600 lines
31 KiB
Groff
600 lines
31 KiB
Groff
|
|
|
|
Article from "Whole Earth Review" No.57 Winter 1987
|
|
|
|
MAY YOU NEVER SLEEP - Cognition Enhancing Drugs
|
|
|
|
by R.U. Sirius
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTELLIGENCE INCREASING DRUGS might be labeled "Cognitive Enhancers,"
|
|
"Memory Enhancers," or, in some cases, "Psychic Energizers." What many of
|
|
these drugs and nutrients have in common is that they produce effects
|
|
similar to effects people are seeking from popular stimulants such as
|
|
caffeine, amphetamines and cocaine. These popular drugs temporarily enhance
|
|
cognition and memory, and amp up the user's energy levels only to leave the
|
|
user depleted. Cocaine and amphetamines might properly be labeled as
|
|
short-term intelligence-increase drugs and long-term intelligence-decrease
|
|
drugs.
|
|
|
|
However, the drugs and nutrients discussed in this review are all believed
|
|
to create long term improvements in memory and cognition. Some of them also
|
|
provide the short-term high-energy states associated with the stimulant
|
|
drugs. Also, there is virtually no tendency towards the kind of weirdness
|
|
and darkness of the spirit which so often accompanies even the occasional
|
|
speed or cocaine high. It seems that while the illicit stimulants cause
|
|
short-term release, but long-term depletion of norepinephrin, many of the
|
|
memory-enhancing drugs and nutrients work on the noradrenergic nervous
|
|
system in a different way, apparently modulating nerve cell control
|
|
mechanisms so that the cellular response is neither too great nor too
|
|
little. This is a gross oversimplification. More precise information on each
|
|
of these cognitive enhancers is easily available to the serious researcher.
|
|
Accurate and concise information for the layperson is easily available
|
|
through the popular written works of Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw who,
|
|
whatever one might think of their bucket-of-pills-a-day personal
|
|
regimen, do
|
|
carefully monitor all of the research in this field.
|
|
|
|
This survey deals primarily with the short-term experiential effects of
|
|
these compounds, since I only have the experience of a relative and
|
|
imprecise ongoing use of one drug, Pemoline, and no scientific proof of any
|
|
intelligence increase on my part. Besides, a three-hour play can be
|
|
realistically reviewed. Reviewing a life is a somewhat more dubious
|
|
prospect.
|
|
|
|
In consideration of all this, I hereby present a review of
|
|
intelligence-increasing drugs. May you never sleep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VASOPRESSIN - Definitely the most euphoric of the memory-enhancing
|
|
intelligence-increase drugs outside of the one being called "Euphoria" (more
|
|
on Euphoria later), Vasopressin is marketed as Diapid, a prescription drug
|
|
made by our old friends Sandoz. It can also be ordered as Vasopressin
|
|
through chemical supply houses by those who know the ropes. I had five
|
|
squirts of Vasopressin out of a nasal inhaler. I was surprised by how strong
|
|
the effects were. I had that charged-up hyperconfident rush that one
|
|
experiences with cocaine, but combined with much clearer ideation and
|
|
without the numbing and discomfort or the strange and disquieting hard edges
|
|
which often accompany even the more euphoric coke highs. It didn't last very
|
|
long, about two hours, most of which unfortunately spent riding the BART and
|
|
walking. By the time I got home, the experience had pretty well dissipated.
|
|
I did not have an opportunity to experience Vasopressin as a work/writing
|
|
drug. It was clear, however, simply from reading (I was reading "Gravity's
|
|
Rainbow" at the time and I consider that a fairly challenging test of
|
|
comprehension) on the BART ride home, that Vasopressin is an excellent tool
|
|
for rapid learning and comprehension of complex systems of thought.
|
|
|
|
The only other time I had Vasopressin, it was in the form of Diapid. I had
|
|
only two squirts at a party late at night on top of fairly substantial
|
|
amounts of marijuana and alcohol. It didn't noticeably cut through the
|
|
depressant effects of those drugs. However, I did experience an intensified
|
|
and prolonged orgasm!
|
|
|
|
HYDERGINE - The invention of one Dr. Albert Hoffmann of Sandoz Laboratories.
|
|
I know of many people who got their hands on buckets of this stuff and I
|
|
know of nobody who continues to take it. The effects are said to be
|
|
cumulative rather than immediate and everybody seems to lose interest. "I
|
|
forgot to take my Hydergine" is a term which one often hears from chagrined
|
|
"intelligence agents," fully cognizant (even without Hydergine) of the
|
|
ironies involved. This probably says more about the people that I hang out
|
|
with than about Hydergine as an intelligence increase agent.
|
|
|
|
Incidentally, Dr. Hoffmann told a friend of mine that one can get exactly
|
|
the same effects one gets from daily megadoses of Hydergine by using 25
|
|
micrograms of LSD daily. I have not experimented with subthreshold acid as
|
|
an IQ substance, so I cannot comment.
|
|
|
|
LECITHIN, CHOLINE with INOSITOL, PHENYLALANINE (with VITAMIN C and B6) -
|
|
While perhaps less intriguing and glamorous to technophilic reality hackers,
|
|
most of these easily available cognitive enhancers have a substantially
|
|
perceptible effect. LECITHIN seems to be the exception. Even at "Durk and
|
|
Sandy" dosage levels there was no noticeable enhancement of focus, recall,
|
|
etc. CHOLINE and INOSITOL, at about three grams each, produce mild but
|
|
definite results with no discomfort and can be used daily. I did this once
|
|
for about a month and found myself losing my sense of humor. However, if
|
|
you're already humorless you might just as well give this a go.
|
|
PHENYLALANINE is quite speedy. While it can be used for creativity and
|
|
focus, it tends to make one irritable. For emergency use only.
|
|
|
|
DEANER - This is getting really popular with the "health food set."
|
|
Experientially, the effect is very subtle but noticeable. I've tried this a
|
|
few times and what I've found is that if I already have a task to do, I will
|
|
do it and, in retrospect, I will realize that I sustained my attention for
|
|
an unusually long time without flagging or needing a break. However, if I
|
|
use this (as I often do with other cognitive enhancers) without a precise
|
|
sense of what the task at hand is, it doesn't clarify and help to motivate
|
|
activity. This is an important point. Drugs such as Vasopressin, Pemoline,
|
|
Euphoria and THA can actually cut through confusion and ennui and help
|
|
invoke will. My guess is that most of these substances also work, to varying
|
|
degrees, on the pleasure centers of the brain, provoking one's natural 'joie
|
|
di vivre' and thereby provoking enthusiasm for creative and organizational
|
|
activities.
|
|
|
|
PEMOLINE (usually combined with Magnesium) - The information most frequently
|
|
passed around in reference to MAGNESIUM PEMOLINE was published by the Church
|
|
of the Tree of Life some years ago in their publication "Bark Leaf". It
|
|
recommends taking "Mag-Pem" at 50-100 mgs. every day for two months in order
|
|
to substantially increase your I.Q. OUCH! This program is a sure ticket to
|
|
severe headaches and extreme nervousness. However, in the 20-30 milligram
|
|
range, I've found that this can be used twice weekly with excellent results.
|
|
The lift is very substantial and noticeable. I, and several of my friends,
|
|
find it particularly good for writing, both creative and functional. For
|
|
rapid-fire associations and grand synthesis just combine it with moderate
|
|
amounts of Cannabis (Sativa, if possible). It lasts about twelve hours,
|
|
coming on slowly and having its greatest effect at around the fifth through
|
|
the tenth hours. Clarity and verbal acuity are the strong points here. At
|
|
times, the sheer mass of information, new thoughts and connections can
|
|
overwhelm and put one into a rather confused state, particularly if one is
|
|
not applying oneself to something. When this occurs I find that I can slow
|
|
down my thoughts to a point where there is coherence simply by verbalizing
|
|
them or writing them down. Unlike its close cousin "EUPHORIA," Pemoline is
|
|
emotionally bland. It is not a pleasure drug. WARNING: from my observations,
|
|
approximately one in every ten people get nothin' but headaches from even
|
|
small doses of Pemoline.
|
|
|
|
EUPHORIA - Well, someone took Pemoline, twisted it around a little bit and
|
|
put a whole lot of pleasure into the equation. This might be a Dangerous
|
|
drug! There are lot of different things that seem to happen with Euphoria.
|
|
The first time I took it (40 milligrams - I've learned since that 25 mg. is
|
|
considered your basic dose) I got really charged up. This is definitely a
|
|
High and it comes on suddenly (about 45 minutes after ingestion). My first
|
|
response upon coming on to it was an experience of an intense rush of
|
|
perceived personal power. I found myself goosestepping down the busy Berkeley
|
|
streets thinking about how good I felt, how successful I was destined to be,
|
|
and knowing that the world was my oyster. After about 15 minutes of this as
|
|
I found myself leaping down the BART escalator, I had to tell myself to slow
|
|
down for fear that I would be completely drained later on. Although I didn't
|
|
really slow down at all during this experience, I did bring myself into a
|
|
somewhat more humane mindset and I spent the subway ride having an almost
|
|
methoxylated amphetamine (MDMA, MDA, etc.)-type ideations. In other words, I
|
|
wasn't just feeling good about myself, I was feeling good about most
|
|
everybody else. The world was everybody's oyster.
|
|
|
|
Arriving at my office, I immediately found myself doing organizational work
|
|
at about three times the normal rate with far more self-assurance and fewer
|
|
mistakes than usual. Simultaneously, I was entertaining perspectives on the
|
|
nature of my true will and making important phonecalls which I had put off
|
|
for some time. I did about thirty hours worth of work in about ten hours. I
|
|
literally could not stop. I tried to make myself take a break for about ten
|
|
minutes. Within a minute, I found my hand going into a drawer to pull out
|
|
another file which needed reorganizing. Believe me, this is very unusual
|
|
behavior. I hate organizational work.
|
|
|
|
This all might sound like the first blushes of an amphetamine high, but
|
|
he emotional overtones and the mentation under this substance is of a softer
|
|
and more inwardly whole (less alienated) quality. As I've already indicated,
|
|
the Euphoria high seems to have a slight methoxylated amphetamine quality to
|
|
it. All in all, this was a very powerful experiencing of clarity,
|
|
self-assurance and cognitive ability. The following day, I experienced the
|
|
same sort of effects at about one-third the intensity. There was no burnout
|
|
at all in aftermath.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent experiments have shown Euphoria to be predictable as an effective
|
|
tool for organizing binges, brainstorming sessions and radio talk-show
|
|
appearances. It also seems to induce ongoing personal growth in terms of
|
|
clarity of personal will. (I've received three other testimonies in this
|
|
same direction.) As a writing tool, I've found Euphoria to be variable. It
|
|
seems that verbal acuity comes on strong but the verbal circuits burn out
|
|
quickly from intensity of use and one has to move on to less verbally
|
|
oriented tasks. In other words, this is generally good for creative flashes
|
|
and outlining grand syntheses but not too good for actual completion of
|
|
written work. It gives one an impatience for minutiae and the kind of
|
|
careful faceting that it takes to bring a work to completion. In terms of
|
|
appreciation and comprehension of aesthetics and information, this seems the
|
|
opposite of its close cousin Pemoline. The accessing mode favored is
|
|
visual. One wants to explore a painting or photograph or watch a movie
|
|
rather than read a book.
|
|
|
|
My only complaint about Euphoria is that it lasts 16 hours, which feels
|
|
about 4 hours too long. In two of my five experiences, the last four hours
|
|
were spent feeling slightly "headachy" and weary, although there was still
|
|
no burnout following sleep. I would say, at this point, that Euphoria should
|
|
not be used more often than once a week since it is so powerful and so much
|
|
energy is expended in the experience. This is easily the most Fun of the
|
|
intelligence increasers and, as such, is probably the most likely to be
|
|
abused.
|
|
|
|
PRL-8-53 - Untried by your reviewer at this time. However, Durk Pearson is
|
|
quoted in 'High Frontiers' as saying that "PRL-8-53 is a terrific memory
|
|
enhancer. Normally you can memorize about seven or eight digits just by
|
|
looking at them for a second. PRL-8-53 gives the average person a memory
|
|
span of about 21 to 22 digits." He also reported that one amnesia victim was
|
|
cured with one dose.
|
|
|
|
THA - Untried by your reviewer at this time. Again, Durk Pearson, this time
|
|
in 'High Frontiers/Reality Hackers Newsletter:' "In combination with
|
|
arecoline, THA has been found to be remarkably effective as a memory
|
|
improver ... it's important that the dosage be individualized ... too much
|
|
will actually impair memory and produce sweating, excessive muscle tone and
|
|
mouth-watering." The standard dosage is "1 to 2 mg." however, Durk
|
|
recommends that you start with a quarter of that every two to four hours and
|
|
work up - if you get those side effects, back off.
|
|
|
|
===========================================
|
|
|
|
Letter to the Editor in response to the R.U.Sirius article above.
|
|
|
|
From the Summer 1988 issue of "Whole Earth Review"
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
IF THESE DRUGS HAD BOTTLES, HERE'S WHAT THE WARNING LABELS WOULD SAY
|
|
|
|
I have been a big fan of your magazine for many years now, and I am a firm
|
|
believer in the principle that the free exchange of information is a
|
|
necessity to the survival and progress of our species. I commend you for
|
|
your efforts in this area.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, when it comes to psychopharmacology the old saying, that a
|
|
little knowledge is far more dangerous than none at all, is quite often
|
|
true. Specifically I am referring to the article of winter '87 on page 56,
|
|
"Cognitive Enhancers." I am not upset that you would print this sort of
|
|
information; there is both interesting and important research going on in
|
|
this field right now. What I object to is the uncritical, inaccurate, and
|
|
incomplete information given in an area that has Serious implications on
|
|
your reader's health. Here are some errata and addenda for that article,
|
|
most of this information is available in the "Physician's Desk Reference"
|
|
and the "Merck Index".
|
|
|
|
VASOPRESSIN - It is a naturally occurring peptide that can cause a wide
|
|
variety of effects beyond those mentioned in the article. It strains the
|
|
heart by reducing the heart's food and oxygen supply and increasing the
|
|
heart's workload by increasing blood pressure. In individuals with hidden or
|
|
overt heart problems, this can mean a heart attack. In addition vasopressin
|
|
can cause a dangerous elevation in brain fluid pressure, leading to stroke,
|
|
coma, or death. Also it can produce vertigo, circumoral pallor, pounding
|
|
headaches, cramps, diarrhea, gas, nausea, vomiting, urticaria, difficulty
|
|
breathing, anaphylactic shock, and normal shock. It is dangerous to use in
|
|
people with a history of epilepsy, migraine, asthma, heart failure, or poor
|
|
kidney function. Vasopressin can have dangerous interactions with most
|
|
stimulants, including pemoline, caffeine, diet pills, and cold medications.
|
|
Overall vasopressin is a real Pandora's Box, but fortunately there is
|
|
ongoing research to develop safer and more effective alternatives.
|
|
|
|
CHOLINE, INOSITOL, VITAMIN B6, PHENYLALANINE, and DEANER - These compounds
|
|
are both basically safe and effective if not spectacular. I would add a few
|
|
notes though. Use caution with these if you have a history of epilepsy.
|
|
Choline may be more effective when taken with inositol. B6 is more effective
|
|
and better for you when taken in wide-spectrum mega-B vitamin supplements.
|
|
PHENYLALANINE is neurotoxic and can cause brain damage in about 2% of the
|
|
population [uploader's note: the 2% with the metabolic disorder PKU, that
|
|
is], and it's probably not good in large doses for anyone. TYROSINE on the
|
|
other hand is not toxic and is a more effective substitute. DEANER can be
|
|
made more effective by combining it with METHIONINE, but be cautious of
|
|
large doses of methionine if you have a history of psychosis. In addition,
|
|
there are other nutrients that are save and effective in increasing
|
|
psychological energy in most people, INOSINE, CYTOCHROME C, LYSINE, and
|
|
GINSENG.
