120 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			120 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
From era@ncar.UCAR.EDU Fri Jun  2 05:30:05 1989
 | 
						||
Flags: 000000000001
 | 
						||
Path: molokai!milano!cs.utexas.edu!inebriae!looking!funny-request
 | 
						||
From: era@ncar.UCAR.EDU (Ed Arnold)
 | 
						||
Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
 | 
						||
Subject: Insurance Companies
 | 
						||
Keywords: maybe, true
 | 
						||
Message-ID: <3420@looking.on.ca>
 | 
						||
Date: 2 Jun 89 10:30:05 GMT
 | 
						||
Sender: funny@looking.on.ca
 | 
						||
Lines: 103
 | 
						||
Approved: funny@looking.on.ca
 | 
						||
Reply-Path: mailrus!ncar.UCAR.EDU!era
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Those of you who are not employed by insurance companies, may find the
 | 
						||
following amusing.  It appeared in an issue of the Colorado Bar Journal,
 | 
						||
and is posted with permission of the author.
 | 
						||
----------
 | 
						||
>From THE WOOL-SACK
 | 
						||
by Christopher R. Brauchli
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
But if the while I think
 | 
						||
on thee, dear friend,
 | 
						||
All losses are restor'd and sorrows end.
 | 
						||
Shakespeare, Sonnet 30
 | 
						||
(Not written to an insurance company.)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Last year closed out with good news for your friend and mine, THE
 | 
						||
INSURANCE COMPANY.  Until recently, all we heard was the sound made by
 | 
						||
companies being crunched by devastating lawsuits brought by injured
 | 
						||
persons aided by my avaricious colleagues.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
So upset was one company that it began paying for advertisements in
 | 
						||
newspapers around the country to marshal opposition to what it called
 | 
						||
"lawsuit abuse."  Although not stated in the ad I saw, implicit was
 | 
						||
the notion that, if we would quit dreaming up lawsuits, people and
 | 
						||
insurance companies would be better off.  As a result of a recent
 | 
						||
court decision, one kind of case will no longer cost the insurance
 | 
						||
company any money.  That will make the insurance companies very happy.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Before I tell you about that case, however, let me tell you about
 | 
						||
something else that makes insurance companies very happy - income
 | 
						||
taxes.*1  I know what you are thinking.  You are thinking that if income
 | 
						||
taxes make insurance companies happy, it must be because they earn the
 | 
						||
same amount of money your Aunt Minnibelle earns, and she likes income
 | 
						||
taxes because she never has to pay them.  If you think that, consider
 | 
						||
this.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
In 1986, fifteen insurance companies paid no federal income taxes.
 | 
						||
Nonetheless, among the fifteen, the one with the lowest net income
 | 
						||
(Ohio Casualty Insurance) had a net income of more than $139 million
 | 
						||
and the one with the highest net income (State Farm) had a net income
 | 
						||
in excess of $1.6 billion.  In 1987, State Farm's net income jumped by
 | 
						||
an additional billion and it paid a half million in federal taxes.
 | 
						||
Your Aunt Minnibelle would be tickled pink if she had that kind of
 | 
						||
income and those kinds of taxes.  So, for that matter, would I.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
But I digress.  Here is what was added to the insurance companies'
 | 
						||
federal income taxes to bring them joy during the recent holiday
 | 
						||
season - Andino v. Dupont Plaza Hotel.  Not being a reported
 | 
						||
case, this is probably one of the few places you can read about it.
 | 
						||
It is nonetheless of some significance, since it establishes
 | 
						||
conclusively that there is at least one area of the law that is not
 | 
						||
developing.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Juanita Andino was injured in the 1986 fire at the Dupont Plaza Hotel
 | 
						||
that killed ninety-seven people.  A suit was brought against the hotel
 | 
						||
on account of her injuries.  One of the plaintiffs (if not the only one)
 | 
						||
was Juanita's husband, Valeriano.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The complaint alleged that as a result of injuries Juanita sustained in
 | 
						||
the fire, she was "unable to perform her duties as a spouse."  In
 | 
						||
addition it was alleged that Valeriano had suffered a loss of income to
 | 
						||
the marital partnership because of Juanita's lost earnings.  Here is
 | 
						||
why the insurance companies are happy.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The judge threw the lawsuit out and fined each of the lawyers who
 | 
						||
brought the lawsuit $5,000.*2  He did that because Mr. Andino, who the
 | 
						||
lawsuit alleged suffered from his wife's inability to perform her
 | 
						||
duties as a spouse and suffered loss of income to the marital
 | 
						||
partnership, was dead.  Not only was he dead, he had been dead for 12
 | 
						||
years before the fire occurred.  The judge ruled that, in order to
 | 
						||
recover damages for an injury, the plaintiff must be alive at the time
 | 
						||
of the injury is alleged to have occurred.  Imagine that!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Now, in addition to the pleasure they receive from tax laws, which are
 | 
						||
kinder to them than to you and me, insurance companies need no longer
 | 
						||
live in fear that the graveyard is the home of potential plaintiffs.
 | 
						||
The Andino case stands for the proposition that people who lie
 | 
						||
moldering in graves may, in some parts of this country, still exercise
 | 
						||
the right to vote.  They do not as they lie in repose, however, have
 | 
						||
standing to sue.*3
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
NOTES
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
*1      For this bit of information I am indebted to John Salmon, who
 | 
						||
	published it in ads in the Denver media.  He thought the public
 | 
						||
	should be aware of the full extent of hardships suffered by
 | 
						||
	insurance companies.
 | 
						||
*2      One of the lawyers was Melvin Belli.  He is fondly remembered
 | 
						||
	in Colorado for his kind remarks about the Colorado Trial Lawyers'
 | 
						||
	Association.  He made those remarks after leaders of CTLA
 | 
						||
	suggested that Belli's trip to Bhopal, India, to represent
 | 
						||
	what, when he left, were best described as "Unknown Plaintiffs,"
 | 
						||
	was not, ostensibly, propelled by eleemosynary engines.
 | 
						||
*3	Contrary to the opinion of some wag I know, this case does not
 | 
						||
	stand for the proposition that the object of a necrophiliac's
 | 
						||
	attention cannot recover damages if a necrophiliac sustains
 | 
						||
	injuries.  This case has nothing to do with necrophilia.  It has
 | 
						||
	to do with sloppy lawyering.
 | 
						||
__________
 | 
						||
Ed Arnold * NCAR (Nat'l Center for Atmospheric Research) * Mesa Lab
 | 
						||
--
 | 
						||
Edited by Brad Templeton.  MAIL, yes MAIL your jokes to funny@looking.ON.CA
 | 
						||
Attribute the joke's source if at all possible.  I will reply, mailers willing.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Remember: PLEASE spell check and proofread your jokes.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
 |