548 lines
27 KiB
Perl
548 lines
27 KiB
Perl
Path: spies!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!zazen!uwec.edu!mcelwre
|
|
From: mcelwre@cnsvax.uwec.edu
|
|
Newsgroups: sci.energy
|
|
Subject: LARSONIAN Physics
|
|
Message-ID: <1992Dec3.185938.2626@cnsvax.uwec.edu>
|
|
Date: 3 Dec 92 18:59:38 -0600
|
|
Organization: University of Wisconsin Eau Claire
|
|
Lines: 538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LARSONIAN "Reciprocal System"
|
|
|
|
Orthodox physicists, astronomers, and astrophysicists
|
|
CLAIM to be looking for a "Unified Field Theory" in which all
|
|
of the forces of the universe can be explained with a single
|
|
set of laws or equations. But they have been systematically
|
|
IGNORING or SUPPRESSING an excellent one for 30 years!
|
|
|
|
The late Physicist Dewey B. Larson's comprehensive
|
|
GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe, which he
|
|
calls the "Reciprocal System", is built on two fundamental
|
|
postulates about the physical and mathematical natures of
|
|
space and time:
|
|
|
|
(1) "The physical universe is composed ENTIRELY of ONE
|
|
component, MOTION, existing in THREE dimensions, in DISCRETE
|
|
UNITS, and in two RECIPROCAL forms, SPACE and TIME."
|
|
|
|
(2) "The physical universe conforms to the relations of
|
|
ORDINARY COMMUTATIVE mathematics, its magnitudes are
|
|
ABSOLUTE, and its geometry is EUCLIDEAN."
|
|
|
|
From these two postulates, Larson developed a COMPLETE
|
|
Theoretical Universe, using various combinations of
|
|
translational, vibrational, rotational, and vibrational-
|
|
rotational MOTIONS, the concepts of IN-ward and OUT-ward
|
|
SCALAR MOTIONS, and speeds in relation to the Speed of Light
|
|
(which Larson called "UNIT VELOCITY" and "THE NATURAL
|
|
DATUM").
|
|
|
|
At each step in the development, Larson was able to
|
|
MATCH objects in his Theoretical Universe with objects in the
|
|
REAL physical universe, (photons, sub-atomic particles
|
|
[INCOMPLETE ATOMS], charges, atoms, molecules, globular star
|
|
clusters, galaxies, binary star systems, solar systems, white
|
|
dwarf stars, pulsars, quasars, ETC.), even objects NOT YET
|
|
DISCOVERED THEN (such as EXPLODING GALAXIES, and GAMMA-RAY
|
|
BURSTS).
|
|
|
|
And applying his Theory to his NEW model of the atom,
|
|
Larson was able to precisely and accurately CALCULATE inter-
|
|
atomic distances in crystals and molecules.
|
|
|
|
All of this is described in good detail, with-OUT fancy
|
|
complex mathematics, in his books.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOKS of Dewey B. Larson
|
|
|
|
The following is a complete list of the late Physicist
|
|
Dewey B. Larson's books about his comprehensive GENERAL
|
|
UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe. Some of the early
|
|
books are out of print now, but still available through
|
|
inter-library loan.
|
|
|
|
"The Structure of the Physical Universe" (1959)
|
|
|
|
"The Case AGAINST the Nuclear Atom" (1963)
|
|
|
|
"Beyond Newton" (1964)
|
|
|
|
"New Light on Space and Time" (1965)
|
|
|
|
"Quasars and Pulsars" (1971)
|
|
|
|
"NOTHING BUT MOTION" (1979)
|
|
[A $9.50 SUBSTITUTE for the $8.3 BILLION "Super
|
|
Collider".]
|
|
[The last four chapters EXPLAIN chemical bonding.]
|
|
|
|
"The Neglected Facts of Science" (1982)
|
|
|
|
"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION" (1984)
|
|
[FINAL SOLUTIONS to most ALL astrophysical
|
|
mysteries.]
|
|
|
|
"BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER" (1988)
|
|
[Available from:
|
|
The International Society of Unified Science
|
|
(ISUS)
|
|
1680 E. Atkin Ave.
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physicist Dewey B. Larson's Background
|
|
|
|
Physicist Dewey B. Larson was a retired Engineer
|
|
(Chemical or Electrical). He was about 91 years old when he
|
|
died a couple of years ago. He had a Bachelor of Science
|
|
Degree in Engineering Science from Oregon State University.
|
|
He developed his comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
|
|
physical universe while trying to develop a way to COMPUTE
|
|
chemical properties based only on the elements used.
|
|
|
|
Larson's lack of a fancy "PH.D." degree might be one
|
|
reason that orthodox physicists are ignoring him, but it is
|
|
NOT A VALID REASON. Sometimes it takes a relative outsider
|
|
to CLEARLY SEE THE FOREST THROUGH THE TREES. At the same
|
|
time, it is clear from his books that he also knew ORTHODOX
|
|
physics and astronomy as well as ANY physicist or astronomer,
|
|
well enough to point out all their CONTRADICTIONS, AD HOC
|
|
ASSUMPTIONS, PRINCIPLES OF IMPOTENCE, IN-CONSISTENCIES, ETC..
|
|
|
|
Larson did NOT have the funds, etc. to experimentally
|
|
test his Theory. And it was NOT necessary for him to do so.
|
|
He simply compared the various parts of his Theory with OTHER
|
|
researchers' experimental and observational data. And in
|
|
many cases, HIS explanation FIT BETTER.
|
|
|
|
A SELF-CONSISTENT Theory is MUCH MORE than the ORTHODOX
|
|
physicists and astronomers have! They CLAIM to be looking
|
|
for a "unified field theory" that works, but have been
|
|
IGNORING one for over 30 years now!
|
|
|
|
"Modern physics" does NOT explain the physical universe
|
|
so well. Some parts of some of Larson's books are FULL of
|
|
quotations of leading orthodox physicists and astronomers who
|
|
agree. And remember that "epicycles", "crystal spheres",
|
|
"geocentricity", "flat earth theory", etc., ALSO once SEEMED
|
|
to explain it well, but were later proved CONCEPTUALLY WRONG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Frank H. Meyer, Professor Emeritus of UW-Superior,
|
|
was/is a STRONG PROPONENT of Larson's Theory, and was (or
|
|
still is) President of Larson's organization, "THE
|
|
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF UNIFIED SCIENCE", and Editor of
|
|
their quarterly Journal "RECIPROCITY". He moved to
|
|
Minneapolis after retiring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Super Collider" BOONDOGGLE!
|
|
|
|
I am AGAINST contruction of the "Superconducting Super
|
|
Collider", in Texas or anywhere else. It would be a GROSS
|
|
WASTE of money, and contribute almost NOTHING of "scientific"
|
|
value.
|
|
|
|
Most physicists don't realize it, but, according to the
|
|
comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the late Physicist
|
|
Dewey B. Larson, as described in his books, the strange GOOFY
|
|
particles ("mesons", "hyperons", ALLEGED "quarks", etc.)
|
|
which they are finding in EXISTING colliders (Fermi Lab,
|
|
Cern, etc.) are really just ATOMS of ANTI-MATTER, which are
|
|
CREATED by the high-energy colliding beams, and which quickly
|
|
disintegrate like cosmic rays because they are incompatible
|
|
with their environment.
|
|
|
|
A larger and more expensive collider will ONLY create a
|
|
few more elements of anti-matter that the physicists have not
|
|
seen there before, and the physicists will be EVEN MORE
|
|
CONFUSED THAN THEY ARE NOW!
|
|
|
|
Are a few more types of anti-matter atoms worth the $8.3
|
|
BILLION cost?!! Don't we have much more important uses for
|
|
this WASTED money?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another thing to consider is that the primary proposed
|
|
location in Texas has a serious and growing problem with some
|
|
kind of "fire ants" eating the insulation off underground
|
|
cables. How much POISONING of the ground and ground water
|
|
with insecticides will be required to keep the ants out of
|
|
the "Supercollider"?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naming the "Super Collider" after Ronald Reagon, as
|
|
proposed, is TOTALLY ABSURD! If it is built, it should be
|
|
named after a leading particle PHYSICIST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LARSONIAN Anti-Matter
|
|
|
|
In Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
|
|
physical universe, anti-matter is NOT a simple case of
|
|
opposite charges of the same types of particles. It has more
|
|
to do with the rates of vibrations and rotations of the
|
|
photons of which they are made, in relation to the
|
|
vibrational and rotational equivalents of the speed of light,
|
|
which Larson calls "Unit Velocity" and the "Natural Datum".
|
|
|
|
In Larson's Theory, a positron is actually a particle of
|
|
MATTER, NOT anti-matter. When a positron and electron meet,
|
|
the rotational vibrations (charges) and rotations of their
|
|
respective photons (of which they are made) neutralize each
|
|
other.
|
|
|
|
In Larson's Theory, the ANTI-MATTER half of the physical
|
|
universe has THREE dimensions of TIME, and ONLY ONE dimension
|
|
of space, and exists in a RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP to our
|
|
MATERIAL half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LARSONIAN Relativity
|
|
|
|
The perihelion point in the orbit of the planet Mercury
|
|
has been observed and precisely measured to ADVANCE at the
|
|
rate of 574 seconds of arc per century. 531 seconds of this
|
|
advance are attributed via calculations to gravitational
|
|
perturbations from the other planets (Venus, Earth, Jupiter,
|
|
etc.). The remaining 43 seconds of arc are being used to
|
|
help "prove" Einstein's "General Theory of Relativity".
|
|
|
|
But the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson achieved results
|
|
CLOSER to the 43 seconds than "General Relativity" can, by
|
|
INSTEAD using "SPECIAL Relativity". In one or more of his
|
|
books, he applied the LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION on the HIGH
|
|
ORBITAL SPEED of Mercury.
|
|
|
|
Larson TOTALLY REJECTED "General Relativity" as another
|
|
MATHEMATICAL FANTASY. He also REJECTED most of "Special
|
|
Relativity", including the parts about "mass increases" near
|
|
the speed of light, and the use of the Lorentz Transform on
|
|
doppler shifts, (Those quasars with red-shifts greater than
|
|
1.000 REALLY ARE MOVING FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT,
|
|
although most of that motion is away from us IN TIME.).
|
|
|
|
In Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
|
|
physical universe, there are THREE dimensions of time instead
|
|
of only one. But two of those dimensions can NOT be measured
|
|
from our material half of the physical universe. The one
|
|
dimension that we CAN measure is the CLOCK time. At low
|
|
relative speeds, the values of the othe two dimensions are
|
|
NEGLIGIBLE; but at high speeds, they become significant, and
|
|
the Lorentz Transformation must be used as a FUDGE FACTOR.
|
|
[Larson often used the term "COORDINATE TIME" when writing
|
|
about this.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
In regard to "mass increases", it has been PROVEN in
|
|
atomic accelerators that acceleration drops toward zero near
|
|
the speed of light. But the formula for acceleration is
|
|
ACCELERATION = FORCE / MASS, (a = F/m). Orthodox physicists
|
|
are IGNORING the THIRD FACTOR: FORCE. In Larson's Theory,
|
|
mass STAYS CONSTANT and FORCE drops toward zero. FORCE is
|
|
actually a MOTION, or COMBINATIONS of MOTIONS, or RELATIONS
|
|
BETWEEN MOTIONS, including INward and OUTward SCALAR MOTIONS.
|
|
The expansion of the universe, for example, is an OUTward
|
|
SCALAR motion inherent in the universe and NOT a result of
|
|
the so-called "Big Bang" (which is yet another MATHEMATICAL
|
|
FANTASY).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION
|
|
|
|
I wish to recommend to EVERYONE the book "THE UNIVERSE
|
|
OF MOTION", by Dewey B. Larson, 1984, North Pacific
|
|
Publishers, (P.O. Box 13255, Portland, Oregon 97213), 456
|
|
pages, indexed, hardcover.
|
|
|
|
It contains the Astrophysical portions of a GENERAL
|
|
UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe developed by that
|
|
author, an UNrecognized GENIUS, more than thirty years ago.
|
|
|
|
It contains FINAL SOLUTIONS to most all Astrophysical
|
|
mysteries, including the FORMATION of galaxies, binary and
|
|
multiple star systems, and solar systems, the TRUE ORIGIN of
|
|
the "3-degree" background radiation, cosmic rays, and gamma-
|
|
ray bursts, and the TRUE NATURE of quasars, pulsars, white
|
|
dwarfs, exploding galaxies, etc..
|
|
|
|
It contains what astronomers and astrophysicists are ALL
|
|
looking for, if they are ready to seriously consider it with
|
|
OPEN MINDS!
|
|
|
|
The following is an example of his Theory's success:
|
|
In his first book in 1959, "THE STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL
|
|
UNIVERSE", Larson predicted the existence of EXPLODING
|
|
GALAXIES, several years BEFORE astronomers started finding
|
|
them. They are a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE of Larson's
|
|
comprehensive Theory. And when QUASARS were discovered, he
|
|
had an immediate related explanation for them also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS
|
|
|
|
Astro-physicists and astronomers are still scratching
|
|
their heads about the mysterious GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. They were
|
|
originally thought to originate from "neutron stars" in the
|
|
disc of our galaxy. But the new Gamma Ray Telescope now in
|
|
Earth orbit has been detecting them in all directions
|
|
uniformly, and their source locations in space do NOT
|
|
correspond to any known objects, (except for a few cases of
|
|
directional coincidence).
|
|
|
|
Gamma-ray bursts are a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE of the
|
|
GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe developed by
|
|
the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson. According to page 386 of
|
|
his book "THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION", published in 1984, the
|
|
gamma-ray bursts are coming from SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS in the
|
|
ANTI-MATTER HALF of the physical universe, which Larson calls
|
|
the "Cosmic Sector". Because of the relationship between the
|
|
anti-matter and material halves of the physical universe, and
|
|
the way they are connected together, the gamma-ray bursts can
|
|
pop into our material half anywhere in space, seemingly at
|
|
random. (This is WHY the source locations of the bursts do
|
|
not correspond with known objects, and come from all
|
|
directions uniformly.)
|
|
|
|
I wonder how close to us in space a source location
|
|
would have to be for a gamma-ray burst to kill all or most
|
|
life on Earth! There would be NO WAY to predict one, NOR to
|
|
stop it!
|
|
|
|
Perhaps some of the MASS EXTINCTIONS of the past, which
|
|
are now being blamed on impacts of comets and asteroids, were
|
|
actually caused by nearby GAMMA-RAY BURSTS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LARSONIAN Binary Star Formation
|
|
|
|
About half of all the stars in the galaxy in the
|
|
vicinity of the sun are binary or double. But orthodox
|
|
astronomers and astrophysicists still have no satisfactory
|
|
theory about how they form or why there are so many of them.
|
|
|
|
But binary star systems are actually a LIKELY
|
|
CONSEQUENCE of the comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of
|
|
the physical universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey
|
|
B. Larson.
|
|
|
|
I will try to summarize Larsons explanation, which is
|
|
detailed in Chapter 7 of his book "THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION"
|
|
and in some of his other books.
|
|
|
|
First of all, according to Larson, stars do NOT generate
|
|
energy by "fusion". A small fraction comes from slow
|
|
gravitational collapse. The rest results from the COMPLETE
|
|
ANNIHILATION of HEAVY elements (heavier than IRON). Each
|
|
element has a DESTRUCTIVE TEMPERATURE LIMIT. The heavier the
|
|
element is, the lower is this limit. A star's internal
|
|
temperature increases as it grows in mass via accretion and
|
|
absorption of the decay products of cosmic rays, gradually
|
|
reaching the destructive temperature limit of lighter and
|
|
lighter elements.
|
|
|
|
When the internal temperature of the star reaches the
|
|
destructive temperature limit of IRON, there is a Type I
|
|
SUPERNOVA EXPLOSION! This is because there is SO MUCH iron
|
|
present; and that is related to the structure of iron atoms
|
|
and the atom building process, which Larson explains in some
|
|
of his books [better than I can].
|
|
|
|
When the star explodes, the lighter material on the
|
|
outer portion of the star is blown outward in space at less
|
|
than the speed of light. The heavier material in the center
|
|
portion of the star was already bouncing around at close to
|
|
the speed of light, because of the high temperature. The
|
|
explosion pushes that material OVER the speed of light, and
|
|
it expands OUTWARD IN TIME, which is equivalent to INWARD IN
|
|
SPACE, and it often actually DISAPPEARS for a while.
|
|
|
|
Over long periods of time, both masses start to fall
|
|
back gravitationally. The material that had been blown
|
|
outward in space now starts to form a RED GIANT star. The
|
|
material that had been blown OUTWARD IN TIME starts to form a
|
|
WHITE DWARF star. BOTH stars then start moving back toward
|
|
the "MAIN SEQUENCE" from opposite directions on the H-R
|
|
Diagram.
|
|
|
|
The chances of the two masses falling back into the
|
|
exact same location in space, making a single lone star
|
|
again, are near zero. They will instead form a BINARY system,
|
|
orbiting each other.
|
|
|
|
According to Larson, a white dwarf star has an INVERSE
|
|
DENSITY GRADIENT (is densest at its SURFACE), because the
|
|
material at its center is most widely dispersed (blown
|
|
outward) in time. This ELIMINATES the need to resort to
|
|
MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES about "degenerate matter", "neutron
|
|
stars", "black holes", etc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LARSONIAN Solar System Formation
|
|
|
|
If the mass of the heavy material at the center of the
|
|
exploding star is relatively SMALL, then, instead of a single
|
|
white dwarf star, there will be SEVERAL "mini" white dwarf
|
|
stars (revolving around the red giant star, but probably
|
|
still too far away in three-dimensional TIME to be affected
|
|
by its heat, etc.). These will become PLANETS!
|
|
|
|
In Chapter 7 of THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION, Larson used all
|
|
this information, and other principles of his comprehensive
|
|
GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe, to derive
|
|
his own version of Bode's Law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Black Hole" FANTASY!
|
|
|
|
I heard that physicist Stephen W. Hawking recently
|
|
completed a theoretical mathematical analysis of TWO "black
|
|
holes" merging together into a SINGLE "black hole", and
|
|
concluded that the new "black hole" would have MORE MASS than
|
|
the sum of the two original "black holes".
|
|
|
|
Such a result should be recognized by EVERYone as a RED
|
|
FLAG, causing widespread DOUBT about the whole IDEA of "black
|
|
holes", etc.!
|
|
|
|
After reading Physicist Dewey B. Larson's books about
|
|
his comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical
|
|
universe, especially his book "THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION", it is
|
|
clear to me that "black holes" are NOTHING more than
|
|
MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES! The strange object at Cygnus X-1 is
|
|
just an unusually massive WHITE DWARF STAR, NOT the "black
|
|
hole" that orthodox astronomers and physicists so badly want
|
|
to "prove" their theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By the way, I do NOT understand why so much publicity is
|
|
being given to physicist Stephen Hawking. The physicists and
|
|
astronomers seem to be acting as if Hawking's severe physical
|
|
problem somehow makes him "wiser". It does NOT!
|
|
|
|
I wish the same attention had been given to Physicist
|
|
Dewey B. Larson while he was still alive. Widespread
|
|
publicity and attention should NOW be given to Larson's
|
|
Theory, books, and organization (The International Society of
|
|
Unified Science).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION
|
|
|
|
I heard of that concept many years ago, in connection
|
|
with UFO's and unorthodox inventors, but I never was able to
|
|
find out how or why they work, or how they are constructed.
|
|
|
|
I found a possible clue about why they might work on
|
|
pages 112-113 of the book "BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER", by
|
|
the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson, which describes part of
|
|
Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical
|
|
universe. I quote one paragraph:
|
|
|
|
"As indicated in the preceding chapter, the development
|
|
of the theory of the universe of motion arrives at a totally
|
|
different concept of the nature of electrical resistance.
