71 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
71 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
CATO POLICY REPORT
|
||
|
||
CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE
|
||
|
||
(By CATO Institute Chairman William Niskanen)
|
||
|
||
The Crime Bill is a Killer
|
||
|
||
Crime in the United States is a serious problem. The crime bill now being
|
||
considered in Congress, however, is not a serious solution. A product of
|
||
mindless Republicans and spineless Democrats, the crime bill is counter-
|
||
productive, discriminatory, and expensive. Let me count the ways.
|
||
|
||
Approval of the crime bill would probably INCREASE the number of murders.
|
||
It has been widely reported that the bill authorizes capital punishment for some
|
||
51 crimes. What has not been widely reported is that 10 of those crimes involve
|
||
something other than murder; treason, espionage, transporting explosives with
|
||
intent to kill, arson of federal property in interstate commerce, the fourth
|
||
felony conviction of a major drug supplier, drug trafficking "drive by
|
||
shootings," aircraft hijacking, hostage taking, kidnapping, and bank robbery.
|
||
Those are clearly serious offenses. The problem with authorizing capital
|
||
punishment for them is that it would eliminate any marginal deterrent effect on
|
||
the offender who murders the victims or witnesses to those offenses. That would
|
||
surely increase the number of hostages, kidnap victims, witnesses to bank
|
||
robbery, and so on who are murdered. The deterrent effect of a criminal penalty
|
||
is a function of the severity of the penalty and the probability of arrest and
|
||
conviction. An increase in the penalty for the crimes listed here would reduce
|
||
the number of offenders convicted, at the cost of the lives of innocent victims
|
||
and witnesses.
|
||
|
||
Second, the bill creates different classes of murders, depending on the
|
||
status of the victim. The murder of foreign officials, a wide range of federal
|
||
officials from the president to poultry inspectors, the families of federal
|
||
officials, state officials assisting federal officials, court officers and
|
||
jurors, and others would be capital crimes. The bill would not provide a
|
||
similar deterrent for the 99-plus percent of murders that do not fall under
|
||
those categories. Similarly, the bill authorizes a police officers "bill of
|
||
rights" without addressing the rights of those who are abused by the arbitrary
|
||
exercise of police power. One might hope that those sections would be ruled
|
||
unconstitutional as inconsistent with equality under the law.
|
||
|
||
And third, the bill is expensive, authorizing an additional #3 billion of
|
||
federal funds for enforcement, incarceration, and the training of police
|
||
officials. That figure underestimates the total cost, because other provisions
|
||
would increase the current overcrowding of state prisons and jails. Crime is a
|
||
serious problem, and additional funding might be appropriate if there were any
|
||
evidence that it would reduce crime. Sen. Warren Rudman (R-N.H.) expressed what
|
||
may be a common belief when he said, "Crime in America is inversely proportional
|
||
to the number of policemen we have on the streets." Unfortunately, there is NO
|
||
evidence that a general increased in funding for police and corrections would
|
||
reduce crime.
|
||
|
||
The provisions of the crime bill discussed above are broadly supported by
|
||
the Bush Administration and members of Congress of both parties. Most of the
|
||
controversy has been focused on the provisions affecting gun control and the
|
||
exclusionary rule. Crime in America is a serious problem, but whatever the
|
||
merits of those provisions, the crime bill of 1991 is not serious legislation.
|
||
|
||
In 1723, the English Parliament passed the Black Act, which authorized the
|
||
capital punishment for such heinous offenses as stalking deer in disguise at
|
||
night, cutting down young trees, and writing threatening letters. The crime bill
|
||
now before the House is addressed to more serious offenses, but the political
|
||
incentives to talk tough and legislate stupidly are the same as those that led
|
||
to the notorious Black Act.
|
||
|
||
Submitted by:
|
||
|
||
Chris Crobaugh
|
||
North Ridgeville, Ohio 44039
|
||
(216) 327-6655
|
||
|