1003 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
1003 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: K2-SUSPECTED ALIEN BASE DISCOVERY ! FILE: UFO1881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5946 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 - Suspected Alien Base Discovery
|
|
Message-ID: <139009.2A56875B@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:12:08 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 121
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:08
|
|
|
|
Below is a seven part message concerning an alleged discovery of an alien base
|
|
in Northern California. This information has not been verified! ParaNet is
|
|
providing it for information only and is not to be construed as an endorsement
|
|
of the material or the Phoenix Project. Anyone with further information is
|
|
encouraged to contact ParaNet at 303-431-8796, or via electronic mail at the
|
|
following addresses:
|
|
|
|
Internet - mcorbin@paranet.org
|
|
Fidonet - 1:104/422
|
|
|
|
THE K-2 REPORT: The Discovery of a Secret Alien Base In Northern
|
|
California. Report Number 920627. May 27, 1992.
|
|
|
|
The "Phoenix Project Reports" Are Published By ADVENT PUBLISHING
|
|
COMPANY P.O. Box 3748 Carson City, NV 89702
|
|
|
|
Entire Contents Copyright (c) 1992 by The Phoenix Project
|
|
|
|
Permission to quote is granted provided the Phoenix Project is
|
|
acknowledged as the source and the Report Title and Date are
|
|
included in any quotes.
|
|
|
|
Reproduction of any Phoenix Project Report or Logo, in any form
|
|
or by any means, is not permissible without written authorization
|
|
from the publisher
|
|
|
|
WHAT IS THE PHOENIX PROJECT?
|
|
|
|
The Phoenix Project is a private, civilian, research
|
|
organization formed in 1952 to investigate and correlate
|
|
information concerning Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) and
|
|
Extra-Terrestrial (ET) activities. It has no affiliation with the
|
|
United States Government or any of its agencies. Because of the
|
|
nature of its work the Phoenix Project does not seek publicity.
|
|
|
|
Staff members are former military personnel who have all been
|
|
associated with intelligence activities, and have knowledge of
|
|
covert government operations concerning UFO's. Their knowledge of
|
|
the specialized field of "intelligence correlation," provide
|
|
unique insights into various subject matter.
|
|
|
|
From time-to-time and in the public interest, the Phoenix
|
|
Project will publish research reports regarding certain subjects.
|
|
A list of reports is available from our publisher. All
|
|
correspondence should be addressed to:
|
|
|
|
The Phoenix Project C/O Advent Publishing Company P.O. Box 3748
|
|
Carson City, NV 89702
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTE
|
|
|
|
The name "Phoenix" is used by many different publishers and
|
|
organizations as a part of the name used in their various
|
|
publications.
|
|
|
|
To avoid any false association with or confusion that might be
|
|
caused by a similar name, all publications of the "Phoenix
|
|
Project" bear the Project's Logo (a registered trade-mark) and
|
|
are published exclusively by Advent Publishing Company. The
|
|
"Phoenix Project" is not affiliated with any other publication,
|
|
publisher, organization or group.
|
|
|
|
In particular, there is no affiliation with a publisher known as
|
|
America West, of Carson City, Nevada, any of its publications, or
|
|
the individuals known as George and Desiree Green, of Tehachapi,
|
|
California.
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION TO THE K-2 REPORT
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL NOTE:
|
|
|
|
June 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
The original "K-2 Special Report," dated July 28, 1989 and
|
|
included in this document, was classified "confidential" for
|
|
circulation within the Phoenix Project only. It was not released
|
|
for public distribution. There are compelling reasons for making
|
|
it public at this time, and to update this information. Note the
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
1) In the last decade, there has been a growing number of
|
|
reports of hostile activity by alien beings, directed against
|
|
humanity.
|
|
|
|
2) Various Departments and Agencies of the United States
|
|
Government have increased their activity on two different levels.
|
|
|
|
One: They have stepped-up the level of their covert dis-
|
|
information campaign -- a campaign aimed at disrupting the
|
|
civilian UFO movement. This is evidenced by an increasing
|
|
quantity of dis-information supplied to individuals,
|
|
organizations and the public. It is an onoing program to create
|
|
wide-spread confusion throughout the UFO movement, to splinter
|
|
organizations, and to discredit any investigators who get near
|
|
the truth. Many researchers are spinning-their-wheels chasing
|
|
down, deliberately planted, false leads. The tactics employed are
|
|
aimed at diverting attention away from critical areas where the
|
|
truth would be revealed.
|
|
|
|
Trained operatives have infiltrated the UFO movement, poising as
|
|
sincere and trusted investigators while others adopt the roles of
|
|
professional skeptics and debunkers. By covering and controlling
|
|
both sides-of-theence, they insure that the truth remains hidden.
|
|
|
|
Two: This duplicity extends to their relations with the aliens.
|
|
On one hand they continue the charade of working with and
|
|
assisting the aliens -- to obtain the advanced alien technology,
|
|
while they secretly develop operations and weapons systems to
|
|
counter the threat the aliens represent.
|
|
|
|
<Continued in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5947 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Part 2
|
|
Message-ID: <139010.2A56875F@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:12:09 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 116
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:08
|
|
|
|
<..Continued from previous message>
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aliens have indulged in the same duplicity. Saying one thing
|
|
to the super-powers, to create an appetite for superior
|
|
technology, while carrying out their own covert activities
|
|
against humanity. They have created wellidden bases of their own.
|
|
Bases that allow them to continue their covert operations without
|
|
government interference or scrutiny. Bases unknown to the various
|
|
world governments.
|
|
|
|
It would be untrue to say that the U.S. Government doesn't
|
|
suspect the existence of hidden alien bases. However, to date,
|
|
they have had shown little success in locating them.
|
|
|
|
It is not the intention or purpose of the Phoenix Project to
|
|
judge the government's actions or the actions of those
|
|
responsible and involved in the UFO coverup activity. Our efforts
|
|
are not part of a vindictive crusade against the government. In
|
|
our opinion, the public has a right to know the facts and
|
|
information revealed by our investigations. If this proves to be
|
|
an embarrassment to those responsible for concealing such
|
|
information, they have only themselves to blame.
|
|
|
|
Our efforts may help wiser heads in the government and
|
|
elsewhere, to realize that the aliens have hidden objectives of
|
|
their own. Objectives they have not made known to the government
|
|
and humanity. Wiser heads may also realize that Washington,
|
|
Langley and Fort Meade do not have exclusive possession of that
|
|
called "intelligence" or intelligence data. Perhaps they will
|
|
finally recognize that "others" are able to obtain, correlate and
|
|
evaluate important information on their own. A rational person
|
|
might realize the value and importance of cooperation with,
|
|
rather than antagonism against, others who possess valuable
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
The objective of the Phoenix Project in making this report
|
|
public is to accomplish the following:
|
|
|
|
1) To reveal to the U.S. Government, civilian UFO investigators
|
|
and the public, the existence and location of a hidden alien
|
|
base. It will also become known that the aliens have used, and
|
|
are continuing to use, without their knowledge or consent,
|
|
personnel of the U.S. Forest Service to help conceal the presence
|
|
of this base. Details concerning this are included in the updated
|
|
information supplement in the Exhibit Section of this report.
|
|
|
|
2) Revealing the location of this base will render it useless to
|
|
the aliens. This will severely impact part of their covert
|
|
activity against humanity.
|
|
|
|
3) To reveal one aspect of the alien threat to the public.
|
|
|
|
HOW THE INVESTIGATION BEGAN AND THE ALIEN BASE WAS DISCOVERED
|
|
|
|
The Phoenix Project investigation into this matter began in
|
|
early June of 1989. Our Staff Member # 2, then, overheard a
|
|
strange short-wave radio transmission that aroused his interest.
|
|
Every night, for two weeks, he monitored this unique radio
|
|
transmission. Then, using radio direction-finding equipment, he
|
|
was able to locate the source of the transmission. By using
|
|
triangulation techniques he found the signal was coming from an
|
|
area some forty miles northeast of his location.
|
|
|
|
On June 10, 1989, he recorded the strange radio transmission.
|
|
The broadcast signal lasted nearly an hour. The recording was
|
|
sent to the Project's Headquarters for further analysis. Our
|
|
analysis of the recording caused the Project to launch a major
|
|
investigation into this matter. As a side project, our Staff
|
|
decided to "test" the current degree of government secrecy
|
|
regarding UFO research. We created a test.
|
|
|
|
THE TEST
|
|
|
|
Our staff contacted Dr. Peter Sturrock at Stanford Research
|
|
Institute in Palo Alto, California. Dr. Sturrock enjoys a quiet
|
|
reputation of being a "concerned" and reliable UFO Researcher. We
|
|
requested that he conduct a further study and analysis of the
|
|
recording. Dr. Sturrock was very interested and cooperative -- at
|
|
first. However, very quickly, his attitude changed. Within a
|
|
week, and acting very reserved and guarded, he phoned us stating
|
|
he couldn't have anything further to do with this matter and that
|
|
Stanford Research could not analyze the recording. No further
|
|
explanation was offered. He suggested we take the recording to
|
|
Dr. James Harder at NASA's Ames Research Center in Mountain View,
|
|
California. We thanked Dr. Sturrock for his initial interest and
|
|
expressed our regrets that he was unable to pursue the matter
|
|
further. In the next day's mail, we received the recording and
|
|
our analysis notes from Dr. Sturrock.
|
|
|
|
A courier delivered the recording to NASA's Dr. Harder, in
|
|
person, the following day. A week later we called to ask how the
|
|
analysis was progressing. Dr. Harder was not available when we
|
|
phoned, but his secretary could not recall having received any
|
|
recording from us. Therefore, there was nothing to analyze and
|
|
they were unable to assist us further. The tone of the
|
|
conversation was abrupt and had the ring of an obvious dismissal.
