276 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
276 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
MONEY INCORPORATED DIGEST #40
|
|
RELEASED 20 APRIL 1995
|
|
WRITTEN AND COMPILED BY SLEEPY
|
|
|
|
MONEY INCORPORATED ARE: SLEEPY
|
|
SONIC FURY
|
|
CCRIDER
|
|
THE BIG CHEESE
|
|
ORGASMIC ANOMALY
|
|
SEXECUTIONER
|
|
|
|
TODAY'S TOPIC: POLICE INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES AND ASSORTED RANTINGS
|
|
|
|
Before I begin the article about police interrogation techniques, I would like
|
|
to say a few words about the bullshit that happened in Oklahoma City yesterday.
|
|
This cowardly act was obviously an Arab attack at the U.S. government. While
|
|
I have no love for our government, this act was obviously aimed at hurting innocent
|
|
people to intimidate our Jewish-run government. Like I said, I have no love for
|
|
our Zionist occupied government, the people killed were, for the most part, not
|
|
Jews. This cowardly act must be dealt with swiftly and forcibly. Unfortunately
|
|
Clinton the peace loving asshole that he is, won't do shit until Iran parks an atom
|
|
bomb on Pennsylvania Avenue and blows his faggot ass up. These towel-headed
|
|
camel jockeys must be nuked and gotten rid of for good. These cowardly sand
|
|
fleas are like cockroaches, they keep coming back. And if you were offended by
|
|
my use of "sand flea" and "camel jockey", I don't give a fuck! I am a bigot and
|
|
I always will be. I have hate for the cowardly races, meaning Jews, Arabs and
|
|
orientals. At least black people have the balls to stand up and kill each other
|
|
instead of innocent women and children. Now that I got the Angry-White-Male
|
|
rantings done, lets get on with my informative text on police interrogation
|
|
techniques!
|
|
|
|
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
|
THE MONEY INC GUIDE TO POLICE INTERROGATION
|
|
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
|
|
|
Why Suspects Confess
|
|
|
|
Many criminal cases, even when investigated by the most experienced
|
|
and best qualified investigators, are ultimately solved by an admission or
|
|
confession from the person responsible for committing the crime. Oftentimes,
|
|
investigators are able to secure only a minimal amount of evidence, be it
|
|
physical or circumstantial, that points directly to a suspect, and in many
|
|
instances, this evidence is not considered strong enough by prosecutors to
|
|
obtain a conviction. In such cases, the interrogation of the suspects and
|
|
their subsequent confessions are of prime importance.
|
|
|
|
This article addresses the question of why suspects speak freely to
|
|
investigators, and ultimately, sign full confessions. The physical and
|
|
psychological aspects of confession and how they relate to successful
|
|
interrogations of suspects are also discussed, as is the "breakthrough," the
|
|
point in the interrogation when suspects make an admission, no matter how
|
|
minuscule, that begins the process of obtaining a full confession.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defining "Interrogation"
|
|
|
|
Interrogation is the questioning of a person suspected of having
|
|
committed a crime. It is designed to match acquired information to a
|
|
particular suspect in order to secure a confession. The goals of interrogation
|
|
include:
|
|
|
|
* To learn the truth of the crime and how it happened
|
|
* To obtain an admission of guilt from the suspect
|
|
* To obtain all the facts to determine the method of operation and
|
|
the circumstances of the crime in question
|
|
* To gather information that enables investigators to arrive at
|
|
logical conclusions
|
|
* To provide information for use by the prosecutor in possible court
|
|
action.
|
|
|
|
Knowing the definition and objectives of the interrogation, the
|
|
question then asked is, "Why do suspects confess?" Self-condemnation and self-
|
|
destruction are not normal human behavioral characteristics. Human beings
|
|
ordinarily do not utter unsolicited, spontaneous confessions. It is logical to
|
|
conclude, therefore, that when suspects are taken to police stations to be
|
|
questioned concerning their involvement in a particular crime, their immediate
|
|
reaction will be a refusal to answer any questions. With the deluge of
|
|
television programs that present a clear picture of the Miranda warning and its
|
|
application to suspects, one would conclude that no one questioned about a
|
|
crime would surrender incriminating information, much less supply investigators
|
|
with a signed, full confession. It would also seem that once suspects sense
|
|
the direction in which the investigators are heading, the conversation would
|
|
immediately end. However, for various psychological reasons, suspects continue
|
|
to speak with investigators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suspect Paranoia
|
|
|
|
Suspects are never quite sure of exactly what information
|
|
investigators possess. They know that the police are investigating the crime,
|
|
and in all likelihood, suspects have followed media accounts of their crimes to
|
|
determine what leads the police have. Uppermost in their minds, however, is
|
|
how to escape detection and obtain firsthand information about the
|
|
investigation and where it is heading.
|
|
|
|
Such "paranoia" motivates suspects to accompany the police voluntarily
|
|
for questioning. Coupled with curiosity, this paranoia motivates suspects to
|
|
appear at police headquarters as "concerned citizens" who have information
|
|
pertinent to the case. By doing this, suspects may attempt to supply false or
|
|
noncorroborative information in order to lead investigators astray, gain inside
|
|
information concerning the case from investigators, and remove suspicion from
|
|
themselves by offering information on the case so investigators will not
|
|
suspect their involvement.
|
|
|
|
For example, in one case, a 22-year-old woman was discovered in a
|
|
stairwell outside of a public building. The woman had been raped and was found
|
|
naked and bludgeoned. Investigators interviewed numerous people during the
|
|
next several days but were unable to identify any suspects. Media coverage on
|
|
the case was extremely high.
|
|
|
|
Several days into the investigation, a 23-year-old man appeared at
|
|
police headquarters with two infants in tow and informed investigators that he
|
|
believed he may have some information regarding the woman's death. The man
|
|
revealed that when he was walking home late one evening, he passed the area
|
|
where the woman was found and observed a "strange individual" lurking near an
|
|
adjacent phone booth. The man said that because he was frightened of the
|
|
stranger, he ran back to his home. After reading the media accounts of the
|
|
girl's death, he believed that he should tell the police what he had observed.
|
|
|
|
The man gave police a physical description of the "stranger" and then
|
|
helped an artist to compose a sketch of the individual. After he left,
|
|
investigators discovered that the sketch bore a strong resemblance to the
|
|
"witness" who provided the information.
|
|
|
|
After further investigation, the witness was asked to return to the
|
|
police station to answer more questions, which he did gladly. Some 15 hours
|
|
into the interrogation, he confessed to one of his "multiple personalities"
|
|
having killed the woman, who was unknown to him, simply because the victim was
|
|
a woman, which is what the suspect had always wanted to be.
|
|
|
|
This case clearly illustrates the need for some suspects to know
|
|
exactly what is happening in an investigation. In their minds, they honestly
|
|
believe that by hiding behind the guise of "trying to help," they will, without
|
|
incriminating themselves, learn more about the case from the investigators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Interrogation Setting
|
|
|
|
In any discussion concerning interrogation, it is necessary to include
|
|
a review of the surroundings where a suspect is to be interrogated. Because
|
|
there is a general desire to maintain personal integrity before family members
|
|
and peer groups, suspects should be removed from familiar surroundings and
|
|
taken to a location that has an atmosphere more conducive to cooperativeness
|
|
and truthfulness. The primary psychological factor contributing to successful
|
|
interrogations is privacy -- being totally alone with suspects. This privacy
|
|
prompts suspects to feel willing to unload the burden of guilt. The
|
|
interrogation site should isolate the suspect so that only the interrogator is
|
|
present. The suspect's thoughts and responses should be free from all outside
|
|
distractions or stimuli.
|
|
|
|
The interrogation setting also plays an important part in obtaining
|
|
confessions. The surroundings should reduce suspect fears and contribute to
|
|
the inclination to discuss the crime. Because fear is a direct reinforcement
|
|
for defensive mechanisms (resistance), it is important to erase as many fears
|
|
as possible. Therefore, the interrogation room should establish a business
|
|
atmosphere as opposed to a police-like atmosphere. While drab, barren
|
|
interrogation rooms increase fear in suspects, a location that displays an
|
|
open, you-have-nothing-to fear quality about it can do much to break
|
|
down interrogation defensiveness, thereby eliminating a major barrier. The
|
|
interrogators tend to disarm the suspects psychologically by placing them in
|
|
surroundings that are free from any fear-inducing distractions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychological Factors
|
|
|
|
More than likely, suspects voluntarily accompany investigators, either
|
|
in response to a police request to answer questions or in an attempt to learn
|
|
information about the investigation. Once settled in the interrogation room,
|
|
the interrogators should treat suspects in a civilized manner, no matter how
|
|
vicious or serious the crime might have been. While they may have feelings of
|
|
disgust for the suspects, the goal is to obtain a confession, and it is
|
|
important that personal emotions not be revealed.
|
|
|
|
Investigators should also adopt a compassionate attitude and attempt to
|
|
establish a rapport with suspects. In most cases, suspects commit crimes
|
|
because they believe that it offers the best solution to their needs at the
|
|
moment. Two rules of thumb to remember are: (1) "There but for the grace of
|
|
God go I"; and (2) it is important to establish a common level of understanding
|
|
with the suspects. These rules are critical to persuading suspects to be open,
|
|
forthright, and honest. Suspects should be persuaded to look beyond the
|
|
investigators' badges and see, instead, officers who listen without judging.
|
|
If investigators are able to convince suspects that the key issue is not the
|
|
crime itself, but what motivated them to commit the crime, they will begin to
|
|
rationalize or explain their motivating factors.
|
|
|
|
At this stage of the interrogation, investigators are on the brink of
|
|
having suspects break through remaining defensive barriers to admit involvement
|
|
in the crime. This is the critical stage of the interrogation process known as
|
|
the "breakthrough".
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Breakthrough"
|
|
|
|
The "breakthrough" is the point in the interrogation when suspects
|
|
make an admission, no matter how small. In spite of having been advised of
|
|
certain protections guaranteed by the Constitution, most suspects feel a need
|
|
to confess. Both hardcore criminals and first-time offenders suffer from the
|
|
same pangs of conscience. This is an indication that their defense mechanisms
|
|
are diminished, and at this point, the investigators may push through to elicit
|
|
the remaining elements of confession.
|
|
|
|
In order for interrogators to pursue a successful breakthrough, they
|
|
must recognize and understand certain background factors that are unique to a
|
|
particular suspect. Many times, criminals exhibit psychological problems that
|
|
are the result of having come from homes torn by conflict and dissension. Also
|
|
frequently found in the backgrounds of criminals are parental rejection and
|
|
inconsistent and severe punishment. It is important that investigators see
|
|
beyond the person sitting before them and realize that past experiences can
|
|
impact on current behavior. Once interrogators realize that the fear of
|
|
possible punishment, coupled with the loss of pride in having to admit to
|
|
committing mistakes, is the basic inhibitor they must overcome in suspects,
|
|
they will quickly be able to formulate questions and analyze responses that
|
|
will break through the inhibitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successful Interrogations
|
|
|
|
Investigators must conduct every interrogation with the belief that
|
|
suspects, when presented with the proper avenue, will use it to confess their
|
|
crimes. Research indicates that most guilty persons who confess are, from the
|
|
outset, looking for the proper opening during the interrogation to communicate
|
|
their guilt to the interrogators.
|
|
|
|
Suspects confess when the internal anxiety caused by their deception
|
|
outweighs their perceptions of the crime's consequences. In most instances,
|
|
suspects have magnified, in their minds, both the severity of the crime and the
|
|
possible repercussions. Interrogators should allay suspect anxiety by putting
|
|
these fears into perspective.
|
|
|
|
Suspects also make admissions or confessions when they believe that
|
|
cooperation is the best course of action. If they are convinced that officers
|
|
are prepared to listen to all of the circumstances surrounding the crimes, they
|
|
will begin to talk. The psychological and physiological pressures that build
|
|
in a person who has committed a crime are best alleviated by communicating.
|
|
In order to relieve these suppressed pressures, suspects explain the
|
|
circumstances of their crimes they confess.
|
|
|
|
And, finally, suspects confess when interrogators are able to
|
|
speculate correctly on why the crimes were committed. Suspects want to know
|
|
ahead of time that interrogators will believe what they have to say and will
|
|
understand what motivated them to commit the crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
It is natural for suspects to want to preserve their privacy, civil
|
|
rights, and liberties. It is also natural for suspects to resist discussing
|
|
their criminal acts. For these very reasons, however, investigators must
|
|
develop the skills that enable them to disarm defensive resistors established
|
|
by suspects during interrogation. Before suspects will confess, they must feel
|
|
comfortable in their surroundings, and they must have confidence in the
|
|
interrogators, who should attempt to gain this confidence by listening intently
|
|
to them and by allowing them to verbalize their accounts of the crimes.
|
|
|
|
Interrogators who understand what motivates suspects to confess will
|
|
be better able to formulate effective questions and analyze suspect responses.
|
|
Obviously, more goes into gaining a confession than is contained in this
|
|
article. However, if the interrogator fails to understand the motivations of
|
|
the suspect, other factors impacting on obtaining the confession will be less
|
|
effective.
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
I hope this file helped you in some way, if the Feds ever come a knockin' at
|
|
your door. I wish I had it a year ago!
|
|
|
|
COPYWRONG 1995 MONEY INC HOLDINGS LTD
|
|
All rights sick of O.J. Simpson.
|
|
|
|
MONEY INCORPORATED ARE: MUTHAPHUKKIN SLEEPY
|
|
SONIC FUCKIN FURY
|
|
CC FUCKIN RIDER
|
|
THE BIG FUCKIN CHEESE
|
|
ORGASMIC FUCKIN ANOMALY
|
|
SEXE FUCKIN CUTIONER
|
|
|