1567 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
1567 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
DATE OF UPLOAD: December 30, 1989
|
|
|
|
ORIGIN OF UPLOAD: ParaNet Information Service
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTED BY: Robert B. Klinn - ParaNet Director of
|
|
|
|
Investigations and Research
|
|
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
(C) Copyright 1989 ParaNet Information Service
|
|
|
|
All Rights Reserved unless copyrighted by Author.
|
|
|
|
THIS FILE WAS PREPARED BY PARANET ALPHA -- PARANET INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
SERVICE
|
|
|
|
1-303-232-6115 9600 BAUD
|
|
|
|
1-303-232-8303 VOICE
|
|
|
|
DENVER, COLORADO
|
|
|
|
NOTE: THESE FILES ARE NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE
|
|
|
|
OF THE PARANET INFORMATION SERVICE NETWORK
|
|
|
|
========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the Record, KLAS-TV, Las Vegas, Nevada, 12/9/89, 7:00 p.m.-
|
|
|
|
7:30 p.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Knapp, producer/host
|
|
|
|
Robert Lazar, guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Hello, and welcome to On the Record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One month ago, we began a series of reports about UFOs. With the
|
|
|
|
exception of a few cranky newspaper people, the response has been
|
|
|
|
overwhelmingly positive. We've had requests for more information
|
|
|
|
from all over the country and from all over the world. Tonight
|
|
|
|
we're going to delve a little deeper into the subject with the
|
|
|
|
man who was the impetus for our report in the first place, Bob
|
|
|
|
Lazar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob, good to have you here. A thumbnail sketch of yourself for
|
|
|
|
those who might not be familiar with your background.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Lazar:
|
|
|
|
I worked at Los Alamos National Lab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
As a physicist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
As a physicist, and hired as a senior staff physicist at Area S-
|
|
|
|
4, for what I was told anyway was the United States Navy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Where is S-4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It's about 10 to 15 miles south of Groom Lake, about 125 miles
|
|
|
|
north of Las Vegas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
How did you get the job?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
I really don't want to mention the guy who I got it through. But
|
|
|
|
I was referred to a person at EG&G to drop off my resume to;
|
|
|
|
that's where I was interviewed; though the job is COMPLETELY
|
|
|
|
unrelated to EG&G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What did they tell you you were going to be doing? Or DID they
|
|
|
|
tell you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
No, they really didn't tell me until the very end. They said a
|
|
|
|
high-technology job, something that I'd be very interested in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Okay, so you get hired. And what happens? Do you fly up there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Fly up there. First day was reading briefings and that sort of
|
|
|
|
thing. And it became evident to me pretty quickly the level of
|
|
|
|
technology they were dealing with: gravitational propulsion and
|
|
|
|
things that science has really only barely touched on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
We'll get into the things that you saw in a couple of minutes.
|
|
|
|
But it's been about a little more than three weeks since your
|
|
|
|
identity was made public. We had you on another program a couple
|
|
|
|
of months ago -- using an assumed name and having you in
|
|
|
|
silhouette -- but since your identity has been made public and
|
|
|
|
since this information has been made public, what's it been like?
|
|
|
|
What's been the response from people that see you on the street?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The response has been almost all favorable. In fact, everyone
|
|
|
|
that I've run into has been very supportive, very interested. I
|
|
|
|
guess there's just two or three letters --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
-- from people that don't believe you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah. Essentially.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Responses from other media outlets as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
They want to interview you? What do they want?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Essentially everything, yes. Radio interviews, TV interviews. A
|
|
|
|
lot of people want to dig back into my background and re-trace
|
|
|
|
everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Many of the people who have been calling -- calling us as well --
|
|
|
|
were under the impression that either you've gone underground or
|
|
|
|
you've been silenced or we've been silenced by dark and sinister
|
|
|
|
forces. Anything like that happen to you so far?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
That's ridiculous. People are always going over the deep end on
|
|
|
|
that. And no one's told me -- other than originally -- not to
|
|
|
|
say anything. And I'm sure no one's come forward to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
But in the beginning, they told you to keep quiet about this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah! It's the most secret program in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
In what way did they try to make sure you kept your mouth shut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Everything up to death threats. I mean CONSTANT reminders of it,
|
|
|
|
signing away my constututional rights for fair trial and that
|
|
|
|
sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
And since this thing, your phone's been tapped, you believe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I believe. I have a tap detector, and occasionally after I
|
|
|
|
pick up the phone, a little red light goes on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
The reason you came forward with the information to begin with?
|
|
|
|
Is it related to the fact that they were bothering you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it was essentially to stop that. What had happened was, I
|
|
|
|
sent in a request for my birth certificate, and as it turned out
|
|
|
|
it wasn't there anymore, that I wasn't born at the hospital! And
|
|
|
|
that kind of got me wondering what's going on. I put in a
|
|
|
|
request for some other information, previous jobs, and that was
|
|
|
|
also gone, and I thought something had to be done before I
|
|
|
|
disappeared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
The same thing -- it was Los Alamos? They've never heard of you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Anything happened since the reports have aired?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
They let me know that they were around by doing stupid, childish
|
|
|
|
little things. But nothing serious, no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
You were worried about your LIFE though for a while there,
|
|
|
|
weren't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
That was one of the reasons to come on and let everything out on
|
|
|
|
the air; it's a little of insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Are you worried any more? Do you get the feeling you're over the
|
|
|
|
hump?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
To some degree, yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Do you find that most people really believe you or that they just
|
|
|
|
want more information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
I think alot of people believe what I said, but the majority I
|
|
|
|
think do just want more information, too. It's an in-depth
|
|
|
|
subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Let's look at some of the technology you saw. When did you first
|
|
|
|
get the idea, what's the first thing you saw that made you
|
|
|
|
convinced that it's not from here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The first thing was HANDS-on experience with the anti-matter
|
|
|
|
reactor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Explain what that is and how it works and what it does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It's a plate about 18 inches in diameter with a sphere on top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
We have a tape of a model that a friend of yours made. You can
|
|
|
|
narrate along. There it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Inside that tower is a chip of Element 115 they just put in
|
|
|
|
there. That's a super-heavy element. The lid goes on top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And as far as any other of the workings of it, I really don't
|
|
|
|
know, you know, [such as] what's inside the bottom of it . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 sets up a gravitational field around the top. That little
|
|
|
|
wave guide you saw being put on the top: it essentially siphons
|
|
|
|
off the gravity wave, and that's later amplified in the lower
|
|
|
|
portion of the craft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But just in general, the whole technology is virtually unknown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Now we saw the model. We saw the pictures of it there. It looks
|
|
|
|
really, really simple, almost too simple to actually do anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Working parts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
None detectable. Essentially, what the job was was to back-
|
|
|
|
engineer everthing, where you have a finished product and to step
|
|
|
|
backwards and find out how it was made or how it could be made
|
|
|
|
with earthly materials. There hasn't been very much progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
How long do you think they've had this technology up there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It seems like quite a while, but I really don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What could you do with an anti-matter generator? What does it
|
|
|
|
do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It converts anti-matter . . .
|
|
|
|
It DOESN'T convert anti-matter! There's an annihilation
|
|
|
|
reaction. It's an extremely powerful reaction, a hundred percent
|
|
|
|
conversion of matter to energy, unlike a fission or fusion
|
|
|
|
reaction which is somewhere around eight-tenths of one percent
|
|
|
|
conversion
|
|
|
|
of matter to energy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
How does it work? What starts the reaction going?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Really, once the 115 is put in, the reaction is initiated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Automatic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
I don't understand. I mean, there's no button to push or
|
|
|
|
anything?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
No, there's no button to push or anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently, the 115 under bombardment with protons lets out an
|
|
|
|
anti-matter particle. This anti-matter particle will react with
|
|
|
|
any matter whatsoever, which I imagine there is some target
|
|
|
|
system inside the reactor. This, in turn, releases heat, and
|
|
|
|
somewhere within that system there is a one-hundred-percent-
|
|
|
|
efficient thermionic generator, essentially a heat-to-electrical
|
|
|
|
generator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
How is this anti-matter reactor connected to gravity generation
|
|
|
|
that you were talking about earlier?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Well, that reactor serves two purposes; it provides a tremendous
|
|
|
|
amount of electrical power, which is almost a by-product. The
|
|
|
|
gravitational wave gets formed at the sphere, and that's through
|
|
|
|
some action of the 115, and the exact action I don't think anyone
|
|
|
|
really knows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wave guide siphons off that gravity wave, and that's
|
|
|
|
channeled above the top of the disk to the lower part where there
|
|
|
|
are three gravity amplifiers, which amplify and direct that
|
|
|
|
gravity wave.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
In essence creating their own gravitational field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Their own gravitational field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
You're fairly convinced that science on earth doesn't have this
|
|
|
|
technology right now? We have it now at S-4, I guess, but we
|
|
|
|
didn't create it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Why not? Why couldn't we?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The technology's not even -- We don't even know what gravity IS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Well, what is it? What have you learned about what gravity is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Gravity is a wave. There are many different theories, wave
|
|
|
|
included. It's been theorized that gravity is also particles,
|
|
|
|
gravitons, which is also incorrect. But gravity is a wave. The
|
|
|
|
basic wave they can actually tap off of an element: why that is
|
|
|
|
I'
|
|
|
|
m not exactly sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
So you can produce your own gravity. What does that mean? What
|
|
|
|
does that allow you to do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It allows you to do virtually anything. Gravity distorts time
|
|
|
|
and space. By doing that, now you're into a different mode of
|
|
|
|
travel, where instead of traveling in a linear method -- going
|
|
|
|
from Point A to B -- now you can distort time and space to where
|
|
|
|
you essentially bring the mountain to Mohammad; you almost bring
|
|
|
|
your destination to you without moving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And since you're distorting time, all this takes place in between
|
|
|
|
moments of time. It's such a far-fetched concept!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Of course, what the UFO skeptics say is, yeah, there's life out
|
|
|
|
there elsewhere in the universe; it can never come here; it's
|
|
|
|
just too darn far. With the kind of technology you're talking
|
|
|
|
about, it makes such considerations irrelevant about distance and
|
|
|
|
time and things like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Exactly, because when you are distorting time, there's no longer
|
|
|
|
a normal reference of time. And that's what producing your own
|
|
|
|
gravity does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
You can go forward or backward in time? Is that's what you're
|
|
|
|
saying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
No, not essentially. It would be easier with a model. On the
|
|
|
|
bottom side of the disk are the three gravity generators. When
|
|
|
|
they want to travel to a distant point, the disk turns on its
|
|
|
|
side. The three gravity generators produce a gravitational beam.
|
|
|
|
What they do is they converge the three gravity generators onto
|
|
|
|
a point and use that as a focal point; and they bring them up to
|
|
|
|
power and PULL that point towards the disk. The disk itself will
|
|
|
|
attach ONTO that point and snap back -- AS THEY RELEASE SPACE
|
|
|
|
BACK TO THAT POINT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now all this happens in the distortion of time, so time is not
|
|
|
|
incrementing. So the SPEED is essentially infinite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
We'll get into the disks in a moment. But the first time you saw
|
|
|
|
the anti-matter reactor in operation or a demonstration -- you
|
|
|
|
had a couple of demonstrations -- tell me about that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The first time I saw it in operation, we just put -- a friend I
|
|
|
|
worked with, Barry -- put the fuel in the reactor, put the lid on
|
|
|
|
as, as was shown there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediately, a gravitational field developed, and he said, "Feel
|
|
|
|
it!" And it felt like you bring two like poles of a magnet
|
|
|
|
together; you can do that with your hand. And it was FASCINATING
|
|
|
|
to do that, impossible, except on something with great mass! And
|
|
|
|
obviously this is just a . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And it was a REPULSION field. In fact, we kind of fooled around
|
|
|
|
with it for a little while. And we threw golf balls off it. And
|
|
|
|
it was just a really unique thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
And you had other demonstrations to show you that this is pretty
|
|
|
|
wild stuff, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, they did. They were able to channel the field off in a
|
|
|
|
demonstration that they created an INTENSE gravitational area.
|
|
|
|
And you began to see a small little black disk form, and that was
|
|
|
|
the bending of the light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Just like a black hole floating around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, well, a black hole is a bad analogy, but yeah, essentially.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
And they gave you some kind of demonstration about time,
|
|
|
|
involving a candle? Explain how that works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, they took a candle and lit it and put it in the distorted
|
|
|
|
gravitational field, which distorts time, and the candle just
|
|
|
|
stood there. It didn't melt or burn. It was REALLY
|
|
|
|
unbelievable!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
You had to be floored by seeing all this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Oh I was! That's why I'm kind of laughing about it now because
|
|
|
|
it must sound ridiculous to everyone. But it's just phenomenal.
|
|
|
|
I mean this is really alien technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
About the 115: We talked a little bit about it in the series of
|
|
|
|
reports. Explain what it is again and why you believe it could
|
|
|
|
not be manufactured here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Okay, it's a super-heavy element: On the periodic chart, which
|
|
|
|
lists all the elements found on earth and that can be
|
|
|
|
synthesized, I think the highest element we've synthesized has
|
|
|
|
been about Element 106.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now from 103 -- or actually, anything higher than plutonium up --
|
|
|
|
the half-life begins to drop; in other words, the element
|
|
|
|
disintegrates. When you get up to Element 106, it's only around
|
|
|
|
for a very small amount of time. Even science today theorizes
|
|
|
|
that up around Element 113 to 116 -- somewhere in there -- they
|
|
|
|
should again become stable. This is in fact true. That's what
|
|
|
|
Element 115 is; it's a stable element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To synthesize it would be impossible. The way we synthesize
|
|
|
|
heavy elements is, we take a stable element like bismuth or
|
|
|
|
something like that, or plutionium, whatever, put it in an
|
|
|
|
accelerator, and BOMBARD it with protons. Essentially what
|
|
|
|
you're trying to do is plug in protons into the atoms and
|
|
|
|
increase the atomic number. To do that to the level of Element
|
|
|
|
115 would just take an infinite amount of power and an infinite
|
|
|
|
amount of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What kinds of things, what capabilities would a heavy element
|
|
|
|
like this have -- I mean other than producing power? Obviously,
|
|
|
|
it can produce a LOT of power, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
It in itself is not anti-matter. It just has a unique property
|
|
|
|
of producing it. Any of the other basic properties it has I
|
|
|
|
really don't know of. But using just the anti-matter-producing
|
|
|
|
property, the potential for a weapon is staggering! It's
|
|
|
|
absolutely staggering!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Like what? A pound of it: what could it do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Well, 2.2 pounds is the energy equivalent of 47 10-megaton
|
|
|
|
hydrogen bombs. I mean, it's a good bang! And a pound of a
|
|
|
|
super-heavy element is maybe the size of a plum or something like
|
|
|
|
that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
I guess what I've heard most from people who just don't buy the
|
|
|
|
whole story is that sure, maybe you work at an area called S-4,
|
|
|
|
and maybe it is a secret area, but what you were shown is stuff
|
|
|
|
that we've made. That we made this 115 -- if it is 115 -- that
|
|
|
|
we made the flying disks, that we made these anti-matter
|
|
|
|
reactors, because these are advances that you just don't know
|
|
|
|
about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Hardly.
|
|
|
|
[Lazar laughs.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Why not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Well, the 115, it's impossible. And the FACT that the main job
|
|
|
|
of everyone there is to find out how everything's made; I mean
|
|
|
|
that just contradicts everything right off the bat. The
|
|
|
|
materials are completely alien to us, and just the overall idea
|
|
|
|
of the project is: Hey, can we duplicate this with materials
|
|
|
|
that we have here? So obviously, it was something that was found
|
|
|
|
or given, for that matter, and we're just trying to duplicate it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
The 115: Where do you suppose it came from then? I mean, what
|
|
|
|
kind of environment would that kind of element come from?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The only place that 115 could be made would have to be in a
|
|
|
|
natural situation, somewhere maybe on the fringes of a supernova
|
|
|
|
or somewhere around maybe a binary star system, where there was
|
|
|
|
more mass in the primordial mix of that system, where heavier
|
|
|
|
elements would have had a chance to form, when the stars were
|
|
|
|
collapsing and there were huge amounts of energy being released.
|
|
|
|
It's something along these lines; it has to be a naturally-
|
|
|
|
occurring element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
You saw an anti-matter reactor. You saw gravity-propulsion
|
|
|
|
systems in flying disks, flying saucers. You saw this Element
|
|
|
|
115. You also read a series of reports that had other stunning
|
|
|
|
information. Can you give an overview of the kind of things that
|
|
|
|
were in these reports?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The reason I didn't do that before was, first of all they were
|
|
|
|
just reports. Everything else I had hands-on experience with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now there was LOTS of strange information in the reports, but
|
|
|
|
there again it's just printed material and it could be
|
|
|
|
disinformation. I don't know. But certainly, the information I
|
|
|
|
did read in the reports about 115, the disks, the grav -- I mean,
|
|
|
|
that all had material that related to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reports went into aliens and even went along the lines of
|
|
|
|
religious --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Well, we can let our audience know. I mean we discussed this,
|
|
|
|
when we were putting this series of reports together, whether to
|
|
|
|
get into the alien thing or not, and we decided not to for the
|
|
|
|
time being. It's not like you're hiding something from the
|
|
|
|
audience or whatever, it was just a decision we made. But you
|
|
|
|
did see reports -- whether they're true or not -- Government
|
|
|
|
reports about aliens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What were the reports?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
There were photographs of aliens. There were autopsy reports.
|
|
|
|
There was really a wealth of information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What did they look like?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The typical "grey." I hate to say that, like anyone knows what a
|
|
|
|
typical grey is. It's a creature, probably three and a half to
|
|
|
|
four feet tall, a large hairless head, black, slanted eyes, long
|
|
|
|
arms, very thin-looking. I don't know how else I would describe
|
|
|
|
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What does an autopsy report look like? What's included in an
|
|
|
|
autopsy report that you said you read?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
The reason I call it an autopsy report is I saw the carcass -- it
|
|
|
|
was obviously a dead alien -- carcass cut up and it was all dark
|
|
|
|
inside like it had an iron base. The reason I say iron is
|
|
|
|
because it was very dark blood or whatever. I'm not a doctor,
|
|
|
|
but it seemed to be one large organ in the body as opposed to
|
|
|
|
identifiable heart and lungs and that sort of thing, but just one
|
|
|
|
gooey mess in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What did the report say? It had pictures; it had to have some
|
|
|
|
words: "Here's Exhibit A, an alien"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Essentially so! They had weights and densities of the organs,
|
|
|
|
said there were no conclusions drawn, but it was just a basic
|
|
|
|
description of what the person who was cutting open the body saw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Say where they came from?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah, in one of the reports it said they came from Reticulum 4,
|
|
|
|
was what it said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Where is that? Any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
[Lazar laughs.]
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm told it's a star system in Zeta Reticuli. Reticulum is
|
|
|
|
the constellation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And by "Reticulum 4," they meant the fourth planet out from that
|
|
|
|
sun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the same reports, we were identified -- instead of saying
|
|
|
|
Earth, we were identified as "Sol 3," meaning the third planet
|
|
|
|
out from our sun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Now you've read a lot of UFO material. Do you find yourself
|
|
|
|
mixing what you've read and what you've learned from up there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
No, that's why I stay away from the UFO researchers and things
|
|
|
|
like that. I really don't want to be associated with that. I
|
|
|
|
don't research the stuff. It's interesting to read, but no, I'm
|
|
|
|
not mixing anything that I've read into this stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
We were just talking about the UFO field in general, and you feel
|
|
|
|
a little reluctant to get mixed up in it, although you ARE right
|
|
|
|
now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Why the reluctance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
I don't know. There are so MANY stories circulating around.
|
|
|
|
Everyone has their own view. Each UFO researcher says they have
|
|
|
|
the right story. And essentially, I don't want to side with
|
|
|
|
anyone because I don't know where that information's come from,
|
|
|
|
though they do all have the basic story: you know, there ARE
|
|
|
|
alien crafts here; how they got here is, probably aliens brought
|
|
|
|
them here, unless we really have a neat setup with the UPS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's just so many different factions of them [UFO
|
|
|
|
researchers], and they all kind of war between each other; I
|
|
|
|
really don't want to get associated with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Before you got into the program at S-4, though, you had an
|
|
|
|
interest in UFOs. It must be hard for people to swallow that
|
|
|
|
here's a guy who has an interest in it and he gets hired into the
|
|
|
|
program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Well, there was a very brief time there I had sent out resumes to
|
|
|
|
several places, and I wanted to get back into the scientific
|
|
|
|
field again. Almost simultaneously, I met John Lear and read
|
|
|
|
some of his material. And initially, I thought he was just
|
|
|
|
absolutely crazy. But apparently, he did have a good source of
|
|
|
|
information because, as it turns out, some of the information
|
|
|
|
that he had I actually had hands-on experience with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
But your regard for UFOs in general: As a scientist, did you
|
|
|
|
think there was something to it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Absolutely not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Absolutely nothing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
No. I would have stood on that 'til the day I died.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Many of the people who have been calling are UFO groups or UFO
|
|
|
|
researchers who have demanded that you talk to them: We've got
|
|
|
|
to talk to this guy; we want to give him a lot more publicity so
|
|
|
|
he stays alive; we want him to give us information so that we can
|
|
|
|
further check out his background, etc.; we want to protect him;
|
|
|
|
we want to help him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You've resisted. You've done this program; you've done a couple
|
|
|
|
of reports with us; and you've done a radio show or two; in
|
|
|
|
general, you've resisted going into the UFO circuit. Why is
|
|
|
|
that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Just like I mentioned before: I just don't want to be associated
|
|
|
|
with those guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And how many people are you going to open up your background to
|
|
|
|
and let them run rampant through it? I mean, private detectives,
|
|
|
|
every UFO group in the world wants to do that! The idea was for
|
|
|
|
me to release the information, essentially to protect myself and
|
|
|
|
take some of the heat off. And I've done that. And that's all
|
|
|
|
that needs to be done, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Certain UFO researchers claim they've been getting information
|
|
|
|
from you all along; you've been leaking stuff to them; and that
|
|
|
|
they've read these reports that verify the information. You've
|
|
|
|
been working with UFO groups while you were in the program at S-
|
|
|
|
4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Not UFO groups. I did mention a couple of things to some people.
|
|
|
|
That's all I'm gonna say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Okay. In essence, were you breaking your vows that you made to
|
|
|
|
the Government?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
And why did you feel that was necessary? I mean, you took an
|
|
|
|
oath, didn't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Yeah. But look at the magnitude of what was going on. I believe
|
|
|
|
that some of the technology -- maybe all of the technology --
|
|
|
|
should be kept secret, until we have a handle on everything. But
|
|
|
|
certainly, the overview of what happened just cannot be a secret
|
|
|
|
from anyone -- not just the American people, but the rest of the
|
|
|
|
world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let out the basic fact that we have these craft, at one time
|
|
|
|
aliens did at least visit and drop off something, however they
|
|
|
|
got here, that there was some contact made, and then cut it
|
|
|
|
short. You don't need to release the information on the gravity
|
|
|
|
generators, the weapon potential -- which is enormous -- and so
|
|
|
|
on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What could you do with that technology? Say you took the flying
|
|
|
|
disks, the anti-matter reactors, the gravity generators, gave it
|
|
|
|
to Los Alamos or Livermore, let them examine the potential
|
|
|
|
abilities of this stuff. I mean, how would this affect life on
|
|
|
|
earth if this stuff was widely available?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
And mass-producable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
That's tough to say. I mean, you have a completely different
|
|
|
|
mode of travel. What happens when you can play with time? That
|
|
|
|
gets into a really deep philosophical question there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
But I mean, it would change a lot of stuff, change everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah! It would change absolutely everything!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
Do you think it will ever come out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
Personally, no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
What do you hope happens, both with yourself and with this
|
|
|
|
information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazar:
|
|
|
|
There's been enough thorns put in their toes to where they do try
|
|
|
|
and release something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knapp:
|
|
|
|
We'll have to have you come back, Bob. Thanks for joining us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|