181 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
181 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
_______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : PROPRIET.ASC | Online Date : 09/14/94 |
|
|
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : UNCLASS |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
FROM:
|
|
|
|
TESLA BBS
|
|
(719) 486-2775 DATA
|
|
300,1200,2400
|
|
(8,N,1)
|
|
(303) 824-6834 VOICE
|
|
|
|
INSIGHTS INTO THE PROPRIETARY SYNDROME
|
|
|
|
By KEN MacNEILL
|
|
|
|
Cadake Industries
|
|
Winter Haven, Florida
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
To give you some background on myself, I have been interested in the energy
|
|
situation since I can remember. I have built all kinds of devices, solar
|
|
energy panels, windmills, photovoltaic arrays, flywheel devices, and also
|
|
carburetors of which I will talk on Sunday. In my background I am an
|
|
accomplished tool and diemaker, moldmaker, been involved in Design Engineering
|
|
for the past 12 years, primarily in the automation area.
|
|
|
|
My first real involvement with other people in this alternate energy area was
|
|
at the Toronto Symposium in 1981 where I met George Hathaway as well as over
|
|
100 other people that believe in the impossible according to orthodox science.
|
|
Since that time I have make myself aware of just about everything that is
|
|
happening in this field, and believe me there are some really fantastic things
|
|
going on. The rediscovery of some of the technology that was lost in the past
|
|
is finally coming to realization, for instance the Tesla technology, the
|
|
Hubbard device, the Moray approach to tapping into the free energy supply that
|
|
we're sitting in without even knowing it.
|
|
|
|
A friend of mine gave me a real insight possibly without even knowing it. He
|
|
said the problem could only be solved by just considering the problem of
|
|
weighing a glass of water at 500 feet under water. Here you are under water
|
|
with a glass of water: how do you weigh it???
|
|
|
|
The analogy is the same for us. Here we sit in the vastness of the cosmos on
|
|
top of one of the biggest magnets known to us and we are like the glass of
|
|
water. We are in the vast ocean of energy. Look around us and watch just the
|
|
weather for instance, the next thunderstorm, think of all the electrical
|
|
potential being wasted. That energy is there; it is very real.
|
|
|
|
Tom Bearden, one of our upcoming speakers, may have illustrated it quite well
|
|
by the bird sitting on top of the wire with 13,000 volts going through it. We
|
|
all know that it could kill him but is doesn't. I am positive that within this
|
|
group will be the ways and means for making the energy situation of the future
|
|
change.
|
|
|
|
Now to the other side of this coin. Why has not this technology been allowed
|
|
to become established? We have to look at the 'profit motive' involved. If we
|
|
have free energy, how will they charge for it? What will happen to the
|
|
billions of dollars that the utilities and oil companies and the government
|
|
backing these establishments do if we can give the people independence from the
|
|
chains of having to pay for energy?
|
|
|
|
One question that has been uppermost in my mind for the last year has been the
|
|
rhetoric given by our elected representatives about the energy situation and
|
|
the amount of money given to small researchers who could possibly give us a
|
|
viable approach to becoming energy independent. Who gets the government
|
|
money?? Let me get a little audience participation in the question. How many
|
|
of you have all the money you need for research in the energy area? Everyone
|
|
who has please stand!!!!! Now let me mention a few of the names of the
|
|
companies that get the money. See if you recognize them: Exxon, Gulf Oil,
|
|
General Electric, Westinghouse, TRW, Exide Storage Battery, all manufacturers
|
|
or producers of fossil fuel products. We need to get away from the fossil
|
|
fuels for the future and get into something that can indeed give us a future
|
|
because we are rapidly depleting not only our natural resources but our air
|
|
and water. All because of burning fossil fuels. We fund our universities and
|
|
colleges in the most directed of ways. If you want to explore the
|
|
possibilities in some some of the more esoteric areas, for instance the ones
|
|
you will be hearing about in the next three days, there is no money for that.
|
|
WHY??? Because of the possibility that we might succeed. What would our
|
|
government do if all the American people could go back and forth to work, heat
|
|
their homes, run their businesses without paying taxes on gas and oil?
|
|
Consider the fact that all of the gas stations would go out of business or
|
|
would have to find other ways of making money. Many complimentary businesses
|
|
would also fold. But alas, this is America. What are we here for??? To
|
|
perpetuate Big Business, Big Government, or to advance toward the future, not
|
|
expending all of our natural resources but to save them to make the goods of
|
|
the future. Coal and oil both can be used for making all kinds of things
|
|
besides fuels; the list is endless.
|
|
|
|
It is my feeling that the technology may be already here and may have been
|
|
shown to the government. It even may have been introduced to our patent office
|
|
and turned down. Because as you know, there is no such thing as a perpetual
|
|
motion device. And I agree with the premise because forever is a long time.
|
|
|
|
But there are surely some of the devices or parts thereof that have been
|
|
introduced to the government or to big business in the past which have been
|
|
shelved. Tesla's transmission device is a classic illustration probably best
|
|
known to this group. What happened is that they removed the money from him to
|
|
do his research and effectively stifled this remarkable man. How many other
|
|
times has it happened to someone not so well known? At this moment, there
|
|
are over 3,000 devices or applications in the patent office that have been
|
|
branded as security or put under wraps by the secrecy order, Title 35, U.S.
|
|
Code (1952) Sections 181-188. What is security? How is it defined? I have
|
|
had many inventors or other scientists tell me that they did not want to
|
|
discuss their invention with me or others because they might lose it to us or
|
|
we might tell someone else before they got it onto the market.
|
|
|
|
Believe me, it won't get there by going through the patent process. It is my
|
|
feeling that if such a device were introduced at this level, then it would be
|
|
put under the Secrecy Act. I don't know that I am correct in this assumption.
|
|
But I cannot imagine a government like ours wanting to commit financial
|
|
suicide. So what better way than to brand something as a secret?
|
|
|
|
I would like to read the Secrecy Order to you so that you may better understand
|
|
my concern. Please pay close attention. I think it is very important. To you
|
|
or anyone!!! Consider your receiving this:
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
SECRECY ORDER
|
|
(Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188)
|
|
|
|
NOTICE: To the applicant above named, his heirs, and any and all
|
|
of his assignees, attorneys and agents, hereinafter designated
|
|
principals:
|
|
|
|
You are hereby notified that your application as above identified has been
|
|
found to contain subject matter, the unauthorized disclosure of which might be
|
|
detrimental to the national security, and you are ordered in nowise to publish
|
|
or disclose the invention or any material information with respect thereto,
|
|
including hitherto unpublished details of the subject matter of said
|
|
application, in any way to any person not cognizant of the invention prior to
|
|
the date of the order, including any employee of the principals, but to keep
|
|
the same secret except by written consent first obtained of the Commissioner of
|
|
Patents, under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186.
|
|
|
|
Any other application already filed or hereafter filed which contains any
|
|
significant part of the subject matter of the above identified application
|
|
falls within the scope of this order. If such other application does not stand
|
|
under a security order, it and the common subject matter should be brought to
|
|
the attention of the Security Group, Licensing and Review, Patent Office.
|
|
|
|
If, prior to the issuance of the secrecy order, any significant part of the
|
|
subject matter has been revealed to any person, the principals shall promptly
|
|
inform such person of the secrecy order and the penalties for improper
|
|
disclosure. However, if such part of the subject matter was disclosed to any
|
|
person in a foreign country or foreign national in the U.S., the principals
|
|
shall not inform such person of the secrecy order, but instead shall promptly
|
|
furnish to the Commissioner of Patents the following information to the extent
|
|
not already furnished: date of disclosure; name and address of the disclosee;
|
|
identification of such part; and any authorization by a U.S. government agency
|
|
to export such part. If the subject matter is included in any foreign patent
|
|
application, or patent, this should be identified. The principals shall comply
|
|
with any related instructions of the Commissioner.
|
|
|
|
This order should not be construed in any way to mean that the Government has
|
|
adopted or contemplates adoption of the alleged invention disclosed in this
|
|
application; nor is it any indication of the value of such invention.
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
It is my feeling that something on the order of a so-called 'free energy
|
|
device' would receive this treatment. My only approach would be to go to the
|
|
public domain. That is, get the information or the device out there to enough
|
|
people that they could not stop you. This group looks like the best group to
|
|
give this information to. Hopefully it will forthcoming in the next three
|
|
days.
|
|
-------
|
|
Transcribed from: PROCEEDINGS; The Second International Symposium
|
|
on Non-Conventional Energy Technology, pp 125-126.
|
|
|
|
I have been told this was presented on September 23, 1983.
|
|
|
|
Contact Ken MacMeill at Cadake Industries, P.O. Box 1866, Clayton,
|
|
GA 30525.
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|