519 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
519 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
|
|
From: mtymp15@staff.tc.umn.edu (51pmytm)
|
|
Subject: Re: Good method for isomerising CNB to THC?
|
|
Message-ID: <mtymp15.738787683@staff.tc.umn.edu>
|
|
Date: Sun, 30 May 1993 18:48:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
In <1ualkiINNr50@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk> maupb@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J L Saunders) writes:
|
|
|
|
>Hi there. I've heard about isomerising, and wondered if there are any good
|
|
>methods out there. I haven't been able to find it in any of the FAQs. If it is
|
|
>covered in detail in an FAQ could you point me to where I can find it?
|
|
|
|
Here is one from the archive:
|
|
|
|
From: bprofane@netcom.com (Gert Niewahr)
|
|
|
|
Isomerization: This method is out of "Dr. Atomic's Marijuana
|
|
Multiplier," one of those early 70's doper pamphlets. This process
|
|
assumes you have pure hash oil to begin with.
|
|
|
|
"Dissolve the hash oil in absolute ethanol or pure methanol in the ratio
|
|
of one gram extract to ten grams solvent. There must be no water in
|
|
this solution, as the next step is the addition of one drop of 100%
|
|
sulfuric acid per gram of extract. Add the acid slowly, drop by drop,
|
|
stirring slowly and completely, with a long glass stirring rod. Place a
|
|
Pyrex pot containing the extract-alcohol-acid solution into the
|
|
refluxing apparatus and reflux for two hours. The acid will not
|
|
evaporate and will remain in the Pyrex pot. Allow to cool. Take the
|
|
cooled solution, pour with an equal volume of water and 1/2 volume of
|
|
petroleum ether into the ether-extraction apparatus (separation funnel).
|
|
Allow to settle, and drain the ether extract layer. This leaves an
|
|
ether-extract-acid mix from which the acid must be purged. To
|
|
accomplish this, pour the ether-extract-solution into four volumes of 5%
|
|
sodium bicarbonate solution (1 gram bicarb. in 20 grams of water). This
|
|
will neutralize the acid, releasing CO2 and leaving a solution of sodium
|
|
sulphate. Allow this to settle into layers, then drain the
|
|
ether-extract layer. Mix the ether-extract solution with an equal
|
|
volume of pure water and let it separate. Drain off the ether-extract
|
|
layer. Evaporate the ether and what remains is hash oil in which all of
|
|
the cannabinoids have been converted into THC."
|
|
|
|
Oh my, having just typed all this in, I thought to check my copy of
|
|
"Cannabis Alchemy" for a method. Not only does it concur with this
|
|
method of isomerization, it has lots of whiz hints on fractionally
|
|
distilling hash oil to get an ultra-pure product. It also claims that
|
|
if you convert THC to its acetate, it becomes very potent and
|
|
psychedelic. Yow.
|
|
|
|
=-=end cut=-=
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Message-ID: <163302Z02101993@anon.penet.fi>
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
|
|
From: an13252@anon.penet.fi (the Objectivist)
|
|
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1993 16:28:12 UTC
|
|
Subject: FILE: Isomerization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Treatise on the Alchemical Method of Isomerization
|
|
of Tetrahydrocannabinol, and the Extraction and Purification thereof
|
|
Version 2.4
|
|
Oct 02 1993 12:14:31 AM EST
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
I am not a trained chemist. You probably aren't, either. I am not responsible
|
|
for your actions, and you are not responsible for mine.
|
|
|
|
Overview and Theory
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The threefold object of this procedure is to extract from the vegetative
|
|
material of the cannabis plant a crude oil, to further purify this extract,
|
|
and finally, to rotate the molecules into their most pharmacologically active
|
|
form, the delta-9 isomer of THC. In the first step, the inert plant material
|
|
that remains is calcined (alcohol burned away and ashes cooked over low heat)
|
|
so that the Salt component of the plant is left behind. In the final step, an
|
|
acid is used to perform the actual molecule rotation (isomerization), and the
|
|
Salt (ashes) from the first step are added. This accomplishes two things: The
|
|
acid remaining in the solution is neutralized, and the Salt is once more
|
|
reunited with the Essence of the plant to produce a true alchemical
|
|
Manifestation.
