65 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
65 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
The following review appeared in the Sunday, September 13, Los
|
|
Angeles Times Calendar (entertainment) section.
|
|
|
|
--begin review--------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
**1/2 [see below]
|
|
Roger Waters
|
|
"Amused to Death"
|
|
Columbia
|
|
|
|
The last utterance in this 72-minute opus is 1984, and Waters'
|
|
thought-provoking, sonically ambitious album owes an immense debt to
|
|
that great dystopian novel. Like George Orwell, Waters envisions a
|
|
society in which endless war, incessant video and a fanatical civil
|
|
religion enforce conformity. Water's new wrinkle is that this
|
|
conformity isn't coerced but seduced: no need for Big Brother to be
|
|
watching when the minds to be controlled are already tamed -- "amused
|
|
to death" -- by their own addiction to watching.
|
|
What's missing, and critically needed, is a central figure to carry
|
|
Waters' ideas and shape a story -- what the Winston Smith character
|
|
did for Orwell, and what the Pink character did for Waters' own Pink
|
|
Floyd-era dystopia of the mind, "The Wall". The result is blurred
|
|
structure (partly improved by the moving old-soldier's tale Waters
|
|
uses as a framing device), too much repetition and a certain distance
|
|
and overintellectualization.
|
|
Waters does bridge that distance in peak moments, notably with the
|
|
heated funk of "What God Wants, Part I" (a musical heir to "Another
|
|
Brick in the Wall") and the Dylan-folk of "Watching TV", which melds
|
|
bitter ironies with deep, wounded feeling. But overall there's a
|
|
dearth of the good old pop-rock appeal that always lifted the better
|
|
Pink Floyd records.
|
|
It's not the first time that Waters the rock-opera-tor has gotten
|
|
bogged down in an overabundance of the recitative needed to outline
|
|
his ideas, while failing to deliver the arias that could bring those
|
|
ideas to their emotional point. All of which makes "Amused to Death"
|
|
more rewarding to think about than to listen to.
|
|
--Mike Boehm
|
|
|
|
[Note] New albums are rated on a scale of one star (poor), two stars
|
|
(fair), three stars (good), and four stars (excellent).
|
|
|
|
--end review----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A couple of my comments for your consideration:
|
|
|
|
* In the answer to the first question, Roger says _when [television]
|
|
is a tool ... to the incumbent philosophy that the free market is
|
|
the god that we should all bow down to ..._. I had always viewed
|
|
the god in _What God Wants_ as the absolute God, but could it
|
|
perhaps be the free market god he refers to? What [the free market]
|
|
wants, [the free market] gets. (???)
|
|
|
|
* Roger hints about maybe doing something with acoustic guitar. I
|
|
wonder if he was contacted by MTV about doing an _Unplugged_ show.
|
|
One can only hope...
|
|
|
|
* In the review, Boehm says that the album is like an outline of a
|
|
plot without the story to realize it. I have found the album a
|
|
little slow and lacking direction as well, and I think that it could
|
|
be because there is no real story with climaxes, etc., but rather
|
|
just a collection of ideas. There's nothing wrong with that in and
|
|
of itself, but the album might have had more impact with a more
|
|
concrete story line. But overall I'd up it to three stars on the
|
|
L.A. Times scale.
|