231 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
231 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Dear Emily Postnews
|
||
Emily Postnews, foremost authority on proper net behaviour,
|
||
gives her advice on how to act on the net.
|
||
============================================================================
|
||
Q: Dear Miss Postnews: How long should my signature be? -- verbose@portal
|
||
A: Dear Verbose: Please try and make your signature as long as you
|
||
can. It's much more important than your article, of course, so try and
|
||
have more lines of signature than actual text.
|
||
Try and include a large graphic made of ASCII characters, plus lots of
|
||
cute quotes and slogans. People will never tire of reading these
|
||
pearls of wisdom again and again, and you will soon become personally
|
||
associated with the joy each reader feels at seeing yet another
|
||
delightful repeat of your signature.
|
||
Be sure as well to include a complete map of USENET with each
|
||
signature, to show how anybody can get mail to you from any site in the
|
||
world. Be sure to include ARPA gateways as well. Also tell people on
|
||
your own site how to mail to you.
|
||
Aside from your reply address, include your full name, company and
|
||
organization. It's just common courtesy -- after all, in some
|
||
newsreaders people have to type an *entire* keystroke to go back to the
|
||
top of your article to see this information in the header.
|
||
By all means include your phone number and street address in every
|
||
single article. People are always responding to usenet articles with
|
||
phone calls and letters. It would be silly to go to the extra trouble
|
||
of including this information only in articles that need a response by
|
||
conventional channels!
|
||
------
|
||
Dear Emily: Today I posted an article and forgot to include my
|
||
signature. What should I do? -- forgetful@myvax
|
||
A: Dear Forgetful: Rush to your terminal right away and post an article
|
||
that says, "Oops, I forgot to post my signature with that last
|
||
article. Here it is."
|
||
Since most people will have forgotten your earlier article,
|
||
(particularly since it dared to be so boring as to not have a nice,
|
||
juicy signature) this will remind them of it. Besides, people care
|
||
much more about the signature anyway. See the previous letter for more
|
||
important details.
|
||
Also, be sure to include your signature TWICE in each article. That
|
||
way you're sure people will read it.
|
||
------
|
||
Dear Ms. Postnews: I couldn't get mail through to somebody on another
|
||
site. What should I do? -- eager@beaver.dam
|
||
A: Dear Eager: No problem, just post your message to a group that a
|
||
lot of people read. Say, "This is for John Smith. I couldn't get mail
|
||
through so I'm posting it. All others please ignore."
|
||
This way tens of thousands of people will spend a few seconds scanning
|
||
over and ignoring your article, using up over 16 man-hours their
|
||
collective time, but you will be saved the terrible trouble of checking
|
||
through usenet maps or looking for alternate routes. Just think, if
|
||
you couldn't distribute your message to 9000 other computers, you might
|
||
actually have to (gasp) call directory assistance for 60 cents, or even
|
||
phone the person. This can cost as much as a few DOLLARS (!) for a 5
|
||
minute call!
|
||
And certainly it's better to spend 10 to 20 dollars of other people's
|
||
money distributing the message then for you to have to waste $9 on an
|
||
overnight letter, or even 25 cents on a stamp!
|
||
Don't forget. The world will end if your message doesn't get through,
|
||
so post it as many places as you can.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What about a test message?
|
||
A: It is important, when testing, to test the entire net. Never test
|
||
merely a subnet distribution when the whole net can be done. Also put
|
||
"please ignore" on your test messages, since we all know that everybody
|
||
always skips a message with a line like that. Don't use a subject
|
||
like "My sex is female but I demand to be addressed as male." because
|
||
such articles are read in depth by all USEnauts.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: Somebody just posted that Roman Polanski directed Star Wars. What
|
||
should I do?
|
||
A: Post the correct answer at once! We can't have people go on
|
||
believing that! Very good of you to spot this. You'll probably be the
|
||
only one to make the correction, so post as soon as you can. No time
|
||
to lose, so certainly don't wait a day, or check to see if somebody
|
||
else has made the correction.