|
|
The electrons, we find, are derived from the environment. It
|
|
was brought out in Volume I [Larson's book "NOTHING BUT
|
|
MOTION"] that there are physical processes in operation which
|
|
produce electrons in substantial quantities, and that,
|
|
although the motions that constitute these electrons are, in
|
|
many cases, absorbed by atomic structures, the opportunities
|
|
for utilizing this type of motion in such structures are
|
|
limited. It follows that there is always a large excess of
|
|
free electrons in the material sector [material half] of the
|
|
universe, most of which are uncharged. In this uncharged
|
|
state the electrons cannot move with respect to extension
|
|
space, because they are inherently rotating units of space,
|
|
and the relation of space to space is not motion. In open
|
|
space, therefore, each uncharged electron remains permanently
|
|
in the same location with respect to the natural reference
|
|
system, in the manner of a photon. In the context of the
|
|
stationary spatial reference system the uncharged electron,
|
|
like the photon, is carried outward at the speed of light by
|
|
the progression of the natural reference system. All
|
|
material aggregates are thus exposed to a flux of electrons
|
|
similar to the continual bombardment by photons of radiation.
|
|
Meanwhile there are other processes, to be discussed later,
|
|
whereby electrons are returned to the environment. The
|
|
electron population of a material aggregate such as the earth
|
|
therefore stabilizes at an equilibrium level."
|
|
|
|
Note that in Larson's Theory, UNcharged electrons are
|
|
also massLESS, and are basically photons of light of a
|
|
particular frequency (above the "unit" frequency) spinning
|
|
around one axis at a particular rate (below the "unit" rate).
|
|
("Unit velocity" is the speed of light, and there are
|
|
vibrational and rotational equivalents to the speed of light,
|
|
according to Larson's Theory.) [I might have the "above" and
|
|
"below" labels mixed up.]
|
|
|
|
Larson is saying that outer space is filled with mass-
|
|
LESS UN-charged electrons flying around at the speed of
|
|
light!
|
|
|
|
If this is true, then the ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION
|
|
fields of spacecraft might be able to interact with these
|
|
electrons, or other particles in space, perhaps GIVING them a
|
|
charge (and mass) and shooting them toward the rear to
|
|
achieve propulsion. (In Larson's Theory, an electrical charge
|
|
is a rotational vibration of a particular frequency (above
|
|
the "unit" frequency) superimposed on the rotation of the
|
|
particle.)
|
|
|
|
The paragraph quoted above might also give a clue to
|
|
confused meteorologists about how lightning is generated in
|
|
clouds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPRESSION of LARSONIAN Physics
|
|
|
|
The comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical
|
|
universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson has
|
|
been available for more than 30 YEARS, published in 1959 in
|
|
his first book "THE STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE".
|
|
|
|
It is TOTALLY UN-SCIENTIFIC for Hawking, Wheeler, Sagan,
|
|
and the other SACRED PRIESTS of the RELIGION they call
|
|
"science" (or "physics", or "astronomy", etc.), as well as
|
|
the "scientific" literature and the "education" systems, to
|
|
TOTALLY IGNORE Larson's Theory has they have.
|
|
|
|
Larson's Theory has excellent explanations for many
|
|
things now puzzling orthodox physicists and astronomers, such
|
|
as gamma-ray bursts and the nature of quasars.
|
|
|
|
Larson's Theory deserves to be HONESTLY and OPENLY
|
|
discussed in the physics, chemistry, and astronomy journals,
|
|
in the U.S. and elsewhere. And at least the basic principles
|
|
of Larson's Theory should be included in all related courses
|
|
at UW-EC, UW-Madison, Cambridge, Cornell University, and
|
|
elsewhere, so that students are not kept in the dark about a
|
|
worthy alternative to the DOGMA they are being fed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this
|
|
partial summary is ENCOURAGED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert E. McElwaine
|
|
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
|
|
|
|
|