269 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
269 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
KEYS:/PACKET RADIO/USE DURING BALTIMORE TRAIN WRECK/DE WB4APR & W3IWI/
|
|
TO: (Group 95)
|
|
|
|
de W3IWI -- 11 January 1986
|
|
- - - - - - - - - -
|
|
A week ago today, on the afternoon of Sunday Jan. 4th, this area was
|
|
jolted by the news of a massive train wreck in Chase MD on the eastern
|
|
edge of Baltimore when the AMTRAK Colonial plowed into three CONRAIL
|
|
engines. Of course amateur radio was involved. Baltimore ARES and
|
|
RACES officials have estimated that some 180 amateurs were involved in
|
|
some way. Many provided "on-the-spot" communications at the crash site
|
|
and between there and nearly 20 disaster relief sites and agencies.
|
|
|
|
Packet Radio was also very involved, primarily in trying to get timely
|
|
'health and welfare' information to the survivor's families and loved
|
|
ones. Most of the health and welfare messages that were handled
|
|
followed the route WB4APR/portable => W3IWI BBS => delivery point
|
|
where the first step was made on packet and the second used packet,
|
|
75m voice nets and VHF channels. This report will chronicle the
|
|
activities at WB4APR and W3IWI with the personal comments of the two
|
|
individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
Packet Radio at the Wreck of the Colonial - I
|
|
|
|
Bob Bruninga WB4APR
|
|
59 Southgate Avenue
|
|
Annapolis, MD 21401
|
|
|
|
At approximately 1400 on 4 January I heard on the local AMRAD
|
|
repeater that there was a train wreck in Baltimore and that an
|
|
emergency NET was being handled on the 146.67 Baltimore repeater.
|
|
Since initial high priority traffic was being passed, it was several
|
|
minutes before it was apparent that this was a major disaster and that
|
|
casualties were involved. A call for portable packet equipment was
|
|
heard over the net and I began packing up. At about 1430 I checked in
|
|
with WA3TOY the Anne Arundel County EC and proceeded at about 1500 to
|
|
the Red Cross in Glen Burnie still 30 miles or more from the site. At
|
|
about 1630 I was directed by the operator on 146.67 to proceed to the
|
|
disaster site and to report to the command center at Engine Company 54
|
|
within a mile of the wreck site.
|
|
|
|
The entire area within 5 miles or more from the accident was
|
|
blocked off because of the enormous number of emergency and support
|
|
|
|
vehicles. The location of the accident was on a peninsula with only
|
|
one two lane highway for access. At the first roadblock I was able to
|
|
convince the officer of my legitimacy by a combination of wearing a
|
|
white hardhat, an AMSAT name tag, a military ID and the pile of
|
|
equipment in the front seat. He said I could go through, but I would
|
|
have to leave my car and he would flag the next emergency vehicle for
|
|
a ride. This was the first lesson: PACK LIGHT! or at least pack with
|
|
a priority layering in mind. I abandoned the car, the emergency
|
|
generator, the food that my wife had packed, the tools, cables,
|
|
antennas, extension cords, lights, foul-weather gear and grabbed my
|
|
two portable packet briefcases and a small box of accessories. I was
|
|
tossed aboard a hook-&-ladder truck in the laps of several firemen for
|
|
a cold three mile ride in to the command post.
|
|
|
|
Engine Company 54 can best be described as a mob scene with every
|
|
imaginable emergency vehicle and personnel mingled with a growing
|
|
number of stranded passengers. I reported to the amateur radio table
|
|
and found that N3FFB was just completing setting up his packet CRT and
|
|
radio and was establishing a link on 145.01 with the WB3FFV BBS only a
|
|
mile or so away. After an anxious several minutes word was received
|
|
that the passengers were being ferried two miles down the road to the
|
|
Bowleys Quarters VFD and that packet capability would be needed. I
|
|
jumped aboard the first bus of 12 passengers and arrived at Bowleys
|
|
|
|
Quarters at about 1800. The only amateur operator there was KA3ENQ
|
|
operating an HT. We set up a packet table near the back door and
|
|
strung my fishpole antenna up the back of the building. Since the
|
|
command center was going to use 145.01, I established a link on 145.05
|
|
through the W3GXT-5 digipeater for sending health and welfare traffic.
|
|
|
|
Having no idea of who, what, or where any other packet activity was
|
|
taking place and noticing that the command center packet station had
|
|
no printer or hardcopy capability, I decided the best thing was to
|
|
start entering the lists of names from our shelter into a computer
|
|
somewhere. I knew of at least three BBS's that could be accessed from
|
|
the location but I had no knowledge of how others planned to use them.
|
|
Since I had both an M-100 based portapacket system using a VADCG TNC
|
|
and an EP-44 portable typewriter system with a TAPR TNC, I had the
|
|
choice of off line message preparation on the M-100 or only manual
|
|
operation of the EP-44 but with hard copy. I chose the hardcopy
|
|
option with the more familiar TAPR TNC (in case relief operators
|
|
showed up) and established a connection with my mail drop BBS in
|
|
Annapolis. My plan was not to tie up any of the major BBS's with my
|
|
keyboard entry, but to let my maildrop program 40 miles away forward
|
|
the traffic at machine speed to the W3IWI BBS and let Tom manage the
|
|
big picture. From his BBS, other stations could download the
|
|
passenger lists for use at the multiple locations concerned.
|
|
|
|
Throughout the night, I would group the passenger lists into messages
|
|
of about 10 people each. I would send these to W3IWI if it was
|
|
available, or to my home BBS. If channel activity on 05 was heavy, I
|
|
QSY'D to 145.01 and posted a few of the messages on the nearby WB3FFV
|
|
BBS.
|
|
|
|
During the excitement, everything was so hectic in our shelter,
|
|
that I never had time to find out what else was going on. I assumed
|
|
that other packet activity was involved from the other shelters and
|
|
that the command post was busy with traffic on 145.01. I remained
|
|
focused only on my effort to get our lists posted somewhere ASAP. The
|
|
advantage of my C-64 BBS in Annapolis for interim message posting was
|
|
that it would forward to W3IWI immediately when I logged off, or if
|
|
W3IWI was busy, I could force a forward at any future time remotely.
|
|
Tom connected and encouraged me to upload directly to his BBS whenever
|
|
it was free, because he could move the messages on floppy disk between
|
|
his two BBS's and other computers for processing. With the
|
|
availability of the three BBS's, I was never in a wait state.
|
|
Whenever a list came to me, I was usually able to begin entry almost
|
|
immediately. Reviewing the 60 feet of printouts from my terminal
|
|
after the exercise, almost every message was entered in under 10
|
|
minutes each. The 14 messages contained the full name and address of
|
|
every passenger in our shelter and the phone number of the next of
|
|
|
|
kin. A total of 165 passengers in our shelter were accounted for in
|
|
our outgoing traffic. The other two shelters processed the remaining
|
|
passengers. Later we learned that the train was carrying
|
|
approximately 610 passengers of which there were 15 fatalities and 170
|
|
injured.
|
|
|
|
The true meaning and value of health and welfare message handling
|
|
became clear. Although phones in the area were not disrupted, they
|
|
were completely swamped with more urgent traffic. For an accident at
|
|
1300 in the afternoon, all of the passengers in our shelter still had
|
|
not had access to a phone to call home as late as 22:00 that night.
|
|
With 165 passengers and many tens of Red Cross and other support
|
|
personnel in our shelter at the fire department, the three available
|
|
phone lines had to remain open for higher priority traffic. Amateur
|
|
radio was the only method of getting the names out quickly. Using a
|
|
packet channel not only increased the speed of transmission and
|
|
reduced the introduction of errors in the data, but also kept the
|
|
voice channels and repeaters free for higher priority traffic.
|
|
|
|
Since I was only allowed to enter the disaster area with what I
|
|
could carry in both arms, it was fortunate that my porta-packet
|
|
station was almost completely self contained in a briefcase. The
|
|
combination of a walkie-talkie with a mini-coax antenna shoved up
|
|
|
|
inside an 18 foot collapsible fiberglass fishing pole and a 50 foot
|
|
piece of miniature 3 conductor intercom cable allowed the packet
|
|
terminal to be operated indoors remotely from the antenna and radio.
|
|
The audio cable is much more compact than a comparable length of
|
|
coaxial cable, and by remoting the terminal from the radio, any RFI
|
|
from the computer is eliminated. Access to the HT which was outside
|
|
on the roof is not a problem with packet because of the single
|
|
frequency channelization of most packet activity. Also, because of
|
|
the burst nature of packet, the BP2 battery pack with unknown initial
|
|
charge lasted the entire 5 hours of continuous use.
|
|
|
|
Later I learned that the addresses collected by the Red Cross and
|
|
provided on my lists were not absolutely critical for the notification
|
|
of next of kin. My message throughput would have probably doubled had
|
|
I omitted the full address. Tom concluded that his job of passing the
|
|
traffic to other nets would have been facilitated had I placed the
|
|
phone number first so that he could sort on the area code and re-group
|
|
the traffic by area.
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packet Radio at the Wreck of the Colonial - II
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Clark, W3IWI
|
|
6388 Guilford Rd.
|
|
Clarksville MD 21029
|
|
|
|
Just like WB4APR, I first heard of the wreck while sitting in the
|
|
shack with a 2M radio in the background tuned to the 145.41 repeater
|
|
in Carroll County MD Sunday about 14:30 EST. A QST came on frequency
|
|
requesting people to stand by for an emergency announcement concerning
|
|
a major disaster in Baltimore. I asked my wife to check TV to see if
|
|
there was any news and by about 15:00 the situation became clear. Like
|
|
APR I also QSY'd to the primary Baltimore 146.67 repeater and heard
|
|
the call for packet coordination. Howard Leadmon WB3FFV runs a wide-
|
|
area coverage BBS on 145.01 only 2 miles from the crash site. Howard
|
|
and I coordinated communications channels for message forwarding
|
|
between us on 145.01, with him to serve local packet communications
|
|
needs at the crash site. I committed my 145.05/221.01 BBS to emergency
|
|
service and proceeded to notify non-involved users to keep both 145.01
|
|
and 145.05 clear until further notice. I then sat and waited for the
|
|
onslaught, not knowing what would develop. I fired up the 75M rig on
|
|
the 3920 kHz Maryland Emergency Phone Net (MEPN) and offered my
|
|
services. There again everyone was waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally about 18:45 WB4APR started sending the lists of survivors
|
|
described in his report. These lists consisted of the survivor's name
|
|
and address, and a phone number for the next of kin. Bob also provided
|
|
info on what time the survivors passed thru his location and where the
|
|
bus was taking them. There had been no instructions, nohow, from
|
|
nobody as to what should be done with the information. So I made some
|
|
snap decisions. First it was noted that nearly all the survivors were
|
|
located between Maryland and Massachusetts with a heavy concentration
|
|
in the New York area. On 3920 we put out QST's for people to handle
|
|
messages to the area codes on Bob's lists.
|
|
|
|
I converted Bob's lists into abbreviated 'instant' (almost) ARRL-
|
|
format radiograms (lacking only the precedence and check information).
|
|
The messages were addressed to a phone number and told the story that
|
|
the party had been reported as OK and was en route to the xxxx Hotel
|
|
by bus. By 23:00 on 3920kHz (with some QSYing to 2M FM channels for
|
|
efficiency) the MEPN had handled about 50 such messages. An additional
|
|
28 were sent as NTS traffic by packet with a total of about 80
|
|
messages having been cleared by 1 AM.
|
|
|
|
To do all this I felt like I was a one-armed paper hanger! Three
|
|
computers were involved (145.05 BBS for msgs incoming from APR, 145.01
|
|
for relaying packet info to/from EASTNET, plus an additional PC-clone
|
|
|
|
to do chores like viewing Bob's lists while making the "instant"
|
|
radiograms, printing same, generating the traffic for export on packet
|
|
on EASTNET, etc.). The 145.01 and 145.05 channels share one antenna
|
|
and are linked together by radio on 220. 2M FM was in use for local
|
|
coordination and message handling. 75M was active for MEPN with the
|
|
kilowatt causing occasional crashes of the 145.01 system. And the
|
|
book-keeping on which msgs had been sent and which hadn't was
|
|
horrendous. I finally crashed about 2AM feeling rather exhausted. The
|
|
next morning I check the BBS and found two more APR lists that had
|
|
been originated around 10PM and had sat on the WB3FFV BBS until they
|
|
were forwarded about 3:30AM.
|
|
|
|
During all this activity I managed to deliver a couple of the messages
|
|
personally by phone. To hear the sound of relief in the voices of the
|
|
recipients made the evenings work worth it! We have also received back
|
|
service messages from amateurs delivering about about 20-30 of the
|
|
pieces of traffic so we know it made it to the other end.
|
|
|
|
After any such effort, it is well to review the lessons learned -- the
|
|
following are personal comments from W3IWI. Any negativism noted
|
|
should be construed as an attempt at constructive criticism:
|
|
|
|
1. I should have realized the volume of traffic that would be
|
|
|
|
generated earlier and had others pull some of APR's messages off the
|
|
145.05 BBS and handle them thru other channels. It is very easy to
|
|
get bogged down in such an operation and fall behind. I should have
|
|
asked for additional help earlier.
|
|
|
|
2. Coordination and information flow to the 'worker bees' left a lot
|
|
to be desired. Bob reported that people just started handing him the
|
|
lists with no instructions on who/where/why they were generated. He
|
|
took the initiative to put the problem off onto me. I had a similar
|
|
problem -- what do I do with the lists? When a disaster occurs
|
|
people end up inventing solutions which may be sub-optimum! At least
|
|
one Monday-morning quarterback informs me that the lists were not
|
|
supposed to be used for the notification of the next of kin of the
|
|
survivors and that we did a 'NO-NO'. If this be the case, then I
|
|
wonder for what purpose the lists were collected?
|
|
|
|
3. The messages we were handling were of use to the recipients for
|
|
only a very short time. Their purpose was to relieve anxiety and
|
|
worry on the part of the families until the victims were able to get
|
|
somewhere to make their personal calls home. I made the very
|
|
arbitrary decision that messages which had not left here by 2AM were
|
|
no longer timely. As a result the last two lists (about 25 names)
|
|
which arrived here at 3:30AM (while I was asleep) were never
|
|
|
|
converted into messages to the next of kin. Again this was a
|
|
judgement call for which I can be easily faulted.
|
|
|
|
4. When handling health and welfare messages, it is important to
|
|
adopt a fixed format early-on. Had APR sent me the lists with some
|
|
sort of machine-readable separator character between the first name,
|
|
last name, address, city, state and phone number fields, then the
|
|
computer here could have been quickly set up to sort the material
|
|
and make the bookkeeping a lot easier! I suspect in any future
|
|
disaster we will see computers beings used even more for helping to
|
|
cope with the large volumes of data.
|
|
|
|
5. Packet once again proved its ability to send fairly large volumes
|
|
of tabular data during times of crisis. If the communications need
|
|
to be rapid, use voice! If they need to be accurate, packet can do a
|
|
great job.
|