199 lines
8.8 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
8.8 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
April 21 1991
|
|
|
|
CENTER2.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This s a letter to the Editor response to an article in the
|
|
now defunct Flying Saucer magazine - September 1962.
|
|
That article is listed on KeelyNet as CENTER1.ASC.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Dear Ray (Palmer - Editor);
|
|
|
|
Your recent Earth's "Center of Gravity" article dealing with
|
|
one aspect of the most baffling of scientific mysteries -
|
|
gravitation - was most informative. Any kind of a breakthrough with
|
|
the possible negation or neutralization of gravity would result in
|
|
fantastic possibilities.
|
|
|
|
With suspended plumb tools NOT pointing DIRECTLY TO the Earth's
|
|
center, one of the accepted PROOFS of a SPHERICAL EARTH is
|
|
DISCREDITED.
|
|
|
|
Other "PROOFS", many of which FLYING SAUCERS (magazine) has
|
|
REFUTED, are:
|
|
|
|
1) that the Earth IS circumnavigable
|
|
2) what really causes the ship's hull to point down
|
|
3) the Earth's shadow on an eclipsed Moon
|
|
4) the pole star angle ABOVE the horizon
|
|
5) high altitude photographs of the Earth's shape
|
|
6) meteors curve BEHIND the horizon
|
|
7) and satellites orbit the globe.
|
|
|
|
Placing the center of gravity at Earth's radius IN SPACE
|
|
between the Van Allen radiation belt seems like a modified version
|
|
of the old theory of gravity being a PUSH of SPACE CHARGES instead
|
|
of a PULL, with the larger sphere of matter HAVING A GREATER RATE OF
|
|
ABSORPTION.
|
|
|
|
The exact site of the French plumb bob tests is of interest
|
|
ESPECIALLY if near Calumet, Michigan, which has an approximate
|
|
latitude of 47 degrees North. With plumb line DIVERGENCIES
|
|
theorized as being CAUSED BY GRAVITY VARIATIONS due to the NEARNESS
|
|
of HIGH DENSITY or MASS, there may be a connection with the Michigan
|
|
tests being located in an iron-ore belt.
|
|
|
|
Although gravity readings near mountain masses MANY TIMES DO
|
|
NOT INCREASE as expected, one of the highest gravity readings in
|
|
recent times has been in mountainous Cyprus.
|
|
|
|
A current theory surmises CONTRACTION of the Earth has CEASED
|
|
and EXPANSION is NOW TAKING PLACE accompanied with a DECREASE IN THE
|
|
FORCE OF GRAVITY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the early twenties Dr. Charles F. Brush reported in "The
|
|
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society" that experiments
|
|
on gravity demonstrated that of two pendulums having the SAME
|
|
OSCILLATION LENGTH, a bismuth bob would GAIN ONE BEAT in 17.432 over
|
|
a zinc bob, with torsion balances of the SAME MATERIALS HAVING THE
|
|
SAME RESULTS. (this is what is now referred (1991) to as the FIFTH
|
|
FORCE - repulsion of matter.....Vangard Sciences)
|
|
|
|
Observations also showed ANOMALIES of CERTAIN SILICATES,
|
|
particularly Lintz Basalt (a German volcanic deposit) with
|
|
accelerations LESS THAN 980 centimeters IN FREE FALL.
|
|
|
|
These contradictions to the accepted view were speculated by
|
|
other experimenters to be due to DIAMAGNETISM (repellent to
|
|
magnetism), a temporary change in the universal constant of
|
|
gravitation, or a possible REACTIVE FORCE set up by the Earth's
|
|
thick UNDERCRUST OF BASALT, although nothing could be definitely
|
|
proven.
|
|
|
|
A 1960 theory suggests the geomagnetic field takes an ELONGATED
|
|
TEARDROP SHAPE with the size (of the teardrop) DEPENDING on the
|
|
STRENGTH OF SOLAR WIND PROTONS, much in the manner of comets with
|
|
their tails STRETCHING AWAY FROM THE SUN.
|
|
|
|
The deformed magnetic field boundary FACING THE SOLAR WIND is
|
|
considered to extend some 20,000 miles SUNWARD, then bulges twice as
|
|
far ON EITHER SIDE OF THE EARTH and finally TAPERS into a long
|
|
downward tail ON THE NIGHTTIME SIDE to an unestimated distance.
|
|
(ergo, a teardrop shape)
|
|
|
|
An interesting feature of this hypothesis is that not only the
|
|
tail but in the polar regions the magnetic field DOES NOT ROTATE
|
|
WITH THE EARTH, although SOME DISTORTION must take place.
|
|
|
|
It seems likely that periodically the Earth and Moon magnetic
|
|
fields WOULD OVERLAP.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard note...
|
|
|
|
Refer to the work of Michael Faraday, Bruce dePalma and
|
|
Paramahansa Tewari. Faraday found that iron filings entrained
|
|
by a magnetic field emanating from the poles of a cylindrical
|
|
magnet WOULD NOT TURN when the magnet was turned. This is an
|
|
anomaly of the first order and a KEY CONCEPT in free energy
|
|
and antigravity research.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Previous published correspondence on photographing the Earth
|
|
from a camera-carrying satellite arouses interest in the possible
|
|
maximum Earth coverage from various heights.
|
|
|
|
In the table is shown different altitudes, off-vertical viewing
|
|
angles, and the approximate surface distance from the vertical to
|
|
slant range at the horizon, based on 4000 statute miles as the Earth
|
|
radius, and 69.5 miles for each degree of circumference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altitude Viewing Ground
|
|
miles degrees miles
|
|
100 77 875
|
|
200 72 1230
|
|
500 63 1897
|
|
1000 53 2571
|
|
5000 26.5 4413
|
|
10000 16.5 5108
|
|
22240 8.7 5647
|
|
|
|
The last figure is the 24-hour observation satellite some 5.5
|
|
Earth radii distant all the while hovering over the same meridian.
|
|
|
|
A one second degree viewing angle at the distance of the moon,
|
|
about 10 times FURTHER than the 24-hour satellite, would cover a
|
|
mile on the surface of the earth.
|
|
|
|
Cedric Giles
|
|
523 Division Avenue
|
|
Carlstadt, NJ
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard note...
|
|
|
|
We have had the distinct pleasure of meeting Mr. Walter Wright,
|
|
THE modern proponent of the PUSH GRAVITY theory which will soon
|
|
be listed on KeelyNet.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wright has many proofs and excellent models to verify his
|
|
contentions. Videotapes of his models in operation are
|
|
excellent and have served to convince many scientists and lay
|
|
people of the validity of the PUSH GRAVITY model.
|
|
|
|
We refer you also to the work of Dr. Hans Nieper, listed on
|
|
KeelyNet as TACHYON1 and TACHYON2.
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|