achieving self-sufficiency, the emphasis at this
|
||
stage could be agricultural experiments utilizing lunar soil as substrate
|
||
and recycling water, oxygen, and carbon dioxide.
|
||
|
||
To accomplish Phase II in any of the scenarios, the STS must have the
|
||
capability of landing and taking off from the Moon, transporting manned
|
||
capsules (about 10,000 kg) to and from the lunar surface, and delivering
|
||
payloads of about 20,000 kg to the lunar surface. This involves delivering
|
||
approximately 40,000 kg into lunar orbit using OTV's. The requirement for
|
||
storage of the return vehicle on the Moon for extended periods (14 days to
|
||
3 months) may require new high-performance, storable propellent systems at
|
||
this phase of development.
|
||
|
||
Permanent Occupancy. At Phase III, permanent occupancy is the
|
||
objective. The surface infrastructure would include greater access to
|
||
power, better mobility in and away from the base, and more diversified
|
||
research capability. Still, depending on the long-term objectives, the
|
||
nature of the base can vary. A science base might emphasize long-range
|
||
traverses for planetological studies or extension of observational
|
||
capability with larger telescopes. A production base will incorporate
|
||
highly automated systems to produce and transfer liquid oxygen for use in
|
||
the transportation system. Advanced research for a self-sufficient base
|
||
would be making first extensions of the base utilizing indigenous
|
||
materials. The production and the self-sufficiency scenarios require a
|
||
small cousin to the Earth-orbit space station in lunar space (lunar orbit
|
||
or an Earth-Moon libration point) to provide for transfer, refueling and
|
||
maintenance of the lunar lander and the OTV's.
|
||
|
||
Advanced Base. The advanced base, Phase IV, is even more specialized.
|
||
Depending on the long-term plan, it produces more types or a greater range
|
||
of scientific investigations, adds products to the growing lunar
|
||
industrial base, or enters a phase of significant expansion of
|
||
capabilities using lunar materials as the majority of the feedstock. This
|
||
is the terminal phase for the science and production scenarios. Future
|
||
growth may occur by enlarging the number of experiments or products
|
||
produced on the Moon, but a self-sustaining capability is not included.
|
||
The production base might even develop toward a highly automated state
|
||
where permanent occupancy was unnecessary. For the production and
|
||
independence scenarios, the base should begin paying its own operational
|
||
costs. In the self-sufficiency scenario, research and development of pilot
|
||
plants aimed at a broad range of indigenous ;lunar technologies would be
|
||
pursued. The final phase of the self-sufficiency scenario is a truly
|
||
autarkic settlement, a lunar colony, in which the link to Earth can be
|
||
discretionary.
|
||
|
||
EVOLUTION OF THE PROGRAM
|
||
|
||
Figure 7 ties the possible development of a lunar base to the growth
|
||
of lunar resource support of the transportation system. Initially, the
|
||
base is totally dependent on terrestrial supply where 7 kg in low-Earth
|
||
orbit is required to place 1 kg on the lunar surface. With the
|
||
introduction of lunar oxygen first into near-Moon operations and then into
|
||
the return leg of the transportation system, the slope of the curve
|
||
changes from 7:1 to 3.5:1. As the lunar manufacturing capability increases
|
||
to the point where aerobrakes can be manufactured, the slope decreases to
|
||
somewhat slightly greater than 1:1. Further growth of lunar capability
|
||
allows expansion of base mass to be more or less independent of the
|
||
quantity of imported terrestrial mass. At the point of self-sufficiency,
|
||
only trace minerals and crew changeout are chargeable weight to lunar
|
||
operations; the slope of the curve in fig. 7 is essentially flat.
|
||
|
||
Another consideration in the growth of lunar activities is the
|
||
economic "balance of trade" between Earth orbit and the lunar surface. The
|
||
value of lunar products may support lunar operations before a true mass
|
||
balance is achieved. It is difficult to calculate the economic value of
|
||
lunar oxygen and other products in low-Earth orbit. However these "lunar
|
||
credits" are shown qualitatively in fig. 7 at the point where a closed
|
||
ecological life support system (CELSS) and a significant manufacturing
|
||
capability are available. The slope of the "credits" line will be a
|
||
function of many things, such as the amount of oxygen required to support
|
||
non-lunar activities, the value of science and research enabled by the
|
||
lunar base. Finally, the dashed line of constant slope indicates the
|
||
continued total dependency that would exist if these technologies are not
|
||
pursued on the Moon, that is, if a self-sufficiency element is not
|
||
included in the lunar base program.
|
||
|
||
The real lunar base will evolve as some combination of the above
|
||
scenarios. Determination of the right mix requires research, development,
|
||
and debate. Even if a program is started now, several years should be
|
||
devoted to study of the detailed lunar base scenario. The time is
|
||
available because the development of the space transportation
|
||
infrastructure and the completion of the orbital science survey will take
|
||
7-10 years. Proper preparation will make it possible to decide on a
|
||
specific lunar base design in the early 1990's. That time frame is
|
||
consistent with the development of the infrastructure that will enable the
|
||
lunar base program to be carried out to its full potential. The first
|
||
manned landings could occur early in the first decade of the next century;
|
||
permanent occupancy could be achieved by the year 2007, the fiftieth
|
||
anniversary of the Space Age.
|
||
|
||
There are potential technological problems that may slow the
|
||
development of the lunar base, and at each phase there will be serious
|
||
questions as to whether to proceed and how and when to proceed. A
|
||
commitment need not be made now to the whole plan. Nevertheless, the
|
||
long-term objective is one of immense significance in human history and
|
||
should not be casually discarded. It is inevitable that humankind will
|
||
settle the Moon and other bodies in the Solar System. We live in a
|
||
generation that has already taken very significant steps along that path.
|
||
With careful planning, we can nuture the capability to move from the
|
||
planet, to provide benefits to Earth, and to satisfy humanity's spirit of
|
||
adventure.
|
||
|
||
REFERENCES
|
||
|
||
Arnold, James R. (1979) Ice in the lunar polar regions, J. Geophys.
|
||
Res., 84, 5659-5668.
|
||
|
||
Arnold, James R. and Duke, Michael B. (1978) Summer Workshop On
|
||
Near-Earth Resources, NASA CP-2031, NASA, Washington, DC, 1-7 pp.
|
||
|
||
Bock, Edward H. (1979) Lunar Resources Utilization for Space
|
||
Construction, Final Report for Contract NAS9-15560, General Dynamics
|
||
Convair Div., Advanced Space Programs, San Diego, CA.
|
||
|
||
Carroll, W. F., Steurer, W. H., Frisbee, R. H., and Jones, R. M.
|
||
(1983) Extraterrestrial materials - Their role in future space
|
||
operations, Astronaut, Aeronaut, 21, 80-85.
|
||
|
||
Criswell, David R. (1980) Extraterrestrial materials processing and
|
||
construction, Final Report Contr. NSR 09-051-001, Lunar and Planetary
|
||
Institute, Houston, TX.
|
||
|
||
Hearth, Donald P. (1976) Outlook for Space, NASA SP-386, NASA, Wash., DC,
|
||
237 pp.
|
||
|
||
Minear, J. W., Hubbard, N., Johnson, T.V., and Clarke, V. C., Jr. (1977)
|
||
Mission Summary for Lunar Polar Orbiter, JPL Document 660-41, Rev. A., Jet
|
||
Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.,36 pp
|
||
|
||
Solar System Exploration Committee (1983) Planetary Exploration Through
|
||
Year 2000: A Core Program, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
|
||
DC, 167 pp.
|
||
|
||
Figure Titles
|
||
|
||
Figure 1. The Space Transportation System of the future may service a
|
||
station in geosynchronous orbit as well as a lunar base via a station in
|
||
lunar space. The lift capacity of the Shuttle fleet may be augmented by an
|
||
unmanned heavy lift vehicle, designed to ship fuel and consumables to
|
||
space.
|
||
|
||
Figure 2. A radio telescope located on the farside of the Moon would be
|
||
shielded from background noises generated by terrestrial sources. Although
|
||
depicted here with a parabolic dish in a convenient crater, an initial
|
||
lunar instrument may well be a phased array of dipole antennas.
|
||
|
||
Figure 3. Liquid oxygen fuel (LOX), manufactured on the Moon and delivered
|
||
to low-Earth orbit may become a profitable export for a lunar base. A
|
||
critical parameter in analyses of the system is the mass payback ratio,
|
||
defined as the ratio of the excess lunar LOX in LEO to the liquid hydrogen
|
||
fuel delivered from Earth to LEO.
|
||
|
||
Figure 4. The mass payback ratio for lunar LOX delivered to LEO is
|
||
sensitive to the design characteristics of the OTV used as a lunar
|
||
freighter. The fractional mass of the OTV aerobrake and the oxidizer to
|
||
fuel ratio are key parameters. Manufacture of aerobrakes on the Moon would
|
||
enhance system performance.
|
||
|
||
Figure 5. A simple cost-benefit analysis assumes that a lunar oxygen
|
||
production facility has its capital costs amortized solely by "profits" on
|
||
delivery of LOX to LEO. While lunar oxygen is competitive with shuttle
|
||
delivery in all cases, introduction of a cost-efficient heavy lift vehicle
|
||
reduces the advantage under more conservative cost estimates for the lunar
|
||
operation. If costs of lunar LOX are shared with other activities, the
|
||
advantage is restored.
|
||
|
||
Figure 6. The first lunar base habitats and laboratories could be space
|
||
station modules, buried in the lunar regolith for protection from solar
|
||
flare radiation. Interface modules not only interconnect the buries
|
||
structures but also can be stacked to create exits to the surface.
|
||
|
||
Figure 7. Initially, almost 7 kg must be lifted into LEO for every kg
|
||
landed on the Moon. As lunar oxygen is introduced into the transportation
|
||
system, the ratio improves as a unit mass goes from Earth to Moon with
|
||
only little overhead in the system. In a Phase IV advanced base, the
|
||
growth of lunar surface infrastructure becomes only weakly dependent on
|
||
imports from Earth. A favorable balance of trade is ultimately
|
||
conceivable.
|
||
|
||
Table 1. Lunar Base Growth Phases: Sciences Base Scenario
|
||
|
||
A growing capability to do lunar science and to use the Moon as a research
|
||
base for other disciplines, using lunar resources to a limited extent to
|
||
support operations.
|
||
Phase I: Preparatory exploration
|
||
. Lunar orbiter explorer and mapper
|
||
. Instrument and experiment definition
|
||
. Site selection
|
||
. Automated site preparation
|
||
|
||
Phase II: Research Outpost
|
||
. Minimum base, temporarily occupied, totally resupplied from Earth
|
||
. Small telescope/Geoscience module
|
||
. Short range science sorties
|
||
. Instrument package emplacement
|
||
|
||
Phase III: Operational Base
|
||
. Permanently occupied facility
|
||
. Consumable production/Recycling pilot plant
|
||
. Longer range science sorties
|
||
. Geoscience/Biomedical laboratory
|
||
. Experimental lunar telescope
|
||
. Extended surface science experimental packages
|
||
|
||
Phase IV: Advanced Base
|
||
. Advanced consumable production
|
||
. Satellite outposts
|
||
. Advanced geoscience laboratory
|
||
. Plant research laboratory
|
||
. Advanced astronomical observatory
|
||
. Long-range surface exploration
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table 2. Lunar Base Growth Phases Production Base Scenario
|
||
|
||
A lunar base that is intended to develop one or more products for
|
||
commercial use. Manned activity may be continuous, but a high degree of
|
||
automation is expected.
|
||
|
||
Phase I: Preparatory exploration
|
||
. Lunar orbiter explorer and mapper
|
||
. Lunar pilot plant definition
|
||
. Site selection
|
||
. Automated site preparation
|
||
|
||
Phase II: Research outpost
|
||
. Minimum base, temporarily occupied, totally resupplied from Earth
|
||
. Surface mining pilot operation
|
||
. Lunar oxygen pilot plant
|
||
. Lunar materials utilization research module
|
||
|
||
Phase III: Operational base
|
||
. Permanently occupied base
|
||
. Expanded mining facility
|
||
. Consumables supplied locally
|
||
. Oxygen production plant
|
||
. Lunar materials processing pilot plant(s)
|
||
|
||
Phase IV: Advanced base
|
||
. Large scale oxygen production
|
||
. Ceramics/Metals production facility
|
||
. Locally derived consumables for industrial use
|
||
. Industrial research facility
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table 3. Lunar Growth Phases: Lunar Self-Sufficiency Research Base
|
||
Scenario
|
||
|
||
A lunar base that grows in its capacity to support itself and expand its
|
||
capabilities utilizing the indigenous resources of the Moon, with the
|
||
ultimate objective of becoming independent of Earth.
|
||
|
||
Phase I: Preparatory exploration
|
||
. Lunar orbiter explorer and mapper
|
||
. Process definition
|
||
. Site selection
|
||
. Automated site preparation
|
||
|
||
Phase II: Research Outpost
|
||
. Minimum base, temporarily occupied, totally resupplied from Earth
|
||
. Surface mining, pilot operation
|
||
. Lunar oxygen production pilot plant
|
||
. Closed systems research module
|
||
|
||
Phase III: Operational base
|
||
. Permanently occupied facility
|
||
. Expanded mining facility
|
||
. Lunar agriculture research laboratory
|
||
. Lunar materials processing pilot plant(s)
|
||
|
||
Phase IV: Advanced base
|
||
. Lunar ecology research laboratory
|
||
. Lunar power station-90% lunar materials-derived
|
||
. Agriculture production pilot plant
|
||
. Lunar manufacturing facility
|
||
. Oxygen production plant
|
||
. Lunar volatile extraction pilot plant
|
||
|
||
Phase V: Self-sufficient colony
|
||
. Full-scale production of exportable oxygen
|
||
. Volatile production for agriculture, Moon-orbit transportation
|
||
. Closed ecological life support system
|
||
. Lunar manufacturing facility: tools, containment systems, fabricated
|
||
assemblies. etc.
|
||
. Lunar power station - 100% lunar materials - derived
|
||
. Expanding population base
|
||
|
||
|