|
|
|
|
HYDERGINE - It is an ergot alkaloid, the same chemical class as LSD, but
|
|
with no psychedelic or immediate effects. It is currently prescribed to help
|
|
alleviate some of the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, but, despite the
|
|
tremendous numbers of people with this affliction, Hydergine is not widely
|
|
used, mainly because it is only effective in about 1/3 of the people using
|
|
it. As a matter of fact it worsens cognition in about 1/3 of people. It is
|
|
dangerous to use in individuals with any history of psychosis, low or high
|
|
blood pressure, heart disease, pregnant women (at any point in pregnancy),
|
|
or a history of migraines. Hydergine has caused rashes, drug fever,
|
|
headaches, dizziness, vision problems, appetite loss, nausea, vomiting,
|
|
cramps, fainting, sluggishness, drowsiness, emotional withdrawal, apathy,
|
|
nervousness, hostility, confusion, depression, weakness, collapse, and coma.
|
|
|
|
EUPHORIA - The section on Euphoria is really in a muddle. First of all it is
|
|
not clear what Euphoria is. The chemical structure shown is the article is
|
|
MDA (methylenedioxy amphetamine), a drug rejected long ago by both
|
|
psychologists and users as inferior to MDMA (XTC); it is also Highly
|
|
Illegal. The other name given for Euphoria was 3,4-Methylenedimethoxy
|
|
Methamphetamine. This is an impossible chemical structure. Technically
|
|
speaking, a chemical structure can contain a methylenedioxy group or have 2
|
|
methoxy groups; there is no such thing as a methylenedimethoxy group. None
|
|
the less I can guess about Euphoria's toxicology from the effects R.U.Sirius
|
|
describes and the class of drugs to which he claims it belongs. Like crystal
|
|
methedrine it is almost certainly capable of precipitating paranoid
|
|
psychosis, even in psychologically stable people. Though Sirius noticed no
|
|
crash, he may have just been lucky. Amphetamines almost always have a crash.
|
|
In general they also create tremendously large egos, and over confidence, so
|
|
No judgement on mental improvement made by people under their influence can
|
|
be trusted. Finally Euphoria is relatively untested, both scientifically and
|
|
on the street. Its long and short term health effects are unknown by based
|
|
on its chemical structure it would not be unreasonable to expect it to cause
|
|
heart damage, brain damage, or cancer. I do not expect Euphoria to be any
|
|
better than Coke or Speed, in the long run. I don't mean to sound cruel or
|
|
cynical, but let some lab rats die before you put your neck on the line.
|
|
|
|
PEMOLINE is an interesting drug at the center of some current research.
|
|
Unfortunately, it is not known how the drug works. If it was, a safer
|
|
alternative could be found. Pemoline has caused fatal liver failure, still
|
|
births, La Tourette's Syndrome, seizures, hallucinations, uncontrollable
|
|
movements of the tongue, lips, face, eyes, and extremities, depression,
|
|
delirium, dizziness, irritability, headaches, drowsiness, insomnia,
|
|
anorexia, nausea, and cramps. Caution should be used when combining it with
|
|
any other drug because it is known to have strong dangerous interactions
|
|
with many drugs. Finally, pemoline, a controlled substance, is recognized by
|
|
the government as having an abuse/addiction liability.
|
|
|
|
PRL-8-53 - I could find no information on this, even in the most up to date
|
|
references. The fact that it still is referred to by its code number
|
|
probably means that it is still highly experimental; they may not even know
|
|
what its structure is yet. It might be safe, but you are playing
|
|
neurochemical roulette.
|
|
|
|
THA - This is potentially very dangerous. It is an acetylcholinesterase
|
|
inhibitor making its actions closely related to Nerve Gas, Pesticides and
|
|
Strychnine. BE CAREFUL!