|
||
And it's not good enough to send the message by mail. Since you're the
|
||
only one who really knows that it was Francis Coppola, you have to
|
||
inform the whole net right away!
|
||
------
|
||
Q: I read an article that said, "reply by mail, I'll summarize." What
|
||
should I do? -- weemba@brahms
|
||
A: Post your response to the whole net. That request applies only to
|
||
dumb people who don't have something interesting to say. Your postings
|
||
are much more worthwhile than other people's, so it would be a waste to
|
||
reply by mail.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: I collected replies to an article I wrote, and now it's time to
|
||
summarize. What should I do?
|
||
A: Simply concatenate all the articles together into a big file and
|
||
post that. On USENET, this is known as a summary. It lets people read
|
||
all the replies without annoying newsreaders getting in the way.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: I saw a long article that I wish to rebut carefully, what should I
|
||
do?
|
||
A: Include the entire text with your article, and include your comments
|
||
between the lines. Be sure to post, and not mail, even though your
|
||
article looks like a reply to the original. Everybody *loves* to read
|
||
those long point-by-point debates, especially when they evolve into
|
||
name-calling and lots of "Is too!" -- "Is not!" -- "Is too, twizot!"
|
||
exchanges.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: How can I choose what groups to post in?
|
||
A: Pick as many as you can, so that you get the widest audience. After
|
||
all, the net exists to give you an audience. Ignore those who suggest
|
||
you should only use groups where you think the article is highly
|
||
appropriate. Pick all groups where anybody might even be slightly
|
||
interested.
|
||
Always make sure followups go to all the groups. In the rare event
|
||
that you post a followup which contains something original, make sure
|
||
you expand the list of groups. Never include a "Followup-to:" line in
|
||
the header, since some people might miss part of the valuable
|
||
discussion in the fringe groups.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: How about an example?
|
||
A: Ok. Let's say you want to report that Gretzky has been traded from
|
||
the Oilers to the Kings. Now right away you might think
|
||
rec.sport.hockey would be enough. WRONG. Many more people might be
|
||
interested. This is a big trade! Since it's a NEWS article, it
|
||
belongs in the news.* hierarchy as well. If you are a news admin, or
|
||
there is one on your machine, try news.admin. If not, use news.misc.
|
||
The Oilers are probably interested in geology, so try sci.physics. He
|
||
is a big star, so post to sci.astro, and sci.space because they are
|
||
also interested in stars. Next, his name is Polish sounding. So post
|
||
to soc.culture.polish. But that group doesn't exist, so cross-post to
|
||
news.groups suggesting it should be created. With this many groups of
|
||
interest, your article will be quite bizarre, so post to talk.bizarre
|
||
as well. (And post to comp.std.mumps, since they hardly get any
|
||
articles there.)
|
||
You may also find it is more fun to post the article once in each
|
||
group. If you list all the newsgroups in the same article, some
|
||
newsreaders will only show the the article to the reader once! Don't
|
||
tolerate this.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: How do I create a newsgroup?
|
||
A: The easiest way goes something like "inews -C newgroup ....", and
|
||
while that will stir up lots of conversation about your new newsgroup,
|
||
it might not be enough.
|
||
First post a message in news.groups describing the group. Hold
|
||
discussion for a short while, and then ask for a vote. Collect votes
|
||
for 30 days. Every few days post a long summary of all the votes so
|
||
that people can complain about bad mailers and double votes. It means
|
||
you'll be more popular and get lots of mail. At the end of thirty days
|
||
if you have 100 more yes votes than no votes you may create the group.
|
||
No matter what the group, it is not necessary to get the approval of
|
||
admins at backbone sites. They will be happy to create any group if it
|
||
passes the above test.
|
||
To liven up discussion, choose a good cross-match for your hierarchy
|
||
and group. For example, comp.race.formula1 or soc.vlsi.design would be
|
||
good group names. If you want your group created quickly, include an
|
||
interesting word like "sex" or "bible."
|
||
------
|
||
Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to
|
||
do?
|
||
A: Don't worry about how your articles look. Remember it's the message
|
||
that counts, not the way it's presented. Ignore the fact that sloppy
|
||
spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent messages
|
||
that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: How should I pick a subject for my articles?
|
||
A: Keep it short and meaningless. That way people will be forced to
|
||
actually read your article to find out what's in it. This means a
|
||
bigger audience for you, and we all know that's what the net is for.
|
||
If you do a followup, be sure and keep the same subject, even if it's
|
||
totally meaningless and not part of the same discussion. If you don't,
|
||
you won't catch all the people who are looking for stuff on the
|
||
original topic, and that means less audience for you.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What sort of tone should I take in my article?
|
||
A: Be as outrageous as possible. If you don't say outlandish things,
|
||
and fill your article with libelous insults of net people, you may not
|
||
stick out enough in the flood of articles to get a response. The more
|
||
insane your posting looks, the more likely it is that you'll get lots
|
||
of followups. The net is here, after all, so that you can get lots of
|
||
attention.
|
||
If your article is polite, reasoned and to the point, you may only get
|
||
mailed replies. Yuck!
|
||
------
|
||
Q: The posting software suggested I had too long a signature and too
|
||
many lines of included text in my article. What's the best course?
|
||
A: Such restrictions were put in the software for no reason at all, so
|
||
don't even try to figure out why they might apply to your article.
|
||
Turns out most people search the net to find nice articles that consist
|
||
of the complete text of an earlier article plus a few lines.
|
||
In order to help these people, fill your article with dummy original
|
||
lines to get past the restrictions. Everybody will thank you for it.
|
||
For your signature, I know it's tough, but you will have to read it in
|
||
with the editor. Do this twice to make sure it's firmly in there.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: They just announced on the radio that Dan Quayle was picked as the
|
||
Republican V.P. candidate. Should I post?
|
||
A: Of course. The net can reach people in as few as 3 to 5 days. It's
|
||
the perfect way to inform people about such news events long after the
|
||
broadcast networks have covered them. As you are probably the only
|
||
person to have heard the news on the radio, be sure to post as soon as
|
||
you can.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: I have this great joke. You see, these three strings walk into a
|
||
bar...
|
||
A: Oh dear. Don't spoil it for me. Submit it to rec.humor, and post
|
||
it to the moderator of rec.humor.funny at the same time. I'm sure he's
|
||
never seen that joke, and I know he loves to have jokes sent to
|
||
rec.humor and rec.humor.funny at the same time.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What computer should I buy? An Atari ST or an Amiga?
|
||
A: Cross post that question to the Atari and Amiga groups. It's an
|
||
interesting and novel question that I am sure they would love to
|
||
investigate in those groups.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What about other important questions? How should I know when to
|
||
post?
|
||
A: Always post them. It would be a big waste of your time to find a
|
||
knowledgeable user in one of the groups and ask through private mail if
|
||
the topic has already come up. Much easier to bother thousands of
|
||
people with the same question.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What is the measure of a worthwhile group?
|
||
A: Why, it's Volume, Volume, Volume. Any group that has lots of noise
|
||
in it must be good. Remember, the higher the volume of material in a
|
||
group, the higher percentage of useful, factual and insightful articles
|
||
you will find. In fact, if a group can't demonstrate a high enough
|
||
volume, it should be deleted from the net.
|
||
------
|
||
Q: My fanzine isn't doing well in the readership surveys because it is
|
||
only quarterly. What can I do?
|
||
A: Simply have the articles take three months to expire, so that they
|
||
always show up in the surveys. All those sites probably aren't using
|
||
their disk space for anything useful, so what not use it to boost your
|
||
ego?
|
||
------
|
||
Q: What does foobar stand for?
|
||
A: It stands for you, dear.
|
||
|