39 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
39 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: PROOF OF LIFE ON MARS FILE: UFO1752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIX, [CITY UNKNOWN], AUSTRALIA-APRIL 11, 1990
|
|
CR: B. CROWLEY
|
|
|
|
FORGET MEN ON THE MOON. HERE'S
|
|
|
|
NEW PROOF OF LIFE ON MARS
|
|
|
|
As these exclusive NASA photos show, the 'men on Mars' myth now takes on a startling new signficance with the discovery of two new 'faces' on the red planet
|
|
|
|
Was there life on Mars? Scientists haven't stopped arguing about the red planet's unique features since American space missions photographed them in 1972 and 1976.
|
|
Recently the debate has heightened with the confirmed discovery of two more "faces" on Mars, in addition to a visage-like structure spotted on one of those missions.
|
|
Some scientists claim these "faces" are actual monuments from a lost civilsation, while others maintain they are merely random geographical patterns.
|
|
But there is one thing they agree on-the space missions' shots revealed several highly unusual rock designs on Mars.
|
|
They include a configuration of huge "pyramids" near the planet's South Pole, sometimes called the "Inca City", and a giant "face" in the region known as Cydonia.
|
|
The face looks like a giant sphinz, set squarely in the red planet's timeless sands, and is about the same size and shape as our own Ayers Rock.
|
|
This enigmatic visage has been described as "simian" and "monkey-faced", with some scientists even claiming it resembles Jesus Christ and comparing its features with those on the controversial Shroud of Turin.
|
|
More conservative scientists believe it is a natural formation, possibly caused by wind erosion. Their views reflect established scientific theory, which dismisses the idea of a former civilisation leaving behind great monuments.
|
|
However, meticulous computer image-enchancement work by two former National Aeronautics and Space Administration workers, Vincent DiPietro and Gregory Molenaar, supports the alternative theory that the face is an artefact built by a lost civilisation.
|
|
DiPietro and Molenaar used their unique techniques to develop some startling colour-enhanced details of the Cydonia face that reveal, among other things, an eyeball in its one visible eye-socket. Another US computer enhcncement specialist, Dr Mark Carlotto of the Analytic Science Corporation in Reading, Massachusetts, has since produced separate blow-up pictures that clearly show teeth in the mouth area.
|
|
And the latest research from DiPietro and Molenaar suggests that there are two other faces on Mars-at least one of which matches the Cydonia face in many key details.
|
|
This new evidence points away from the "wind erosion" theory and backs up the higher culture argument.
|
|
|
|
DiPietro and Molenaar discovered the two new faces in the region known as Utopia.
|
|
The first face bears a particularly strong resemblance to the Cydonia face.
|
|
The first Utopia face and its Cydonia counterpart share three kdy aspects: an indentation above the right eye cavity, a distinctive notch in the cheek below the eyes and and Egyptian-style "headdress" (or is it a space helmet?).
|
|
Unlike the Cydonia face, the nose of the Utopia face seems to have been damaged-like our own famous Sphinx in Egypt, which had its nose smashed by a Muslim fanatic around 1400 AD.
|
|
The Mars face dwarfs its Egyptian cousin, measuring about 2.5 kilometres long and 2 kilometres wide. It would have taken considerably more than a passing Bedouin to deface it!
|
|
According to DiPietro and colleagues, the second Utopia face, further south, also has the three key markings, but its image is nowhere near as sharp as the other Utopia face.
|
|
But why do we need a third face to confirm the existence of a Martian high culture? Shouldn't the two faces already discovered be exciting enough evodence?
|
|
|
|
By Brian Crowley
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |