99 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
99 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
I met with the author of the following document, Jerry Birdsall, at the
|
||
Lincoln Symposium, and found him to be genial and credible. He has asked
|
||
me to post this information with the understanding that I not mention the
|
||
name of the individual or the book referred to. You can correspond with
|
||
Jerry on this system, in private mail to: JERRY BIRDSALL.
|
||
--Jim Speiser
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
THE GROWING CONCERN REGARDING MISINFORMATION AND UNFOUNDED CONSPIRACY
|
||
SPECULATIONS IN THE UFO COMMUNITY
|
||
|
||
|
||
The purpose of this letter is to warn interested persons that mis-
|
||
information is occurring in the UFO community and in at least one case is
|
||
being carelessly propagated. This is based on my own experience due to the
|
||
publishing of a recent trade paperback concerning UFO phenomena in the
|
||
greater New York area. This book specifically contains naive and off-based
|
||
speculations about certain government involvement in this phenomena.
|
||
|
||
I am referred to in this book (under an alias) as a government agent
|
||
who interfered, threatened, and in general loused up research investiga-
|
||
tions. Nearly all of the recounting concerning me is either out of se-
|
||
quence, out of context, misinterpreted, or out-and-out wrong. It is true
|
||
that I did work for the Department of Defense when I first contacted the
|
||
author in 1984 (I left the government shortly thereafter). I volunteered
|
||
this information up front so that this sort of misunderstanding would not
|
||
happen and stressed that I was interested for purely personal reasons
|
||
only. I did not in any manner represent myself as an "agent" from the
|
||
government as was alluded. The main reason that I wanted to meet the
|
||
author was to try to get him funding through the Fund For UFO Research
|
||
(FUFOR) of which I was a member while I lived in the DC area. As a point
|
||
of fact, several key members of FUFOR are employed by the government -one
|
||
by the Navy, one a Pentagon lawyer, and one by the CIA.
|
||
|
||
I tried to contact the author several times by phone between the
|
||
Fall of '84 to the present. It was only just recently that I finally got
|
||
through to him. He was not interested in hearing me out but chose instead
|
||
to cling to his seemingly paranoid conspiracy beliefs. I think that this
|
||
is quite unfortunate - that someone who purports to be an authority on
|
||
UFOs hasn't the interest or courtesy to listen to someone who he has in
|
||
effect slandered in the eyes of the UFO community. And what happened to
|
||
scientific objectivity? We should all truly examine our definitions of
|
||
what an authority in this field means. There are those who represent them-
|
||
selves as such who are doing harm, in my opinion, to the future of UFO re-
|
||
search. If the legitimate UFO community as a whole shared information more
|
||
openly and networked more efficiently, consensus approval could be given
|
||
to those who wish approval from the UFO community as legitimate and re-
|
||
sponsible researchers.
|
||
|
||
I contend that there is no room for unfounded, wild speculation in a
|
||
field such as this where things are bizarre enough on their own without
|
||
the creation of contrived, self indulgent, half-cocked bizarreness. I am
|
||
really disappointed in the author, and have lost nearly all respect for
|
||
him. Irresponsible writing of this nature only serves to raise the ambient
|
||
level of paranoia, muddles future research, and is a true disservice to
|
||
the field in general.
|
||
|
||
I first found out about the author from a local newspaper article
|
||
when I came home to Connecticut one weekend. I was living and working in
|
||
Maryland at the time. This was in the summer of 1984. I called him from my
|
||
home in Maryland (he said I called from my office), we spoke briefly (he
|
||
said I quizzed him for an hour), and I didn't mention any details of what
|
||
work I did until we met at my parent's home weeks later. Furthermore, I
|
||
only had his home number and could not have called him from work because I
|
||
didn't have his work number. In fact, I didn't even have an office!
|
||
|
||
It would take several pages to list all the errors about me in his
|
||
book, and that is not the point I wish to make here. If the author was
|
||
half the investigator that he makes himself out to be, you [would] think
|
||
that he would have bothered to verify that I indeed was from Connecticut,
|
||
and not only that, but was raised in the same town he was! He did admit to
|
||
me that his editor did change a few things around. I contend that the mo-
|
||
tive was to add drama to help sell his book.
|
||
|
||
It was just recently when I had finally spoken to the author and
|
||
heard his position that I felt I owed this to the UFO community at least
|
||
to set matters straight. I am all for the government coming clean on all
|
||
it knows about UFOs. I am however totally against irresponsible, conjec-
|
||
tural accusations being leveled against anyone - the government included.
|
||
I think it is absurd that two persons who are on the same side of the
|
||
fence - even between the same fenceposts - on the UFO issue should be at
|
||
odds with one another. This is through no fault of my own. The author
|
||
knows that anytime he wishes to talk, I am more than willing.
|
||
|
||
I feel now more than ever it is time for responsible, objective, and
|
||
open-minded research into all areas scientific, psychological, sociologi-
|
||
cal, medical and paranormal if we are to make any real progress regarding
|
||
the UFO question. This is the time for more cooperation and sharing of
|
||
information within the UFO community. As our awareness of the UFO issue
|
||
grows broader, and our notions of the phenomena become more complex and
|
||
unusual, I think we will find that we will be straining our perceptions of
|
||
reality itself. It will become increasingly difficult to remain objective.
|
||
It is time we put our preconceived notions aside and reexamine the issues
|
||
with a fresh eye.
|
||
|
||
Jerry Birdsall
|
||
d such as this where things are bizarre enough on their own without
|
||
the creation of contrived, self indulgent, half-co
|
||
|