textfiles/survival/roadblok

ROADBLOCKS by Kurt Saxon   copyright 1979
     Following a nuclear war or total socio-economic collapse, 
surviving city populaces will panic. Every highway out of every 
sizeable city and town will be crowded with refugees. Most main 
highways will become clogged to the point of disuse with wrecked 
vehicles.
     With escape as the only alternative to death, drivers of 
wrecked, broken down or hopelessly blocked vehicles will commandeer 
any available vehicle, even if they have to kill the less 
aggressive drivers. Ruthless survivors will siphon the fuel from 
stalled vehicles, taking also anything they can from their owners.
     Between large cities and towns, homes will be looted by these 
desperate escapees, moving usually singly until they reach smaller 
towns. You can well imagine that any glut of such survivors 
reaching a small town will be a potentially dangerous lot and will 
have to be prevented from entering unchecked.
     Regardless of your town's officials' attitudes toward such 
probabilities, now, roadblocks will be set up after the first 
influx of refugees hits. Even the most apathetic mayor will then 
order martial law concerning the townspeople and especially the 
refugees.
     All too many officials will be mentally and emotionally 
unprepared and so will be likely to impose total roadblocks, 
forcing the refugees to turn back. This will be a mistake, as the 
gathering of mobs of frustrated refugees will only create the kind 
of Killer Caravans described in my last editorial. Such caravans 
would endanger the towns, as they would destroy the counties' 
farmers and resources the townsmen will need to survive.
     Roadblocks can be set up which will benefit both the townsmen 
and the refugees. Such roadblocks would be checkpoints and 
relocation centers, rather than total barricades causing more chaos 
than they were meant to prevent.
     Aside from a number of criminal types among the refugees, the 
majority would be only desperate, shortsighted but otherwise decent 
people. There would also be many who had relatives and refuges 
further on. Then, there would be many among the refugees which the 
town would do well to accept, rather than turn away.
     A basic consideration of any potential Warlord would be that 
nearly all the manufactured goods used by the townsmen are from the 
outside. Most of the processed foods are also trucked in. Any town 
cut off from the outside would be in deep trouble if total 
isolation were imposed.
     Nearly every town is surrounded by large farms and tracts of 
rangeland. The products from these would no longer have an outside 
market. Nor would the monocultures, or one crop systems be 
practical after the crash. Truck gardening would be the best 
system, with refugees growing vegetables and small plots of grains, 
rather than, say, multi-acreages of wheat, corn, etc.
     The heavy farm machinery would soon break down and hand labor 
would be in great demand. The best course to follow would be to 
break up these large holdings into nine acre plots and settle 
refugee farmers and manual laborers on them. Of course, the owners 
would be recompensed by some barter system or the refugees could 
work as sharecroppers.
     Since the town system will have to be completely reorganized, 
with cottage industries turning out everything from shoes to nails, 
any skills will be in demand. Few small towns have the skilled 
workers to keep it going when outside commerce is stopped.
     Machinists, tool and die makers, chemists, plumbers and the 
whole caste of skilled laborers will be needed in abundance. The 
local skilled workers simply won't be able to handle all the work 
needed to keep the town from coming apart.
     All through the various volumes of THE SURVIVOR are crafts and 
trades which must be applied if a town is to continue. You can't 
expect the locals to be able to develop the skills to implement 
them in the time needed to make life continue comfortably.
     Alternative energy systems will have to be constructed to 
supply every household. Steam engines will have to be built to 
power machinery. The machinery will have to be built to turn out 
products no longer available.
     Whereas a small town of 10,000 might seem crowded now, double 
and triple the population will be needed to start over. More people 
will not be a crowd. Properly dispersed over the unused land, a 
city-state can evolve where every pair of hands and every mind will 
be usefully occupied.
     Doctors and chemists can keep the hardy segment of the 
population healthy, although, at first, many people will die simply 
because they can't face an unfamiliar future. So don't fear 
overpopulation by outsiders.
     This doesn't mean that every refugee will be welcome or 
tolerated. But the refugees will be a source of many of the skills 
and knowledge the locals can't supply.
     The roadblocks at every entrance around the town will be to 
screen the refugees to determine which should be absorbed into the 
population. Those with practical educations and those willing to do 
physical labor should be welcomed.
     Those refugees who are obvious criminals, fags, whores, bums 
and sundry trash should be hanged. No need to let them go to ravage 
and pollute communities outside your area. Whether you like it or 
not, the crash will force a culling of the anti-social. Those 
parasites who live as predators will be doomed anyway, as austerity 
forbids tolerance of the predatory and dissolute.
     The refugees absorbed into the community would also be a 
source of supply to the town. The crash will put people on foot and 
bicycles and horse carts, unless individuals convert their engines 
to use methane. But most of the cars would be a communal resource. 
The vehicles can be stripped of wiring, electrical components, 
generators, batteries, glass, sheet metal, steel, etc., all useful 
for building other things.
     The best way to make a roadblock is to have junked autos 
blocking the roadsides. Then, line up about ten autos, five on each 
lane, staggered about fifty feet apart. That way, a refugee would 
have to slow to about 5 miles an hour and zigzag through.
     Many good and worthwhile people would be distrustful of 
roadblocks of any kind. You must make the roadblocks impenetrable 
to undesirables but as official and businesslike as possible. 
Refugees who simply want a chance for life will welcome authority. 
Uniformed officers manning a proper way station will be a 
comforting sight to refugees who would expect to get shot or robbed 
by a mob of armed civilians manning a roadblock.
