162 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
162 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: MJ-12/THE EUROPEAN CONNECTION 10/89 FILE: UFO1871
|
|
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
MJ-12 - THE EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Initially the MJ12 papers were sent to Mr. Shandera in an envelope,
|
|
post marked Albuquerquee, as undeveloped 35mm film. Later on Moore
|
|
published them. Their publication caused a great deal of surprise
|
|
mixed with doubts and anxiety in UFO circles worldwide. Some admitted
|
|
them without any questions to be authentic, some did not. There was
|
|
some preliminary work done with regards to their authenticity and the
|
|
saga still continues today. What is important in this event is that
|
|
Mr. Moore's ex-colleague or colleague, Stanton Friedman is commissioned
|
|
to carry out further research on these documents. The funds are provided
|
|
to him by the Fund For UFO Research and MUFON, so I am told. The role
|
|
of the funding organizations in itself is raising some questions. One
|
|
might ask why? For example, at the time when Moore was busy discrediting
|
|
Paul Bennewitz for obvious reasons, Bruce Maccabee was following similar
|
|
track, suggesting indirectly, thru his own so called independent inquiry,
|
|
more or less what Moore was implying. This is quite obvious in Maccabee's
|
|
correspondence with MacCampell. (Some copies of these correspondence are
|
|
in my possession).
|
|
|
|
Bill Cooper and few others had openly expressed their suspicion about
|
|
Mr. Moore's conducts. Cooper's invitation from the last MUFON symposium
|
|
was withdrawn and Moore allowed in. I would be surprised if anything but
|
|
a smoke screen would come out from this so called investigation into the
|
|
authenticity and origin of MJ12 papers from this current research. This
|
|
is yet another close-shop approach by two American UFO groups who work
|
|
very closely with each other and hardly ever allow any other even volunteer
|
|
organization to participate in their operations. This I can say with
|
|
absolute certainty and reason. At the time when the Gulf Breeze case
|
|
surfaced and again these two organizations were involved to the degree of
|
|
monopolization of the case, CUFOS's effort was responded with utmost
|
|
venom. My own inquiry at that time as one of their own consultants
|
|
(MUFON) to have some of these photographs analysed was severely rejected
|
|
by Walt Andrus. And even today I am not aware of anybody else who
|
|
managed to study those Gulf Breeze photographs but Bruce Maccabee from
|
|
FUFOR, who was recently awarded I think 5000 US Dollars by MUFON. I
|
|
might be carrying some poison in my pen but please do not forget what
|
|
is mentioned here is actually happened and is not a hypothecy. It is
|
|
like foxes mediating the wolf for devouring the lamb.
|
|
|
|
But, even more important is the European connection of this entire
|
|
bizarre affair. What I am about to say is what I am told in person by
|
|
the person concerned, and the confirmation is also documented on video
|
|
tape in another occasion in relation to this topic. Mr. Tim Good has
|
|
said to me personally and in a recent UFO conference, held by the
|
|
Yorkshire UFO Society in September this year (1989), where he was a guest
|
|
speaker that, he received his MJ12 papers from a CIA source independently
|
|
in US. He went on saying that he is pleased to say that he was the first
|
|
person to publish them. When I questioned him personally in another
|
|
occasion prior to this conference few months ago, he said that his source
|
|
is still an active CIA member, middle aged. Was he referring to Mr. Moore
|
|
then? Did he know THEN, that Mr. Moore is an active agent and yet despite
|
|
all his claims to reveal the COVER UPS he was actually covering him up?
|
|
If this is the case why, what interest does he have in all this? Or, he
|
|
was talking to me about yet another CIA agent? At some stage prior to
|
|
publishing his MJ12 papers in his book 'Above Top Secret', Mr. Good
|
|
travelled to USA to see Moore and compare his documents of MJ12 with
|
|
Moore's. Yet, what is more intriguing is that Good's published papers,
|
|
whilst taking into consideration his claim to be the first to publish,
|
|
and Moore's are the same. Moore apparently admitted to have tampered
|
|
the MJ12 documents for reasons unknown. The next question is, what is
|
|
Mr. Good's role in all this?
|
|
|
|
When I put this question to Mr. Good, he replied that, Moore published
|
|
his papers initially as I did, later on he decided to make some alterations.
|
|
(Private conversation, the author and Mr. Good, Sep.23, 1989). This I
|
|
can not accept because once a so called document/s published, the latter
|
|
altered or shortened version could easily be spotted and compared with the
|
|
initial publication. There are two important points which would underline
|
|
my reasoning. One, we should not forget that Mr. Good's 'Above Top Secret'
|
|
book had a world wide distribution, hence if there were any differences
|
|
with Moore's version, both parties would have been subjected to inquiries
|
|
about their anomalies. Two, only recently Moore admitted tampering the
|
|
documents, and before that no one had noticed any differences. If Mr.
