421 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
421 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
Rewards for Conviction of Mail Order Fraud,
|
|
Cons, Scams, Bait and Switch,
|
|
False Advertising, and Pyramid Schemes
|
|
|
|
Every year some new scheme, and many old ones, succeed in bilking people
|
|
out of their hard-earned money. CrimeFighters can help bring the
|
|
perpetrators to justice and collect rewards for doing so.
|
|
|
|
A common method used to defraud the public is the use of a phoney lottery
|
|
operated via telephone boiler rooms (telemarketing), or by direct mail.
|
|
The scam is, you are told you have won a fantastic prize, but to qualify
|
|
you have to make a small purchase -- often costing a few hundred dollars.
|
|
Needless to say, the junk you receive isn't worth the money you had to pay
|
|
to get them, and of course you never see the big prize. Boiler rooms and
|
|
mailboxes are easily set up to get into business, and simply closed down
|
|
when the scam has run its course or the law starts nosing around.
|
|
|
|
A recent newspaper article mentions that experienced con artists and scam
|
|
operators are well aware of the postal inspectors powers and arrest rate.
|
|
To avoid violating postal laws, they often insist on delivering the offer
|
|
or receiving the money in person, or by sending or receiving it via Federal
|
|
Express. Possibly, anyone who is reluctant to use the postal service when
|
|
delivering the solicitation, the offer, the merchandise, or receiving the
|
|
money or any part of the transaction, may be a scam operator trying to
|
|
avoid postal inspectors. Look for that as an indication of a scam.
|
|
|
|
Another scam is a phoney lottery that may be registered as a non-profit
|
|
corporation that has obtained permits to lend credence to the scam.
|
|
Incorporation, registration, and permits may be impressive but provide no
|
|
guarantee of legitimacy. The phoney lottery rigs the contest to favor the
|
|
owners, a confederate, or a fictitious person who "wins" the big prize.
|
|
|
|
Another example is an illegal tax shelter plan, where the corporation sells
|
|
shares in a multimillion-dollar condominium. If the IRS later finds such a
|
|
scheme unauthorized and illegal, the property could be forfeited because it
|
|
was the instrument used to make the fraud effective.
|
|
|
|
Often with a fine, there is also a forfeiture of the property used to
|
|
commit the crime, especially if the property was essential to the fraud or
|
|
crime committed. For example, if the prize in an illegal lottery was a
|
|
$125,000 Rolls Royce automobile that was essential for the perpetration of
|
|
the fraud, the Rolls can and probably would be seized and forfeited. A
|
|
CrimeFighter instrumental in conviction would receive, in addition to half
|
|
of the fines, half of the value of the automobile.
|
|
|
|
Spotting Mail Order Scams and Frauds
|
|
|
|
Here's an easy job for stay-at-home CrimeFighters. Read classified ads to
|
|
spot illegal mail order scams, investigate to obtain the required evidence,
|
|
report fraudulent schemes, and collect the rewards. When you find a get-
|
|
rich quick scheme that looks too good to be true, it usually is and may
|
|
also be illegal. The TV program "Deals and Steals" is worth watching for
|
|
examples of scam operations. Another one is "20/20." The following scams
|
|
occur over and over.
|
|
|
|
Multi-Level Marketing Schemes (MLMs)
|
|
|
|
There are legal and illegal multi-level marketing schemes. AMWAY and a few
|
|
other similarly operated businesses are legal MLMs because they pay over-
|
|
ride commissions based on ongoing and repeat-sales of actual products at
|
|
various distribution levels throughout their chain. Paying override
|
|
commissions to sales managers and distributors is a common business
|
|
practice. MLMs take it to its maximum degree possible.
|
|
|
|
Illegal MLMs do not expect continuing retail sales of expendable items,
|
|
such as soap powder or vitamins. Their only source of continuing income is
|
|
additional lump-sum amounts paid up-front as membership or distributorship
|
|
fees from new recruits. Various names are used by illegal MLMs for each
|
|
level of distribution or management to make them sound plausible. When they
|
|
run out of recruits, they run out of income to pay override commissions and
|
|
the MLM collapses. The people at the top make money at the expense (and
|
|
chagrin) of the people at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
A new MLM wrinkle is to sell "reports". The sales pitch tells the mark to
|
|
mail a thousand or more letters to names found on mailing lists. The sales
|
|
letter describes the operation as a bonafide MLM. The "product" is a group
|
|
of five reports which sells for $5. The person who buys them can copy them
|
|
and do the same thing and sell them to umpteen more marks, and so on.
|
|
|
|
No one wants to continue to buy the reports again and again (as they do for
|
|
vitamins or cosmetics). The money paid to the man at the top of the list
|
|
(or the first to mail a few thousand letters) has to come from the pockets
|
|
of marks. Somewhere down the road, the second and subsequent levels of
|
|
marks won't be able to find any more suckers. The last few thousand people
|
|
who joined the MLM will never get their money back. They've been stung!
|
|
|
|
The sale of the reports supposedly legitimize the use of the MLM name. The
|
|
actual value of the reports is questionable, but the main problem with the
|
|
illegal MLM is that it does not sell "repeat" items such as those sold by
|
|
legitimate MLMs. They do not expect a continuous flow of income and so
|
|
cannot pay commissions. Instead, payments to each new con man in the scam
|
|
must come from new marks, who try to sell five sheets of paper to other
|
|
marks, and so on. The "reports" are just a ruse to rationalize the scam.
|
|
As any lawyer will tell you, a rose is a rose, no matter what you call it.
|
|
|
|
By the same token, paper reports (costing less than $1) or like items of
|
|
insignificant value become sham sales. Selling them would be determined by
|
|
the courts as simply a ruse to make the scam plausible to gullible people.
|
|
|
|
More and more phoney MLMs are making the rounds. Every week someone hatches
|
|
a new one. Look for them, and prosecute them. However, before you jump the
|
|
gun and possibly make false accusations (or false arrests), check them out
|
|
first with a lawyer or the FBI.
|
|
|
|
Chain Letters Called by Various Names
|
|
|
|
In chain letters, or similar dressed-up MLM schemes, it's not possible for
|
|
everyone in the pyramid to get their money back, let alone make a profit.
|
|
That means new recruits who pay into the scheme at a later date can't get
|
|
paid as promised. Those who initiate the scheme and their immediate
|
|
followers have a good chance of collecting more than they put into it, but
|
|
the majority of investors wind up losers. That's fraud, which falls under
|
|
RICO statutes.
|
|
|
|
You don't have to catch the person who originated these scams. Each and
|
|
every person involved in and participating in pyramid schemes is guilty of
|
|
breaking the law. If you can establish an audit trail of names, you may be
|
|
able to snare a few hundred to a few thousand violators.
|
|
|
|
The list of names on the chain letter doesn't contain the names of everyone
|
|
involved, only the current list. However, each person on the letter may be
|
|
"persuaded" to produce the list they received (and probably kept) to
|
|
provide an audit trail back to almost all of the people involved.
|
|
|
|
Police, prosecutors, and the courts are far too busy to be enthusiastic
|
|
about the huge chore to convict every person on a pyramid scheme. But if a
|
|
CrimeFighter wanted to, he could "volunteer" (Qui Tam law) to prosecute a
|
|
few hundred or a few thousand (felony) lawbreakers. Even if the reward paid
|
|
is only $100 per person (under 3059), you qualify for Qui Tam. That puts
|
|
you in the driver's seat to lay charges and do the plea bargaining. You can
|
|
also file a $1,000 personal lawsuit at the same time to collect for your
|
|
time and expenses involved.
|
|
|
|
Lay criminal charges under RICO as well as a personal civil suit for $1,000
|
|
against each lawbreaker. Using the Rules of Discovery and interrogatories
|
|
and depositions, you can obtain the names and addresses of participants
|
|
from list-to-list all the way to the top. There's usually a few hundred to
|
|
a thousand or more participants in most chain-letter schemes. If you track
|
|
them down, and prosecute 1,000 of them, using RICO and civil suits, at
|
|
$1,000 each you could wind up with a million dollars!
|
|
|
|
By now you should know how to use plea bargaining on pending criminal
|
|
charges as leverage to settle your civil suit for $1,000. An out-of-court
|
|
settlement lets you dismiss the criminal charges with a warning for first
|
|
time violators. I believe 99.9% would be happy to settle out of court.
|
|
|
|
Arizona Revised Statutes, under Trade and Commerce, which follows, can be
|
|
used as an example. All states have similar statutes. Look them up.
|
|
|
|
ARS 44-1731 (pyramid schemes) Definitions.
|
|
|
|
In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
|
|
|
|
1. "Compensation" includes a payment based on a sale or distribution made
|
|
to a person who either is a participant in a pyramid promotional scheme or
|
|
has the right to become a participant upon payment.
|
|
|
|
2. "Consideration" means the payment of cash or the purchase of goods,
|
|
services or intangible property but does not include:
|
|
|
|
(a) The purchase of goods or services furnished at cost to be used in
|
|
making sales and not for resale.
|
|
|
|
(b) Time and effort spent in pursuit of sales or recruiting activities.
|
|
|
|
3. "Pyramid promotional scheme" means any plan or operation by which a
|
|
participant gives consideration for the opportunity to receive compensation
|
|
which is derived primarily from any person's introduction of other persons
|
|
into participation in the plan or operation rather than from the sale of
|
|
goods, services or intangible property by the participant or other persons
|
|
introduced into the plan or operation.
|
|
|
|
ARS 44-1732 Violation; classification
|
|
|
|
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this article is guilty
|
|
of a class 6 felony.
|
|
|
|
B. The attorney general or county attorney, or both, shall institute the
|
|
criminal actions to enforce provisions of this article.
|
|
|
|
An act or practice in violation of this article constitutes an unlawful
|
|
practice under 44-1522. The attorney general may investigate and take
|
|
appropriate action as prescribed by chapter 10, article 7 of this title
|
|
(Section 44-1521 et seq.)
|
|
|
|
ARS 44-1735 Pyramid promotional scheme; prohibition; defenses excluded.
|
|
|
|
A. A person shall not establish, operate, advertise or promote a pyramid
|
|
promotional scheme.
|
|
|
|
B. A limitation as to the number of person who may participate or the
|
|
presence of additional conditions affecting eligibility for the opportunity
|
|
to receive compensation under the plan or operation does not change the
|
|
identity of the scheme as a pyramid promotional scheme nor is a defense
|
|
under this article that a participant, on giving consideration, obtains any
|
|
goods, services or intangible property in addition to the rights to receive
|
|
compensation."
|
|
* * * * * *
|
|
|
|
Selling five flimsy reports (or any other item or providing services of any
|
|
kind, of any value) does not make an illegal pyramid scheme legitimate. The
|
|
test is that if there are no repeat sales to generate a normal profit from
|
|
which distributors can actually earn their commissions, it's probably a
|
|
pyramid scheme. Check it out.
|
|
|
|
Fraud and Deception
|
|
|
|
There is a subtle difference between falsity and deception. Blatantly false
|
|
statements such as "the best burger in the world" is not considered false
|
|
advertising, no matter how true or untrue the statement is (who knows?).
|
|
These generalized statements are classified as "puffery" and often used to
|
|
some extent by many companies. Hardly anyone takes them seriously.
|
|
|
|
However, a false or unproven statement that says, in effect, one product
|
|
will do something better than a competitive product may, comes under the
|
|
scrutiny as a false advertising claim. And when something is knowingly and
|
|
willfully done to deceive the public into buying a product, it's illegal.
|
|
|
|
For example, a well-known company advertised a can of shaving cream as
|
|
their competitor's brand ("brand X") to demonstrate how quickly brand X
|
|
evaporated compared to their brand. The deception was that brand X didn't
|
|
contain shaving cream but a concoction that foamed like shaving cream and
|
|
evaporated quickly.
|
|
|
|
A famous brand of "chunky style" Soup was once advertised on TV using a few
|
|
marbles in the bottom of a soup bowl to make it appear as though the soup
|
|
was "brim-full" of meat and vegetables. The use of marbles in soup was done
|
|
"knowingly and willfully" to deceive the public. That's illegal.
|
|
|
|
Bait and Switch Advertising
|
|
|
|
Another type of fraud is accomplished by a company or individual that
|
|
advertises to sell a product for a very low price. People who ask for the
|
|
item are often advised, "sorry, we just sold the last one." They're
|
|
steered to a more expensive product the company really wants to sell.
|
|
Having just one or two of the products available and advertised at a low
|
|
price won't get the company off the hook for bait and switch advertising
|
|
unless the number of units available is mentioned in the ad. Fraud occurs
|
|
when the intent was not to sell the advertised item(s) but simply to lure
|
|
the public into the place of business to buy higher-priced items.
|
|
|
|
Example: A few years ago I wanted to buy some furniture. A bedroom suite
|
|
was advertised for about half the usual price. When I went to the store I
|
|
was shown a bedroom set of flimsy furniture. For what I had in mind, the
|
|
price was O.K. so I decided to purchase it anyway - to the consternation of
|
|
the salesman. It turned out that bedroom set was their one and only. It was
|
|
used as "bait." They didn't expect to sell it and didn't want to sell it.
|
|
They tried to talk me out of it by "discounting" a better-looking group. I
|
|
didn't realize it at that time, but they were using a bait and switch
|
|
operation.
|
|
|
|
Bait and switch is very common. It's also against the law because it's
|
|
"deceptive advertising." Used car dealers are notorious for bait and
|
|
switch advertisements ("creampuffs" turn out to be clunkers) but they
|
|
lure you to their salesroom so they can work on you to sell you a
|
|
different, higher-priced vehicle.
|
|
|
|
Another incident: Many years ago I read an advertisement offering a low-
|
|
cost automatic transmission drain and refill plus a free inspection. After
|
|
the truck was up on a rack and the transmission partially disassembled, I
|
|
was shown the "burnt" oil and parts and was strongly advised to have an
|
|
overhaul done. I couldn't afford the $300 or so they said it would cost, so
|
|
I told them to just put it back together as I had no problem with it
|
|
before. The mechanic worked on me, the head mechanic worked on me, and the
|
|
sales manager worked on me - trying to convince me to have it "overhauled."
|
|
It took almost an hour to convince them I was absolutely not going to be
|
|
coerced into expensive repairs when I felt none was necessary. (The truck
|
|
transmission never gave me any problems afterwards.)
|
|
|
|
It was a typical bait and switch operation. The company was later charged
|
|
and convicted for this illegal practice. If I had known the law at that
|
|
time, I would have reported it and collected a reward -- and might have
|
|
been able to buy a new truck!
|
|
|
|
Automotive repair chains that offer "free inspection" are sometimes used
|
|
like bait and switch ads. Free inspections often lead to expensive repairs.
|
|
Some may be required, some not.
|
|
|
|
Ghost Cars
|
|
|
|
Occasionally, news reporters will take a "ghost" car, which has been
|
|
checked by a couple of reliable mechanics and certified that no repairs are
|
|
necessary, to a franchised shop for inspection. They find that quite a few
|
|
mechanics claim the car needs expensive repairs. The undercover investiga-
|
|
tion or sting operations by reporters always make a good news story.
|
|
If you're a reporter, remember that you can also collect a reward!
|
|
|
|
If you're mechanically inclined, get an older car, have it checked out and
|
|
verified as mechanically sound by two certified mechanics who know what
|
|
you're up to. Advise them they may be required to be "expert witnesses."
|
|
(They get paid for their time.) Then set up your auto-mechanic sting
|
|
operation, and snare a dozen or so dirty-dealing garage-mechanic bandits!
|
|
|
|
The supply of garage-mechanic bandits is unlimited. If they're part of a
|
|
franchise chain, so are the fines! In a large city there's enough
|
|
business for a full-time garage-buster. If you go after the franchise
|
|
chains, and snare a few dealers, it could lead to megabuck fines, of which
|
|
you can get half when you prosecute under RICO civil suits.
|
|
|
|
* * * * * *
|
|
|
|
False Advertising
|
|
|
|
Look for intentionally misleading wording that seems to promise one thing,
|
|
but delivers another -- sometimes by implying what isn't stated but leading
|
|
readers to believe they will get what seems to be promised, but which is
|
|
never intended to be delivered.
|
|
|
|
According to Section 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, deceptive
|
|
advertisements are those that are "misleading in material respect," which
|
|
has been interpreted by the courts to mean the deceptive advertisement must
|
|
somehow affect the purchasing decisions of the customer.
|
|
|
|
If the wording is designed skillfully, knowingly and willfully to entice
|
|
buyers by implying something that isn't true, but coaxes the purchase by
|
|
deliberate omission of the true facts, or play of words, it's deceptive
|
|
advertising.
|
|
|
|
For a complete definition of what constitutes fraudulent practices, look up
|
|
your state laws concerning trade and commerce. State law books, usually
|
|
called "Revised Statutes," cite a few cases for quick reference. They will
|
|
help you decide the type of evidence you need and help you analyze the
|
|
strengths and weaknesses in the potential fraud case you may have
|
|
discovered.
|
|
* * * * * *
|
|
|
|
U.S. Post Office Rewards
|
|
|
|
This section isn't about the "Wanted" posters hanging in the U.S. Post
|
|
office. It's about rewards offered for information leading to the arrest
|
|
and conviction of persons violating postal laws.
|
|
|
|
This law is long and humdrum for CrimeFighters, so I'll skip the many pages
|
|
that lead up to the reward clause.
|
|
|
|
Title 39 USCS 101 et seq.
|
|
|
|
404. Specific Powers.
|
|
|
|
"(a) Without limitation of the generality of its powers, the Postal Service
|
|
shall have the specific powers, among others:
|
|
|
|
(skipped (1) through (6) the non-reward paragraphs)
|
|
|
|
(7) to investigate postal offenses and civil matters relating to the postal
|
|
Service;
|
|
|
|
(8) to offer and pay rewards for information and services in connection
|
|
with violations of the postal laws, and, unless a different disposal is
|
|
expressly prescribed, to pay one-half of all penalties and forfeitures
|
|
imposed for violations of law affecting the Postal Service, its revenues,
|
|
or property, to the person informing for the same, and to pay the other
|
|
one-half into the Postal Service Fund; and ..." Unquote.
|
|
|
|
* * * * * *
|
|
|
|
While almost all of the wording in it pertains to postal property, stamps
|
|
and mail, it covers almost all crimes that uses postal services in one way
|
|
or another. Almost all scams either use the mails to distribute their
|
|
offerings, or to receive money though the mails. (More on that at the end
|
|
of this chapter.)
|
|
|
|
The key words are "to pay one-half." Under this law, negotiations aren't
|
|
required to qualify for 50% of the resultant fines and forfeitures. At
|
|
least that's what appears to be the case.
|
|
|
|
Protecting Your Claim for Postal Rewards
|
|
|
|
I mailed the evidence of a pyramid scheme letter I received to the postal
|
|
authorities in California. I didn't get a reward. The inspector I dealt
|
|
with brushed me off and didn't answer my letters requesting a follow up. In
|
|
other words, I was stonewalled -- a common occurrence from bureaucrats.
|
|
|
|
I was told by a U.S. Postal Agent that the Service has no provision to pay
|
|
rewards for fraud cases even if it's called "mail fraud." According to the
|
|
person I dealt with, Title 39 USCS 404 refers only to the crimes listed on
|
|
Notice 96 (below). After reading the words and phrases in USCS 404 (above)
|
|
you may agree I was eligible, but just stonewalled by a petty bureaucrat at
|
|
the bottom of the decision-making ladder.
|
|
|
|
Their rationale is, I suppose, they're saving taxpayers' money. While that
|
|
may be true, it also discourages any further disclosures. In this case, a
|
|
thousand dollars "saved" might well mean many postal violations and many
|
|
thousands of dollars worth of potential fines and forfeitures are lost.
|
|
In England, that's called being penny-wise and pound foolish.
|
|
|
|
My mistake was in not negotiating first and keeping the evidence. I felt
|
|
that if I provided the information, rewards would be paid without any
|
|
hassle. Unfortunately, that's not how bureaucrats think. In most cases,
|
|
they begrudge paying citizens for what they feel is their duty. It doesn't
|
|
matter if there is a law saying rewards will be paid. If they can avoid
|
|
paying it, they'll stonewall your requests and letters of inquiry, and
|
|
simply brush you off.
|
|
|
|
If you receive or obtain evidence of any kind of mail fraud, do not mail it
|
|
to postal authorities (or any other law enforcement agency). Make a brief
|
|
preliminary disclosure of the details but don't provide the name and
|
|
address of the person or company. Negotiate for a reward, and get the
|
|
promise to pay in writing.
|
|
|
|
Also, another thing to look out for: be sure the person who promises to
|
|
pay a reward has the authority to legally bind the agency to the payment.
|
|
If the person who makes the promise isn't authorized to make any such
|
|
promises, the promise can be swept aside. To avoid that problem, insist
|
|
that the promise to pay a reward (and a share of the fines and forfeitures)
|
|
also includes a separate paragraph that clearly states the person offering
|
|
the reward is duly authorized to pay the reward as outlined in the letter
|
|
to you. If the person who signs such a statement isn't authorized (and
|
|
knowingly lies) you can sue him personally, as well as the department he
|
|
represents, for breach of promise.
|
|
|
|
If you want the largest reward possible, prosecute the case yourself under
|
|
Federal RICO law. If that's too much trouble, keep in mind that almost all
|
|
felonies are covered by their own respective Federal laws according to the
|
|
crime committed. Use them instead of Postal laws for prosecution. Or,
|
|
contact the FBI or U.S. District Attorney for those few cases where RICO
|
|
doesn't apply. The FBI has proven to be more generous in paying rewards
|
|
than the Postal Service, and welcomes information from CrimeFighters.
|
|
|
|
F9 for Next Chapter
|