249 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
249 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
September 1991
|
||
|
||
|
||
THE KENTUCKY STATE POLICE DRUG TESTING POLICY
|
||
|
||
By
|
||
|
||
W. Michael Troop
|
||
Acting Kentucky State Police Commissioner
|
||
Secretary of Justice
|
||
and
|
||
Jerry Lovitt
|
||
Major
|
||
Commander, Operations Division (East Branch)
|
||
Kentucky State Police
|
||
|
||
|
||
Today, it is no longer enough for a law enforcement agency
|
||
to claim that it is drug free; it must prove it. To this end,
|
||
the Kentucky State Police developed and implemented an employee
|
||
drug testing policy. This policy is an enhanced version of the
|
||
Kentucky State Government's policies that will help to promote
|
||
further the concept, and hopefully, the reality of a drug-free
|
||
workplace.
|
||
|
||
CREATING THE POLICY
|
||
|
||
Department administrators set out to make the drug testing
|
||
policy a product of employees. To begin, they appointed
|
||
representatives from the Trooper Advisory Panel and the Civilian
|
||
Advisory Panel, whose members are elected by sworn and civilian
|
||
employees respectively, to a Drug Testing Advisory Committee.
|
||
Then, employees from other areas of the agency, such as data
|
||
processing, the laboratory, personnel, and the Legal Office,
|
||
were also appointed to the committee. A Branch Commander from
|
||
the Operations Division headed the 16-member committee. After 4
|
||
months of research and planning, the committee formulated a drug
|
||
testing policy that was fair, workable, and one that ensured
|
||
employee privacy, integrity, and dignity throughout the testing
|
||
process.
|
||
|
||
The committee also developed a 20-page booklet to
|
||
communicate the key points of the drug policy to the employees.
|
||
And, prior to implementing the policy, a staff officer visited
|
||
each of the Kentucky State Police's 16 posts to present the
|
||
program to the employees and to address their questions and
|
||
concerns. Additionally, post and section commanders received
|
||
training in the drug testing program procedures.
|
||
|
||
THE DRUG TESTING PROCESS
|
||
|
||
Random Drug Testing
|
||
|
||
As of January 1, 1991, all sworn employees hired since
|
||
1984, when drug testing of job applicants began, and all
|
||
aircraft support personnel became subject to random drug
|
||
testing. Employees hired prior to 1984 are also subject to
|
||
random drug testing. Random drug testing of civilian employees
|
||
in certain safety-sensitive classifications, such as arson
|
||
investigations, communications, the forensic laboratory, and in
|
||
the armed facilities security section, will also become
|
||
mandatory in 1991. However, before an agency employee can be
|
||
randomly tested, written authorization is obtained on a
|
||
voluntary consent form. This form stipulates that the employee
|
||
agrees to be drug tested no less than once and no more than
|
||
twice over a 2-year period.
|
||
|
||
Specific Selection Drug Testing
|
||
|
||
In addition to a random drug testing policy, the committee
|
||
also set a specific selection drug testing policy. Under this
|
||
policy, drug testing is mandatory for the following groups of
|
||
employees:
|
||
|
||
* All sworn employee applicants
|
||
|
||
* Employees eligible for promotion
|
||
|
||
* Employees transferring into aircraft support
|
||
|
||
* Drug enforcement/special investigations staff members
|
||
|
||
* Special response team members and/or those involved in
|
||
drug interdiction work.
|
||
|
||
Drug testing is also required for any sworn employee upon
|
||
documented, reasonable suspicion of illegal drug use. If an
|
||
employee refuses to be tested for possible drug use, they are
|
||
then subject to disciplinary action. In addition, should an
|
||
employee be involved in an accident or critical incident, drug
|
||
testing is available upon request.
|
||
|
||
The Drug Test
|
||
|
||
Every Monday, the post and section commanders coordinate
|
||
the matching of employee names to individual identification
|
||
numbers--not Social Security numbers. Only those employees
|
||
subject to and available for random drug testing during a
|
||
particular week are assigned identification numbers. Then, the
|
||
identification numbers only are forwarded to the agency's
|
||
personnel branch for entry into a computer system. The computer
|
||
randomly selects a subset of the entered identification numbers,
|
||
and any employee whose identification number matches one of the
|
||
numbers that the computer selects will be drug tested within 5
|
||
working days. The selected employees post or section commanders
|
||
withholds notification of testing until the day of the test so
|
||
that drug testing is not compromised and that it occurs in a
|
||
timely and efficient manner.
|
||
|
||
Drug testing is performed through urinalysis. Only
|
||
Kentucky State Police Forensic Laboratory personnel and post or
|
||
section commanders are authorized to administer the drug tests.
|
||
At the time of the test, each employee is asked to complete a
|
||
more-detailed voluntary consent form. This enhanced consent
|
||
form: 1) Requests employee permission for a urine specimen to
|
||
be collected and tested; 2) describes the list of drugs for
|
||
which the specimen will be tested; 3) describes how the test
|
||
results will be used and to whom they may be communicated; 4)
|
||
delineates possible agency action if the test is positive; and
|
||
5) informs the employee of the consequences of violating any
|
||
testing procedure. The form also requests a list of any
|
||
medication the employee has taken over the last 15 days.
