285 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
285 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: CSETI FILE: UFO3240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVELOPING APPROPRIATE COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM
|
|
|
|
For any of this to go forward, it is essential that we address the question of
|
|
how humans view themselves, and how the human race is viewed, by humans, as
|
|
a whole. How many times do we read in the UFO literature the word "superior"
|
|
in reference to the extraterrestial beings currently visiting earth. And how
|
|
often have we heard theologians and others indicate that we humans are the
|
|
only beings that really matter in this universe so grand! Both of these
|
|
extreme views - that of innate human inferiority and that of innate human
|
|
uniqueness and divine superiority - are dangerous distortions of the collective
|
|
appropriate self-esteem needed for a healthy ETI-Human long term relationship.
|
|
|
|
On the question of ETI superiority, we must make a distinction between
|
|
possessing more advanced technology or even more developed intellectual
|
|
abilities, and actual superiority as beings. Were the Europeans who possessed
|
|
greater technology superior AS PEOPLE to the Native Americans which they
|
|
found here? Certainly not! And is a MIT scientist with an IQ of 160
|
|
superior as a person to a wood craftsman with an IQ of 100? No! To state
|
|
that a race or people possess more advanced technology or social systems is
|
|
not to say that they are superior beings. On the other hand, it is
|
|
equally true that if their values and attributes vary from 20th century
|
|
human values and attributes then they are not inferior beings either. We
|
|
must be careful not to repeat the old mistake which humans have made with each
|
|
other: confusing sameness with equality. Both between two individuals and
|
|
between two peoples from two different planets we will find variation,
|
|
difference and strengths and weaknesses; this does not mean that one is
|
|
superior or inferior to the other, only that they are DIFFERENT. Our
|
|
equality as beings is founded in the fact that both humans and extraterrestial
|
|
beings are conscious, intelligent sentient creatures. Conscious Intelligence
|
|
is both our point of equality and our point of unity; it is the basis for
|
|
the relationship itself. If we look to our point of unity, we will discover
|
|
delight. While we must avoid the arrogance and chauvinism which has
|
|
characterized human relationships, we must also avoid a sense of inferiority
|
|
or worthlessness based simply on greater ETI technology or even intelligence.
|
|
For there is more to the life of a conscious intelligent being than IQ and
|
|
material advancement. WHile exhibiting geuine humility where warranted, we
|
|
must maintain the appropriate sense of collective self-esteem born out of
|
|
the realization that to be human is to be conscious, awake, intelligent and
|
|
self-aware, just as every other being in the universe is conscious, awake,
|
|
intelligent and self-aware. Beyond this it is entirely likely that humans may
|
|
have as much to offer to the development and enlightenment of ETI as the other
|
|
way around. If we are to gallop out steed into this arena, then mutual
|
|
respect and self-respect are required, not puffed up arrogance or cowering
|
|
inferiority. The strict materialist model of looking only to things and
|
|
differences, of endless reductionism and fragmentation, will assure us only
|
|
confusion, consternation and loss. We must be wise, and perceive the whole,
|
|
while yet discerning the distinctions. Our vision must be clear, for it alone
|
|
can be the foundation of our success. We must learn to see with the eye of
|
|
oneness, for in a universe so diverse we shall be lost without it. To be human
|
|
is wonderful: It is to be consacious, intelligent, loving and aware. And what
|
|
is wonderful about being human is what is wonderful about being any intelligent
|
|
being in the universe; this, let us share.
|
|
|
|
THE CE-5 INITIATIVE PRINCIPLES
|
|
|
|
DEFINITION: CE-5 is a term describing a 5th category of close encounters with
|
|
Extraterrestial Intelligence(ETI), characterized by mutual, bilateral
|
|
communication rather than unilateral contact. The CE-5 Initiative has as its
|
|
central focus bilateral ETI-Human communication based on mutual respect and
|
|
universal principles of exchange and contact. CE types 1-4 are essentially
|
|
passive, reactive and ETI initiated; CE-5 is distinguished from these by
|
|
conscious, voluntary and proactive human initiated or cooperative contacts with
|
|
ETI. Evidence exists indicating that CE-5's have successfully occurred in the
|
|
past, and the inevitable maturing of the human/ETI relationship requires
|
|
greater research and out-reach effort into this possibility. While ultimate
|
|
control of such contact and exchange will (and probably should) remain with
|
|
the technologically more advanced intelligent life forms (i.e. ETI) this does
|
|
not lesses the importance of conscientious, voluntayr human initiatives,
|
|
contact and follow-up to conventional CE's type 1-4.
|
|
|
|
CORE PRINCIPLES AND PREMISES OF THE CE-5 INITIATIVE
|
|
|
|
1. ETI and Extraterrestial Transports (UFOs) have been and currently are in
|
|
contact with human society.
|
|
|
|
2. ETI has a net peaceful, benign and probably protective motive for the
|
|
relationship with humanity at this time.
|
|
|
|
3. The CE-5 Initiative is proactive, bilaterally communicative and
|
|
multidisciplinary in nature and is not primarily motivated towards the current
|
|
acquisition of ETI technology, except as mutually permitted by the ETI-Human
|
|
relationship.
|
|
|
|
4. ETI's enigmatic and elusive behavior may be understood as human-protective
|
|
when viewed from their perspective; a wartorn, aggressive, nuclear armed and
|
|
disunified earth civilization must not receive further potentially harmful
|
|
technologies until a lasting world peace and unity is achieved, and
|
|
international human goals become peaceful, cooperative, and unified in nature.
|
|
Such a transformation will then indicate the readiness for a fuller contact and
|
|
exchange between humans and ETI. We must respect and accept ETI's control and
|
|
wisdom in this regard.
|
|
|
|
5. Notwithstanding the protective limits mentioned above, ETI is apparently
|
|
desirous of an expanded contact with humans, and is open to voluntary, human
|
|
initiated contact and exchange. There is strong evidence to suggest that ETI
|
|
has been systematically introducing themselves to human civilization for the
|
|
past 45 years or longer, and that such contact has steadily deepened and
|
|
intensified over this period.
|
|
|
|
6. CE-5 communication based in a paradigm of love, unity, non-violence,
|
|
cooperation and shared interests has been and will continue to be most
|
|
effective.
|
|
|
|
7. in addition to point number 4 above, we may expect a certain limited nature
|
|
to ETI contact so that the disruptive potential of such contact will be
|
|
minimized. Certainly, a massive influx of ETI culture, technology, etc. would
|
|
prove harmful to long term human evolution if said influx was sudden or ill-
|
|
timed. Though the exact limits as human civilization evolves and grows in peace
|
|
and unity, or at times of significant world-wide crisis.
|
|
|
|
8. All CE-5 Initiative contact will be for the benefit of all of humanity (as
|
|
well as ETI) and will not redound to the benefit of only one nation or
|
|
culture. This is essential.
|
|
|
|
9. All CE-5 Initiative contact will be free of hostile intent, and will be
|
|
free of the presence of any and all weaponry, defensive or offensive.
|
|
|
|
10. All CE-5 Initiative contact will be shared with all CE-5 Associates to the
|
|
extent possible. The CE-5 Initiative will cooperate with all other UFO/ETI
|
|
research organizations so long as such groups are credible and have non-
|
|
harmful and peaceful procedures and intentions.
|
|
|
|
11. Both humans and ETI have physical and mental/spiritual aspects to their
|
|
reality and contact and communication will proceed on all levels of our shared
|
|
reality.
|
|
|
|
12. The CE-5 Initiative affirms that humans and ETI, as conscious beings, are
|
|
essentially more alike than dissimiliar. Regardless of how different we may
|
|
externally or physically appear, the reality og humans as conscious and
|
|
intelligent beings establishes the common basis for communication, deeper and
|
|
bilateral contact, and mutual self-respect.
|
|
|
|
13. Our embryonic efforts now will have ramifications throughout the next
|
|
millenium and should therefore be undertaken with all due deliberation, vision
|
|
and integrity. Our goals, methodology and conduct are oriented towards a
|
|
broad-based long-term endevor.
|
|
|
|
14. The primary model for communication and exchange, as well as internal
|
|
communication within the CE-5 Initiative, is that of consultation and respect
|
|
for the views of others.
|
|
|
|
15. The most important charactersitics, required of CE-5 Initiative
|
|
participants are honesty, open-mindedness, intuitive ability, good
|
|
communication skills and trustworthiness. Technical skills and academic
|
|
credentials are certainly valued, but the above qualities are primary. CE-3
|
|
and 4 contactees are especially encouraged to participate as research
|
|
associates. Participant confidentially will be assured if requested. In
|
|
addition, CE-5 Initiative Core Groups will ideally have participants expert
|
|
or competent in:
|
|
1. Medicine/Physiology
|
|
2. Physics, Theoretical and Applied
|
|
3. Psychology/Counseling
|
|
4. Higher mental/spiritual functions(e.g. meditation, telepathy)
|
|
5. Communications and Electronics
|
|
6. Public Relations
|
|
7. Research/Documentation, including video, audio and print
|
|
8. Astronomy and Astrophysics
|
|
9. Sociology and Anthropology
|
|
|
|
16. CE-5 Initiative Core Groups will work with ongoing research efforts to
|
|
maximize our collective knowledge and data base. Current and ongoing CE 1-4
|
|
sites/locales or individuals will especially be integrated into CE-5 strategic
|
|
planning.
|
|
|
|
17. CE-5 Initiative Projects, training and results will be shared through
|
|
conferences, symposia, and publications.
|
|
|
|
18. The activities of the CE-5 Initiative will maintain high standards of
|
|
conduct and professionalism, while preserving an atmosphere of open-mindedness
|
|
and creative 'brainstorming.' Anyone found to be spreading misinformation or
|
|
falsified cases intentionally will be prohibited from participating in any of
|
|
the activities of the CE-5 Initiative.
|
|
|
|
19. We hold that carefully planned Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind will
|
|
unlock new frontiers in the relationship between ETI and humanity. All
|
|
sincere researchers and theorists are welcome to join in this profound
|
|
endeavor on behalf of mankind's growth and evolution.
|
|
|
|
ESSENTIAL QUALITIES OF THE CE-5 WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANT
|
|
|
|
The goal of the CE-5 Initiative is nothing less that the establishment of a
|
|
voluntary, mutually beneficial relationship between humans and those
|
|
extraterrestial people currently visiting earth. We have neither been
|
|
appointed nor outworldly selected to engage in so high an endeavor. Rather,
|
|
we have voluntarily come forward driven by an interest at once sublime and
|
|
urgent. As important as individual skills and capabilities may be such an
|
|
undertaken, they are nevertheless secondary to the consciousness and attitudes
|
|
of the individual and the group.
|
|
|
|
Personal integrity, honesty, selflessness, harmlessness, peacefulness,
|
|
patience, acceptance of diversity, courage, unity, maturity, a reasoned but
|
|
open mind, the ability to maintain confidentiality - these qualities must rank
|
|
pre-eminently among those needed by CE-5 Initiative Working Group participants.
|
|
For if we are skilled but selfish, we shall fail to succeed; if we are
|
|
knowledgeable but aggressive, our efforts will be in vain; if we are curious
|
|
but fearful, we will not be able to endure. We cannot expect to be saints,
|
|
but at the same time, a specific consciousness and attitude are required if
|
|
success is to be realized.
|
|
|
|
Basic to all these qualities is purity of motive and the essential condition of
|
|
being free from prejudice and malice. Those who are familiar with 'UFOlogy'
|
|
will know that this is no mean feat, insofar as there is a virtual epidemic of
|
|
fear, paranoia and wild and frightening speculations infecting the UFO/ETI
|
|
field. Subjective and reactionary interpretations of certain UFO related
|
|
events have spawned a cottage industry of those exponents of conspiracies,
|
|
goblins, good and evil E.T.s, Star Wars-type encounters and so on. This
|
|
poisonous and insidious millieu has expanded to encompass countless books and
|
|
organizations, and is slowing growing colonies of fear and paranoia in
|
|
innumerable minds and hearts. So pervasive is this attitude that some of the
|
|
individuals who claim to be most scientific and objective routinely use
|
|
words such as 'alarming', 'sinister', 'intruders', 'victims', 'deception', and
|
|
even 'rape' and 'murder' when describing UFO occupants and their interactions
|
|
with humans. It is little wonder that impartial observers consider many UFO
|
|
'buffs' to be kooks, crackpots or worse. There is a super-abundance of
|
|
emotionality, hyper-religiosity and superstition, and only a nominal amount
|
|
of seasoned analysis and sane yet visionary planning.
