textfiles/hacking/shw0593.asc

130 lines
6.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

Red Hot Television Is Banned
In a debacle that mirrors the "Spycatcher" case of a few years
ago, Red Hot Television's attempt at stopping the UK Heritage
Secretary's proscription order coming into effect has failed. It
is now illegal to purchase or sell subscriptions or decoders for
the channel in the UK.
Red Hot Television had hoped to get an injunction restraining the
Heritage Secretary, Peter Brooke, from proscribing the channel in
the UK. The case in favour of Red Hot Television was convincing
and perhaps as a result, the judges on the judicial review decided
to refer the matter to the European Court.
To those of us who live in democracies with actual written
constitutions, the UK has always been somewhat of a mystery. The
law is supposed to be, for the most part, common sense. Yet here
is a decision that effectively says that Red Hot Television is
guilty until proven innocent.
The problem is not that the channel is banned in the UK. It is
that the UK court decided to refer the matter to the European
Court. Apparently the points of law raised pertained to whether
the UK Heritage Secretary, Peter Brooke, could legally make an
order banning the channel under European law.
The argument against the UK government decision is more convincing
and it has been boosted in an illogical way. An EC commissioner
has said that it is ok for the UK government to do so. The
commissioner involved was Commissioner De Pinhero. The grounds
cited were that the transmissions might be damaging to minors.
Right, I know what you are thinking. The Red Hot Television
transmissions are scrambled and are on after midnight. Apparently
the kids that de Pinhero and Brooke know are up at this time and
have their own decoders.
Historically, the EC policy on satellite television has been
little short of a comedy of errors. The last great screw-up was
D2-MAC. The commissioner there was stupid enough to mention in an
interview that he was taking advice from Philips and Thomson on
the subject. Well D2-MAC is presently not seen in the same light
by the EC. The European Court may well take a similar view of the
UK Government proscription order.
The problem with the UK Government's position is that it totally
ignores reality. Perhaps in former times when society was tightly
controlled a proscription order would have an effect. The avenues
of getting equipment and information into a country are wide.
Unless the UK Government gets the Customs and Excise to examine
every letter and parcel coming into the country then there is no
possible way the ban can be enforced. The Grey Market operations
of the last few years are a testament to that.
There is a flourishing Grey Market for subscriptions in the UK.
The standard trade is a Sky Movies subscription for a FilmNet
subscription. The Grey Market operator picks up a commission on
the deal. It is logical to expect that the subscriptions to Red
Hot Television will be handled the same way.
There are legal penalties for those in the UK who handle such
operations. Even UK controlled magazines are not allowed to
publish the schedules or subscription details for the proscribed
channel.
Luckily in Ireland, Red Hot Television is not banned. Though
incidentally a bishop, not the famous one, was reported in a
Dublin newspaper to be calling for the channel to be banned.
Ireland is a prime location for such Grey Market operations due to
the proximity. Of course it will be the Irish pirates who will run
them.
According to some interpretations, the Black Book - European
Scrambling Systems 3 may also be proscribable as it contains
circuits that can be used to descramble the channel.
SAVE But Soon Enigma
At present, scrambling system used by Red Hot Television is SAVE.
The SAVE system is rather primitive and can easily be defeated
with about five pounds worth of parts. Indeed there are many
circuit designs and descramblers floating around. Old BBC and
Premier descramblers are being modified.
Red Hot Television have announced that they will change to their
more secure Enigma system. Initially it was hoped that the
transition would begin in late March and would be completed by
May.
There were a few problems in the encoder section that forced tests
to be suspended for a few weeks. It now looks like the changeover
will not occur for some time.
The system that Red Hot Television will upgrade to is a clone of
VideoCrypt. This fact has sent shockwaves through the industry.
Former lackeys of BSkyB and News Datacom in the press, are said to
be re-evaluating their position. But then they couldn't tell SAVE
from SATPAC without a press release. I never believed that the
system was as secure as they made out. The fact that it could be
cloned has proven the point.
The fact that Red Hot Television are to use a clone of VideoCrypt
has obviously jeopardised the position of VideoCrypt. The
proscription legislation refers specifically to decoders. The
existing VideoCrypt decoders can be used, with a Red Hot
Television card to descramble the channel. Does this not mean that
the sale of VideoCrypt decoders is banned?
Certainly if the Enigma system goes into operation before the case
reaches the European Court, the UK government will have to, by
the terms of their legislation, stop people from selling
VideoCrypt decoders. After all it is the VideoCrypt decoder that
will be used to decode the channel.
Will this mean that the manufacturers will be stopped? Amstrad and
Pace will not be pleased to hear that their IRD sales can be
stopped. BSkyB and the other users of the system would also suffer
as a result. VideoCrypt is the de-facto English language
scrambling system. Perhaps in their zeal to be seen to act, the UK
government has managed to act in the wrong way.
It would seem that the move to proscribe the channel was a knee
jerk reaction. The channel went largely unnoticed by terrestrial
television viewers. The fact that there was a court action against
the channel, drew in some four thousand subscriptions in the space
of a few days. If anything, the attention has increased the
audience. The fact that it is now banned will serve to mushroom
the viewer figures.