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, the "lost" recording was a copy and not the
|
|
original. It was becoming very obvious that Dr. Sturrock and
|
|
Stanford Research, and that Dr. Harder and NASA, were not going
|
|
to reveal what their analysis of the recording revealed. Again,
|
|
the official research community had failed our "test." It was
|
|
time to move on.
|
|
|
|
<Continued in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5951 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Part 3
|
|
Message-ID: <139011.2A568762@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:12:10 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 119
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:09
|
|
|
|
<<..Continued from previous message>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, the Project's Staff decided to investigate the
|
|
location thought to be the source of the strange radio
|
|
transmission.
|
|
|
|
On June 15, 1989, a Phoenix Project Survey Team made a
|
|
preliminary investigation to locate the site and origin of the
|
|
mysterious radio transmission. The site was located and a
|
|
preliminary investigation was completed.
|
|
|
|
A second site survey and more detailed investigation was
|
|
conducted on June 28, 1989. The results of this second survey
|
|
prompted the need for an in-depth scientific survey and
|
|
investigation of the site.
|
|
|
|
On July 19, 1989, the third survey was launched. A well-equipped
|
|
science and investigative team arrived at the K-2 Site for a
|
|
three-day effort. For security reasons, at the time, the Phoenix
|
|
Project assigned the code name "K-2" to the site area and the
|
|
investigative effort. The results of all three site surveys and
|
|
the results of the investigation, were compiled the following
|
|
week. The following report reveals the details of that
|
|
investigation.
|
|
|
|
Date of original report: July 28, 1989
|
|
|
|
Revised for updated information: June 22, 1992
|
|
|
|
K-2 -- A SPECIAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
A SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
|
|
|
|
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
K-2 is the Phoenix Project code name for a specific geographical
|
|
site in Northern California. It has been determined, by
|
|
investigation, that this site is the location of a previously
|
|
unknown and undiscovered extra-terrestrial (alien) installation
|
|
and base of operations.
|
|
|
|
To date, the U.S. Government and its various intelligence
|
|
agencies has given no indication that they are aware of the
|
|
existence of the K-2 Alien Base or its location. It is also
|
|
unknown to the general public and to leading UFO researchers.
|
|
This report is the first time its existence has been revealed.
|
|
|
|
Alien spacecraft seen arriving and departing from this base, and
|
|
the small, grey, alien creatures seen at this location, lead to
|
|
the inescapable conclusion that this base was built by, and is
|
|
operated by, an alien race from the star system Zeta Reticuli.
|
|
This race, known in covert government and select public circles,
|
|
and to UFO researchers, has been named the Greys.
|
|
|
|
CONCEALMENT FEATURES
|
|
|
|
The site of this secret alien base is within the Plumas National
|
|
Forest. The base is well-concealed and hidden underground, inside
|
|
a "land-mark" mountain -ilot Peak, in northern California. This
|
|
site is located in Plumas County, on a remote and isolated
|
|
stretch of county road between the towns of La Porte and Quincy.
|
|
See Exhibit 1.
|
|
|
|
The site is isolated and cut-off from general access, except
|
|
from the air or the use of snowmobiles, or ski's, 6 months of the
|
|
year because of heavy snow conditions. A well constructed and
|
|
permanent "fire" lookout tower on top of Pilot Peak (K-2) was
|
|
suddenly abandoned several years ago. Discussions with local U.S.
|
|
Forest Rangers, indicate there are no intentions of ever manning
|
|
or re-activating the fire lookout station. Budgetary problems
|
|
were not a factor. The explanation given, was that the lookout
|
|
was obsolete. Fire spotting, these days, according to the
|
|
rangers, is better accomplished by patrolling aircraft.
|
|
|
|
This explanation, (in 1989) seems suspect and insubstantial, at
|
|
best. Evidence to support these claims are provided by the fact
|
|
that other fire lookout stations, in nearby areas, are
|
|
operational and manned throughout the peak summer fire season.
|
|
Why is the K-2 fire lookout an exception?
|
|
|
|
An outstanding "air approach corridor," provides incoming and
|
|
outgoing alien spacecraft with exceptional concealment. The "air
|
|
corridor" leading to and from this hidden base is, somehow, not
|
|
covered by either military or civilian radar or air traffic
|
|
control. This has been verified by examination of aeronautical
|
|
charts of the area. Terrain features, also, provide excellent
|
|
concealment from visual observation. See Exhibit 2.
|
|
|
|
TERRAIN FEATURES OF THE SITE:
|
|
|
|
The main area of the Alien base is a "U" shaped bowl cradled at
|
|
the northern end and at the foot of Pilot Peak and its associated
|
|
mountain ridges. The site is protected on three sides by 400 to
|
|
600 foot mountain ridges. Two, level terrain, landing zones 200
|
|
to 300 feet in diameter are present. Well concealed and expertly
|
|
camouflaged entrances to the Alien base are located near each of
|
|
the landing zones. See Exhibit 3.
|
|
|
|
High mountains and deep valleys, leading to and from the open
|
|
mouth of the "U" shaped site, provides a 20 mile approach and
|
|
departure corridor that is secure from ground-based radar, civil
|
|
or military. The deep valley and canyons also prevent visual
|
|
observation of low-flying spacecraft. Visual observation from
|
|
high-flying military or civilian jet traffic is not likely, as
|
|
the site is not on or near an established air traffic route. See
|
|
Exhibit 17.
|
|
|
|
<Continued in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5949 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Part 4
|
|
Message-ID: <139012.2A568765@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:12:11 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 115
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:10
|
|
|
|
<<<..Continued from previous message>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
LANDING SITE EVIDENCE
|
|
|
|
There are some physical indications present at both landing
|
|
sites, Landing Zone 1 and 2 (indentations in the ground, large
|
|
circular areas of flattened native grass, and small amounts of
|
|
residual radio-active radiation). Most striking, however, is the
|
|
fact that there is an unusual absence of animal or rodent
|
|
presence. There are no animals; animal tracks, rodents, snakes,
|
|
ground squirrels or chipmunks present in or around the landing
|
|
sites. However, these creatures are present everywhere else in
|
|
the area. Birds, also present elsewhere, seem to avoid flying
|
|
over or through the landing areas. Insect life, particularly
|
|
flying insects -- deer flies, common flies and mosquitoes, are
|
|
present everywhere. Other researchers have established the fact
|
|
that the lack of animal or rodent presence in UFO landing areas
|
|
is significant.
|
|
|
|
AREA NEAR CONCEALED BASE
|
|
|
|
To the casual observer visiting the K-2 site, everything would
|
|
appear quite normal. The area seems peaceful and serene. However,
|
|
in the general area of the concealed Alien base, to an
|
|
experienced observer, it suggests and entirely different picture.
|
|
The area is too tranquil and perfect, both in appearance and in
|
|
the general atmosphere of the place. The term "picture perfect"
|
|
is appropriate. This setting is completely unrealistic and
|
|
paradoxical when compared with other areas a mere half-mile away.
|
|
|
|
SURVEY PARTY OBSERVATIONS
|
|
|
|
On three occasions (in 1989) trained investigators of the
|
|
Phoenix Project have visited and investigated the K-2 site. They
|
|
have all experienced and observed unusual phenomena and
|
|
conditions in the area.
|
|
|
|
1) An uncanny stillness (the absence of normal sounds) during
|
|
the day. This was even more evident during the hours of darkness.
|
|
No animal sounds. No owls hooting. No birds chirping. No cries
|
|
from coyotes. The absence of these normal sounds in the area was
|
|
unsettling. This phenomenon has been observed on every visit to
|
|
this site.
|
|
|
|
2) All the investigators experienced independent and unprompted
|
|
feelings of being observed by unseen watchers. This was
|
|
particularly evident on the first visit to the site. Each member
|
|
of the survey party, independently, and with no solicitation or
|
|
prompting from each other, reported, afterwards, strong feelings
|
|
of being watched and frequently they turned around to look behind
|
|
them. However, no unseen watchers were discovered. This left a
|
|
strong impression on the survey party.
|
|
|
|
3) On the first survey there were observations of unusual cloud
|
|
behavior. Clouds that formed out of nowhere. Clouds that appeared
|
|
and disappeared with sudden quickness. Thick, angry looking, grey
|
|
clouds that billowed up in ominous manner, with a "boiling" and
|
|
rolling end-over-end motion, that quickly enveloped the entire
|
|
site area. Survey party members wondered if the atmosphere was,
|
|
somehow, being controlled. All of this activity was confined to
|
|
the K-2 site area. A half-mile away, in any direction, the sky
|
|
was clear.
|
|
|
|
4) Observations on the first and second visits to the site,
|
|
revealed that an earthen dike (erected to maintain a 6 foot water
|
|
level in a large pond near the concealed secret base) had very
|
|
recently, been deliberately breached over a ten foot width,
|
|
dropping the pond's water level to a 6 inch depth. Shovel marks
|
|
were evident in the breach area. The lack of erosion, on the
|
|
sides of the breached area, indicated its recent nature.
|
|
|
|
However, on the third visit this breach had been expertly
|
|
repaired. There were heavy equipment tracks (a bulldozer's) in
|
|
and around the dike. Earth, dug from a nearby hill, was used to
|
|
repair the dike. Forest Rangers, who patrol the area several
|
|
times each day, when questioned about this, were at a loss to
|
|
explain the repairs. No one using heavy equipment had been
|
|
observed in the area. According to the Rangers, the pond is not
|
|
used for any known purpose -- yet it's there. Someone recently
|
|
breached it to lower the water level. Then, someone, unknown and
|
|
unobserved, repaired it. See Exhibit 15.
|
|
|
|
Why the pond with no known purpose or function? Why breach it?
|
|
Why repair it? Why wasn't the use of heavy equipment or the
|
|
repairs, noticed by the patrolling Rangers? It should be stated
|
|
that the Rangers are very observant and notice everything going
|
|
on in their area, as our questions revealed. Why is K-2, this
|
|
Alien base, seemingly, exempt?
|
|
|
|
5) The county road between the towns of La Porte and Quincy is a
|
|
rough, poorly maintained, dirt road for some 30 miles. Rough dirt
|
|
roads are prevalent throughout the area for miles in all
|
|
directions. There are no towns, settlements, fishing areas, camp
|
|
grounds, or anything else of significance, anywhere in the area
|
|
near Pilot Peak (K-2). This site is out in the middle of nowhere.
|
|
Yet -- the county road for 2-1/2 miles either side of the
|
|
entrance to the K-2 site, is a modern, well maintained, black-
|
|
topped, 2 lane highway. Before and after this 5 mile stretch of
|
|
modern road, it is again a dirt road. Why? No one questioned by
|
|
our investigators had any explanation. And, more curiously, no
|
|
one seemed the least bit curious about it. Why? Refer to Exhibits
|
|
1 and 3.
|
|
|
|
<Continued in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5950 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Part 5
|
|
Message-ID: <139013.2A568768@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:12:12 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 110
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:11
|
|
|
|
<<<<..Continued from previous message>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
6) There is a rough, hard-packed, dirt road leading to K-2 from
|
|
the town of La Porte. It is a narrow 2 lane road. It is not
|
|
frequently traveled. On the third visit to the K-2 site,
|
|
extraordinary logging activity, by "two" major logging companies,
|
|
were evident. Only the trees within 20 feet on either side of
|
|
this dirt road are being cut and hauled to sawmills. When
|
|
questioned, the loggers were uncommunicative regarding this
|
|
activity. However, there is every reason to believe, from the
|
|
nature of this activity, that this road is going to be widened
|
|
and improved. Possibly, even black-topped.
|
|
|
|
One must remember that this road is an obscure county road that
|
|
is infrequently used. It provides a secondary connection between
|
|
the two towns of La Porte and Quincy, some thirty miles apart.
|
|
Why the activity to widen and improve it? Why improve a road that
|
|
is hardly used by the general public?
|
|
|
|
It must be remembered that all these secondary county roads are
|
|
totally impassible, because of heavy snow, for 6 months of the
|
|
year. No efforts are made during the winter to keep them open and
|
|
clear. In fact, just outside of La Porte there is a heavy metal
|
|
gate that is used to block the road during the winter months.
|
|
Why, then, all this activity? What purpose is being served?
|
|
|
|
METHODS USED TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE, LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE
|
|
ALIEN BASE
|
|
|
|
Since the only way to conceal a large installation is to bury it
|
|
underground, or in the depths of an ocean, out of sight, only
|
|
certain types of sophisticated scientific instruments can reveal
|
|
the underground presence of such an installation. Foremost among
|
|
these instruments, is that known as a portable "total field"
|
|
magnetometer. This instrument is widely used by professional
|
|
geologists to detect the presence of valuable underground
|
|
minerals, oil, and water deposits. It is also used by
|
|
sophisticated archaeologists to detect the remains of ancient
|
|
buried cities, caverns and other valuable sites of past
|
|
civilizations.
|
|
|
|
A magnetometer is a precision instrument that measures minute
|
|
changes or deviations in the Earth's magnetic field within a
|
|
given area. All geological features: mountains, lava beds,
|
|
rivers, streams and lakes, plains, meadows and plateaus, and even
|
|
grains of sand, eventually, over thousands of years, align their
|
|
molecular magnetic structure with the prevailing direction of the
|
|
Earth's magnetic field. Earthquakes, volcanoes and geological up-
|
|
thrusts, and their resultant forces, in creating all geological
|
|
formations, cause deviations in an area's basic magnetic pattern.
|
|
Underground geological features such as: upthrust dikes, sheer
|
|
planes, faults, mineral deposits, caverns, caves, tombs, rivers
|
|
and lakes, etc., and other anomalies, leave their characteristic
|
|
and recognizable magnetic signatures.
|
|
|
|
In a like manner, any underground excavations, tunneling or
|
|
shafts, create a deviation from the normal patterns prevalent in
|
|
a given area. Such underground construction activity disturbs the
|
|
local magnetic field in the area. This disturbance is caused by
|
|
the material excavated or otherwise moved. The magnetometer can,
|
|
by noting the strength of such deviations and disturbances, then
|
|
determine the location, shape, size and depth of such buried
|
|
features and anomalies.
|
|
|
|
Sophisticated computer programs can then analyze the information
|
|
reported by this instrument and create statistical data, charts,
|
|
plots and maps, which portray the underground features of an area
|
|
in amazing detail. The magnetometer, in a sense, is similar to
|
|
having a form of powerful x-ray vision that is capable of looking
|
|
deep within the earth.
|
|
|
|
For three days starting on July 19, 1989, a portable total-field
|
|
magnetometer was used by the Phoenix Project's scientific survey
|
|
team to conduct a magnetic mapping of highly suspect areas of the
|
|
K-2 site.