|
|
Good was aware of this tampering, as a conscincious researcher, why he
|
|
never mentioned anything about it to UFO community to safeguard the public's
|
|
interest? Or, was it that he was influenced by Mr. Moore in his facts
|
|
finding trip? Or, was it a joint decision by both parties to publish
|
|
the documents as they were published in Mr. Good's book and by Mr. Moore,
|
|
after, may be they both tampered the papers?
|
|
|
|
In a written letter to me by CIA, dated 07 MAR 1989, in connection to
|
|
my inquiry about MJ12, they say "CIA review of a 'Majestic 12', Majic 12'
|
|
or MJ 12 - there are variations among the requesters, package has been
|
|
requested by a number of persons worldwide. Only one part of that
|
|
package as submitted to us was purported to be a CIA document; it was a
|
|
poorly done photocopied fabrication. We cannot identify any CIA equities
|
|
in any of the other material, and it is not our function to determine
|
|
who does have equities therein" it goes on saying "Unfortunately, as you
|
|
may know, there have been numerous hoaxes perpetrated over the years in
|
|
the field of UFO investigation; photocopiers and carbon copies make this
|
|
process relatively simple."
|
|
|
|
Bearing CIA's reply in mind, if Mr. Good claims that his papers were sent
|
|
to him by an active CIA agent, then I think, his so called agent has some
|
|
answering to make, and it is a bad time to divert part of this inquiry
|
|
towards Mr. Good. Surely, if he knows his source, as he has admitted to
|
|
me, he should be able to get some questions answered with regards to the
|
|
validity or invalidity of these documents and save the ufologists part of
|
|
this sixteen thousand dollars. And if he does not trust his source, again
|
|
he should be able to help the line of the inquiry by adding that point
|
|
that, these documents might have been fakes and dis-information. Although,
|
|
this would be rather difficult for him now, but still it is not too late.
|
|
He should have had this assurity from his source before the publication,
|
|
and somehow I think he received that from Mr. Moore. But, of course we
|
|
now know who Moore was and is. Other important point is that if Mr. Good's
|
|
source has provided him with disinformation, which in return Mr. Good has
|
|
passed on to ufologists, by the same agent? This we do not know. Assuming
|
|
that Mr. Good's source IS reliable, again Mr. Good would be the best person
|
|
to go to in order to find out the 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' of the MJ12 documents,
|
|
in seeking his assistance, that I am sure he should be glad to offer.
|
|
How? In the same quiet way that his source provided him with this documents,
|
|
this agent should be able to give him the supporting evidence. There are
|
|
various options and methods open to the ufologists to further this
|
|
investigations.
|
|
|
|
Of course, all these options are dependent on the assumption that Mr. Good
|
|
has told us the truth. But, if what he has said in some stage is proven
|
|
to be not the truth, then the honest ufologists are faced yet with another
|
|
'Unofficial' MAJESTIC 12 group in their own community which upon their
|
|
will and well established stance in UFO circles, give us any time they wish
|
|
bunch of gubbly googs and expect us to swallow. I am not putting any
|
|
comments about Mr. Good's close ties and links with the elite, official/
|
|
unofficial information-emitting circles here. Neither I am passing any
|
|
judgement about the comments he has made couple of times to one of his
|
|
close UFO colleagues that 'If I put infront of you solid, concrete evidence
|
|
to prove to you that UFOs do constitute a serious threat to the national
|
|
security of U.K., what would you do?' and his fellow colleague's answer
|
|
that "I would publish it", and Mr. Good's final comment 'Therefore, I can
|
|
not give you that evidence!' In other words this/these possible evidence
|
|
is for 'The Eyes Only'. (Bearing in mind that the official stance of
|
|
Ministry of Defence in U.K. is that UFOs DO NOT constitute any threat to
|
|
the national security). How has Mr. Good come upon this evidence that
|
|
so many in UK as yet have failed, is a mystery.
|
|
|
|
I am beginning to believe that for sometimes now the UFO community has been
|
|
taken for a ride by a bunch of self acclaimed giants of ufology. Some of
|
|
these inturn are infilterated by official agencies, some others act as
|
|
double agents. I firmly believe that Moore is not the last and we might
|
|
see few more heads to roll. Although, I do hope I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Azadehdel.
|
|
|
|
================================= EOF =======================================
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
= IF YOU HAVE ANY UFO RELATED INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO SEE =
|
|
= OR HAVE DISTRIBUTED, YOU CAN NOW SEND IT VIA OUR NEW UFONET FAX LINE. =
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
= ------>>> UFONET FAX HOTLINE - 24 Hrs - (414) 351-2075 <<<------ =
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |