228 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
228 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
Richard Wright, American Hunger, and the Communist Party
|
||
|
||
Richard Wright's flirtation with the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) was not based
|
||
on idealism, strong beliefs, or rational judgment, but rather on Wright's need
|
||
to take off his mask and share his intelligence with the world. We see no
|
||
evidence that Wright looked to Communism because of its ideals. Instead,
|
||
Wright made his political foray because of his yearning to break out of his
|
||
shell and reveal his real self to others.
|
||
|
||
Richard Wright lived most of his life through a mask. Rarely letting down his
|
||
guard:
|
||
|
||
The essence of the irony of the plight of the Negro in America, to me, is that
|
||
he is doomed to live in isolation...[1] (p. 14)
|
||
|
||
Though I had fled the pressure of the South, my outward conduct had not
|
||
changed. I had been schooled to present an unalteringly smiling face and
|
||
I continued to do so despite the fact that my environment allowed more open
|
||
expression. I hid my feelings and avoided all relationships with whites that
|
||
might cause me to reveal them.[1] (p. 14-15)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Here we see that Wright felt that he is trapped behind his mask and could not
|
||
express his feelings. Unlike some, Wright actually did have strong emotions
|
||
as we learn earlier: "All my life I had done nothing but feel and cultivate
|
||
my feelings [1]" (p. 13). Even though Wright was now in the North, he could
|
||
not even engage in an intelligent conversation with anyone besides himself
|
||
because of a combination of societal pressures and his own inner anxieties.
|
||
Bradley [3] concurs:
|
||
|
||
These observations seems to reflect more than they illuminate; to me they
|
||
reveal a man horribly crippled, uneasy with emotion, unaccustomed to warmth.
|
||
The causes of that crippling are not totally clear. (p. 70)
|
||
|
||
The illness that Wright suffered was not one with an easy cure. Though the
|
||
symptoms were apparent enough for even Wright to notice, Bradley [3] points
|
||
out that the causes were not clear. Societal pressures, like the underlying
|
||
racism in Chicago, may have been a large factor. In Chicago, in the 1920's
|
||
and 1930's, if you were black and you were lucky, maybe you would have the
|
||
opportunity to become a mailman. If you were black, you could not dream.
|
||
You could not even dream of becoming a professional baseball player. Even
|
||
today, Jesse Jackson has said that Chicago is the most racist city in
|
||
America.
|
||
|
||
Wright was confused and unable to understand his inner emotions. Withdrawn,
|
||
Wright longed to open up to someone, but he did not have that someone.
|
||
|
||
|
||
I still had no friends, casual or intimate, and felt the need for none. I had
|
||
developed a self sufficiency that kept me distant from others, emotionally
|
||
and psychologically...Emotionally, I was withdrawn from the objective world;
|
||
my desires floated loosely within the walls of my consciousness, contained
|
||
and controlled.
|
||
|
||
...Even though I reacted deeply, my true feelings raced along underground,
|
||
hidden.[1] (p. 20)
|
||
|
||
Wright claimed that he had no need for friends but we know he only lied to
|
||
himself. People as intelligent as Richard Wright need an outlet for
|
||
conversation and others to stimulate their minds. Wright contradicts
|
||
himself less than a page later:
|
||
|
||
|
||
I did not act in this fashion deliberately; I did not prefer this kind
|
||
of relationship with people. I wanted a life in which there was a constant
|
||
oneness of feeling with others, in which the basic emotions of life were
|
||
shared...But I knew that no such thing was possible in my environment.[1]
|
||
(p. 20-21) [italics mine]
|
||
|
||
Wright did not just want "a life in which there was a constant oneness of
|
||
feelings with others," he needed such a life. He had a strong need for
|
||
other people and for a sense of belonging even though he initially acted
|
||
in the opposite fashion. To live this life, Wright had to believe in
|
||
something larger than himself. Wright had to associate himself with a
|
||
higher being. Because he had already discounted God and religion, Wright
|
||
gravitated toward the Communist party.
|
||
|
||
Wright joined the Party not because he admired socialism, but because he
|
||
needed people and because it was a vehicle for him to cultivate his writing.
