397 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
397 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=1, RM=70, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
taken from Mufon brochure
|
|
with Vangard commentary
|
|
|
|
Mufon Metroplex presents "The Philadelphia Experiment"
|
|
by Al Bielek
|
|
on Saturday, January 13, 1990
|
|
in Dallas, Texas
|
|
|
|
The Philadelphia Experiment (U.S. Government designation
|
|
"Project Rainbow") had its origin in a feasibility study
|
|
started in the early 1930's at the University of Chicago
|
|
(1931) and later moved to Princeton's Institute of Advanced
|
|
Studies. Involved in the Program at various times were
|
|
renowned scientists that included Dr. Albert Einstein, Dr.
|
|
John von Neumann, Dr. Nikola Tesla, and others.
|
|
|
|
Originally a theoretical study in methods to produce an
|
|
"invisibility screen", the first fully successful test in
|
|
1940 converted the program to a military project : "Project
|
|
Rainbow".
|
|
|
|
As a military (Navy) program, a volunteer crew had to be
|
|
trained and a ship selected - the Eldridge (DE 173).
|
|
Equipment had to be ordered, built, and installed for
|
|
seaborne tests. Sea trials were conducted outside of
|
|
Philadelphia, in the Delaware Bay area.
|
|
|
|
First tests were in July, 1943 with serious personnel
|
|
problems resulting. The final test - 12 August 1943 - was an
|
|
utter disaster to ship and crew : the ship survived after its
|
|
return to normal time and location in the Philadelphia
|
|
harbor.
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Navy continues to deny to this day that this project
|
|
ever took place : or that it was coupled through hyperspace
|
|
to another project in the future (1983).
|
|
|
|
The expectations for the project and the nature of the
|
|
problems with the crew will be developed and discussed, as
|
|
well as why the "human equation" failed. A review of prior
|
|
publications attempting to expose this project will also be
|
|
discussed.
|
|
|
|
The lecturer, Alfred D. Bielek, was born in August 1916 as
|
|
Edward A. Cameron, son of Alexander D. Cameron, Sr. He
|
|
attended several Universities, graduating with a Ph D. in
|
|
Physics (1939). Enlisting in the Navy along with his
|
|
brother, they eventually became directly involved in the
|
|
"Philadelphia Experiment". The story of how he - Edward
|
|
Cameron - was eventually removed form the project and became
|
|
Alfred D. Bielek is a bizarre story of government
|
|
brainwashing and manipulation, and destruction of a career.
|
|
The story of his brother is still more bizarre as well as
|
|
tragic.
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bielek is today a retired electronics engineer with 30
|
|
years of a consulting career behind him.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following is a Vangard Sciences commentary by Jerry W. Decker
|
|
and is based on personal studies in a variety of subjects
|
|
including the "Philadelphia Experminent"
|
|
and attendance of the lecture
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bielek is a most engaging speaker. He presents a wide range
|
|
of popular references during his talks and weaves quite a web.
|
|
|
|
However, the information available prior to the 1983 movie, "The
|
|
Philadelphia Experiment" does not concern the prospect of time
|
|
transport.
|
|
|
|
The stated focus of the "Philadelphia Experiment" project was to
|
|
"achieve radar invisibility". Mr. Bielek states that his
|
|
"memories began coming back AFTER seeing the movie in 1988."
|
|
|
|
I got the impression that he incorporates new topics into his
|
|
storyline as fast as he hears them, claiming that his "memory
|
|
suddenly came back on that."
|
|
|
|
Another major flaw was the statement that Nikola Tesla was in
|
|
association with and in charge of the project. This is highly
|
|
incredible since the experiment occurred in July, 43' and Tesla
|
|
died on January 7, 1943 in New York City.
|
|
|
|
Yet another reference which is difficult to believe is that
|
|
Gustave LeBon was a consultant and worked with Tesla and Einstein
|
|
on the project.
|
|
|
|
Bielek says that Thorn EMI, producer of the film, "The
|
|
Philadelphia Experiment" was banned from showing it in September
|
|
1983. He later says it was given a limited showing in the USA.
|
|
|
|
Thorn Instruments, an old English manufacturer of labware from the
|
|
early 1800's bought into EMI and had in their archives a story of
|
|
a disappearing ship with a picture of the "time traveller" who
|
|
brought it to them.
|
|
|
|
In the picture were the Wilson brothers of Thorn, Aleister Crowley
|
|
(infamous occultist) and a 4th person who was Preston Nickles.
|
|
|
|
This "traveller" said to be Peter Nickles is a past president of
|
|
the USPA (United States Psychotronic Association) and was
|
|
supposedly in the picture taken in 1890. Supposedly Mr. Nickles
|
|
was shown the picture by a Thorn/EMI representative (Chief
|
|
Archivist). It showed him about 10 years older than now, 1989.
|
|
|
|
They would not let Nickles copy the picture. Bielek says Crowley
|
|
said that Nickles was a man out of the future and gave them the
|
|
story of the disappearing ship.
|
|
|
|
Alan Batchelor? is said to be another survivor of the experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Rainbow was said to be the original name of the project,
|
|
later changed to Project Phoenix. It took four hours for the
|
|
disappearance from Philadelphia to return.