|
|
|
|
The presence of our survey teams aroused intense curiosity on
|
|
the part of the U.S. Forest Service and their Rangers. The first
|
|
day, several different Rangers questioned us intensely. They
|
|
asked us who we were, what we were doing, how long we would be in
|
|
the area, where we came from, etc. We had prepared plausible
|
|
answers to such questions in advance of being questioned. Our
|
|
answers seemed to satisfy their initial curiosity. However, the
|
|
second and third day of our presence on the site, brought the
|
|
Rangers out in force. Hardly an hour would pass before a
|
|
different Ranger or pair of Rangers would appear and start the
|
|
questions all over again. They seemed determined to find out
|
|
exactly who we were, why we were there, what we were doing, and
|
|
why we were doing it, etc. Some of the Rangers stayed a while and
|
|
became interested in the scientific equipment and its operation.
|
|
To satisfy them, we let them assist us in taking some of the
|
|
magnetometer readings. But, continuously, they tried to pump us
|
|
for additional information. Each time we gave them the same
|
|
answers and eventually they would leave. The on-going visits and
|
|
questions eventually became a game that was amusing. However, we
|
|
couldn't help but wonder what was driving their curiosity and why
|
|
they continued the constant barrage of questions. See Exhibit 21.
|
|
|
|
<Continued in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5948 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Part 6
|
|
Message-ID: <139014.2A56876B@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:13:13 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 112
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:11
|
|
|
|
<<<<<..Continued from previous message>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This magnetic survey revealed the presence of a large metallic
|
|
or metal constructed chamber of enormous size, thought to be the
|
|
main alien installation or base, and other metal-lined chambers.
|
|
In addition, various metalined tunnels and fused natural rock
|
|
passages and tunnels, connecting various areas of the
|
|
installation, and providing means to enter and exit the base were
|
|
detected.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent computer analysis, of the data obtained, created a
|
|
highly-detailed magnetic contour map of part of this installation
|
|
(the bulk of the main installation lies under an area not
|
|
surveyed on this occasion, but "linking" evidence indicates its
|
|
direction and location) along with various tunnels, passages and
|
|
entrances. Exhibits 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 include this
|
|
scientific information.
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSION (July 1989)
|
|
|
|
It is the opinion of the members of the Phoenix Project's
|
|
investigators and scientific survey teams, based on their
|
|
personal on-site observations and in-depth study of the Pilot
|
|
Peak (K-2) site, the facts revealed, interviews with USFS
|
|
Rangers, and scientific analysis, that a hidden, underground,
|
|
major operational base of alien beings has been discovered. This
|
|
investigation and survey were conducted by highly-trained and
|
|
credible individuals who uncovered -- incredible facts. A
|
|
complete magnetic survey of adjacent areas, several acres in
|
|
extent, would reveal the true dimensions of this installation and
|
|
additional valuable details, and is to be recommended. However,
|
|
the financial cost of such an extensive survey is beyond the
|
|
resources available to this group of investigators.
|
|
|
|
INFORMATION UPDATE
|
|
|
|
Date: August 16, 1989 From: Staff # 1 Subject: Activity Reports
|
|
concerning K-2
|
|
|
|
Comment from Staff # 1: Date: August 10, 1989, Time: 2215 PDT.
|
|
|
|
At 2215 PDT, I received a phone call from Staff # 2 who was
|
|
stationed forty miles southwest of K-2. In an excited manner, he
|
|
described sighting a large glowing object that had, only minutes
|
|
before, passed very near his observation point. He supplied a few
|
|
details. Knowing, from experience that the Phoenix Project phones
|
|
are being monitored by various government intelligence agencies,
|
|
I cut the conversation short and requested that he investigate
|
|
the K-2 Site the next day and send me the complete details by
|
|
courier. I received the following information from Staff # 2 on
|
|
August 14, 1989.
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Report # 1: By Staff # 2: Date: August 10, 1989, Time: 2212 PDT.
|
|
Location: Approximately 40 miles southwest of K-2.
|
|
|
|
A brightly glowing object was observed from my location. It was
|
|
approximately 30-40 feet in diameter, moving slowly from south to
|
|
north at 500 feet above the tree-tops.
|
|
|
|
When first sighted, the object was approaching from the South
|
|
and slowing down. When opposite my observation point, it stopped
|
|
in mid-air and hovered. The object was glowing with a bright
|
|
white light, as it approached. When it stopped and hovered, the
|
|
color changed to a bright blue light.
|
|
|
|
It remained stopped for approximately 15 seconds, then it
|
|
changed back to a bright white color, as it started moving slowly
|
|
(10-15 mph) toward the North in the direction of K-2.
|
|
|
|
Observations: The object lit up the area, quite well, when it
|
|
was glowing with the white light. No sound was produced by the
|
|
object. Normal animal and insect sounds, in my area, were
|
|
silenced. A light breeze, present before the object appeared,
|
|
disappeared. Everything became very still, as the object was
|
|
approaching and while it was hovering.
|
|
|
|
The Moon was still below the horizon. The sky was clear and
|
|
dark, with stars clearly visible.
