430 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
430 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
||
IS THIS AN UNTAMPERED FILE?
|
||
|
||
This ASCII-file version of Imprimis, On Line was
|
||
packaged by Applied Foresight, Inc. (AFI hereafter).
|
||
Every AFI-packaged ASCII version of Imprimis is
|
||
distributed in either an "-AV protected" ZIP file
|
||
format or a SDN (Shareware Distributors Network)
|
||
protected SDN file.
|
||
|
||
"AV" is the authenticity verification feature provided
|
||
to registered PKZIP users, which Applied Foresight,
|
||
Inc., is. If you are using the MS-DOS PKUNZIP.EXE
|
||
program written by PKWARE Inc. and do not see the "-AV"
|
||
message after every file is unzipped AND receive the
|
||
message "Authentic files Verified! #JAA646 Applied
|
||
Foresight Inc." when you unzip this file then do not
|
||
trust it's integrity. If your version of PKUNZIP is not
|
||
the PKWARE-authored program (for instance, you are
|
||
running a non-MS-DOS version), then this message may
|
||
not be displayed. (Note: version 2.04g of PKZIP was
|
||
used to create this authentication message.)
|
||
|
||
SDN is the major distributor of Shareware and
|
||
Copyrighted Freeware and users who extract files from
|
||
an SDN file with the current version of the archive
|
||
utility ARJ, should see:
|
||
|
||
*** Valid ARJ-SECURITY envelope signature:
|
||
*** SDN International(sm) SDN#01 R#2417
|
||
|
||
This file is an SDN International(sm) Author-Direct
|
||
Distribution. It should be verified for the SDN
|
||
Security Seal by the FileTest utility available at The
|
||
SDN Project AuthorLine BBS 203-634-0370.
|
||
|
||
(Note: prior to about May, 1993, SDN used PAK to
|
||
archive its distributions and its authenticity message
|
||
differs from the above.)
|
||
|
||
Trust only genuine AFI-packaged archives ... anything
|
||
else may be just that: ANYTHING ELSE.
|
||
|
||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
||
Imprimis, On Line -- October, 1993
|
||
|
||
IMPRIMIS (im-pr<70>-mis), taking its name from the Latin
|
||
term, "in the first place," is the publication of
|
||
Hillsdale College. Executive Editor, Ronald L.
|
||
Trowbridge; Managing Editor, Lissa Roche; Assistant,
|
||
Patricia A. DuBois. Illustrations by Tom Curtis. The
|
||
opinions expressed in IMPRIMIS may be, but are not
|
||
necessarily, the views of Hillsdale College and its
|
||
External Programs division. Copyright _ 1993.
|
||
Permission to reprint in whole or part is hereby
|
||
granted, provided a version of the following credit
|
||
line is used: "Reprinted by permission from IMPRIMIS,
|
||
the monthly journal of Hillsdale College." Subscription
|
||
free upon request. ISSN 0277-8432. Circulation 480,000
|
||
worldwide, established 1972. IMPRIMIS trademark
|
||
registered in U.S. Patent and Trade Office #1563325.
|
||
For more information on free print subscriptions or
|
||
back issues, call 1-800-437-2268, or 1-517-439-1524,
|
||
ext. 2319, or write Imprimis, Hillsdale College,
|
||
Hillsdale, MI 49242.
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
"Private Sector Solutions to Public Sector Problems"
|
||
by Barry Asmus, Senior Economixt
|
||
National Center for Policy Analysis
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Volume 22, Number 10
|
||
Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242
|
||
October 1993
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Preview: Barry Asmus argues that public sector
|
||
"solutions" have done more harm than good in our
|
||
society and that it is high time to restore the freedom
|
||
of the marketplace. This essay is based on his remarks
|
||
at Hillsdale's Shavano Institute for National
|
||
Leadership seminar, "American Perestroika: Returning
|
||
Public Services to the Private Sector" on May 24-25,
|
||
1993 in Atlanta, Georgia.
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Let's play a "what if" game about public spending for a
|
||
moment. What if our politicians had said back in 1965:
|
||
"We won't spend a dime on welfare for the next three
|
||
decades, but in the early 1990s, we will take the money
|
||
we would have spent and buy every Fortune 500 company
|
||
and every piece of farm land in America. Then we will
|
||
deed these companies and farms over to the poor." That
|
||
is exactly what politicians could have done with the
|
||
money--about $3.5 trillion--that they have spent on
|
||
welfare since 1965. If they had, what would the problem
|
||
of poverty be like today? Would there be tens of
|
||
thousands of Americans who are members of a "permanent
|
||
underclass" and millions more who qualify as "working
|
||
poor?"