|
|
|
|
Bielek also said EBE-1 (extra-terrestrial biological entity #1)
|
|
gave the secret of the transistor to the government, (no time
|
|
frame). (Of course, we all know the germanium transistor was
|
|
invented by Thomas Henry Moray and stolen by Bell Labs)
|
|
|
|
Bielek says his brother time travelled to 1983, lost his "time
|
|
lock", aged about 1 year per hour and died shortly thereafter. He
|
|
then said his brother was later reborn. (I don't pretend to
|
|
understand this.)
|
|
|
|
Supposedly every 20 years on the 12th of August, the magnetic
|
|
energy peaks, i.e. 1943-1963-1983 to allow a synchronicity.
|
|
Linking and coupling to the surge would cause a shift, (again
|
|
confusing).
|
|
|
|
Dr. Von Neumann (of computer fame) was supposedly involved in the
|
|
"Philadelphia Experiment" with Tesla, Einstein and LeBon. Bielek
|
|
says he is recorded to have died in 1953 or 1957.
|
|
|
|
In Phoenix, 1986, Bielek's memories recalled a site in Montauk
|
|
which might be where Von Neumann currently resides in obscurity.
|
|
In January 1988, Bielek's memories of the "Philadelphia
|
|
Experiment" were recalled.
|
|
|
|
Another major discrepancy, records indicate the original manned
|
|
experiment occurred on October 28, 1943, NOT the 12th August,
|
|
1943.
|
|
|
|
Despite the irregularities, there were some interesting comments
|
|
made in regard to time.
|
|
|
|
The two most outstanding things about the public lecture was the
|
|
showing of a slide purported to be a "Zero Time Reference
|
|
Generator" which looks strangely similar to an old Army field
|
|
kitchen refrigeration unit. No technical details were given or
|
|
offered.
|
|
|
|
This device was purported to be the oscillator which drove the
|
|
coils of the experiment. Mr. Bielek claimed that the unit shown
|
|
was used to synchronize two separate signals (one for each coil).
|
|
|
|
The literature of the "Philadelphia Experiment" is replete with
|
|
descriptions of the technology. Further findings by our group
|
|
and associates indicate a more "coherent" approach.
|
|
|
|
Basically, a coil was wound on each half of the ship and driven by
|
|
separate oscillators, synced with an adjustable phase angle to
|
|
create a "Scalar-type wave". This distorted the field matrices of
|
|
matter encompassed within the field for "unusual effects".
|
|
|
|
Keely was more than familiar with this field of compound
|
|
vibrations and their applications, HELL, HE PRECEDED ALL OTHERS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The other interesting comment was about a Professor of Mathematics
|
|
at the University of Wisconsin in the 30's. His name - Henry
|
|
Levenson. He specialized in time studies and developed a time
|
|
variant equation.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Levenson co-authored 2 books and wrote 1. None of these books
|
|
are available (of course) but Bielek indicates they might be
|
|
available in restricted or private libraries such as Princeton.
|
|
|
|
The time comments centered around a concept involving a TIME LOCK
|
|
which was "encoded" at the time of creation of all matter, living
|
|
or otherwise. Thus, all matter created on the Earth, must be
|
|
"clocked" to the Earth time lock. The Earth must be "clocked" to
|
|
the Solar time lock and that to the Galaxial.
|
|
|
|
If your time lock became "distorted" by high intensity fields, it
|
|
would create a variety of problems due to the instability of the
|
|
recovery process, assuming that recovery could be possible.
|
|
|
|
Bielek claimed that the original system was powered with a 500 KW
|
|
generator, later increased to 2 MegaWatt. Another experiment was
|
|
supposed to have been done with 3 field coils, all synced to the
|
|
same clocking system.
|
|
|
|
The 3 field design created major arcing and caused a return to the
|
|
2 field design. Bielek also claims that there were 3000 tubes
|
|
used in the system.
|
|
|
|
If you get the chance to hear Mr. Bielek, I do recommend it if
|
|
only for entertainment. However, if you want useable data, stick
|
|
to books periodicals and your own research.
|
|
|
|
The time theories espoused by Bielek seem particularly worthy of
|
|
study. Much of the "Scalar" craze indicates a technology which
|
|
could duplicate or surpass the original "Philadelphia Experiment".
|
|
|
|
Just for grins, I will state my own conclusion and theory on the
|
|
subject. I base it on UFO phenomena, the work of Dr. Harold S.
|
|
Burr, Dr. Walter Russell, W. J. Hooper and personal observations.
|
|
|
|
If the original purpose was "invisibility" as stated in various
|
|
articles and commentaries, then why did a SHIP wind up in a HARBOR
|
|
FILLED WITH WATER and NOT in the middle of a city street or a
|
|
wheat field in Kansas.
|
|
|
|
Seems that something is amiss as other accounts of the experiment
|
|
state it was not carried out once but several times. Each time,
|
|
the ship "teleported" to a watery target. What are the chances
|
|
that EVERY TIME the ship would "land" in water??
|
|
|
|
As I understand it, partially based on this quote from our file
|
|
PHILAD1.ZIP:
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Navy, for one, seemed obsessed with the idea of
|
|
the perfect camouflage - the ultimate secret weapon -
|
|
INVISIBILITY. If only one of their warships could be made
|
|
invisible, think of the havoc it could cause the enemy.
|
|
Havoc that could conceivably bring the bitter and long-
|
|
enduring war to an end.