|
|
|
|
A "scanner" radio, I was monitoring, picked up severe noise 30
|
|
seconds before, during, and while the object moved away from my
|
|
location.
|
|
|
|
I did not experience any electrical effects (tingling or prickly
|
|
sensations) during the sighting.
|
|
|
|
The sighting lasted approximately 45 seconds. There was not
|
|
enough time to get a camera and take pictures.
|
|
|
|
Within 10 minutes, after the object left the area, eight Air
|
|
Force jet fighters (F-4s, judging from their sound and
|
|
appearance) and moving very fast, went overhead traveling in the
|
|
same direction the object had taken -owards the North. Four
|
|
minutes later, the fighters returned, heading south. I presumed
|
|
the object had been spotted by their radar. Their quick return
|
|
would indicate they lost radar contact with the object.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<Concluded in next message..>
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 5952 of alt.alien.visitors:
|
|
Path: bilver!tous!tarpit!fang!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!scicom!paranet!p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG!ParaNet(sm).Information.Service
|
|
From: ParaNet.Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (sm)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
|
|
Subject: K2 Report - Conclusion
|
|
Message-ID: <139015.2A56876E@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
|
|
Date: 5 Jul 92 05:13:14 GMT
|
|
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
|
|
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/428.0 - <ParaNet(sm) , Arvada CO
|
|
Lines: 211
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Forwarded from "ParaNet UFO Echo"
|
|
* Originally from ParaNet(sm) Information Service
|
|
* Originally dated 07-04-92 22:12
|
|
|
|
<<<<<<..Continued from previous message>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Report # 3 By Staff # 2: Date: August 11, 1989, Time: 1500 PDT
|
|
Location: K-2
|
|
|
|
Following the events of the night before, I made a quick trip to
|
|
check out the K-2 area.
|
|
|
|
Observation: There was a "burned" or scorched area on the
|
|
ground, 30 feet in diameter, at the LZ-1 (landing zone 1)
|
|
apparently, where an object had landed. In the rush to get there,
|
|
I forgot to take my camera. No pictures were obtained. After
|
|
further checking out the area, I left. I decided to return the
|
|
next day with a camera to get pictures of the burn marks.
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Report # 4 By Staff # 2: Date: August 12, 1989, Time: 1300 PDT
|
|
Location: K-2
|
|
|
|
Observation: Another quick trip to K-2 -- this time with the
|
|
camera.
|
|
|
|
"This second trip -- brought a surprise. The burned round mark
|
|
on the ground wasn't there (the one I had observed the day
|
|
before. The 30 foot diameter burned area). It looks like "they"
|
|
(the Greys) had removed everything that would show they had
|
|
landed there. I did some digging, but there was nothing to show
|
|
for it. They had replaced the ground (the burned area) with new
|
|
soil, including the dead grass that covers the ground. They seem
|
|
to know we are on to them, and are making it difficult for us to
|
|
prove anything. From now on, the camera goes with me everywhere."
|
|
See Exhibits 19 and 20.
|
|
|
|
Memo August 12, 1989 From Staff # 1 To: Staff # 2
|
|
|
|
Our contacts in the Air Force verify that on the night of August
|
|
10, 1989, at the time indicated in Report # 1 of that date, that
|
|
eight F-4's, scrambled from Beale AFB, CA. They had a brief
|
|
radar-lock, on a "bogie" in the area described. However, they
|
|
lost the target, due to ground clutter when it suddenly descended
|
|
into the mountainous terrain. They returned to the base when a
|
|
further sweep of the area proved fruitless.
|
|
|
|
You're right, the AF had a blip on their radar, but lost it when
|
|
the ship dropped into that 20-mile approach corridor between the
|
|
valleys and the radar dead zone.
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Comments by Staff # 1 Date: 8/15/89, Time: 1300 PDT
|
|
|
|
The events taking place, as described in the preceding reports,
|
|
indicate on-going activity at the K-2 site. This activity, adds
|
|
weight to the conclusions and evidence gathered by our Survey
|
|
Team. Those findings were included in the "K-2, Special Report"
|
|
Dated 7/28/89. These recent events taking place at K-2 validate
|
|
our initial findings.
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Comments by Staff # 1 Date: 8/29/89
|
|
|
|
Observations of night-time activity at K-2, over the past month,
|
|
indicate that alien crafts are making supply runs at two week
|
|
intervals. All of our attempts, on site, to photograph or video
|
|
tape their arrival, unloading and departures have failed. The
|
|
aliens seem to detect our presence even though we have made every
|
|
effort to remain concealed. On two occasions, from our concealed
|
|
location, we have observed one of their craft making a landing
|
|
approach. The craft suddenly veers off, about two miles from the
|
|
base, and quickly leaves the area. For both practical and
|
|
economic reasons we cannot continue this surveillance. In our
|
|
opinion, we have validated the existence of the base and the
|
|
alien activity associated with this site.
|
|
|
|
* * * ADDENDUM:
|
|
|
|
6/23/92 ADDITIONAL CONCLUSION
|
|
|
|
Previously, we mentioned the extreme curiosity exhibited by U.S.