|
||
|
||
What if our politicians had said back then:
|
||
"Instead of spending 14 percent of the GDP--about $840
|
||
billion in 1992--on health care, much of it subsidized
|
||
government spending, we will promote free market
|
||
solutions," that is, health care costs paid by the
|
||
consumer instead of government and other third parties.
|
||
Would there be any support today for socialized
|
||
medicine, for price controls on provider fees and
|
||
charges, or for adopting what is basically a Third
|
||
World model for U.S. health care?
|
||
|
||
What if they had also said: "Instead of spending
|
||
more money than any nation on earth on centralized,
|
||
government-run primary and secondary education--
|
||
currently more than $200 billion a year or almost
|
||
$6,000 per pupil--we will strengthen the private,
|
||
locally-supported schools that were once the backbone
|
||
of education in the country." Would 40 percent of all
|
||
high schoolers today be functionally illiterate or
|
||
reading below the 8th grade level? Would one-quarter of
|
||
them be dropping out?
|
||
|
||
This "game" has a very serious purpose: It shows
|
||
how much our dependence on politicians and public
|
||
sector solutions has cost us and how little it has
|
||
achieved. Schemes of top-down economic coordination are
|
||
a hopeless absurdity whether tried by the U.S. or the
|
||
former Soviet Union.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Essence of Modern Politics
|
||
|
||
The "public choice" school of economics explains why
|
||
government solutions to economic problems inevitably
|
||
fail. First, politicians don't spend our money as
|
||
carefully as if it were their own. Second, in contrast
|
||
to the private business firm, the public agency has no
|
||
bottom line. Prices, wages, interest, profits are not a
|
||
part of the government calculus. The politician has all
|
||
sorts of incentives to spend more of our money to "do
|
||
good" (there is no end to what do-gooders will do with
|
||
other people's money). It is important that they "care"
|
||
about a perceived public crisis and "bring home the
|
||
bacon" to constituents, so as to increase their own
|
||
political power and influence.
|
||
|
||
Finally, politicians are motivated to localize
|
||
benefits and defuse costs. For instance, a few
|
||
Congressmen can get together in committee and agree to
|
||
award sugar beet farmers in their districts a whopping
|
||
$1 or $2 billion in subsidies and price supports in
|
||
exchange for electoral support, knowing full well that
|
||
since it costs only a few dollars per taxpayer, no one
|
||
will protest. Every Congressman has supporters who are
|
||
quite willing to steal from the many to benefit
|
||
themselves. The Congressman gets re-elected and special
|
||
interests vow their continued support.
|
||
|
||
Today, government at all levels is spending about
|
||
$2.3 trillion of our money every year, in contrast to
|
||
the $678 billion, adjusted for inflation, in 1965. Yet
|
||
we still have the same problems and they are, if
|
||
anything, worse. Why? It is not because politicians are
|
||
spending too little. It is because there are inherent
|
||
flaws in government as a delivery system. When the
|
||
consumer "purchases" something from government, the
|
||
good or service appears to be "free." The act of
|
||
consumption is divorced from the tax payment and excess
|
||
demand always results. In addition, efficiency suffers.
|
||
The absence of a profit or loss calculation by
|
||
government means services such as garbage collection,
|
||
fire protection, prisons, city management services, and
|
||
schools, for example, are invariably more expensive
|
||
than when provided by private industry. Government does
|
||
a rotten job of running nearly every enterprise it
|
||
undertakes while simultaneously reducing personal
|
||
freedom and choice.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Deja Vu All Over Again
|
||
|
||
The Clinton administration continues to stubbornly
|
||
insist that government is not spending or regulating
|
||
enough. Exploiting the politics of envy and class
|
||
warfare, they suggest that the rich are not paying
|
||
their "fair share" of taxes, though the top one percent
|
||
of income earners paid 17 percent of the total federal
|
||
tax burden in 1980 and 27.5 percent in 1990.
|
||
|
||
The essence of modern politics, Clinton seems to
|
||
think, is to keep the populace envious and then to drag
|
||
out more "experts" and public sector "solutions."
|
||
That's certainly what is happening now. Health care is
|
||
a good example. We are the world leader in health care.
|
||
There is no place on the face of the earth that has a
|
||
system as successful as ours or can deliver the quality
|
||
of health care we have come to enjoy. Yet politicians
|
||
tell us that the current system is falling apart and
|
||
that only government can "fix things." Stirring the
|
||
acids of envy, they portray doctors and drug companies
|
||
as the enemies who need to be controlled when in fact
|
||
it is government policy and the legal system that need
|
||
changing. Hillary Clinton warns us that 37 million
|
||
Americans are uninsured, even though 10 million of
|
||
these earn more than $30,000 per year and fully one-
|
||
half of the 37 million are without insurance for less
|
||
than four months. To the extent that there is an
|
||
uninsured problem, it is the result of government's
|
||
larger role in health care markets--largely made "free"
|
||
to the patient by Medicare and Medicaid--that has
|
||
driven medical care costs upward, thereby forcing many
|
||
individuals out of the market.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Taking from Peter to Pay Paul
|
||
|
||
Politicians can't give us anything without depriving us
|
||
of something else. Government is not a god. Every dime
|
||
they spend must first be taken from someone else.
|
||
Unfortunately, stealing money from Peter to give to
|
||
Paul really makes Peter a "Paul-bearer." The last
|
||
Republican administration signed off on nearly $300
|
||
billion in increased taxes and regulatory costs during
|
||
its four years. The current Democratic administration
|
||
wants to at least match that with its very first round
|
||
of proposed of tax hikes.
|
||
|
||
No wonder Washington, D.C. is so often described
|
||
as 67 square miles surrounded by reality, an influence-
|
||
peddling pleasure palace, a whorehouse where every four
|
||
years we get to elect a new piano player. Politicians
|
||
just don't seem to understand that taxes are a
|
||
disincentive to people who work, save, and invest. High
|
||
taxes actually reduce tax revenues from the rich, as
|
||
they motivate individuals to reduce their taxable
|
||
income and economic activity. And the problem is
|
||
compounded by the fact that politicians spend at least
|
||
$1.30 for every dollar collected in taxes. Tax rates
|
||
have gone up and down over the years, but spending
|
||
continues to rise.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Wealth of Nations
|
||
|
||
The good news is that despite what politicians are
|
||
doing to damage our economy--and they are doing plenty-
|
||
-we are living in an age when the possibilities to
|
||
create new wealth and expand the production of goods
|
||
and services are greater than ever. In today's global
|
||
marketplace all you need to start a business is a
|
||
telephone and a fax machine. Labor and capital are more
|
||
mobile than ever before, going where they are wanted
|
||
and staying where they are well treated. Annual
|
||
international capital flows are fifty times greater
|
||
than all world trade, zooming along fiber optic cables
|
||
and bouncing off satellites at the speed of thought
|
||
rather than the speed of things. The earth has become a
|
||
massive electronic highway.
|
||
|
||
The world economy is in an epochal transformation
|
||
from the Machine Age to the Information Age. Brains are
|
||
replacing BTUs. The new source of wealth is not
|
||
material, it is information. Here are two very modest,
|
||
everyday examples: Old-style carburetors used to allow
|
||
automobiles to run 12 miles on a gallon of gasoline.
|
||
Now, computerized fuel injectors allow them to run 22
|
||
miles on the same amount of fuel, thereby effectively
|
||
increasing the world supply of gasoline by one-third.
|
||
It used to take 165 pounds of aluminum to make one
|
||
thousand cans. Now, it only takes 30 pounds. As we push
|
||
further into the information age, matter will no longer
|
||
matter. It is what the mind does with matter that
|
||
counts. These technological advances, and thousands
|
||
like them, are not the result of public spending; they
|
||
are the result of free minds at work in a free market.
|
||
It is for this reason, says Hillsdale College President
|
||
George Roche, that "the wealth of nations lies not in
|
||
material resources but in the minds and hearts of men."
|
||
|
||
Centralized command is over. Hierarchal, corporate
|
||
bureaucracies are over. We are moving from monolithic
|
||
palace structures to a world of tents--fast, flexible,
|
||
and immediate response to changing customer demands.
|
||
"Reinventing government" is not going to work because
|
||
government is the wrong mechanism to give people what
|
||
they want. The information economy demands agility and
|
||
the efficiency of market signals which government does
|
||
not possess. The speed that Wal-Mart shows in
|
||
responding to consumer preferences in its markets is
|
||
simply not possible for the U.S. postal service or the
|
||
top-heavy, monopolistic public school system. If
|
||
Marriott believes it must contract out the hotel's
|
||
parking, then what are the implications for municipally
|
||
operated parking garages? As GM, IBM, Apple, GE, the
|
||
Union Pacific, and EDS eliminate bureaucratic rule,
|
||
decentralize, link their profit centers in partnership,
|
||
and engage in a continuous process of self-education
|
||
and assessment, what are the odds that the EPA, FDA,
|
||
the Department of Agriculture, the Department of
|
||
Education, and the Tennessee Valley Authority, to name
|
||
a few, will do the same?
|
||
|
||
The answer is privatization wherever possible and
|
||
then some. Public bureaucracies never plan their own
|
||
demise. We must do it for them, arguing on the grounds
|
||
that government ownership of property does not promote
|
||
an efficient allocation of resources but that it
|
||
actually prevents it.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Mainspring of Human Progress
|
||
|
||
Others have said it over and over again: Freedom is the
|
||
mainspring of human progress. But our politicians
|
||
apparently choose to ignore this. They are not looking
|
||
to maximize our freedom; they are bent on limiting it
|
||
and on confiscating more of what we earn and save. The
|
||
idea of imposing higher taxes and more regulation on an
|
||
economy to help it grow is like breaking a man's leg to
|
||
help him run faster. As with everything politicians do,
|
||
their timing is awful. Around the world,
|
||
centralization, industrial planning, and command
|
||
economies are on the way out. Privatization around the
|
||
globe continues to be the goal--in the United Kingdom,
|
||
Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, China, parts of Africa, and
|
||
in particular in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet
|
||
Union. Most of these countries are lowering taxes, not
|
||
raising them.
|
||
|
||
Ironically, that in the midst of this revolution,
|
||
Clinton's brain trust--in particular Secretary of Labor
|
||
Robert Reich and intellectual guru Lester Thurow--offer
|
||
the German "social economy" as a model to be emulated.
|
||
(Note how they have now soured on Japan.) We are
|
||
advised to copy Germany's apparent hardening of the
|
||
arteries, even as Chancellor Helmut Kohl, recognizing
|
||
his nation's folly, declares: "A successful industrial
|
||
nation--which means a nation with a future--doesn't
|
||
allow itself to be organized as a collective amusement
|
||
park." Meager job growth in Germany has been mostly in
|
||
the government sector. Labor unions and
|
||
"codetermination" in industrial management have
|
||
produced restrictive labor practices, discouraged new
|
||
hiring, and limited productivity in German industry.
|
||
The current German recession and the cost of
|
||
reunification have simply accelerated the demise of the
|
||
earlier "economic miracle." It appears that the social
|
||
welfare state can no longer pay for its foolhardy
|
||
promises.
|
||
|
||
It has taken all of the history of the world to
|
||
reach its current gross world product-- about $25
|
||
trillion--and that could very well double in the next
|
||
30 years because so many nations in Latin America,
|
||
Eastern Europe, and Asia have finally begun to throw
|
||
off the chains of socialism and embrace the free
|
||
market. We can learn from them as we seek to rid
|
||
ourselves of the creeping varieties of collectivism
|
||
that have taken root here in the United States in the
|
||
last sixty years:
|
||
|
||
* Public sector problems will be resolved best
|
||
through private sector solutions.
|
||
|
||
* Individuals are the ultimate source of wealth,
|
||
and economic growth can occur only if people are
|
||
allowed to better themselves by taking chances.
|
||
|
||
* It is entrepreneurial business that creates
|
||
prosperity, not politicians. Government cannot
|
||
create jobs. The miracle of a government summer
|
||
employment grant is more than offset by the
|
||
anti-miracle of higher taxes and the private
|
||
businesses that fail to expand and hire.
|
||
|
||
* The economy is not a machine; it is a living
|
||
social organism. The beneficial outcomes
|
||
generated by a spontaneous free market order
|
||
cannot be known in advance. The self-regulating
|
||
nature of a market economy is comparable to the
|
||
interdependent qualities of the biologist's
|
||
ecosystem, not the mathematical precision wished
|
||
for by so many economists in their static
|
||
systems and equations.
|
||
|
||
* The market is not good because it works; it
|
||
works because it is good. As one economic
|
||
historian has noted, "It is a plain historical
|
||
fact that the treatment of man by man became
|
||
conspicuously more humane side by side with the
|
||
rise of capitalism."
|
||
|
||
* Freedom and capitalism are inseparable.
|
||
Capitalism is. The market, like gravity, is.
|
||
|
||
* And finally, freedom is a "virus" for which
|
||
there is no antidote.
|
||
|
||
---------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Barry Asmus is a senior economist for the National
|
||
Center for Policy Analysis. The Center produces studies
|
||
that promote free enterprise, tax reform, limited
|
||
government, and a strong national defense. His
|
||
background includes: professor of economics, twice
|
||
voted outstanding university educator; Freedoms
|
||
Foundation award winner in private enterprise
|
||
education; and syndicated radio commentator for
|
||
"Perspectives on the Economy." His recent books include
|
||
Crossroads: The Great American Experiment, co-authored
|
||
with Donald B. Billings and nominated for an H.L.
|
||
Mencken Award, and a fictional work, The Space Place.
|
||
|
||
###
|
||
|
||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
End of this issue of Imprimis, On Line; Information
|
||
about the electronic publisher, Applied Foresight,
|
||
Inc., is in the file, IMPR_BY.TXT
|
||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|