textfiles/politics/SPUNK/sp000682.txt
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

133 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext

The information in this file was recently published in FREEDOM -
the fortnightly anarchist journal published by FREEDOM PRESS:
FREEDOM PRESS (IN ANGEL ALLEY) 84B WHITECHAPEL HIGH STREET,
LONDON E1 7QX GREAT BRITAIN
Do write for a sample copy or for a copy of our booklist of
publications. We will be putting more of this information out so
watch this spot...
CHOMSKY ON ASIA
As part of the current FOCUSES on different countries in Asia we
asked Noam Chomsky to comment on some of the issues we are
raising. Below we publish his replies to some questions we
posed...
Warren Christopher recently on a visit to China raised the Human
Rights issue with the Chinese government. How has corporate
interest reacted to his 'muddying the waters'? That Christopher
raised the human rights issue in China is widely believed (less
in the US than outside it), but it is true only in the narrowest
sense. He added to the pleas from the Clinton administration that
China make some kind of meaningless gesture so that the
Clintonites could pretend not to be backtracking on another
campaign promise. There was never the slightest chance that they
would interfere with profits by bringing up human rights In
general terms how do you see China fitting into the 'New World
Order'? As fot China and the NWO, the country seems to be
splitting into a sector that is part of the Japan-based overseas
Chinese investment network, linked to US multinationals and
export-import as well, with the usual third world amenities:
super-cheap labor, women burned to death locked into toy
factories, 15,000 deaths from industrial accidents last year, and
all sorts of other wondrous things that never come up in human
rights discussions, because profits are involved. About 3/4 of
the country seems to be either out of it, or perhaps even
declining. Could be an explosion, I think. The US has also
lifted the embargo against Vietnam recently. A change of heart?
And now that Coca Cola seems to have replaced the napalm who did
win the Vietnam war? Lifting the embargo has a very simple
explanation. Torturing people is fun, but making money is more
important. US business was becoming concerned that it was being
cut out of a promising source of cheap labor, markets, resources,
so the government 'discovered' that Vietnam has been more
forthcoming about POWs (the only moral issue left after
aggression that killed millions of people and destroyed three
countries - I doubt that Stalinist Russia could have gotten away
with what Western commissars have achieved on this one. Who won
the Vietnam war? Over 20 years ago I pointed out that the US had
already won - as, incidentally, was pretty well understood in the
business world. It hadn't yet achieved maximal objectives, but
had satisfied its major war aims, to ensure that there would be
no demonstration affect of successful development along
independent state-directed lines in Indochina. The documentation
on this is very clear, but unacceptable in the commissar culture,
which insists on total victory, in line with its general
totalitarian thrust. There are rumblings throughout the region
of discontent with GATT what potential do the people have of
winning such struggles in Asia or elsewhere? In Asia, there's
plenty of discontent with GATT. In India, they'll probably have
to ratify it at gunpoint. No alternative, though. Power has
shifted remarkably to absolutist, unaccountable institutions of a
scale that would have made any classical liberal shrink in
horror. National states are generally overwhelmed, and even rich
and powerful ones like the US are fairly restricted in policy
planning. A long story.