150 lines
8.4 KiB
Plaintext
150 lines
8.4 KiB
Plaintext
==============
|
||
INSIDE UFOLOGY
|
||
July 1988
|
||
==============
|
||
|
||
|
||
CUFOS MEMBERS DO ABOUT-FACE ON GULF BREEZE
|
||
|
||
ParaNet Alpha 07/03 -- "History tells us that [UFO] pictures that look
|
||
fake...ARE fake." Those words, written by ufologist Jerome Clark, may come
|
||
back to haunt him. Clark edits the International UFO Reporter, organ of
|
||
the Center for UFO Studies, and is a longtime contributing editor to FATE
|
||
Magazine. His words were part of an editorial for the March/April issue of
|
||
the IUR, entitled "Ill Breeze," and referred to the series of photos taken
|
||
by "Mr. Ed" in Gulf Breeze, FL, of an object that Clark said resembled
|
||
"something that you use to cover a lightbulb with."
|
||
|
||
Clark was echoing the view held by many CUFOS staffers that the Gulf
|
||
Breeze photos just look too "hokey" to be real. Indeed, sentiments seem to
|
||
be running along almost strictly organizational lines: Don Schmitt, Mark
|
||
Rodeghier, Michael Swords, George Eberhardt, and Robert Boyd, CUFOS mem-
|
||
bers all, have each expressed extreme doubts about the case and its inves-
|
||
tigation, while most MUFON higher-ups, including Dennis Stacy and Walt
|
||
Andrus, have maintained a "wait and see" posture -- at least, in the case
|
||
of Andrus, when they weren't gushing about the case being the "most sig-
|
||
nificant in history," etc. This schism gave the appearance of signifying a
|
||
chill in the usually friendly relationship between the two groups, an
|
||
appearance that Schmitt told ParaNet was illusory and unwarranted.
|
||
|
||
Feud or not, a thaw is most definitely in the air. Shmitt told us
|
||
that the problem seems to have been one of miscommunication. "There's a
|
||
lot to this case we hadn't seen before," he said. And now, ParaNet has
|
||
learned that Jerry Clark has changed his mind and is expressing "support"
|
||
for the case.
|
||
|
||
The turning point seems to be the presentation by Dr. Bruce Maccabee
|
||
at the 1988 MUFON Symposium in Lincoln, at which he showed the results
|
||
thus far of his photo analysis work. "We can only learn from this case,"
|
||
said Maccabee. "If its a hoax, we will learn about a new kind of hoaxer,
|
||
one who seeks no notoriety for himself, who is well-established in his
|
||
community, who cooperates fully with investigators, even going so far as
|
||
to build a special camera mount to our specifications, and who is so con-
|
||
fident in his work that he uses a special, sealed 3-D camera provided by
|
||
investigators. Obviously, if its real, we will learn a tremendous amount
|
||
about the nature of the UFO phenomenon."
|
||
|
||
Among other things, he had determined the object in at least one
|
||
photo to be around 18 feet in diameter and 14 feet tall. Use of the
|
||
special dual-camera mount referred to earlier had determined that the
|
||
image is not a double exposure. And triangulation of the two images showed
|
||
it to be not less than 150 feet from the photographer, out over the bay
|
||
that separates Gulf Breeze from the mainland of Florida.
|
||
|
||
One by one, Maccabee either refuted or clarified objections to the
|
||
case raised by, among others, Robert Boyd of CUFOS...27 points in all.
|
||
Even Phil Klass was impressed enough to compliment Maccabee, and seemed to
|
||
be at a loss for major objections.
|
||
|
||
In the meantime, Schmitt is not letting MUFON completely off the
|
||
hook. He still objects to the comments of some of the principals in the
|
||
case, most notably Andrus, Don Ware, and Budd Hopkins. He maintains they
|
||
were "hasty" and "unprofessional" in their early exposure of the details
|
||
of the reports, and in some of their positive, seemingly over-credulous
|
||
comments. And he wishes MUFON had shared some of the more positive details
|
||
of the photo-analysis earlier, before either group had published in their
|
||
respective journals.
|
||
|
||
And Jerry Clark? Well, he's changed his mind before. His address at
|
||
the symposium was on the return of the nuts-and-bolts theory of UFOs, and
|
||
how the "paraphysical" and "psychic" explanations were just cop-outs. This
|
||
from a man who had co-written a previous tome, with Loren Coleman, on the
|
||
psychic aspects of the UFO phenomenon.
|
||
|
||
[For the record, the ParaNet rating of the Gulf Breeze case stands
|
||
at S5/P5, Highly Strange, Data Unreliable/Probable Hoax; however, whereas
|
||
it previously bordered on P1, it is now very close to becoming a P3. Fur-
|
||
ther photoanalysis results, if in any way conclusive, will have a great in-
|
||
fluence on the rating.]
|
||
|
||
-----------------------
|
||
|
||
AND NOW YOU KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY....
|
||
|
||
Back in June of 1978, a retired Air Force Colonel appeared on TV's
|
||
Merv Griffin show to discuss his UFO sighting of 1954, when he was a B-52
|
||
pilot. "We were cruising at 10,000 feet when we spotted a target somewhere
|
||
around 20,000 to 25,000 feet. It was about seven miles in front of us to
|
||
our right, and we were overtaking it. It then started descending across
|
||
our flight path, and I decided to check it out. So I advanced power and
|
||
began closing a little faster and descending. We kept getting closer and
|
||
closer and pretty soon we were within a mile of the object, flying over
|
||
trees at 345 MPH."
|
||
The plane closed to within an eighth of a mile of the disc-shaped
|
||
object. "It was about 60 feet in diameter and 10 or 11 feet thick through
|
||
the center," he said. "It had what looked like a titanium-type finish
|
||
(silver gray). I pulled up and made a hard turn that put it out of sight
|
||
for roughly four seconds. We whipped back to pull up alongside of it and
|
||
it wasn't there. I zoomed up to 1500 feet. `There it is!' I said. It was
|
||
about 2 miles in front of us going across a field leaving a dusty trail
|
||
behind it. I guessed its speed at about 170 MPH." After another dive, the
|
||
crew lost sight of the object. "We never saw it again," said Air Force
|
||
Colonel William Coleman, former Public Information Officer for Project
|
||
Blue Book, who until that broadcast, had emphatically denied that he had
|
||
ever had such an experience. [Source: MUFON Journal, June 1988]
|
||
|
||
----------------------
|
||
|
||
MJ-12's DAY IN COURT?
|
||
|
||
The war of words between MJ-12 proponent William Moore and debunker
|
||
Phil Klass is heating up. After releasing a venomous attack on Klass' ob-
|
||
jections to MJ-12 through his publication, Fair Witness Focus, Moore pub-
|
||
lished a similar monograph in the proceedings of the 1988 MUFON Symposium.
|
||
Since Moore failed to show for the event, the paper was never delivered,
|
||
but Klass responded to the charges of "straight-out lying" and other ob-
|
||
fuscations by implying that he would be contacting attorneys about pos-
|
||
sible libel charges.
|
||
Moore, in the meantime, has sent an open letter to Klass in which he
|
||
outlines 19 incidents in which he feels Klass has strained the boundaries
|
||
of objective investigation, through the use of "vicious, vituperative at-
|
||
tacks," "insinuation," and "innuendo." Moore's major objection is Klass'
|
||
alleged implication that he, Moore, may be a willing accomplice to the
|
||
forgery of government documents in the MJ-12 affair. For example, in the
|
||
December 15, 1987 issue of "Saucer Smear," Klass is quoted as saying in a
|
||
letter, "In my opinion, Moore's behavior in the past six months is NOT
|
||
that of an innocent victim of somebody else's hoax." (Emphasis in origi-
|
||
nal).
|
||
Moore ends the letter by demanding of Klass "written acknowledgement
|
||
that you do not now and never have possessed proof positive that the...MJ-
|
||
12 documents...are fraudulent." Further, he wants Klass to acknowledge
|
||
that his public statements were not intended to imply that Moore or any of
|
||
his associates were involved in a hoax; and predictably, Moore wants a
|
||
written apology. The possibility of legal action is also dangled in
|
||
Moore's closing.
|
||
Now, would anyone care to speculate on the outcome of a jury trial
|
||
in which the MJ-12 documents were the central evidence?
|
||
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
AND FINALLY...
|
||
|
||
ParaNet has learned that a major TV project on UFOs is in the works,
|
||
one that is, naturally, hoped to "blow the lid off the whole thing." We
|
||
can't be more specific at this time, except to say that parts of it might
|
||
actually be done live. (No, Geraldo Rivera is NOT involved).
|
||
|
||
--Jim Speiser
|
||
Press ENTER to Continue:
|
||
|
||
|