|
||
Through the John Reed Club, Wright was able to show the world, or at least
|
||
other people associated with the Communist Party USA, his intellect and
|
||
insight.
|
||
|
||
Not only did Wright not believe in Communism, but he made little effort to
|
||
learn what the Party really stood for. Wright had no trouble studying
|
||
Dostoevski or Sociology to cultivate his writings, but he could not find
|
||
the time to read Marx or Moore or even to pick up a newspaper or an
|
||
encyclopedia and learn about Trotsky.
|
||
|
||
... I stammered, trying not to reveal my ignorance of politics, for I had
|
||
not followed the details of Trotsky's fight against the Communist party
|
||
of the Soviet Union ...[1] (p. 81)
|
||
|
||
McCall [5] points out that Wright had little in common with the Communist
|
||
party:
|
||
|
||
Doctrinal differences don't matter; ideas themselves scarcely matter; all
|
||
that counts is the blessed new feeling of belonging [5] (p. 363)
|
||
|
||
What did Wright believe? What were his political views? Did he even agree
|
||
with socialism? American Hunger does not make any attempt to answer these
|
||
questions. Wright believed in the individual rather than the collective
|
||
body, an idea foreign to most members of the Communist party in those days.
|
||
The Communists were not looking to cultivate free thinkers - people who
|
||
they felt belonged to the bourgeoisie. Wright believed that one could not
|
||
be free until one could freely think. CPUSA was looking for men and women
|
||
of action, they were looking for soldiers. Wright was a man of action, but
|
||
he was not a soldier. A soldier shoots without asking "why?" A true member
|
||
of the Communist Party did not read books, a real member worked in the
|
||
factory by day and led protest marches by night. The Communists had two
|
||
basic essentials: food and shelter. Wright needed something else - he
|
||
needed books.
|
||
|
||
The Party demanded that Wright subordinate his artistic goals for their
|
||
needs. Members attacked Wright's intellect as no good for their cause,
|
||
a cause that Wright either did not believe in or did not fully understand.
|
||
But Wright made a conscious, calculated, and rational decision to join the
|
||
Communist party. Wright used the Party as an umbilical cord to nurse his
|
||
writing and nurture his soul. Wright wanted to use CPUSA to make friends
|
||
and reveal his thoughts. Wright, however, had no intention of being used
|
||
by the Communist party - especially by those who did not appreciate his
|
||
talents. American Hunger reveals that Wright was mistrusted because he
|
||
was deemed an "intellectual." At one point Wright attends his first
|
||
Communist unit meeting and his serious report is followed by laughter
|
||
by the rank and file of those in attendance:
|
||
|
||
During the following days I had learned through some discreet questioning
|
||
that I had seemed a fantastic element to the black Communists. I was
|
||
shocked to hear that I, who had been only to grammar school, had been
|
||
classified as an intellectual. What was an intellectual? I had never
|
||
heard the word used in the sense in which it was applied to me. I had
|
||
thought that they might refuse me on the grounds that I was not
|
||
politically advanced; I had thought they might place me on probation;
|
||
I had thought they might say I would have to be investigated. But they
|
||
had simply laughed.[1] (p. 77)
|
||
|
||
The John Reed Club filled a large void which allowed Wright's writing to
|
||
feel and flourish. The Club was why Wright had associated himself with
|
||
CPUSA in the first place - it was a forum for thoughtful discussion and
|
||
it provided outlets for writers to publish their work. Wright's Communist
|
||
foray was all but over after the Communists decided to eliminate the John
|
||
Reed Club in the New York Conference:
|
||
|
||
Debate started and I rose and explained what clubs had meant to young writers
|
||
and begged for their continuance. I sat down amid silence. Debate was closed.
|
||
The vote was called. The room filled with uplifting hands to dissolve. Then
|
||
came the call for those who disagreed and my hand went up alone.[1] (p. 98)
|
||
|
||
Wright used the Communist party as a tool to dislodge the mask he had worn
|
||
for so long. Initially, CPUSA liberated him and enabled Wright to express
|
||
his feelings. However, it soon became apparent that the Party wanted to go
|
||
further and replace Wright's old mask with a new mask of their creation.