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 28, 1943, an experiment was conducted at the
|
|
Philadelphia Navy Yard. This event, appropriately enough,
|
|
became known as "The Philadelphia Experiment".
|
|
|
|
A Navy escort destroyer named the DE 173 (better known as
|
|
the U.S.S. Eldridge), with hundreds of tons of electronic
|
|
equipment aboard, lay in its dock. Scientists on shore
|
|
started the experiment which involved Dr. Albert Einstein's
|
|
"Unified Field Theory", a completed version appearing in the
|
|
period 1925-27. "Withdrawn" as incomplete, the revised
|
|
theory returned in 1940. The result of the experiment was
|
|
brain-rattling!
|
|
|
|
The ship faded rapidly from sight in a foggy, green
|
|
mist - and COMPLETELY VANISHED! Speechless amazement
|
|
struck the wide-eyed scientists ashore.
|
|
|
|
Then, after a few minutes (another account makes that
|
|
"seconds"), the ship reappeared where it had formerly
|
|
been, to its Philadelphia dock, and regained its visibility!
|
|
But that was not all. Something equally stunning was
|
|
discovered to have happened during its vanishment.
|
|
|
|
--> During that period of a few minutes (or seconds) the ship had
|
|
--> shown up at its other Norfolk Navy Yard dock in Virginia!
|
|
--> So, not only had it successfully become invisible, but it had
|
|
--> also been TELEPORTED!
|
|
|
|
Notice the arrows and how the ship went to its OTHER DOCK but in
|
|
Virginia, not the one in Philadelphia.
|
|
|
|
Since we live in a serial time which clocks our every action and
|
|
records it on the surrounding space continuum. Our presence at
|
|
in any space at a given timeframe is captured by local
|
|
space/matter conditions so that the moving of the earth and our
|
|
solar system in its orbit would not leave us in space were we to
|
|
teleport.
|
|
|
|
So we have slices of wherever we have been since our creation. We
|
|
should be able to step back into any given slice, not in time,
|
|
only in space.
|
|
|
|
Another condition of this concept is that the PRESENT represents a
|
|
suction which maintains matter as a balloon in the "holographic
|
|
image" of a mass in a single time frame and in a specific spatial
|
|
location. Remember that this is in the PRESENT ONLY.
|
|
|
|
Since the Eldridge had a history of having been at its OTHER DOCK
|
|
SOMETIME IN THE PAST and probably on several occasions, then if we
|
|
could distort the tempic (time) field enough, we could momentarily
|
|
teleport the ship NOT THROUGH TIME BUT THROUGH SPACE to a place IT
|
|
HAD BEEN BEFORE.
|
|
|
|
Now, if during that act and BEFORE COMPLETE TRANSFER WAS
|
|
ACCOMPLISHED, someone cut the power, the portions of matter which
|
|
had teleported would be "sucked" back like a vacuum to the source,
|
|
i.e. the original spatial location of the PRESENT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Think of it as two balloons. A full one in Philadelphia
|
|
represents the Eldridge. At the port in Virginia, an empty
|
|
balloon represents the holographic image (with no matter) and of
|
|
a SPATIAL image sometime in the past.
|
|
|
|
(Of course, for each timeframe past, an empty holographic image
|
|
balloon lies there recording the passage through time of each
|
|
object, just like a frame of a comic strip)
|
|
|
|
If we slowly squeeze the full balloon (representing the Eldridge
|
|
at the Philadelphia port in the original or PRESENT location), a
|
|
connecting tube to the Virginia port allows the passage of
|
|
"matter" into the empty Eldridge.
|
|
|
|
We get to a point where the source is 1/4 empty and the target is
|
|
3/4 full.
|
|
|
|
IF at this point, someone RELEASES THE PRESSURE, what happens?
|
|
|
|
The "teleported matter" will surge back into the ORIGINAL SPATIAL
|
|
location which exerts a vacuum to keep its balloon full.
|
|
|
|
Of course, once the transfer is complete, the suction then takes
|
|
place from the target spatial location.
|
|
|
|
Since the pressure (high intensity pulsing magnetic waves) was
|
|
released before the transfer was complete, the resulting surges
|
|
created massive distortions in all mass encompassed by the field.
|
|
|
|
Living organisms record field effects in their tissues.
|
|
Therefore, all tissure formations which took place during the
|
|
surge, recorded the surges to "haunt" the victims. This
|
|
apparently distorts the Bio-plasmic field also to cause major
|
|
physical problems.
|
|
|
|
This is probably damnably confusing, but I can't do pictures with
|
|
this word processor, so words must suffice.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Hope you have found this informative and of
|
|
sufficient interest to get to this point.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for supporting KeelyNet and Vangard Sciences!
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINIS
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|