74 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
74 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
How Many Generic Chickens Can You Fit Into a Generic Pontiac?
|
||
|
||
|
||
A while back, someone asked how many generic chickens would fit
|
||
into a generic Pontiac. This question has been on my mind recently, so I
|
||
decided to work out this problem, for the benefit of all humanity.
|
||
|
||
I. It has been proven succesfully that chickens have a definite
|
||
wave-like nature. In reproducing Thomas Young's famous double-slit
|
||
experiment of 1801, Sir Kenneth Harbour-Thomas showed that chickens
|
||
not only diffract, but produce interference patterns as well. (This
|
||
experiment is fully documented in Sir Kenneth's famous treatise
|
||
"Tossing Chickens Through Various Apertures in Modern Architecture",
|
||
1897)
|
||
|
||
II. It is also known, as any farmhand can tell you, that whereas if one
|
||
chicken is placed in an enclosed space, it will be impossible to
|
||
pinpoint the exact location of the chicken at any given time t. This
|
||
was summarized by Helmut Heisenberg (Werner's younger brother) in
|
||
the equation:
|
||
d(chicken) * dt >= b
|
||
(where b is the barnyard constant; 5.2 x10^(-14) domestic fowl *
|
||
seconds)
|
||
|
||
III. Whatever our results, they must be consistant with the fundamentals
|
||
of physics, so energy, momentum, and charge must all be conserved.
|
||
|
||
A. Chickens (fortunately) do not carry electric charge. This was
|
||
discovered by Benjamin Franklin, after repeated experiments with
|
||
chickens, kites, and thunderstorms.
|
||
B. The total energy of a chicken is given by the equation:
|
||
E = K + V
|
||
Where V is the potential energy of the chicken, and K is the
|
||
kinetic energy of the chicken, given by
|
||
(.5)mv^2 or (p^2) / (2m).
|
||
C. Since chickens have an associated wavelength, w, we know that
|
||
the momentum of a free-chicken (that is, a chicken not enclosed
|
||
in any sort of Pontiac) is given by: p = b / w.
|
||
|
||
IV. With this in mind, it is possible to come up with a wave equation
|
||
for the potential energy of a generic chicken. (A wave equation will
|
||
allow us to calculate the probability of finding any number of
|
||
chickens in automobiles.) The wave equation for a non-relativistic,
|
||
time-independant chicken in a one- dimensional Pontiac is given by:
|
||
[V * P] - [[(b^2) / (2m)] * D^2(P)] = E * P
|
||
P is the wave function, and D^2(P) is its second derivative.
|
||
The wave equation can be used to prove that chickens are in
|
||
fact quantized, and that by using the Perdue Exclusion formula
|
||
we know that no two chickens in any Pontiac can have the same
|
||
set of quantum numbers.
|
||
|
||
V. The probability of finding a chicken in the Pontiac is simply the
|
||
integral of P * P * dChicken from 0 to x, where x = the length of the
|
||
Pontiac. Since each chicken will have its own set of quantum numbers
|
||
(when examining the case of the three-dimensional Pontiac) different
|
||
wave functions can be derived for each set of quantum numbers.
|
||
It is important to note that we now know that there is no such
|
||
thing as a generic chicken. Each chicken influences the position and
|
||
velocity of every other chicken inside the Pontiac, and each chicken
|
||
must be treated individually.
|
||
It has been theorized that chickens do in fact have an intrinsic
|
||
angular momentum, yet no experiment has been yet conducted to prove
|
||
this, as chickens tend to move away from someone trying to spin them.
|
||
Curious sidenote: Whenever possible, any attempt to integrate a
|
||
chicken should be done by parts, as most people will tend to want the
|
||
legs (dark meat), which can lead to innumerable family conflicts
|
||
which are best avoided if at all possible.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The Prestidigitator, Drew Physics Major Extraordinary
|
||
24 March 1988
|
||
|