textfiles/politics/SPUNK/sp000920.txt

111 lines
6.3 KiB
Plaintext

VISIONS OF FREEDOM - AN ANARCHA-FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE
Organised by an anarchist collective in Sydney, Visions of Freedom
in January 1995 held for me the promise of something much
more politically relevant than other conferences i have attended
over the past few years. Although there were a large number of
workshops/presentations scheduled forthe weekend, organisers urged
participants to set up their own workshops - directly in contrast to
the rigid scheduling of sessions in academic, student-based and left
conferences. This freedom meant that theoretically there was no one
agenda set for the weekend, that it was up to us to create
meaningful discussion. Being an anarchist conference, i also hoped
that i would not need to do as much sifting and reinterpretation of
political ideas, as is so often necessary at the usual type of
conferences, and was looking forward to meeting with a whole heap of
activists with a lot of interesting and challenging things to say.
The plenary was opened by a blessing from Monsignor Porca Madonna,
presenting a queer mockery of the recent papal visit. Following
this, people from various anarchist perspectives spoke, with a short
time for questions of each. What became apparent during this opening
session was the reluctance of women to ask questions (and this
relative silence was evident throughout the weekend) This reluctance
had also make it difficult for the organisers to find a woman who
would speak about feminism at the plenary. The male speakers for the
most part focussed on theoretical and historical analysis of
anarchist struggle, the woman who spoke about feminism offered
mainly anecdotes and personal stories. Although i value and think
necessary the subjective experience of women as political, in this
context it seemed that the *real* anarchist politics was the domain of
men, and that women's political experience and analysis was not
taken as seriously, was marginalised and not placed as central to
debate.
The Anarchy and Feminism workshop on the Saturday afternoon was one
of the most well-attended workshops of the weekend - with over 100
people in the room a lot of our time was actually taken up with
working out how to get the most out of it. By the time we broke
up into small groups we had half an hour for discussion, then 20
minutes to report back to the larger group. Not long. The number of
people and the range oftopics - pornography and sex work, violence
and militarism, direct action, essentialism and strutures, racism,
feminist responses to the state and media representations -
suggested that this workshop was merely a starting point, a means of
finding common interest. It also shows that we shouldn't be letting
feminist politics be seen as only vaguely relevant to anarchism, as
a single issue, a women's issue. Many feminist concerns are
absolutely central to the anarchist struggle, and challenge and
inform the way we actually perceive anarchism.
Queer visibility at the conference was often in contradictory ways.
The organisers recognised queers within anarchism from the beginning,
with the opening blessing and a speaker from the Sisters of the
Order of perpetual Indulgence on the links between gay struggle and
anarchism. However, this was undermined throughout the weekend by
other participants - s/m was referred to several times in the context
of violence, homophobic material was circulated and when it was
removed notions of censorship and freedom of speech were invoked,
leading us to question just who exactly is free to speak, it seems
to help if you are a white heterosexual male. In the queer workshop we
also had the same problem of not enough time to discuss all the
thingsthat came up - isolation withing anarchism,critiqueof
mainstream heterosexuality, critique of mainstream homocapitalism,
coalition politics, direct action and ideas for change.
Throughout the weekend, i spoke to many women who were frustrated
and angry at how they were being treated in workshops and how their
politics were belittled or dismissed. The predominantly white men at
the conference seemed to think that by taking on the label anarchism
that they have magically transcended the racial, gender and sexual
prejudices that are in our society, that a commitment to the
politics of anarchism automatically justifies their behaviour. They
are ready to point out the injustices of mainstream society, but
unable to see when they are reinforcing the same inequalities.
Working towards eradicating such prejudices means more than paying
lip serivce to concepts of autonomy and equality, considering that
some groups have more access to getting freedom than others. Even in the
Anarchy and Feminism workshop, the one workshop that placed women as
central to discussion, men were unable to restrain themselves from
trying to dominate and undermine discussion.
If as anarchists we are serious in our challenge of authority,
hierarchy and violence, then we need to recognise the very complex
ways in which power is exercised in our society. The hierarchy is
systematic and multifaceted, and is not changed by adhering to a code
of so-called revolutionary politics that repeatedly excludes the
experience of and refuses to be open to challenge from the other.
At the same time, i think that if women had been better organise
before the conference we would have had more of a chance of
directing debate in relevant and useful ways. If we had felt more
confident about challenging the male domain and had been stronger
as a group, then it wouldn't have been left to a few brave
individuals to put themselves on the line. Quite a few women said to
me that they would have liked to have seen more workshops organised
by feminists and queers, but seemed unwilling to organise them and i
wonder why this is the case. Sadly i feel that sometimes it is
easier to complain about what is offered to us than to create what
it is we really want.
Overall, i feel that most of what i learnt and valued over the
weekend were the conversations outside of the conference itself. I
met a lot ofimpassioned and inspiring women (and a couple of men)
and had some really challenging discussions. I am also aware of just
how much more preparation i want to do before the next one so that i
am a lot clearer about what i want to get out of it, and how that
might be done.
nicki