77 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
77 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
SUBJECT: IS THE K2 REPORT A FAKE ? FILE: UFO1533
|
|
|
|
PART 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Validity of the K-2 Report: Addendum 2 of 2
|
|
by Joseph Harris
|
|
CIS: 70714,3321
|
|
|
|
This is a simple curiosity about the K-2 Report, and not, exactly,
|
|
an error. It does however, raise a question or two:
|
|
|
|
[Quote from K-2]
|
|
|
|
Comments by Staff # 1
|
|
Date: 8/29/89
|
|
|
|
Observations of night-time activity at K-2, over the
|
|
past month, indicate that alien crafts are making supply
|
|
runs at two week intervals. All of our attempts, on site,
|
|
to photograph or video tape their arrival, unloading and
|
|
departures have failed. The aliens seem to detect our
|
|
presence even though we have made every effort to remain
|
|
concealed. On two occasions, from our concealed location,
|
|
we have observed one of their craft making a landing
|
|
approach. The craft suddenly veers off, about two miles
|
|
from the base, and quickly leaves the area. For both
|
|
practical and economic reasons we cannot continue this
|
|
surveillance. In our opinion, we have validated the
|
|
existence of the base and the alien activity associated
|
|
with this site.
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
Two problems with this:
|
|
|
|
1. From what they say, all attempts to photograph or video tape the
|
|
objects have failed.
|
|
|
|
Yet they also say that on 2 occasions they observed landing craft
|
|
making an approach, but turning away while still 2 miles out.
|
|
|
|
Sorry guys, but ANYTHING you can see, you can photograph and
|
|
video tape. You don't mean to tell me that trained scientific-
|
|
military people went to observe a supposed alien base and FORGOT
|
|
THEIR CAMERAS? That makes about as much sense as the guy who went
|
|
to the LZ and saw landing marks, but conveniently forgot his camera.
|
|
|
|
2. They also state that over the course of the "last month" the aliens
|
|
have been making regular supply runs at 2 week intervals. That doesn't
|
|
jive with the rest of the report. That would have covered most of
|
|
the month of August, in which we already know that at least one
|
|
sighting was made. Why no mention of the others? Why was Staff # 2
|
|
so excited about his sighting on the tenth if this was to be
|
|
expected? How can they state with such confidence that the supply
|
|
runs are regular? If they make the supply runs every two weeks, then
|
|
they would only have had 2 chances to observe them. Hardly enough
|
|
data to base the opinion that these are regular supply runs...
|
|
|
|
" In our opinion, we have validated the existence of the base and the
|
|
alien activity associated with this site."
|
|
|
|
This line deserves absoloutly no comment...
|
|
|
|
Conclusion:
|
|
|
|
This portion of the K-2 report raises more questions about it's
|
|
credibility in general. If the US postal service were a bit faster,
|
|
I'd be able to post quite a bit more about the K-2 report.
|
|
Until I receive my confirming data though, this will have to remain
|
|
simply as a teaser... sorry. :^)
|
|
|
|
Joe.
|
|
|
|
**********************************************
|
|
* THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
|
|
********************************************** |