166 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
166 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
The following is a excerpt from a lecture that was documented in a
|
||
book that I own. It was a lecture given by professional radionics
|
||
researchers. I do not know all the details of the device discussed,
|
||
and I am forwarding this information just for comparative purposes.
|
||
Just to show you how complicated this whole area can get!!!Enjoy!
|
||
|
||
R E S E A R C H W O R K O N T H E H U M A N
|
||
|
||
E L E C T R O M A G N E T I C F I E L D
|
||
By Dr. E.A. Maury and Marguerite Maury
|
||
|
||
(THE AURA IN OTHER WORDS!)
|
||
|
||
It is admitted today (particularly through the work of the American
|
||
Scientist Dr, H. G. Burr, and his collaborators of the University of Yale)
|
||
that every living thing is surrounded by an electric aura produced by its
|
||
own organism.
|
||
|
||
The aura consists of an electric, dynamic field, an it plays an important
|
||
part in determining the volume, the form and the biological behaviour of
|
||
every plant and animal. It is influenced by cosmic rays and by sun spots.
|
||
Life on the earth can thus be said to be electrically connected with the
|
||
entire dynamic system of the universe. In just a few words I shall recall
|
||
the experiments of Burr and his collaborators: by putting a salamander
|
||
into a salt solution connected to a registering apparatus by means of two
|
||
electrodes, and then revolving the receptacle containing the animal, the
|
||
existance of an electrical field flowing through the electrodes can be
|
||
established and registered. The same experiment has been made on human
|
||
beings by placing each index finger of a healthy person in a small bowl
|
||
containing a salt solution; in which case the galvanometer indicates a
|
||
value of 1.5 millivolts. If however one of the index fingers has an open
|
||
cut, the galvanometer will indicate a value of 12 millivolts. Thanks to
|
||
our new apparatus of electrical measures, we too have been able to
|
||
register the differences in voltage of healthy and sick organisms.
|
||
|
||
I shall dispense with a detailed description of our apparatus so as not
|
||
unduly to complicate our subject. I shall only recall that it contains
|
||
an amplifier having a sufficiently high gain to permit the obervation of
|
||
something intangible. The first thing then that the engineer who
|
||
constructed the apparatus did, was to perfect an amplifier to make it
|
||
provide a multiplication of approximately 10,000, the reception of the
|
||
amplifier being insured by an ultra-sensitive detector, constructed like
|
||
a microphone, capable of serving also as a cardiphone. The outgoing
|
||
terminal of the amplifier is connected to a cathode ray oscillograph
|
||
with a loud speaker recorder. This apparatus functions when connected to
|
||
the main electric supply after the tubes of the amplifier have warmed up
|
||
for a few seconds before a test is made.Technically, to perfect the
|
||
apparatus and to obtain clear-cut responses, anti-parasite filters
|
||
have been added. Later on we intend to undertake our experiments in a lead
|
||
screened room isolating us from the outside, for this should allow us to
|
||
record the electric field of a human being in all its purity,
|
||
establishing its exact numerical value.
|
||
|
||
The subject examined is made to stand on an insulating mat in front of the
|
||
apparatus. It is important that the subject should remain as silent and
|
||
motionless as possible to avoid vibrations caused by currents of air or
|
||
sound, which can interfere.The operator then takes into his right hand
|
||
the microphone connected to the amplifying apparatus, and he holds it with
|
||
its lower surface parallel to the subject examined, and with distances
|
||
from the subjects body varied. (We shall later appreciate the importance
|
||
that can be attributed to the respective values corresponding to the
|
||
distances between the emitting subjetc and the reciving microphone.)
|
||
|
||
When the current flowing through the amplifier is increased to a certain
|
||
critical maximum, a characteristic whistling noise is heard in the
|
||
loudspeaker and a certain sine wave image is produced as the oscillograph
|
||
records the screen picture. There the curves are rather close together
|
||
or the curves rather long. More-over there is a strict parallelism
|
||
between the intensity and the modulation of the sound signal and, on the
|
||
other hand, the rapidity and density of the wave picture on the oscillators
|
||
screen. At first we thought this might have been due to a Larsen Effect
|
||
or phenomenon related to the reflection of waves but succesive experiments
|
||
have proved that this phenomena plays only a very minor part in the
|
||
production of these wave forms. We have noticed, for instance, that the
|
||
visual and sound reactions recorded are not corresponding ones over all
|
||
parts of the body. For example, near the plexuses of the sympathetic
|
||
nervous system of certain subjects (cardiac plexus, solar plexus, lumbar
|
||
plexus) the sound modulations are very high and sharp (that is, of a
|
||
very high frequency), whilst the waves shown on the screen are very close
|
||
to each other, this meaning, most probably, that the individuals in
|
||
question possess a strong magnetism. The reactions can be noted at a
|
||
distance of 15 feet and more. We have also noticed that the strongest
|
||
reaction can be obtained near the regions of the body where the Hindu
|
||
chakras are situated. It seems, thenm, that these precise points are
|
||
indeed the pionts where vital energy is emitted.
|
||
|
||
I have described in as few words as possible our experimental technique
|
||
and operational methods employed to examine, as exteriorized
|
||
phenomena of physical apparatus, these fields of human radiations which
|
||
have been the object of so much controversy. Thanks to the same method
|
||
it has been possible for us besides to determine the presence of fields
|
||
of radiation which are exterior to an object. As an interesting
|
||
illustration of this, moving the microphone around a bust in terra cotta
|
||
we were able to observe the difference in the wave modulations near the
|
||
lower part of the face of the sculptured head and near the eyes. Is this
|
||
due to a phenomenon caused by the influence of form? It is possible.
|
||
Similiarly we have also been able to record the field of radiations
|
||
due to an oil painting representing a little fishing port. It should be
|
||
observed that there the modulations were entirley different according
|
||
to whether the microphone was placed near the part representing the sea,
|
||
or the part representing the earth and the low houses of the fishermen
|
||
of Brittany. Should this phenomenon be attributed to an influence due to
|
||
the chemical composition of the colours used? It is probably due to an
|
||
influence of color refraction, this much depending upon the objects
|
||
painted by the artist.
|
||
|
||
It seems to have been now well established that by means of this apparatus
|
||
incontestably corresponding visible and audible reactions are obtained
|
||
as soon as the microphone is placed more or less close to an animate
|
||
or inanimate body, the degree of reation seeming to be in accordance with
|
||
the form and intensity of the radiating field. These experiments have
|
||
convinced us of the physical reality of an external field produced by
|
||
living beings and dead objects. This is only a small step forwards, as
|
||
we all very well know; for we now have to determine the exact wavelenghts
|
||
of these radiations which should vary according to the degree of health
|
||
of the individual examined. We have allready observed that each person
|
||
has his own oscillograph waveform, and that certain diseases such a
|
||
cancer, for example, produce the same general change in the appearance
|
||
of the personal waveform.
|
||
|
||
Certainly it is as yet too soon to draw any definite conclusions from
|
||
these experiments. I think that this method of examination should be
|
||
continued in order to try to establish the nature of signs conforming
|
||
to or giving indications of certain serious diseases before their full
|
||
development, the information being derived from modifications of the
|
||
oscillographic curves testifying to specific modifications of the
|
||
human wavelenghts, these modifications being observable from a
|
||
variation in the field of external radiations.
|
||
|
||
D I S C U S S I O N
|
||
|
||
Mr. Eagerton Sykes asked if the use of the word microphone was a
|
||
mistake in Dr. Maurys paper.
|
||
Mr. Macbeth (who has seen the Maury appliance) explained that
|
||
microphone was the name given to the collector which was applied
|
||
to the affected area of a patient by being held a few inches off the
|
||
skin. This collector conveys the detected influences to the
|
||
thermionic valve amplifier which finally produces a corresponding
|
||
oscillogram or else a musical note on a connected loud speaker.
|
||
Mr. de la Warr explained that the sound was a heterodyne effect derived
|
||
from an oscillating diaphragm.
|
||
|