265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
MARIJUANA MYTHS
|
||
by Paul Hager
|
||
Hoosier Cannabis Re-legalization Coalition
|
||
|
||
1. Marijuana causes brain damage
|
||
|
||
The most celebrated study that claims to show brain damage
|
||
is the rhesus monkey study of Dr. Robert Heath, done in the late
|
||
1970s. This study was reviewed by a distinguished panel of
|
||
scientists sponsored by the Institute of Medicine and the
|
||
National Academy of Sciences. Their results were published under
|
||
the title, Marijuana and Health in 1982. Heath's work was
|
||
sharply criticized for its insufficient sample size (only four
|
||
monkeys), its failure to control experimental bias, and the
|
||
misidentification of normal monkey brain structure as "damaged".
|
||
Actual studies of human populations of marijuana users have shown
|
||
no evidence of brain damage. For example, two studies from 1977,
|
||
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
|
||
(JAMA) showed no evidence of brain damage in heavy users of
|
||
marijuana. That same year, the American Medical Association
|
||
(AMA) officially came out in favor of decriminalizing marijuana.
|
||
That's not the sort of thing you'd expect if the AMA thought
|
||
marijuana damaged the brain.
|
||
|
||
2. Marijuana damages the reproductive system
|
||
|
||
This claim is based chiefly on the work of Dr. Gabriel
|
||
Nahas, who experimented with tissue (cells) isolated in petri
|
||
dishes, and with researchers who dosed animals with near-lethal
|
||
amounts of cannabinoids (i.e., the intoxicating part of
|
||
marijuana). Nahas' generalizations from his petri dishes to
|
||
human beings have been rejected by the scientific community as
|
||
being invalid. In the case of the animal experiments, the
|
||
animals that survived their ordeal returned to normal within 30
|
||
days of the end of the experiment. Studies of actual human
|
||
populations have failed to demonstrate that marijuana adversely
|
||
affects the reproductive system.
|
||
|
||
3. Marijuana is a "gateway" drug -- it leads to hard drugs
|
||
|
||
This is one of the more persistent myths. A real world
|
||
example of what happens when marijuana is readily available can
|
||
be found in Holland. The Dutch functionally decriminalized
|
||
marijuana in the 1970s. Since then, hard drug use -- heroin and
|
||
cocaine -- have DECLINED substantially. Even use of marijuana
|
||
has declined. If marijuana really were a gateway drug, one would
|
||
have expected use of hard drugs to have gone up. Actual studies
|
||
of hard drug "addicts" reveal that they start with alcohol or
|
||
tobacco more frequently than marijuana.
|
||
|
||
4. Marijuana suppresses the immune system
|
||
|
||
Like the studies claiming to show damage to the reproductive
|
||
system, this myth is based on studies where animals were given
|
||
extremely high doses of cannabinoids. These results have never
|
||
been duplicated in human beings. Interestingly, two studies done
|
||
in 1978 and one done in 1988 showed that hashish and marijuana
|
||
may have actually stimulated the immune system in the people
|
||
studied.
|
||
|
||
5. Marijuana is much more dangerous than tobacco
|
||
|
||
Smoked marijuana contains more carcinogens than does an
|
||
equivalent amount of tobacco (1.5 to 3 times). Marijuana,
|
||
however, unlike tobacco, actually dilates (enlarges) the air
|
||
passages in the lungs which promotes self-cleaning. This is one
|
||
reason why cannabis has been found useful in the past in treating
|
||
asthmatics. It should be remembered that a heavy tobacco smoker
|
||
consumes much more tobacco than a heavy marijuana smoker consumes
|
||
marijuana. Two other factors are important. The first is that
|
||
paraphernalia laws directed against marijuana users make it
|
||
difficult to smoke safely. These laws make water pipes and
|
||
bongs, which filter some of the carcinogens out of the smoke,
|
||
illegal and, hence, unavailable. The second is that, if
|
||
marijuana were legal, it would be more economical to have
|
||
cannabis drinks like bhang (a traditional drink in the Middle
|
||
East) or tea which are totally non-carcinogenic. This is in
|
||
stark contrast with "smokeless" tobacco products like snuff which
|
||
can cause cancer of the mouth and throat. Nicotine itself is
|
||
very toxic in even small quantities. In contrast, the
|
||
cannabinoids are relatively non-toxic. When all of these facts
|
||
are taken together, it can be clearly seen that the reverse is
|
||
true: marijuana is much SAFER than tobacco.
|
||
|
||
6. Legal marijuana would cause carnage on the highways
|
||
|
||
Although marijuana, when used to intoxication, does impair
|
||
performance in a manner similar to alcohol, actual studies of the
|
||
effect of marijuana on the automobile accident rate suggest that
|
||
it poses LESS of a hazard than alcohol. When a random sample of
|
||
fatal accident victims was studied, it was initially found that
|
||
marijuana was associated with RELATIVELY as many accidents as
|
||
alcohol. In other words, the number of accident victims
|
||
intoxicated on marijuana relative to the number of marijuana
|
||
users in society gave a ratio similar to that for accident
|
||
victims intoxicated on alcohol relative to the total number of
|
||
alcohol users. However, a closer examination of the victims
|
||
revealed that around 85% of the people intoxicated on marijuana
|
||
WERE ALSO INTOXICATED ON ALCOHOL. For people only intoxicated on
|
||
marijuana, the rate was much lower than for alcohol alone. This
|
||
would suggest that legal marijuana would not pose as serious a
|
||
hazard as legal alcohol.
|
||
|
||
NOTE: We of the HCRC believe that DUI laws pertaining to
|
||
driving under the influence of alcohol should apply to driving
|
||
under the influence of marijuana. We believe in the RESPONSIBLE
|
||
USE of marijuana, NOT IRRESPONSIBLE ABUSE.
|
||
|
||
7. Marijuana "flattens" human brainwaves
|
||
|
||
This is an out-and-out lie perpetrated by the Partnership
|
||
for a Drug-Free America. A few years ago, they ran a TV ad that
|
||
purported to show, first, a normal human brainwave, and second, a
|
||
flat brainwave from a 14-year-old "on marijuana". When
|
||
researchers called up the TV networks to complain about this
|
||
commercial, the Partnership had to pull it from the air. It
|
||
seems that the Partnership faked the flat "marijuana brainwave".
|
||
In reality, marijuana has the effect of slightly INCREASING alpha
|
||
wave activity. Alpha waves are associated with meditative and
|
||
relaxed states which are, in turn, often associated with human
|
||
creativity.
|
||
|
||
8. Marijuana impairs short-term memory
|
||
|
||
This is true but misleading. When one is intoxicated on
|
||
alcohol, one's motor control is affected. When one is
|
||
intoxicated on marijuana, one's concentration is affected. Any
|
||
impairment of short-term memory disappears when one is no longer
|
||
intoxicated. Often, the short-term memory effect is paired with
|
||
a reference to Dr. Heath's poor rhesus monkeys to imply that the
|
||
condition is permanent.
|
||
|
||
9. Marijuana lingers in the body like DDT
|
||
|
||
This is also true but misleading. Cannabinoids are fat
|
||
soluble as are innumerable nutrients and, yes, some poisons like
|
||
DDT. For example, the essential nutrient, Vitamin A, is fat
|
||
soluble but one never hears people who favor marijuana
|
||
prohibition making this comparison.
|
||
|
||
10. There are over a thousand chemicals in marijuana smoke
|
||
|
||
Again, true but misleading. The 31 August 1990 issue of the
|
||
magazine Science notes that of the over 800 volatile chemicals
|
||
present in roasted COFFEE, only 21 have actually been tested on
|
||
animals and 16 of these cause cancer in rodents. Yet, coffee
|
||
remains legal and is generally considered fairly safe.
|
||
|
||
11. No one has ever died of a marijuana overdose
|
||
|
||
This is true. It was put in to see if you are paying
|
||
attention. Animal tests have revealed that extremely high doses
|
||
of cannabinoids are needed to have lethal effect. This has led
|
||
scientists to conclude that the ratio of the amount of
|
||
cannabinoids necessary to get a person intoxicated (i.e., stoned)
|
||
relative to the amount necessary to kill them is 1 to 40,000. In
|
||
other words, to overdose, you would have to consume 40,000 times
|
||
as much marijuana as you needed to get stoned. In contrast, the
|
||
ratio for alcohol varies between 1 to 4 and 1 to 10. It is easy
|
||
to see how upwards of 5000 people die from alcohol overdoses
|
||
every year and no one EVER dies of marijuana overdoses.
|
||
|
||
Check us out
|
||
|
||
We believe that the truth is our strongest weapon. To date,
|
||
the prohibitionists have refused to meet us in public debate:
|
||
they fear the truth and know that they stand to lose in any
|
||
direct confrontation. They cower behind a wall of myths, lies,
|
||
and half truths. In the battles that lie ahead we will try to
|
||
flush the prohibitionists into the open. In order to be
|
||
successful in this goal, we will need to batter down the myths
|
||
and lies by giving our message the widest possible distribution.
|
||
|
||
Check us out. Listen to our Truth Squad, check our sources,
|
||
and ask us the tough questions. Examine our claims with a
|
||
skeptical, but open, mind. We feel that after looking at the
|
||
facts you will find it very hard to side with the prohibitionists
|
||
ever again.
|
||
|
||
We're looking for allies, declared or undeclared. Getting
|
||
the message out costs money. Our opponents dispose of literally
|
||
hundreds-of-millions of dollars. If you'd like to quietly donate
|
||
to the cause, send your contributions to the Hoosier Cannabis
|
||
Re-legalization Coalition at P.O. Box 5325, Bloomington, IN
|
||
47407. If you'd like to help in a more direct way contact me,
|
||
Paul Hager, at (812) 333-1384. Our meetings are open to the
|
||
public and we welcome new members. Contact us for more
|
||
information.
|
||
|
||
Sources
|
||
|
||
1) Marijuana and Health, Institute of Medicine, National
|
||
Academy of Sciences, 1982. Note: the Committee on Substance
|
||
Abuse and Habitual Behavior of the "Marijuana and Health"
|
||
study had its part of the final report suppressed when it
|
||
reviewed the evidence and recommended that possession of
|
||
small amounts of marijuana should no longer be a crime (TIME
|
||
magazine, July 19, 1982). The two JAMA studies are: Co,
|
||
B.T., Goodwin, D.W., Gado, M., Mikhael, M., and Hill, S.Y.:
|
||
"Absence of cerebral atrophy in chronic cannabis users",
|
||
JAMA, 237:1229-1230, 1977; and, Kuehnle, J., Mendelson,
|
||
J.H., Davis, K.R., and New, P.F.J.: "Computed tomographic
|
||
examination of heavy marijuana smokers", JAMA, 237:1231-
|
||
1232, 1977.
|
||
|
||
2) See Marijuana and Health, ibid., for information on this
|
||
research. See also, Marijuana Reconsidered (1978) by Dr.
|
||
Lester Grinspoon.
|
||
|
||
3) See "A Comparison of Marijuana Users and Non-users" by
|
||
Norman Zinberg and Andrew Weil (1971). This showed a
|
||
negative correlation between use of marijuana and use of
|
||
alcohol. A recent article about the Dutch experience is
|
||
written up in "The Economics of Legalizing Drugs", by
|
||
Richard J. Dennis, The Atlantic Monthly, Vol 266, No. 5, Nov
|
||
1990, p. 130.
|
||
|
||
4) See a review of studies and their methodology in "Marijuana
|
||
and Immunity", Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Vol 20(1),
|
||
Jan-Mar 1988. Studies showing stimulation of the immune
|
||
system: Kaklamani, et al., "Hashish smoking and T-
|
||
lymphocytes", 1978; Kalofoutis et al., "The significance of
|
||
lymphocyte lipid changes after smoking hashish", 1978. The
|
||
1988 study: Wallace, J.M., Tashkin, D.P., Oishi, J.S.,
|
||
Barbers, R.G., "Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subpopulations
|
||
and Mitogen Responsiveness in Tobacco and Marijuana
|
||
Smokers", 1988, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, ibid.
|
||
|
||
5) For current information on cannabis drinks see Working Men
|
||
and Ganja: Marijuana Use in Rural Jamaica by M. C. Dreher,
|
||
Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1982, ISBN 0-89727-
|
||
025-8. For information on cannabis and actual cancer risk,
|
||
see Marijuana and Health, ibid.
|
||
|
||
6) For a survey of studies relating to cannabis and highway
|
||
accidents see "Marijuana, Driving and Accident Safety", by
|
||
Dale Gieringer, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, ibid.
|
||
|
||
7) For information about the Partnership ad, see Jack Herer's
|
||
book, The Emperor Wears No Clothes, 1990, p. 74. For
|
||
information on memory and the alpha brainwave enhancement
|
||
effect, see "Marijuana, Memory, and Perception", by R. L.
|
||
Dornbush, M.D., M. Fink, M.D., and A. M. Freedman, M.D.,
|
||
presented at the 124th annual meeting of the American
|
||
Psychiatric Association, May 3-7, 1971.
|
||
|
||
8) See Marijuana and Health, ibid. Also see "Marijuana,
|
||
Memory, and Perception", ibid.
|
||
|
||
9) The fat solubility of cannabinoids and certain vitamins is
|
||
well known. See Marijuana and Health, ibid. For some
|
||
information on vitamin A, see "The A Team" in Scientific
|
||
American, Vol 264, No. 2, February 1991, p. 16.
|
||
|
||
10) See "Too Many Rodent Carcinogens: Mitogenesis Increases
|
||
Mutagenesis", Bruce N. Ames and Lois Swirsky Gold, Science,
|
||
Vol 249, 31 August 1990, p. 971.
|
||
|
||
11) Cannabis and alcohol toxicity is compared in Marijuana
|
||
Reconsidered, ibid., p. 227. Yearly alcohol overdoses was
|
||
taken from "Drug Prohibition in the United States: Costs,
|
||
Consequences, and Alternatives" by Ethan A. Nadelmann,
|
||
Science, Vol 245, 1 September 1989, p. 943.
|
||
|
||
|