|
|
|
|
I wish you all good luck in your quest for personal growth. I am sure in the
|
|
near future science will come up with many things to help you. Please do not
|
|
let enthusiasm interfere with accuracy and safety
|
|
|
|
Name withheld upon request
|
|
|
|
==========================================================================
|
|
|
|
Uploader's Notes:
|
|
|
|
The previous letter is interesting in that the writer makes an
|
|
erroneous assumption about the structure of Euphoria based on an
|
|
erroneous and mislabeled diagram in the original R.U.Sirius article.
|
|
Euphoria is NOT related to the methamphetamine class of drugs as this
|
|
writer assumes! Euphoria IS however related to Pemoline (as R.U.Sirius
|
|
implies in the text of his article), so the warnings above about
|
|
Pemoline may well apply to Euphoria.
|
|
|
|
The writer of this letter also makes a wrong assumption about
|
|
PRL-8-53; namely, that it is so new that there's no info about it
|
|
available yet. At the end of this file, there's an article out of
|
|
"The Daily Breeze" Newspaper (which I don't have a date for, but it
|
|
was published in either 1980 or 1981) that explains the origin
|
|
of PRL-8-53.
|
|
|
|
Strangely, R.U.Sirius didn't identify the chemical structure of
|
|
PRL-8-53 either, even though he knew it was being investigated
|
|
by Durk Pearson!
|
|
|
|
========================================================================
|
|
|
|
Yet More Letters to the Editor in response to the R.U.Sirius article above.
|
|
|
|
From the Winter 1988 issue of "Whole Earth Review"
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
NO EUPHORIA ABOUT CHEMICAL STRUCTURE
|
|
|
|
In your Winter '87 issue, you ran an article by 'R.U.Sirius' entitled:
|
|
"May You Never Sleep" dealing with personal use(s) of experimental or FDA
|
|
licensed materials which your article collectively termed 'cognitive
|
|
enhancers.' Some of these are prescription only drugs, others come from
|
|
underground chemistry. Psychedelics generally have continued to receive
|
|
erroneous, confused & even hysterical press stemming from the LSD chromosome
|
|
scare of the mid-sixties through & into today's supposedly better informed
|
|
press & reporters having, among other things, computer technology to aid in
|
|
getting the facts straight. Or so one would think. Or at least hope.
|
|
|
|
However, I'm sorry to say that 'Whole Earth Review' has perpetuated this
|
|
same disregard for the facts of the matter not in one issue (Winter 1987)
|
|
but again in your Summer 1988 issue, surrounding the same subject - U4Euh
|
|
(Euphoria). In Sirius' original piece, he presented a completely False
|
|
chemical identification diagram re: U4Euh, showing instead that if MDA, a
|
|
completely different substance altogether. We all make mistakes, but Sirius
|
|
AGAIN put his foot in his mouth, appearing in the June issue of 'Whole Mind"
|
|
& calling U4Euh N-Methyl Aminorex, which is again false.
|
|
|
|
In the Summer WER there is a letter of rebuttal to Sirius' article which
|
|
attempted to once & for all (I suppose) set the facts straight, particularly
|
|
about U4Euh. Here again, an attempt at correction dis-information IN
|
|
ACTUALITY ends up spreading further myths surrounding U4Euh & psychedelics.
|
|
|
|
The letter writer states: "finally, U4Euh is relatively untested, both
|
|
scientifically & on the street, etc...."
|
|
|
|
OK. Let's get some facts straight & clear up a lot of confusion about this
|
|
substance U4Euh. U4Euh (4-Methyl Aminorex) was 1st discovered by a research
|
|
group headed by Georde Poos at McNeil Laboratory in Ft. Walsh, PA. in the
|
|
early 1960's. The 1st published report appeared in 'The Journal of Med.
|
|
Chem." in 1963 [1] & several other patents were issued in Belgium, France &
|
|
the US [2,3,4]. Three other papers were published regarding U4Euh in 1963 &
|
|
1966 [5,6,7].
|
|
|
|
In the mid 1980's, U4Euh was resurrected within the underground &
|
|
noncontrolled experiments were carried out on humans. The substance's new
|
|
spokesman was named The Friendly Stranger & samples were studied at, among
|
|
other places, the Continental Rainbow Gatherings. Both instructional manuals
|
|
as WELL as ongoing research results were distributed to those having
|
|
interest & concern about U4Euh & its effects.
|
|
|
|
There are two forms of U4Euh currently available via the underground - the
|
|
free-base & the hydrochloride. Prices range from $75 pre gram for the
|
|
hydrochloride upwards to $150 per gram for the most powerful free-base.
|
|
|
|
This substance (4-Methyl Aminorex) was placed on schedule I by the DEA & the
|
|
FDA in 1987. The resultant scheduling report presented by the DEA shows a
|
|
Death associated with its use (or abuse).
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately psychedelics or 'cognitive enhancers' remain the legendary,
|
|
obscurely attractive sources for 'bad press' - & are kept illegal - BECAUSE
|
|
false, misleading, obtuse or hysterical reporting (like that perpetuated in
|
|
your WER) outweighs the true facts of the matter.
|
|
|
|
I hope that author R.U.Sirius & WER continue to provide insightful articles
|
|
in the area(s) of drug use/abuse. However, some attempt must be made to
|
|
provide accurate reporting, especially in areas already worked over by too
|
|
much of the same.
|
|
|
|
Best wishes,
|
|
Thomas Lyttle,
|
|
Publisher,
|
|
Psychedelic Monographs and Essays
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
|
|
[1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 6, 266 (1963)
|
|
[2] Belgian Patent 628,803, June 16, 1963
|
|
[3] French Patent M2448, May 4, 1964
|
|
[4] U.S.Patents 3,161,650 Dec 15, 1964 and 3,278,382 Oct 11,1966
|
|
[5] Archives Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 164(2) 412-18 (1966)
|
|
[6] Journal of Pharm. & Experim. Therapeutics 140: 367-374 (1963)
|
|
[7] Ibid. 141:180-84 (1964)
|
|
[8] Journ. Clin. Pharmacology 7:296-302 (1967)
|
|
[9] Science 1982 218(457)487-490
|
|
[10] Annual Reviews of Med. Chemistry 1965 51-58 (1966)44-47
|
|
|
|
The above mentioned references were provided by
|
|
'Psychedelic Monographs & Essays' from an upcoming piece entitled:
|
|
"A Chemical and Pharmacological Review of Euphoria or Intellex"
|
|
by 'The New Age Chemist'.
|
|
|
|
This piece will appear in the Autumn 1988 (vol.4) issue of PM&E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOTHER ALCHEMIST WHO AGREES
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
|
|
|
|
I read with interest the article in issue #57 on intelligence drugs by
|
|
"R.U.Sirius." I also read the same author's letter correcting the depicted
|
|
structure and identification of "Euphoria" in issue #58.
|
|
|
|
I too noticed that the chemical structure on page 58(#57) was that of
|
|
3,4-methylene dioxymethamphetamine (mistakenly spelled as "3,4-Methylene
|
|
Dimethoxy Methamphetamine"). while it was incorrectly labeled as "EUPHORIA."
|
|
The label was meant to say "chemically related to MDA." The label was
|
|
however, correct in stating that it was "Ecstacy."
|
|
|
|
In "Sirius's" letter (#58, page 140) correcting his article in issue #57, he
|
|
(?) states that "Euphoria is N-Methyl Aminorex and looks like this -
|
|
|
|
|
|
C6H5 O NH2
|
|
\ \
|
|
| || [uploader's note: THIS IS THE CORRECT U4EUH.]
|
|
|___N
|
|
/
|
|
CH3
|
|
|
|
Well, this structure is not that of N-Methyl Aminorex. It is correctly
|
|
called 4-Methyl Aminorex.
|
|
|
|
Aminorex has the structure:
|
|
|
|
[Diagram of Aminorex]
|
|
|
|
And the structure of N-Methyl Aminorex is as follows:
|
|
|
|
[Diagram of N-Methyl Aminorex]
|
|
|
|
I am not yet sure what the correct chemical structure of "Euphoria" is but I
|
|
am sure of the above information. Perhaps this will help clear up the
|
|
misunderstanding.
|
|
|
|
"Sirius," maybe you could try again to enlighten us? What is the correct
|
|
structure and name of "Euphoria"?
|
|
|
|
Yours sincerely,
|
|
The Alchemist
|
|
Vashon, Washington
|
|
|
|
===========================================================================
|
|
|
|
Article from "The Daily Breeze" newspaper, published around 1980 or 1981
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Found to Improve Memory
|
|
|
|
OMAHA (AP) - Creighton University researchers say they have discovered an
|
|
organic chemical compound which apparently improves memory and intellectual
|
|
performance that normally deteriorate with aging.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Nikolaus Hansl, associate professor of medical chemistry and a member of
|
|
the team of scientists, said the compound, known as PRL-8-53, counters the
|
|
destruction of certain chemical pathways in the brain by "making up the
|
|
slack chemically."
|
|
|
|
In a clinical study at Creighton, Hansl said, 58 college students performed
|
|
better on intellectual tasks when they were given the compound, which he
|
|
described as similar to an amino acid.
|
|
|
|
In another study published in 1978, researchers compared the compound's
|
|
effects on performance of college students with that of persons who were
|
|
over 30.
|
|
|
|
The participants were asked to remember lists of "nonsense syllables,"
|
|
geometric objects and other tasks, Hansl said.
|
|
|
|
"The older group showed a 130% to 140% improvement in memory over the
|
|
college students," he said.
|
|
|
|
He said the effect of the compound lasted about seven hours, and added that
|
|
even after the effect faded, memory was better.
|
|
|
|
"Experiences from the past that were fading were recalled better" with no
|
|
detectable side effects, he said.
|
|
|
|
Hansl said the compound could help "the geriatric population - anyone over
|
|
30 - such as the elderly man who forgets his glasses or loses a thought in
|
|
midsentence. I would like to make them more self-sufficient."
|
|
|
|
Another use, he said, could aid those "in intellectual stress situations,
|
|
such as a businessman or student, to perform tasks better."
|
|
|
|
But Hansl added there have been no indications that people with brain damage
|
|
could benefit from the compound.
|
|
|
|
He said the research team is working on a related compound which could
|
|
produce even better results. They are now evaluating the clinical effects of
|
|
the compound.
|
|
|
|
Hansl, who had been involved in the research project for more than 15 years,
|
|
said the chemical is one of a new group of compounds that were studied in
|
|
the search for a new tranquilizer that would not slow down intellectual
|
|
functions.
|
|
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
Uploader's Note:
|
|
|
|
On the back of the above news clipping I wrote:
|
|
|
|
"PRL-8-53 is 3-(2-benzylmethylamino ethyl) benzoic acid methyl ester"
|
|
|
|
I don't recall where I found that piece of info, but I suspect it
|
|
was from an item in "Science News".
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Reader's Guide to Periodic Literature lists the following
|
|
reference to PRL-8-53:
|
|
|
|
"Learning and Memory Improvment Through Chemistry: Dream or Reality
|
|
in the Offing." (PRL-8-53) by Nicolas Hansl & A.B. Hansl
|
|
in the "Phi Delta Kappan" 61:264-5 December 1979
|
|
|
|
But I haven't been able to get a copy of that article yet.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Finally, the magazine "Reality Hackers/High Frontiers" which
|
|
R.U.Sirius edits is available from:
|
|
|
|
Fun City MegaMedia/Mondo 2000
|
|
PO Box 49271, Berkeley, CA 94704
|
|
(415)845-9018
|
|
|
|
And the "Whole Earth Review" is available from:
|
|
|
|
Whole Earth Review
|
|
PO Box 15187, Santa Ana, CA 92705-9913
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
=========================================================================
|
|
Blitzkrieg Bbs 502/499-8933
|
|
NUP: Blood Red
|
|
After Dec 1st 1992
|
|
NUP: Samhain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|