|
||
|
||
The employee is then handed a sealed, plastic specimen
|
||
container with a built-in thermometer. The employee provides
|
||
the urine specimen in a secured, private restroom. In the
|
||
interest of employee privacy, there are no witnesses, and
|
||
disrobing is not required. When the employee returns the filled
|
||
specimen container to the drug testing personnel, it is
|
||
immediately checked for temperature to ensure that the employee
|
||
has provided an authentic sample. Next, in the presence of the
|
||
employee, the specimen is divided into two containers. One of
|
||
the samples is held as a control sample in case an employee
|
||
would wish to verify positive results later with a laboratory of
|
||
their choosing.
|
||
|
||
Drug testing personnel then explain the chain-of-custody
|
||
form to the employee. Once the employee verifies the
|
||
information on this form, drug testing personnel seal the
|
||
specimen containers with lids and with tamper-proof sealing
|
||
tape. A label that identifies the specimens only by employee
|
||
identification number is affixed to each container. The
|
||
employee, after verifying that the identification number on the
|
||
specimen containers matches the identification number on the
|
||
list held by the post or section commander, signs off on this
|
||
list. Afterward, drug testing personnel forward the
|
||
chain-of-custody form and the specimen containers to the
|
||
Kentucky State Police Forensic Laboratory.
|
||
|
||
At the laboratory, each employee's specimen is checked for
|
||
possible tampering, logged in, and processed. A test tube
|
||
sample is also drawn from an original specimen and stored for
|
||
future testing, if needed. Several test tube samples are
|
||
batched together, of which approximately 20 percent will be
|
||
control samples for quality assurance checks.
|
||
|
||
Analysis
|
||
|
||
Immunoassay tests are used to screen the samples. These
|
||
tests serve to identify substances, such as proteins, through
|
||
their ability to stimulate physical responses from the body's
|
||
immune system. Each specimen is screened for marijuana,
|
||
cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepine,
|
||
and propoxyphene. It is also checked for the presence of other
|
||
elements to ensure the authenticity of the urine specimen.
|
||
|
||
The drug detection levels set in the agency's drug testing
|
||
policy are as follows:
|
||
|
||
* Marijuana--50 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
* Cocaine--300 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
* Opiates--300 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
* Amphetamines--300 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
* Benzodiazepine--300 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
* Propoxyphene--300 ng/ml
|
||
|
||
If the first screening of a particular specimen is positive,
|
||
a more-complex and expensive chemical analysis, such as gas
|
||
chromatography or mass spectrometry, is performed to confirm the
|
||
initial results of the immunoassay screening. If this test is
|
||
positive, the specimen is sent to an independent laboratory for
|
||
further analysis. A second positive confirmation will trigger
|
||
administrative and/or disciplinary action against the tested
|
||
employee.
|
||
|
||
Agency Response to Positive Test Results
|
||
|
||
All test results are sent directly to the Kentucky State
|
||
Police's Employee Assistance Program--the only place where an
|
||
identification number can be correlated to an employee's name.
|
||
From this point, a medical review officer, who is a physician
|
||
employed on a contract basis, meets privately with the employee
|
||
whose test results indicate unsanctioned drug use.
|
||
|
||
If the medical review officer finds no legal reason for the
|
||
positive test results, the physician notifies the Employee
|
||
Assistance Program. The Employee Assistance Program then
|
||
notifies the Internal Affairs Section, if the results concern a
|
||
sworn employee, or the Legal Office, if the results concern a
|
||
civilian employee. Internal Affairs or the Legal Office will
|
||
then contact the employee. The commissioner, who is empowered
|
||
to authorize an immediate nondisciplinary administrative leave
|
||
for the employee in question, is also informed of
|
||
"presumptive" positive test results.
|
||
|
||
Any employee found to be involved in illegal drug use faces
|
||
disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. However,
|
||
for prescription drug misuse, the agency's emphasis is on
|
||
employee rehabilitation only. All employees, regardless of the
|
||
type of drug use violation, are required to make themselves
|
||
available to the Employee Assistance Program if referred to the
|
||
program by a supervisor. Employees may also be required to
|
||
complete satisfactorily a drug abuse assistance or treatment
|
||
program as a condition of continued employment.
|
||
|
||
In an effort to direct employees to the best available drug
|
||
abuse assistance or treatment programs, the Employee Assistance
|
||
Program maintains an updated list of drug abuse treatment
|
||
facilities nationwide.
|
||
|
||
CONCLUSION
|
||
|
||
The Kentucky State Police's drug testing policy is a
|
||
product of its employees. It provides what is believed to be a
|
||
total approach to the substance abuse issue, of which drug
|
||
testing is but one component. The policy also emphasizes
|
||
employee awareness/education programs; supervisor/manager
|
||
training; prohibitions against the use, sale, possession or
|
||
manufacture of illegal drugs; specific guidelines about the
|
||
misuse of alcohol and prescription drugs; employee and family
|
||
counseling through the Employee Assistance Program; and support
|
||
for long-term rehabilitation. As of February 1991, 98% of all
|
||
sworn employees have voluntarily submitted to drug testing. As
|
||
a whole, 84.4% of both sworn and civilian personnel within the
|
||
Kentucky State Police have been tested.
|
||
|
||
It is the Kentucky State Police's belief that the general
|
||
public has a right to expect a stricter accounting of law
|
||
enforcement employees concerning possible illegal drug use than
|
||
would routinely be expected of most government employees. Drug
|
||
testing of law enforcement employees is a small step to take
|
||
toward meeting that expectation. A law enforcement agency could
|
||
not deliver a stronger message to the public it serves.
|
||
|