     A proper sign for a roadblock would read something like this: 
"WAY STATION. FIRST AID. FOOD. RELOCATION CENTER. STOP AND 
REGISTER."  A park ranger type and a couple of uniformed police and 
National Guardsmen would give the decent refugee the confidence to 
cooperate.
     Such a roadblock would have to be legitimate and fair. Only if 
a person who stopped were an obvious anti-social type should his 
property be confiscated. He wouldn't care, since he would be hanged. 
     There would be cases criminal types would see the roadblock 
ahead, turn, and head back the other way. These would be the most 
dangerous people in our decadent society. They must not live.
     Chances are, they would be dopers and murderers who had looted 
pharmacies to keep up their habits. They would probably have great 
supplies of drugs best used to relieve suffering, of which there 
would be a good deal in the town as supplies ran out. Also, they 
might have innocent captives, especially girls. Such cars would 
also be likely to be full of guns and ammo.
     Perhaps a half-mile below the roadblock should be a series of 
overturned vehicles, seemingly wrecks, but placed there to force 
any returnees to slow down. Hidden at the side of the road should 
be a couple of snipers. As the creeps slow to get around the 
wrecks, the driver should be shot. I'd love that assignment.
     When the driver was shot, survivors should be commanded to 
leave the vehicle with hands raised. If they should begin firing, a 
couple of shotgun blasts should finish them off. Hopefully, the 
passengers would get out and surrender and any captives could be 
released and taken forward and any criminals who surrendered could 
be taken to town and hanged.
     Anyone having a legitimate reason to return from the 
roadblock, especially refugees coming from the opposite direction, 
should display an official pass prominently on their windshield. 
Some might be locals with business in other parts of the county. 
Others might just be decent refugees who didn't care to settle in 
the town and learned from the townsmen that their destinations were 
impossible to reach and chose alternate destinations in the other 
direction. Of course, no one should be permitted to go back at 
night, since the snipers could not distinguish between legitimates 
and criminals.
     Roadblocks could also serve as a compassionate measure for 
those who had a distant destination but were uncertain of their 
chances of getting there. They could leave their children in the 
town in the care of foster parents. If they finally reached their 
destination, when travel became safer, they could return for their 
children. If they didn't live to return, their children could be 
saved to become members of the community.
     The proper us of the roadblock, supervised by the right kind 
of Warlord, would not only save the town, but help rebuild 
civilization. Through it, professional people, such as teachers, 
doctors, scientists, military veterans, etc., could be gleaned from 
the otherwise doomed.
     Roadblocks must never be misused. Personal property, 
regardless of its nature, must not be confiscated from any decent 
refugee, whether he is chosen to become a citizen of town or 
decides to move on. Only if he is an obvious predator and is 
hanged, should his property be consigned to the common resource pool.
     It may be obvious that a refugee's property was looted from 
some store along the way. Even so, he must be allowed to keep it, 
again, unless he is an obvious criminal. Unless you know he killed 
its owner to get it, you must let him alone.
     During earthquakes, floods, and other natural disasters, 
looters are shot. But with the collapse of our socio-economic 
system or nuclear war, the condition of ruin may, in most cases, be 
considered permanent. Therefore, if a store is ownerless and the 
area is ruined, looting is simply preserving.
     If a refugee has a carload of merchandise obviously taken from 
a store, or even a pharmacy in a blighted area, how do you know he 
killed the owner to get it? Would you have passed it up? These are 
things you must consider before passing judgment. If you hang a man 
for looting in a city no longer habitable, without proof of his 
using force, you may be wrong.
     A good way to tell if he is a legitimate opportunist is to 
invite him to settle and use the goods for barter. He may not care 
to stay. He may want to move on to relatives ahead and barter 
there. That must be left up to him.
     If you confiscate his goods and/or hang him as a criminal just 
because he has goods you want, you will then be a criminal. 
However, if he has a car loaded with narcotics, it might seem 
pretty obvious that he's a doper who might well have killed to get 
the goods.
     Furthermore, he would not be willing to barter them. If he 
were legitimate, he would be willing to turn them over to the 
hospital or give a good reason for trading them to a hospital in a 
town further away.
     If he were suspect, he could be quarantined for 24 hours. If 
he were a doper he would begin to get withdrawal symptoms soon. 
Then he could be hanged or O.D.ed and the drugs could be turned 
over to the hospital with no guilt on the part of the Warlord.
     However, if he showed no symptoms of drug withdrawal and gave 
a reasonable explanation for wanting to keep them, let him go. Any 
doctor could tell if his stock were medicinal or chosen especially 
for the doper's trade. Let a doctor decide.
     If all these rules are followed, they will provide several 
advantages to the community and the culture. The town can give 
refuge to hundreds of doctors, scientists, tradesmen, skilled 
workers, veterans and others who will be an asset to society.
     By giving refuge to the best people, you'd have a city-state 
which could leap centuries ahead of ours in a couple of 
generations. By giving safe passage and some rations to the lesser 
able and refuge to the children, you'd be establishing a climate of 
humanity and compassion which could set an example for harsher areas.
     Another good thing about the roadblocks would be the culling 
out of some of the worst people in today's society. Unfortunately, 
the worst among humans are the most tenacious to life. While the 
more decent and docile will perish through lack of aggressive 
spirit, the trashiest scum will bull their way through situations 
you wouldn't believe. Killing them off would be doing future 
generations a favor.
     So a proper system of roadblocks around your town would be far 
from repressive. It could mean the difference between survival and 
death for our culture.