|
|
|
|
In this environment of fear and near hysteria, it is a challenge to the
|
|
conscientious. There is a tendency for students of UFOlogy to become colonized
|
|
by these fear-engendering ideas, and view this phenomenon through the darkened
|
|
visor of negativity. GOing beyond this fear and remaining free of these
|
|
negative prejudices is an essential condition which all CE-5 Initiative
|
|
Working Group participant must achieve. Our position, which is clear and
|
|
unequivocal, is that all extraterrestial people are to be regarded as non-
|
|
hostile and approachable. There is no conclusive evidence to suggest otherwise,
|
|
and until clearly PROVEN otherwise, our position is firm. Clearly, anyone who
|
|
holds one group of extraterrestials as 'good' and another as 'bad', and so on,
|
|
is wholly unsuited for this endeavor. To be so prejudiced is to subvert the
|
|
entire purpose of our mission, which is the establishing of a peaceful
|
|
relationship with any and all extraterrestial people visiting earth. In this
|
|
regard, we make no distinction between the so-called 'greys' and the so-called
|
|
Nordic types, or any other group for that matter. It is clear from
|
|
multiple case reports that these various groups are involved with a cooperative
|
|
project regarding earth and her people, and it is dangerous and unwarranted
|
|
to hold prejudiced views towards one group or the other. That one group or
|
|
the other is associated with certain activities is, we feel, a specialized
|
|
function of the overall cooperative effort currently under way. We must
|
|
remember that human perceptions of actions must not be confused with true
|
|
extraterrestial motives, and to reach prejudiced and negative conclusions based
|
|
on these fragmented perceptions is dangerous, premature and unproductive.
|
|
|
|
While every person is certainly entitled to his or her own opinions, it is the
|
|
uncompromising policy of CSETI at this time that no person holding such
|
|
negative and prejudicial views will be allowed to participate in CE-5
|
|
Initiative Working Group activities. The reasons for this are more than merely
|
|
philosophical: It is evident that these extraterrestial beings are capable
|
|
of assessing the views, attitudes and intentions of both the Working Groups and
|
|
their individual members. For any member to hold negative and prejudicial views
|
|
towards one or any other group of extraterrestial people may very well result
|
|
in the failure of the CE-5 Initiative protocols and all group endeavors. That
|
|
is, one member of a group holding such views may result in the failure of the
|
|
entire project, insofar as the extraterrestial people may feel both
|
|
unwelcome and unsafe in approaching the group. Nor should we arrogate to
|
|
ourselves the right to 'pick and choose' among various extraterrestial
|
|
peoples, anymore than we should 'pick and choose' prejudicially among various
|
|
races of human; all such prejudices are offensive and unenlightened, and
|
|
must be overcome.
|
|
|
|
To be free from prejudice is a significant challenge for many people. For CE-5
|
|
Initiative Working Group Participants, it is an essential requirement and
|
|
not an optional one. Let us free ourselves from the fancy, fiction and fear
|
|
which abounds, and hold to a higher vision, above fear, free from negative
|
|
preconceived ideas. Let us be visionary and creative, but grounded;
|
|
courageous but not foolish; open-minded but not gullible; analytical but not
|
|
fragmented or cynical; intelligent and yet loving. Our task calls for nothing
|
|
less, and our success is dependent on our arising to such inner standards
|
|
that no rumor or fear can defeat.
|
|
|
|
Peace be with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*********************************************************************
|
|
* -------->>> THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo <<<------- *
|
|
********************************************************************* |