|
|
Forest Rangers, and their barrage of questions while we conducted
|
|
the scientific survey of K-2 in July of 1989. The reason for
|
|
their conduct and questions became known in August of 1989 and
|
|
during the course of subsequent investigations at K-2. Refer to
|
|
Exhibit 21.
|
|
|
|
As a result of the public disclosure of the Alien Base revealed
|
|
in this report, it will prove most interesting to observe what
|
|
action is taken by any unit of the U.S. Government to deal with
|
|
this situation. It is doubtful they will allow an Alien Base to
|
|
operate right under their noses.
|
|
|
|
This would be an excellent occasion for the public, in large
|
|
numbers, to camp out at the K-2 site, use their home video
|
|
cameras to record what activity occurs and whether they are
|
|
ordered to leave the area.
|
|
|
|
Also, without a doubt, it is not difficult to predict a scenario
|
|
in which well-paid and learned government experts will proclaim
|
|
that no alien base exists at K-2. In the interim, nobody would be
|
|
surprised, would they (??), if the area was suddenly fenced off
|
|
by a double perimeter chain-link fence and patrolled by security
|
|
guards. The public may even be denied any access to the area.
|
|
Now, what would that suggest to you?
|
|
|
|
It's something of a Catch-22 situation for the government. Any
|
|
action taken to suppress the alien base will be revealed and
|
|
noticed by the public, and any inction, hoping people will forget
|
|
it, allows the aliens to continue their operations. It's a bad
|
|
situation for the aliens, as well. All the publicity and people
|
|
hanging around the area will disrupt their activities. Somehow,
|
|
the term "poetic justice" seems correct in this situation.
|
|
Perhaps you'll agree.
|
|
|
|
K-2 DATA EXHIBIT PACKAGE
|
|
|
|
LIST OF EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 1: Quincy - La Porte Area Map.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 2: Aeronautical Chart of K-2 Area detailing Military
|
|
Operation Areas (MOA's) Boundaries, Radar coverage and approach
|
|
corridors.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3: Expanded Topographic Map of K-2 Site.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 4: Text - Detailed Magnetometer Data of K-2, Section 3.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 5: K2Q3S3 (Quad 3, Section 3) Magnetic Field Stats
|
|
indicating section line numbers, line stations and magnetometer
|
|
readings.
|
|
|
|
Exhibits 6 A,B,C,D: K2Q3S3 Top View. Detailed Magnetic Profile
|
|
Charts of Section 3 survey lines.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 7: K2Q3S3 High-Resolution Magnetic Contour Map of
|
|
Section 3, Quad 3, indicating major underground features.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 7A: Text - Describing the hidden underground parts of
|
|
the Alien base, in the area surveyed, and revealed by the
|
|
Magnetometer Data.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 8: Text - K2SCARP Magnetic Data (Section 3) Re-Survey of
|
|
lines 30, 40, and 50, for expanded details of Item A, line 40.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 9: K2SCARP Top View, Magnetic Profile of Lines 30, 40
|
|
and 50.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10: K2SCARP Magnetic Contour Map showing expanded
|
|
features of Item A on Lines 30, 40, and 50.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 11: Photo - of a section of the modern blackop road
|
|
fronting the entrance to the K-2 Site.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 12: Photo - K-2 Site entrance road and portion of
|
|
Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1).
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 13: Photo - LZ-1 and the Alien Base.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 14: Photo - South end of Alien Base and LZ-2.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 15: Photo - The mysterious Dike and Pond.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 16: Photo - The Rock Scarp detailed on Line 40 of the
|
|
magnetometer data.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 17: Photo - Medium view of the overall K-2 Site, landing
|
|
areas and the Alien base.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 18: Photo - Long View of K-2 showing the hidden approach
|
|
corridors to the site.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 19: Photo - Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1).
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 20: Photo - Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1) showing landing marks.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 21: Text - Describing latest finding regarding K-2.
|
|
|
|
All of the exhibits listed in this report are contained in the
|
|
printed K-2 Report available from the publisher. All printed
|
|
versions of the Phoenix Project Special Reports contain the
|
|
exhibits referenced in the reports text. Send a self-addressed,
|
|
stamped envelope to Advent Publishing Company, P.O. Box 3748,
|
|
Carson City, Nevada 89702, for a list of Phoenix Project Special
|
|
Reports.
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL NOTE:
|
|
|
|
Very recently, the Phoenix Project conducted an undercover
|
|
investigation of the U.S. Forest Service Headquarters at Quincy,
|
|
California. That investigation has revealed startling new
|
|
information. A Special "K-2 Supplemental Report," will be issued
|
|
in the near future. It will reveal this new information and
|
|
contain exhibits of the evidence obtained.
|
|
|
|
END OF FILE
|
|
PARANET FILENAME: K2RPT.REP
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
ParaNet(sm) Information Service - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
|
|
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
|
|
INTERNET: ParaNet(sm).Information.Service@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
|
|
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |