96 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
96 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
This proves that you reading this are probably a motorist
|
||
traveling and not a driver driving. But your schools,
|
||
parents, and friends all told you that driving is a
|
||
privelege and not a right. But what is a driver ?????
|
||
A person who receives financial compensation from
|
||
transporting the public is a driver according to
|
||
law researchers. If you just travel about in your car
|
||
you probably are not a driver. If you are not a driver
|
||
then you have a constitutional right to travel about
|
||
in your car without being required to have a driver's
|
||
License, register your car or buy auto insurance !!!!
|
||
Take this to your lawyer !!!!!!! or upload to Special
|
||
Interest Law Bulletin Boards such as (805)273-8476,
|
||
(214)522-1963, (212)409-4194, (313)774-7258.
|
||
*
|
||
Smart Brave Lady
|
||
322730 South Mill
|
||
Tempe, Arizona
|
||
*
|
||
Accused
|
||
*
|
||
In the municipal Court of the City of Some City
|
||
In the County of You Name it, State of Your Choice
|
||
STATE OF Your Choice )
|
||
) NOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE
|
||
Plaintiff ) DEMAND TO DISMISS
|
||
) v.
|
||
) 68999990C
|
||
) No.68888890V
|
||
Smart Brave Lady ) 68777777V
|
||
)
|
||
Accused ) --------------------------
|
||
*
|
||
The accused, Smart Brave Lady, hereby gives Notice of
|
||
her continued special appearance before this tribunal, as
|
||
it is in want of subject matter jurisdiction and
|
||
jurisdiction of the person of the accused. The lack of
|
||
jurisdiction arises under the doctrine of primary
|
||
jurisdiction and the plaintiff has made finding of facts,
|
||
upon which this Court must take judicial notice to
|
||
convict, without affording an opportunity to be heard and
|
||
the plaintiff has otherwise failed to exhaust its
|
||
administrative remedies.
|
||
* Accordingly this Court should discharge the offenses
|
||
brought against the accused, or issue a stay in
|
||
proceedings pending the outcome of a proper hearing
|
||
in the agency or issue an order to show cause to the
|
||
plantiff why these offenses should not be discharged
|
||
or the proceedings stayed pending proper agency action.
|
||
* This Notice of Special Appearance is supported by
|
||
the attached statement of facts and points of authority.
|
||
*
|
||
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 5th day of July, 1989
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
* ______________________
|
||
* Smart Brave Lady
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
* STATEMENT OF FACTS AND POINTS OF AUTHORITY
|
||
*
|
||
The accused declares the following facts to be true to
|
||
the best ot her knowledge and belief.
|
||
*
|
||
1. The accused has the unalienable vested right to travel
|
||
upon the highways without submitting to regulation under
|
||
the police powers of the State of Arizona.
|
||
2. The accused's property, the car in which she is
|
||
traveling, is a household good exempt from taxation
|
||
and accorded regulation in accordance with Article
|
||
IX, &2, Clause 1 of the Constitution for the State of
|
||
Arizona.
|
||
3. Notwithstanding the fact, by this provision of
|
||
Constitution, the accused has no duty to inform
|
||
the agency that she has taken advantage of such
|
||
exemption, she has requested attempting to obtain a
|
||
hearing before the agency to determine whether her
|
||
use of her automobile is for a commercial purpose.
|
||
(See Exhibit A)
|
||
4. The hearing has not been held as of this time
|
||
and the agency has just recently responded to her
|
||
initial request. (See Exhibit B)
|
||
5. The accused has information and reason to believe
|
||
that the officer, who issued the citations, made an
|
||
administrative determination at the roadside that
|
||
the accused's property was a motor vehicle, subject
|
||
to the license tax, and that the accused was driving
|
||
said alleged motor vehicle for hire.
|
||
6. The accused contends that her car is not a motor vehicle
|
||
subject to the license tax, and that she is traveling and
|
||
not driving.
|
||
7. The accused has infromation and reason to believe that
|
||
the office has not been designated to make administrative
|
||
findings on disputes between the accused and the Motor
|
||
Vehicles Division of the Arizona Department of Revenue.
|
||
|