|
||
They sought to apply a filter to his mind which would sift through Wright's
|
||
thoughts and only allow him to express such feelings that were in line with
|
||
Communist mentality. Leibowitz [4] agrees:
|
||
|
||
Any authority that usurps his liberty and brushes aside his feelings is
|
||
intolerable to Wright4 [ ](p. 351)
|
||
|
||
Wright had come too far to be pressured to give up his individuality. And
|
||
his sense of himself, which initially attracted him to the Party, is what
|
||
led to his Communist demise. Ironically, Wright ultimately left the Party
|
||
for the same reason he joined it - to reach his artistic goals.
|
||
|
||
An invisible wall was building slowly between me and the people with whom
|
||
I had cast my lot. Well, I would show them that all men who wrote books
|
||
were not their enemies. I would communicate the meaning of their lives
|
||
to people whom they could not reach; then, surely, my intentions would
|
||
merit their confidence... I had to win the confidence of people who had
|
||
been mislead so often that they were afraid of anybody who differed from
|
||
themselves. Yet deep down I feared their militant ignorance.[1] (p. 78)
|
||
|
||
Leibowitz [4] remarks:
|
||
|
||
That the Communists did not respect individuality wounded Wright in his
|
||
secret spot: his ambition to be a writer.[4] (p. 349)
|
||
|
||
Wright probably would have never become a great writer if not for his foray
|
||
into Communism. The John Reed Club, the intelligent discussions, and even
|
||
his experience with petty politics gave him the tools, the vision, and the
|
||
confidence to write. Wright's entire life was destroyed by the Communist
|
||
party in a way, however. During the Red Scare, he chose to leave the
|
||
country rather than testify against those people who had oppressed him.
|
||
Wright's exodus from the United States ultimately lead to his life's
|
||
decline,
|
||
|
||
The Communist party has been a mainstay with many of the great African-
|
||
American writers. As recent as the 1980's, Angela Davis was an active
|
||
Communist. Davis, a great writer, ran for Vice President under the
|
||
CPUSA ticket both in 1980 and in 1984. However, even Davis' involvement
|
||
became tragic. Gus Hall, the Communist party boss, purged her from the
|
||
party in 1991 after she complained about racial quotas.[6]
|
||
|
||
As for Wright, he wrote half a book in the prime of his life about his
|
||
experience with Communism. His political experiences and traumas left a
|
||
profound mark on his conscious. It is as though he thought he found
|
||
himself only to realize that his search was far from over:
|
||
|
||
Humbly now, with no vaulting dream of achieving a vast unity, I wanted
|
||
to try to build a bridge of words between me and the world outside,
|
||
that world which seemed so distant and elusive that it seemed unreal.[1]
|
||
(p. 135)
|
||
|
||
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Appendix - Bibliography
|
||
|
||
1. Wright, Richard. American Hunger. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1977.
|
||
|
||
2. Reilly, John M. (p. 213-227). Critical Essays on Richard Wright. Edited
|
||
by Yoshinobu Hakutani. Boston: G.K. Hall & Co., 1982.
|
||
|
||
3. Bradley, David. "American Hunger (1977)," (p. 69-71). Richard Wright -
|
||
Critical Perspectives Past and Present. Edited by Henry Louis Gates Jr.
|
||
and K.A. Appiah. New York: Amistad, 1993
|
||
|
||
4. Leibowitz, Herbert. "<22>Arise, Ye Pris'ners of Starvation': Richard
|
||
Wright's Black Boy and American Hunger," (p. 328-358). Richard Wright -
|
||
Critical Perspectives Past and Present. Edited by Henry Louis Gates Jr.
|
||
and K.A. Appiah. New York: Amistad, 1993
|
||
|
||
5. McCall, Dan. "Wright's American Hunger," (p. 359-368). Richard Wright -
|
||
Critical Perspectives Past and Present. Edited by Henry Louis Gates Jr.
|
||
and K.A. Appiah. New York: Amistad, 1993
|
||
|
||
6. "California Honors Communist." Campus Fall 1995, Volume 7: 10-11
|