|
|
|
|
Whatever your opinion of alchemy and belief, or lack thereof, in its validity
|
|
as a scientific discipline, the process I offer here for your use is tried and
|
|
true. If all safety precautions are taken and you invest patience and care in
|
|
your efforts, the procedures are quite safe, and the results well worth the
|
|
time and energy.
|
|
|
|
For further reading on the subject of alchemy:
|
|
|
|
Atwood, A Suggestive Inquiry into the Hermetic Mastery, 1850
|
|
Hitchcock, Remarks on Alchemy and the Alchemists, Boston, 1857
|
|
Waite, Lives of the Alchemystical Philosophers, London, 1888
|
|
" The Occult Sciences, London, 1891
|
|
Bacon, Mirror of Alchemy, 1597
|
|
S. le Doux, Dictionnaire Hermetique, 1695
|
|
Langlet de fresnoy, Histoire de la Philosophie Hermetique, 1792
|
|
" " Theatrum Chemicum, 1662
|
|
Valentine, Triumphal Chariot of Antimony, 1656
|
|
Redgrove, Alchemy Ancient and Modern
|
|
Figuier, L'Alchimie et les Alchimistes, Paris, 1857
|
|
|
|
Gold, D., Cannabis Alchemy, date unknown
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Bother Doing All This?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Cannabis has been used for thousands of years as one of the mildest, safest,
|
|
and most effective substances available for use in both recreational and
|
|
social relaxation, and as an organic treatment of many medical conditions.
|
|
However, when any plant material is burned, harmful smoke is produced
|
|
containing carbon monoxide and many other carcinogenic and toxic compounds
|
|
such as benzopyrene, benzanthracene, the nitrosamines (also found in bacon),
|
|
hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxides, acetaldehyde, toluene and phenol.
|
|
|
|
The female flowering tops of cannabis have been shown to contain less than
|
|
one-third the total "tars" than equivalent amounts of tobacco. and of
|
|
twenty-nine areas of the lung, only the large air passageway is irritated more
|
|
by cannabis than by tobacco. Cannabis also has a positive or neutral effect on
|
|
most other areas of the lung, and most of its negative impact upon the
|
|
respiratory system in general can be eliminated by use of a pipe which filters
|
|
the smoke through water before inhalation. However, there are still many times
|
|
when a person either cannot, or does not wish to, smoke. One example can be
|
|
found in the fact that cannabis can be excellent therapy, both medically and
|
|
emotionally, for persons with HIV, yet inhaling cannabis smoke increases the
|
|
risk of a fatal infection in the lungs, especially when the cannabis has been
|
|
improperly cured and dried and aspergillus fungus is present (note that this
|
|
fungus poses little or no health risk to persons with normally functioning
|
|
immune systems). The ingestion of purified THC is a much safer alternative in
|
|
such cases, having no effect whatsoever on the lungs if taken orally and
|
|
negligible effects on the lungs when vaporized and inhaled. Despite its
|
|
current verboten status in society at large, enough people have chosen to use
|
|
cannabis for one reason or another that I feel this information will find an
|
|
appreciative audience.
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that when THC is ingested through pyrolysis (burning and
|
|
smoking), only half of it is assimilated and used by the body. Ingesting
|
|
(eating/drinking) the hemp in a form that the gastrointestinal tract can best
|
|
deal with results in more THC being absorbed, but this has the possibility of
|
|
unknown effects via decarboxylation. In addition, it is difficult to precisely
|
|
gauge dosages when ingesting THC directly without the benefit of experience.
|
|
With vaporization, that THC which would have been burned and wasted becomes
|
|
available for whatever its intended effects. This is of great economic
|
|
advantage, given hemp's current artificially inflated market price. Also, the
|
|
smoker may easily titrate the doses (that is, easily self-administer them, at
|
|
whatever speed is best) until the desired effect is precisely achieved.
|
|
|
|
Finally, remember that this is a *VERY* time-consuming process. Make sure you
|
|
can either stay awake for as long as it takes, or have friends to work in
|
|
shifts. Obviously, the more solvent you have to boil off, the longer it will
|
|
take. Always assume it will take longer than you think. It's best to not rush
|
|
around, to ensure that you can take all the time you need to work on this at
|
|
the slow, steady pace it requires. It's not strictly necessary to do all the
|
|
stages immediately following each other -- you can take breaks in between
|
|
stages -- but it helps to keep your mind focused.
|
|
|
|
Now, with all the formalities concluded, let's begin.
|
|
|
|
Initial Extraction
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
In a previous version of this file, I recommended ethyl alcohol as the
|
|
menstruum (solvent) for the initial extraction. However, after further reading
|
|
and experimentation, I now recommend acetone instead of alcohol. THC's
|
|
solubility in acetone is, it would seem, much greater than with any other
|
|
solvent (except for petroleum ether, which we use in stage 2 to purify this
|
|
first-stage oil). The reason? Alcohols are too water soluble for the best
|
|
possible purity, and too many other non-psychoactive materials remain in the
|
|
finished oil. In the interest of brevity, and to save wear and tear on your
|
|
obedient typist's fingers, it's your own responsibility when reading the
|
|
following to substitute "acetone" wherever you see "alcohol" used.
|
|
|
|
Fill a large pot with water, and heat to boiling. Place in the water a glass
|
|
jar filled with loosely packed, cleaned female flowers of cannabis. (Male
|
|
flowers and even leaves may be used, but only if there is no other
|
|
alternative.)
|
|
|
|
Add sufficient solvent to completely cover cannabis. Solvent may be any
|
|
alcohol of 95% or greater purity (i.e., rubbing alcohol works), but ethyl
|
|
alcohol is best, as it is non-toxic and will not harm you if you "screw up".
|
|
My personal recommendation is either 99.99% laboratory alcohol, or, since this
|
|
is damn difficult to acquire, Everclear 190 proof grain alcohol. 151 proof rum
|
|
isn't the greatest, but if the others are too hard to acquire, this may be
|
|
your only option.
|
|
|
|
MAKE SURE THAT THE SMALL GLASS JAR IS HELD IN PLACE SOMEHOW! Otherwise, when
|
|
enough of the solvent boils away, the jar will be light enough that the water
|
|
pressure will tip it over, and then you will be extremely unhappy (and
|
|
possibly unlucky enough to witness a gigantic ball of flame lighting up your
|
|
kitchen, and maybe even yourself). A set of rubber lab grips attached to a
|
|
heavy base works nicely.
|
|
|
|
Place a watchglass over the top of the jar so that the alcohol will be
|
|
constantly recirculated instead of boiling off, and keep water at a gentle
|
|
boil for three to four hours. Let everything cool, and strain all liquid
|
|
thoroughly from the plant fibers.
|
|
|
|
Place fibers in a cast iron skillet. Ignite the alcohol to burn it off, and
|
|
while you continue with the extraction of the essence, keep a very low flame
|
|
under the ashes of the fibers for one hour, stirring them occasionally. If you
|
|
have an assistant, it's best to have them stir the ashes while you keep
|
|
working with the essence.
|
|
|
|
To remove the alcohol, you need an accurate thermometer. Set up the system the
|
|
same way as before, but this time, do not cover the jar. Place thermometer in
|
|
jar and heat the essence to 220F. Keep a small mirror held over the jar. When
|
|
the mirror stops fogging up -- i.e., no more steam -- enough of the water has
|
|
boiled away. IMMEDIATELY turn off the heat and remove the jar from the hot
|
|
water (don't forget to wear gloves!). This is crude extract, and can contain
|
|
anywhere from 10 to 50 percent THC.
|
|
|
|
It's perfectly all right to use this oil any way you like. But you can do
|
|
better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purification Stage
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
To further extract and purify the essence, petroleum ether must be used as the
|
|
solvent. USE ONLY ELECTRIC HEAT WITH A QUICK SHUTOFF SWITCH, AND DON'T LET
|
|
OPEN FLAME ANYWHERE NEAR YOU! Petroleum ether is one of the most explosively
|
|
flammable things in existence, so treat it accordingly -- keep the container
|
|
in the freezer at all times unless you actually need some.
|
|
|
|
Dissolve the crude extract from the previous step in 5 times its own weight of
|
|
ether, amd add to this volume an equal volume of water. Both the water and the
|
|
ether must be as cold as possible. Close the holding container TIGHTLY, and
|
|
gently shake up and down. Uncap to relieve pressure buildup, re-cap, and
|
|
repeat until you're sick of it. Set it down somewhere cool and safe, where it
|
|
won't get knocked or vibrated, and let it settle into layers. This will take
|
|
about a half hour.
|
|
|
|
(The bottom layer consists of alcohol, water, tars, and minor resins. The next
|
|
layer up is the emulsion layer, and the top layer is the ether extract which
|
|
is holding the THC in suspension.)
|
|
|
|
Now you need to blow the bottom two layers into another container, which is
|
|
easy to do if you set up the first container as a bong. Attach a tube to where
|
|
the bowl would normally go and hang the other end in the sink. Very gently,
|
|
blow into the tube where you would normally inhale. MAKE SURE THE BOTTOM END
|
|
OF THE TUBE THAT EXTENDS DOWN INTO THE CONTAINER IS *ALL* THE WAY DOWN TO THE
|
|
BOTTOM! Otherwise, you will blow all the good stuff into the sink, and you
|
|
will be very unhappy. Just watch the water level, and don't blow too hard.
|
|
Don't try to get every last drop; just get as much as you can without getting
|
|
too close to the ether-THC layer.
|
|
|
|
If you like, add more ether and water and repeat this stage. When it's
|
|
purified enough for your taste, cook the ether extract in the double boiler at
|
|
104F to evaporate the ether, again making sure to hold the extract jar in
|
|
place.
|
|
|
|
This being the next step up from crude, I guess you'd call this resulting
|
|
sticky stuff "forty-weight", or something like that. And, as before, it's
|
|
perfectly fine to stop here. Read on for the gory details on the final
|
|
stage...because you know you can do better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isomerization
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This stage rotates all the existing lesser cannabinoids and cannabinols into
|
|
THC, and all the existing THC into the most active isomer, delta-9-THC. This
|
|
step involves the use of sulfuric acid, so I shouldn't have to remind you to
|
|
wear long rubber gloves, don't inhale its fumes, DON'T TREAT IT CASUALLY
|
|
BECAUSE IT CAN EAT HOLES IN LOTS OF THINGS, INCLUDING YOU.
|
|
|
|
Dissolve the extract in 10 times its own weight in ether. SLOWLY, add one drop
|
|
of sulfuric acid for each gram of extract, stirring with a glass rod. Heat as
|
|
in the initial extraction, with the jar covered by a watchglass. Cook two
|
|
hours, stirring occasionally, and allow to cool.
|
|
|
|
Mix the solution with an equal volume of cold water and one-half its volume of
|
|
cold ether, and repeat the shaking and separation steps. Take extract and
|
|
slowly add the calcined ash from the first extraction. Stir it all in, and run
|
|
the solution through filter paper to strain the ash sediment out. Check for
|
|
any remaining acid by adding a small pinch of sodium bicarbonate (baking
|
|
soda). If the solution fizzes, keep adding bicarb very slowly until fizzing
|
|
stops.
|
|
|
|
Add fresh water and ether, shake and separate. Cook at 104F until the ether is
|
|
evaporated. Voila! You now have essence of cannabis, which can contain
|
|
anywhere from 85 to 99 percent THC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Yield and Consumption Methods
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
In general, you can expect to produce about one ounce of oil per pound of
|
|
cannabis. Depending on the potency of the individual plant, of course, this
|
|
amount can vary greatly; however, the potency of the finished essence will
|
|
always be of the highest possible.
|
|
|
|
To use the oil in cooking, thoroughly mix it into a fat or oil. Examples: sour
|
|
cream, olive oil, milk. For best results, the resulting mixture should be
|
|
GENTLY heated before adding it to the rest of the food. Example: mix oil with
|
|
butter over low heat, and use as regular butter in cookies, etc.
|
|
|
|
To "vaporize" the oil, place it on a metal surface (tinfoil works, too). Heat
|
|
the surface, and inhale the vapors through a tube. For best results, build a
|
|
"vaporizer" machine with an enclosed area so as not to waste the vapors (plans
|
|
can be found in back issues of _High Times_ magazine). Actually, it doesn't
|
|
REALLY "vaporize" in the strict technical meaning of the word, but I'll assume
|
|
noone cares about atmospheric pressures and such.
|
|
|
|
The oil can even be mixed with crude cannabis and smoked in a cigarette, and
|
|
although half of the potency is lost due to the burning, it's still fun, and
|
|
tastes wonderful. My preferred method of doing this is to use a long, thick
|
|
needle and heat it with a lighter for about 3 seconds. Wait just a second
|
|
before dipping it into the essence -- if it's too hot, the oil will vaporize
|
|
on contact and be wasted. Don't dip it in too far at first until you get the
|
|
hang of working with this stuff; it has a very unique consistency and
|
|
behavior, and it sticks to damn near anything.
|
|
|
|
Lay a cigarette paper (preferably Modiano; these have the lowest content of
|
|
"residue" materials) out flat, holding it down with your fingers at both
|
|
sides. "Paste" the oil onto the paper with the needle, putting a nice, even
|
|
coat over as large an area as you can get without smudging your fingers (leave
|
|
a little unncoated space near each edge so you can roll it without getting
|
|
your fingers covered in oil). Roll your cannabis in the paper as you would
|
|
normally.
|
|
|
|
Before smoking the rolled cigarette, place in a LOW warm oven (100-125F) for
|
|
five to ten minutes to melt the oil. This will not only distribute it more
|
|
evenly by soaking into the cannabis, but the heat will bring the taste and
|
|
potency to its peak potential. Smoke while still warm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dosage
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
For an average cannabis user who smokes perhaps once or twice per day, 3 or
|
|
4 drops of the essence, either eaten or vaporized, will be quite sufficient
|
|
for an enjoyable "high" of four to five hours. For a novice user, 1 or 2
|
|
drops will usually be quite enough. Individual idiosyncrasies are always
|
|
present, and no two people will need the same amount, nor will they be
|
|
affected the same way. Some rare individuals may experience paranoia and
|
|
psychotic reactions to cannabis, and such individuals would be well advised
|
|
to discontinue its use. But on the whole, cannabis is a safe and enjoyable
|
|
pleasure to be enjoyed in moderation, like anything pleasant in life, and
|
|
truly lives up to its reputation as it has for thousands of years. DEA Judge
|
|
Francis Young in September, 1988, called it "in its natural form, one of the
|
|
safest therapeutically active substances known to man." May it continue to
|
|
be enjoyed as long as life exists on Earth.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
|
|
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
|
|
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
|
|
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
From: verdant@twain.ucs.umass.edu (Sol Lightman)
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
|
|
Subject: Re: FILE: Isomerization
|
|
Date: 2 Oct 1993 16:46:39 GMT
|
|
Message-ID: <28kb9f$nsp@nic.umass.edu>
|
|
|
|
A shorter description of the procedure is available in
|
|
``Marijuana Chemistry'' by Michael Starks. ISBN 0-914171-39-9
|
|
|
|
Brian
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst | _________,^-.
|
|
Cannabis Reform Coalition ( | ) ,>
|
|
S.A.O. Box #2 \|/ {
|
|
415 Student Union Building `-^-' ? )
|
|
UMASS, Amherst MA 01003 verdant@twain.ucs.umass.edu |____________ `--~ ;
|
|
\_,-__/
|
|
* To find out about our on-line library, mail a message with the
|
|
* pattern "{{{readme}}}" contained IN THE SUBJECT LINE.
|
|
* You will be mailed instructions; your message will be otherwise ignored
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Message-ID: <055302Z19121993@anon.penet.fi>
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
|
|
From: an58614@anon.penet.fi
|
|
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1993 05:46:37 UTC
|
|
Subject: Hash Oil Isomerization
|
|
|
|
Apologies if this question has been answered before,
|
|
but my newsreader tends to miss a lot of postings.
|
|
|
|
Treatment with acid, according to my understanding, does not cause
|
|
isomerization of THC, but converts the cannabidiol to delta-9-THC. Since
|
|
cannabidiol represents a significant proportion of the cannabinoids in
|
|
extracted plant material, making this conversion can make a big
|
|
difference in the potency of the product.
|
|
|
|
In the dim, dark, distant past I have treated extracted plant materials
|
|
with 0.05% HCl in ethanol by refluxing for 2 hours. I have never done a
|
|
controlled study to determine if this was doing any good, but I can
|
|
verify that it certainly doesn't do any harm.
|
|
|
|
Pertinient references (for completists):
|
|
|
|
Mikes and Waser, Science (172), 1158-1159, June 11, 1971 (see
|
|
references in footnote 8).
|
|
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, (v60, n10), 1433-1457, Ocotober,
|
|
1971 (see esp p1440).
|
|
|
|
Hope this is a help.
|
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
|
|
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
|
|
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
|
|
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,alt.hemp
|
|
From: andy@eng.tridom.com (Andrew P. Klenzak)
|
|
Subject: Isomerization (was Re: HASH OIL TASTES LIKE SH*T)
|
|
Message-ID: <CI74FJ.62p@tridom.com>
|
|
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 20:18:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article A8644wk@asb.com, max.fordham@asb.com writes:
|
|
>
|
|
>NE>>Have you folx heard any of "isomerization" of hash oil? Supposedly,
|
|
>NE>>treating hash-oil with dilute HCl acid under certain circumstances
|
|
>NE>>allows conversion of some weak/non-psychoactive THC's in the oil to the
|
|
>NE>>more potent delta-9 THC. In some cases, it is reported to increase
|
|
>NE>>potency by 3-5 times, depending I guess on the ratios of weak THCs in
|
|
>NE>>the original material. Something about "isomeric rotations of
|
|
>NE>>the THC molecules" or something.... Anybody interested, I'll give ya
|
|
>NE>>some references as to where to find info on thee process next time...
|
|
>
|
|
>NE>Yes very interested!! Tell me more! Tell me more!
|
|
>
|
|
>OK, now that I have my copy of "Dr. Atomic's Marijuana Multiplier" in
|
|
>front of me, I see that he used Sulfuric acid, not HCl. Isomerization
|
|
>coverts cannabidiol and weak THCs to yer favorite #9. Anywhere from
|
|
>double to 5 times original potency.
|
|
|
|
per Cannabis Alchemy,
|
|
|
|
Cannabidiol
|
|
|
|
|
| Heat and
|
|
| H+ (from the acid)
|
|
|
|
|
\ /
|
|
|
|
Delta-9 THC (using formal numbering)
|
|
Delta-1 THC (using monoterpenoid numbering)
|
|
|
|
|
| Heat and
|
|
| H+ (from a stronger acid acting longer)
|
|
|
|
|
\ /
|
|
|
|
Delta-6 THC (aka Delta-8 THC -- depends on the numbering system used)
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Delta-6 THC is a higher-rotating form of tetrahydrocannabinol.
|
|
D. Gold (author of Cannabis Alchemy) suggests that the higher-rotating
|
|
forms "are more potent than the low-rotating and produce a higher,
|
|
more psychedelic and spritual effect." He notes a study done by
|
|
Mechoulan (1970) which showed little difference between the
|
|
pharmacological effects of Delta-9 and Delta-6. I'll leave it to
|
|
the reader to experiment for him/herself.
|
|
|
|
The "rotating" spoken of here refers to the relative positions of
|
|
the double bonding in the THC molecule. [chemists out there feel
|
|
free to chime in...]
|
|
|
|
The first reaction, Cannabidiol --> Delta-9 THC, is, I think, what
|
|
is generally referred to as isomerization. This can occur in an
|
|
absolute ethanol solution with .05% HCL boiled for 2 hours (the
|
|
"hash" oil is in solution in the ethanol, obviously). The
|
|
increase in potency you'll get depends on the relative amounts of
|
|
Cannabidiol and THC in the original oil. If there were 1 part
|
|
THC and 1 part Cannabidiol, then you might expect a doubling of
|
|
potency after isomerization.
|
|
|
|
The second reaction, Delta-1/9 --> Delta-6/8, is an additional step to
|
|
get the allegedly more potent higher-rotating form of THC. It requires
|
|
more vigorous conditions. D. Gold notes that in a toluene solution
|
|
with p-toluenesulfonic acid for 10 hours at 100 degrees C there is a
|
|
90% conversion rate of Delta-1 to Delta-6 (the THC/hash oil is in
|
|
solution in the toluene).
|
|
|
|
Gold also gives a discussion about producing THC acetate, which he
|
|
says has *twice* the potency of regular THC. It's very involved,
|
|
and potentially hazardous...
|
|
|
|
>Instead, I would recommend either/or/both _Cannabis_Alchemy_(CA) by
|
|
>Gold, approx.US$12.95(prices from an old catalog from '92), or better
|
|
>yet, _Marijuana_Chemistry_(MC), by Starks, for about US$19.95.
|
|
>
|
|
>I've "paged through" CA, and it was reasonably detailed, etc, though,
|
|
>from what I have heard, the higher price of MC is well justified by the
|
|
>great thoroughness.
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen Marijuana Chemistry, but CA is not real heavy into the
|
|
theory and chemical conversion steps, but does include a few pertinent
|
|
references/citations and lots of practical how-to advice and instructions.
|
|
|
|
It's the holidays folks -- go ahead and order them BOTH and do some fun
|
|
reading. You'll most assuredly learn something.
|
|
|
|
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|