46 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
46 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
Ovulation versus cretinism
|
|
|
|
Two different theories exist concerning the origin of children: the theory of
|
|
sexual reproduction, and the theory of the stork. Many people believe in the
|
|
theory of sexual reproduction because they have been taught this theory
|
|
at school.
|
|
|
|
In reality, however, many of the world's leading scientists are in favour of
|
|
the theory of the stork. If the theory of sexual reproduction
|
|
is taught in schools,
|
|
it must only be taught as a theory and not as the truth. Alternative
|
|
theories, such as the theory of the stork, must also be taught.
|
|
|
|
Evidence supporting the theory of the stork includes the following:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
It is a scientifically established fact that the stork does exist.
|
|
This can be confirmed by every ornithologist.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
The alledged human foetal development contains several features
|
|
that the theory of sexual reproduction is unable to explain.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
The theory of sexual reproduction implies that a child is approximately
|
|
nine months old at birth. This is an absurd claim. Everyone knows that a
|
|
newborn child is newborn.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
According to the theory of sexual reproduction, children are a result of
|
|
sexual intercourse. There are, however, several well documented cases where
|
|
sexual intercourse has not led to the birth of a child.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Statistical studies in the Netherlands have indicated a positive correlation
|
|
between the birth rate and the number of storks. Both are decreasing.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
The theory of the stork can be investigated by rigorous scientific methods.
|
|
The only assumption involved is that children are delivered by the stork.
|
|
|
|
(Original version by Erkki Aalto, Dept. of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Stork
|
|
Science, University of Helsinki ---
|
|
English version by Jopi Louko, Institute of Stork Research,
|
|
University of Alberta)
|