661 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
661 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=78, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
October 16, 1990
|
||
|
||
listed on KeelyNet as
|
||
UFO4.ZIP
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
How to Build a Flying Saucer
|
||
After So Many
|
||
Amateurs
|
||
Have Failed
|
||
|
||
An essay in Speculative Engineering
|
||
|
||
by T. B. Pawlicki
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
At the end of the nineteenth century, the most distinguished
|
||
scientists and engineers declared that no known combination of
|
||
materials and locomotion could be assembled into a practical flying
|
||
machine. Fifty years later another generation of distinguished
|
||
scientists and engineers declared that it was technologically
|
||
infeasible for a rocket ship to reach the moon. Nevertheless, men
|
||
were getting off the ground and out into space even while these
|
||
words were uttered.
|
||
|
||
In the last half of the twentieth century, when technology is
|
||
advancing faster than reports can reach the public, it is
|
||
fashionable to hold the pronouncements of yesterday's experts to
|
||
ridicule. But there is something anomalous about the consistency
|
||
with which eminent authorities fail to recognize technological
|
||
advances even while they are being made. You must bear in mind that
|
||
these men are not given to making public pronouncements in haste;
|
||
their conclusions are reached after exhaustive calculations and
|
||
proofs, and they are better informed about their subject than anyone
|
||
else alive. But by and large, revolutionary advances in technology
|
||
do not contribute to the advantage of established experts, so they
|
||
tend to believe that the challenge cannot possibly be realized.
|
||
|
||
The UFO phenomenon is a perversity in the annals of
|
||
revolutionary engineering. On the one hand, public authorities deny
|
||
the existence of flying saucers and prove their existence to be
|
||
impossible. This is just as we should expect from established
|
||
experts. But on the other hand, people who believe that flying
|
||
saucers exist have produced findings that only tend to prove that
|
||
UFOs are technologically infeasible by any known combination of
|
||
materials and locomotion.
|
||
|
||
There is reason to suspect that the people who believe in the
|
||
existence of UFOs do not want to discover the technology because it
|
||
is not in the true believer's self interest that a flying saucer be
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
within the capability of human engineering. The true believer wants
|
||
to believe that UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin because he is
|
||
seeking some kind of relief from debt and taxes by an alliance with
|
||
superhuman powers.
|
||
|
||
If anyone with mechanical ability really wanted to know how a
|
||
saucer flies, he would study the testimonies to learn the flight
|
||
characteristics of this craft, and then ask, "How can we do this
|
||
saucer thing?" This is probably what Werner Von Braun said when he
|
||
decided that it was in his self-interest to launch man into space:
|
||
"How can we get this bird off the ground, and keep it off?"
|
||
|
||
Well, what is a flying saucer? It is a disc-shaped craft about
|
||
thirty feet in diameter with a dome in the center accommodating the
|
||
crew and, presumably, the operating machinery. And it flies. So
|
||
let us begin by building a disc-shaped airfoil, mount the cockpit
|
||
and the engine under a central canopy, and see if we can make it
|
||
fly. As a matter of fact, during World War II the United States
|
||
actually constructed a number of experimental aircraft conforming to
|
||
these specifications, and photographs of the craft are published
|
||
from time to time in popular magazines about science and flight. It
|
||
is highly likely that some of the UFO reports before 1950 were
|
||
sightings of these test flights. See how easy it is when you 'want'
|
||
to find answers to a mystery?
|
||
|
||
The mythical saucer also flies at incredible speeds. Well, the
|
||
speeds believed possible depend upon the time and place of the
|
||
observer. As stated earlier, a hundred years ago, twenty-five miles
|
||
per hour was legally prohibited in the belief that such a terrific
|
||
velocity would endanger human life. So replace the propeller of the
|
||
experimental disc airfoil with a modern aerojet engine. Is mach 3
|
||
fast enough for believers?
|
||
|
||
But the true saucer not only flies, it also hovers. You mean
|
||
like a Hovercraft? One professional engineer translated Ezekiel's
|
||
description of heavenly ships as a helicopter-cum-hovercraft.
|
||
|
||
But what of the anomalous electromagnetic effects manifest in
|
||
the space surrounding a flying saucer? Well, Nikola Tesla
|
||
demonstrated a prototype of an electronic device that was eventually
|
||
developed into the electron microscope, the television screen, an
|
||
aerospace engine called the Ion Drive. Since World War II, the
|
||
engineering of the Ion Drive has been advanced as the most promising
|
||
solution to the propulsion of interplanetary spaceships. The drive
|
||
operates by charging atomic particles and directing them with
|
||
electro-magnetic force as a jet to the rear, generating a forward
|
||
thrust in reaction. The advantage of the Ion Drive over chemical
|
||
rockets is that a spaceship can sweep in the ions it needs from its
|
||
flight path, like an aerojet sucks in air through its engines.
|
||
Therefore, the ship must carry only the fuel it needs to generate
|
||
the power for its chargers; there is no need to carry dead weight in
|
||
the form of rocket exhaust. There is another advantage to be
|
||
derived from ion rocketry: The top speed of a reaction engine is
|
||
limited by the ejection velocity of its exhaust. An ion jet is
|
||
close to the speed of light. If space travel is ever to be
|
||
practical, transport will have to achieve a large fraction of the
|
||
speed of light.
|
||
|
||
In 1972 the French journal Science et Avenir reported Franco-
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
American research into a method of ionizing the airstream flowing
|
||
over the wings to eliminate sonic boom, a serious objection to the
|
||
commercial success of the Concorde. Four years later a picture
|
||
appeared in an American tabloid of a model aircraft showing the
|
||
current state of development. The photograph shows a disc-shaped
|
||
craft, but not so thin as a saucer; it looks more like a flying
|
||
curling stone. In silent flight, the ionized air flowing around the
|
||
craft glows as a proper ufo should. The last word comes from an
|
||
engineering professor at the local university; he has begun
|
||
construction of a flying saucer in his backyard.
|
||
|
||
To the true believer, the flying saucer has no jet. It seems
|
||
to fly by some kind of antigravity. As antigravity is not known to
|
||
exist in physical theory or experimental fact in popular science,
|
||
the saucer is clearly alien and beyond human comprehension. But
|
||
antigravity depends upon what you conceive gravity to be, doesn't
|
||
it?
|
||
|
||
For all practical purposes, you do not have to understand what
|
||
Newton and Einstien mean by gravity. Gravity is an acceleration
|
||
downward, to the center of the earth. Therefore, antigravity is an
|
||
acceleration upward. As far as practical engineering is concerned,
|
||
any means to achieve a gain in altitude is an antigravity engine.
|
||
An airplane; a balloon; a rocket; a stepladder; all are antigravity
|
||
engines. See how easy it is to invent an antigravity engine?
|
||
|
||
There are three basic kinds of locomotive engines. The primary
|
||
principle is traction. The foot and the wheel are traction engines.
|
||
The traction engines depend upon friction against a surrounding
|
||
medium to generate movement, and locomotion can proceed only as far
|
||
and as speedily as the surrounding friction will provide. The
|
||
second principle is displacement. The balloon and the submarine
|
||
rise by displacing a denser medium; they descend by displacing less
|
||
that their weight. The tertiary drive is the rocket engine. A
|
||
rocket is driven by reaction from the mass of material it ejects.
|
||
Although a rocket is most efficient when not impeded by a
|
||
surrounding medium, it must carry not only it's fuel but also the
|
||
mass it must eject. As a consequence, the rocket is impractical
|
||
where powerful acceleration is required for extended drives. In
|
||
chemical rocketry, ten minutes is a long burn for powered flight.
|
||
What is needed for practical antigravity locomotion is a fourth
|
||
principle which does not depend upon a surrounding medium or
|
||
ejection of mass.
|
||
|
||
You must take notice that none of the principles of locomotion
|
||
required any new discovery. they have all been around for thousands
|
||
of years, and engineering only implemented the principle with
|
||
increasing efficiency. A fourth principle of locomotion has also
|
||
been around for thousands of years: It is centrifugal force.
|
||
Centrifugal force is the principle of the military sling and the
|
||
medieval catapult.
|
||
|
||
Everyone knows that centrifugal force can overcome gravity. If
|
||
directed upward, centrifugal force can be used to drive an
|
||
antigravity engine. The problem engineers have been unable to solve
|
||
is that centrifugal force is generated in all directions on the
|
||
plane of the centrifuge. It won't provide locomotion unless the
|
||
force can be concentrated in one direction. The solution of the
|
||
sling, of releasing the wheeling at the instant the centrifugal
|
||
|
||
Page 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
force is directed along the ballistic trajectory, has all the
|
||
inefficiencies of a cannon. The difficulty of the problem is not
|
||
real, however. There is a mental block preventing people from
|
||
perceiving a centrifuge as anything other than a flywheel.
|
||
|
||
A bicycle wheel is a flywheel. If you remove the rim and tire,
|
||
leaving only the spokes sticking out of the hub, you still have a
|
||
flywheel. In fact, spokes alone make a more efficient flywheel than
|
||
the complete wheel; this is because momentum only goes up only in
|
||
proportion to mass but with the square of speed. Spokes are made of
|
||
drawn steel with extreme tensile strength, so spokes alone can
|
||
generate the highest level of centrifugal force long after the rim
|
||
and tire have disintegrated. But spokes alone still generate
|
||
centrifugal force equally in all directions from the plane of
|
||
rotation. All you have to do to concentrate centrifugal force in
|
||
one direction is remove all the spokes but one. That one spoke
|
||
still functions as a flywheel, even though it is not a wheel any
|
||
longer.
|
||
|
||
See how easy it is once you accept an attitude of solving one
|
||
problem at a time as you come to it? You can even add a weight to
|
||
the end of the spoke to increase the centrifugal force.
|
||
|
||
But our centrifuge still generates a centrifugal force
|
||
acceleration in all directions around the plane of rotation even
|
||
though it doesn't generate acceleration equally in all directions at
|
||
the same time. All we have managed to do is make the whole ball of
|
||
wire wobble around the common center of mass between the axle and
|
||
free end of the spoke. To solve this problem, now that we have come
|
||
to it, we need merely to accelerate the spoke through a few degrees
|
||
of arc and then let it complete the cycle of revolution without
|
||
power. As long as it is accelerated during the same arc at each
|
||
cycle, the locomotive will lurch in one direction, albeit
|
||
intermittently. But don't forget that the piston engine also drives
|
||
intermittently. The regular centrifugal pulses can be evened out by
|
||
mounting several centrifuges on the same axle so that a pulse from
|
||
another flywheel takes over as soon as one pulse of power is past
|
||
it's arc.
|
||
|
||
The next problem facing us is that the momentum imparted to the
|
||
centrifugal spoke is carries it all around the cycle with little
|
||
loss of velocity. The amount of concentrated centrifugal force
|
||
carrying the engine in the desired direction is too low to be
|
||
practical. Momentum is half the product of mass multiplied by
|
||
velocity squared. Therefore, what we need is a spoke that has a
|
||
tremendous velocity with minimal mass. They don't make spokes like
|
||
that for bicycle wheels. A search through the engineers' catalog
|
||
however, turns up just the kind of centrifuge we need. An electron
|
||
has no mass at rest (you cannot find a smaller minimum mass than
|
||
that); all it's mass is inherent in its velocity. So we build an
|
||
electron raceway in the shape of a doughnut in which we can
|
||
accelerate an electron to a speed close to that of light. As the
|
||
speed of light is approached, the energy of acceleration is
|
||
converted to a momentum approaching infinity. s it happens, an
|
||
electron accelerator answering our need was developed by the
|
||
University of California during the last years of World War II. It
|
||
is called a betatron, and the doughnut is small enough to be carried
|
||
comfortably in a man's hands.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 4
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
We can visualize the operation of the Mark I from what is known
|
||
about particle accelerators. To begin with, high energy electrons
|
||
ionize the air surrounding them. This causes the betatrons to glow
|
||
like an annular neon tube.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, around the rim of the saucer a ring of lights will
|
||
glow like a string of shining beads at night. The power required
|
||
for flight will ionize enough of the surrounding atmosphere to short
|
||
out all electrical wiring in the vicinity unless it is specially
|
||
shielded. In theory, the top speed of the Mark I is close to the
|
||
speed of light; in practice there are many more problems to be
|
||
solved before relativistic speeds can be approached.
|
||
|
||
The peculiar property of microwaves heating all material
|
||
containing the water molecule means that any animal luckless enough
|
||
to be nearby may be cooked from the inside out; vegetation will be
|
||
scorched where a saucer lands; and any rocks containing water of
|
||
crystallization will be blasted. Every housewife with a microwave
|
||
knows all this; only hard-headed scientists and soft-headed true
|
||
believers are completely dumbfounded. The UFOnauts would be cooked
|
||
by their own engines, too, if they left the flight deck without
|
||
shielding. This probably explains why a pair of UFOnauts, in a
|
||
widely published photograph, wear reflective plastic jumpsuits.
|
||
Mounting the betatrons outboard on a disc is an efficient way to get
|
||
them away from the crew's compartment, and the plating of the hull
|
||
shields the interior. At high accelerations, increasing amounts of
|
||
power are transformed into radiation, making the centrifugal drive
|
||
inefficient in strong gravitational fields. The most practical
|
||
employment of this engineering is for large spacecraft, never
|
||
intended to land. The flying saucers we see are very likely
|
||
scouting craft sent from mother ships moored in orbit. For brief
|
||
periods of operation, the heavy fuel consumption of the Mark I can
|
||
be tolerated, along with radiation leakage - especially when the
|
||
planet being scouted is not your own.
|
||
|
||
When you compare the known operating features of particle
|
||
centrifuges with the eyewitness testimony, it is fairly evident that
|
||
any expert claiming flying saucers to be utterly beyond any human
|
||
explanation is not doing his homework, and he should be reexamined
|
||
for his professional license.
|
||
|
||
For dramatic purpose, I have classified the development of the
|
||
flying saucer through five stages:
|
||
|
||
Mark I - Electronic centrifuges mounted around a fixed disc,
|
||
outboard.
|
||
Mark II - Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard around a
|
||
rotating disc.
|
||
Mark III - Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard around a
|
||
rotating disc, period of cycles tuned to harmonize
|
||
with ley lines, for jet assist.
|
||
Mark IV - Particle centrifuge tuned to modify time coordinates
|
||
by faster than light travel.
|
||
Mark V - No centrifuge. Solid state coils and crystal
|
||
harmonics transforms ambient field directly for
|
||
dematerialization and rematerialization at
|
||
destinations in time and space.
|
||
|
||
Now that the UFO phenomenon has been demystified and reduced to
|
||
|
||
Page 5
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
human ken, we can proceed to prove the theory. If your resources
|
||
are like those of the PLO, you can go ahead and build your own
|
||
flying saucer without any further information from me, but I have
|
||
nothing to work with except the junk I can find around the house.
|
||
|
||
I found an old electric motor that had burned out, but still
|
||
had a few turns left in it. I drilled a hole through the driving
|
||
axle so that an eight inch bar would slide freely through it. I
|
||
mounted the motor on a chassis so that the bar would rotate on an
|
||
eccentric cam. In this way in end of the bar was always extended in
|
||
the same direction while the other end was always pressed into the
|
||
driving axle. As both ends had the same angular velocity at all
|
||
times, the end extending out from the axle would always have a
|
||
higher angular momentum. This resulted in a concentration of
|
||
centrifugal acceleration in one direction. when I plugged the in
|
||
the motor, the sight of my brainchild lurching ahead - unsteadily,
|
||
but in a constant direction, - gave me a bigger thrill than my
|
||
baptism of sex - lasted longer, too. But not much longer. In less
|
||
than twenty seconds the burned-out motor gasped its last and died in
|
||
a puff of smoke; the test run was broadcast on radio microphone but
|
||
the spectacle was lost without television. Because my prototype did
|
||
not survive long enough to run in two directions I had to declare
|
||
the test inconclusive because of mechanical breakdown. So, what the
|
||
hell, the Wright brothers didn't get far off the ground the first
|
||
time they tried either. Now that I know the critter will move, it
|
||
is worthwhile to put a few bucks in to a new motor, install a
|
||
clutch, and gear the transmission down. One problem at a time is
|
||
the way it goes.
|
||
|
||
A rectified centrifuge small enough to hold in one hand and
|
||
powered by solar cells, based on my design, could be manufactured
|
||
for about fifty dollars (depending on production and competitive
|
||
bids). Installed on Skylab, it would be sufficient to keep the
|
||
craft in orbit indefinitely. A larger Hyperspace Drive (as I call
|
||
this particular design) will provide a small but constant
|
||
acceleration for interplanetary spacecraft that would accumulate
|
||
practical velocities over runs of several days.
|
||
|
||
It is rumored that a gentleman by the name of Dean invented
|
||
another kind of antigravity engine sometime during the past fifty
|
||
years, but I have been unable to track down any more information
|
||
except that its design consists of wheels within wheels. A
|
||
gentleman in Florida, Hans, Schnebel, sent me a description of a
|
||
machine he built and tested that is similar in principle to the Dean
|
||
drive. Essentially, a large rotating disk has a smaller rotating
|
||
disc on one side of the main driving axle. The two wheels are
|
||
geared together so that a weight mounted on the rim of the smaller
|
||
wheel is always at the outside of the larger wheel during the same
|
||
length of arc of each revolution, and always next to the main axle
|
||
during the opposite arc. What happens is that the velocity of the
|
||
weight is amplified by harmonic coincidence with the large rotor
|
||
during one half of its period of revolution, and diminished during
|
||
the other half cycle. This concentrates momentum in the same
|
||
quarter continually, to rectify the centrifuge. The result is
|
||
identical to my Hyperspace Drive, @ut hasthe beauty of continuously
|
||
rotating motion. Now, if the Dean drive is made with a huge main
|
||
rotor, - like about thirty feet in diameter - there is enough room
|
||
to mount a series of smaller wheels around the rim, set in gimbals
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 6
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
for attitude control, an Mr. Dean himself has himself a model T
|
||
Flying Saucer requiring no license from the AEC.
|
||
|
||
In 1975, Professor Eric Laithwaite, Head of the Department of
|
||
Electrical Engineering at the Imperial College of Science and
|
||
Technology in London, England, invented another approach to
|
||
harnessing the centrifugal force of a gyroscope to power an
|
||
antigravity engine - well, he almost invented it, but he did not
|
||
have the sense to hold onto success when he grasped it. Professor
|
||
Laithwaite is world-renowned for his most creative solutions to the
|
||
problems of magnetic-levitation-propulsion systems, and the fruit of
|
||
his brain is operating today in Germany and Japan, his railway
|
||
trains float in the air while traveling at over three hundred miles
|
||
per hour. If anyone can present the world with a proven anti
|
||
gravity engine, it must be the professor.
|
||
|
||
Laithwaite satisfied himself that the precessional force
|
||
causing a gyroscope to wobble had no reaction. This is a clear
|
||
violation of Newton's Third Law of Motion as 'generally conceived'.
|
||
Laithwaite figured that if he could engage the precessional
|
||
acceleration while the gyroscope wobbled in one direction and
|
||
release the precession while it wobble in other directions, he would
|
||
be able to demonstrate to a forum of colleagues and critics at the
|
||
college a rectified centrifuge that worked as a proper antigravity
|
||
engine. His insight was sound but he did not work it out right.
|
||
All he succeeded in demonstrating was a 'separation between action
|
||
and reaction,' and his engine did nothing but oscillate violently.
|
||
Unfortunately, neither Laithwaite or his critics were looking for a
|
||
temporal separation between action and reaction, so the loophole he
|
||
proved in Newton's Third Law was not noticed. Everyone was looking
|
||
for action without reaction, so no one saw anything at all.
|
||
Innumerable other inventors have constructed engines essentially
|
||
identical to Laithwaite's, including a young high school dropout who
|
||
lives across the street from me.
|
||
|
||
Another invention described is U.S. Patent disclosure number
|
||
3,653,269, granted to Richard Foster, a retired chemical engineer in
|
||
Louisiana. Foster mounted his gyroscopes around the rim of a large
|
||
rotor disc, like a two cylinder flying saucer. Every time the rotor
|
||
turns a half cycle, the precessional twist of the gyros in reaction
|
||
generates a powerful force. During the half cycle when Foster's
|
||
gyros were twisting in the other direction, his clutch grabbed and
|
||
transmitted the power to the driving wheels. During the other half
|
||
cycle, the gyros twisted freely. Foster claims his machine traveled
|
||
four miles per hour until it flew to pieces from centrifugal forces.
|
||
After examining the patents, I agreed that it looked like it would
|
||
work, and it certainly would fly to pieces because the bearing
|
||
mounts were not nearly strong enough to contain the powerful
|
||
twisting forces his machine generated. Foster's design, however,
|
||
cannot be included among antigravity engines because it would not
|
||
operate off the ground. He never claimed it would, and Foster
|
||
always described his invention truthfully as nothing more than an
|
||
implementation of the fourth principle of locomotion.
|
||
|
||
What Laithwaite needed was another rotary component, like the
|
||
Dean drive, geared to his engine's oscillations so that they would
|
||
always be turned to drive in the same direction. As it happens, an
|
||
Italian by the name of Todeschini recently secured a patent on this
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 7
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
idea, and his working model is said to be attracting the interest of
|
||
European engineers.
|
||
|
||
When the final rectifying device is added to the essential
|
||
Laithwaite design, all the moving parts generate the vectors of a
|
||
vortex, and the velocity generated is the axial thrust of the
|
||
vortex. Therefore I call inventions based on this design the Vortex
|
||
Drive.
|
||
|
||
By replacing the Hyperspace modules of the Mark I Flying Saucer
|
||
with Vortex modules, still retaining the essential betatron as the
|
||
centrifuge, performance is improved for the Mark II. To begin with,
|
||
drive is generated only when the main rotor is revolving, so the
|
||
saucer can be parked with the motor running. This eliminates the
|
||
agonizing doubt we all suffered when the Lunar Landers were about to
|
||
blast off to rejoin the command capsule: Will the engine start?
|
||
This would explain why the ring of lights around the rim of a saucer
|
||
is said to begin to revolve immediately prior to lift off. A
|
||
precessional drive affords a wider range of control, and the
|
||
responses are more stable than a direct centrifuge. But the most
|
||
interesting improvement is the result of the 'structure' of the
|
||
electromagnetic field generated by the Vortex drive. By amplifying
|
||
and diminishing certain vectors harmonically, the Mark III flying
|
||
saucer can ride the electromagnetic current of the Earth's
|
||
electromagnetic field like the jet stream. And this is just what we
|
||
see UFO's doing, don't we, as they are reported running their
|
||
regular flight corridors during the biennial tourist season.
|
||
Professor Laithwaite got all this together when he conceived of his
|
||
antigravity engine as a practical application of his theory of
|
||
"rivers of energy running through space"; he just could not get it
|
||
off the drawing board the first time.
|
||
|
||
The flying saucer consumes fuel at a rate that cannot be
|
||
supplied by all the wells in Arabia. Therefore we have to assume
|
||
that UFO engineers must have developed a practical atomic fusion
|
||
reactor. But once the Mark III is perfected, another fuel supply
|
||
becomes attainable, and no other is so practical for flying saucer.
|
||
The Moray Valve converts the Mark III into a Mark IV Flying Saucer
|
||
by extending its operational capabilities through 'time' as well as
|
||
space. The Moray Valve, you see, functions by changing the
|
||
direction of flow of energy in the Sun's gravitational field. It is
|
||
the velocity of energy that determines motion, and motion determines
|
||
the flow of time. We shall continue the engineering of flying
|
||
saucers in the following essays.
|
||
|
||
My investigation into antigravity engineering brought me a
|
||
technical report while this typescript was in preparation. Dr.
|
||
Mason Rose, President of the University for Social Research,
|
||
published a paper describing the discoveries of Dr. Paul Alfred
|
||
Biefeld, astronomer and physicist at the California Institute for
|
||
Advanced Studies, and his assistant, Townsend Brown. In 1923
|
||
Biefeld discovered that a heavily charged electrical condensor moved
|
||
toward its positive pole when suspended in a gravitational field.
|
||
He assigned Brown to study the effect as a research project. A
|
||
series of experiments showed Brown that the most efficient shape for
|
||
a field propelled condensor was a disc with a central dome. In 1926
|
||
Townsend published his paper describing all the construction
|
||
features and flight characteristics of a flying saucer, conforming
|
||
to the testimony of the first flight witnessed over Mount Rainer
|
||
|
||
Page 8
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
twenty-one years later and corroborated by thousands of witnesses
|
||
since. (The Biefeld-Brown Effect explains why a Mark III rides the
|
||
electromagnetic jet stream.)
|
||
|
||
We may speculate that flying saucers spotted from time to time
|
||
may not only include visitors from other planets and travelers
|
||
through time, but also fledglings from an unknown number of cuckoo's
|
||
nests in secret experimental plants all over the world. The space
|
||
program at Cape Canaveral may be nothing more than a supercolossal
|
||
theatre orchestrated by Cecil B. Demille to reassure Americans that
|
||
they are still 'numero uno' after Russia beat our atomic ace by
|
||
putting Sputnik into orbit. We need not doubt that the Apollo
|
||
spaceships got to the Moon, but we may wonder if Neil Armstrong was
|
||
the first man to land there. The real space program may have been
|
||
conducted in secret as a spin-off from the Manhattan Project since
|
||
the end of World War II, and Apollo 13 may have been picked up by a
|
||
sag wagon to make sure our team scored a home run every time they
|
||
went to bat. The exploration of space is the most dangerous
|
||
enterprise ever taken on by a living species. Don't you ever wonder
|
||
why the Russians are losing men in space like a safari being
|
||
decimated in headhunter country, while nothing ever happens to our
|
||
boys except accidents during ground training?
|
||
|
||
-T.B. Pawlicki
|
||
|
||
Well, I hope you enjoyed that. Coming soon in our series of
|
||
informational speculations:
|
||
Build your own Time Machine,
|
||
Build your own Pyramid or Megalith,
|
||
Turn lead into gold,
|
||
Create a worldwide communications network,
|
||
and my personal favorite,
|
||
How to build an atomic bomb.
|
||
|
||
Now if someone knows how we can clone a person using household
|
||
materials, that would be the topper of the toppers. Keep your mind
|
||
open, but not so open that your brains fall out...
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
This file courteously supplied to KeelyNet
|
||
by the Darkside (Ken Geest) at
|
||
314-644-6705
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
-The Rev.
|
||
|
||
Transcendental Communications...
|
||
UFOs!
|
||
Conspiracies & Cover-Ups!
|
||
New Age!
|
||
|
||
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] \/
|
||
[] [] _______
|
||
^ [] BBS# (714)599-6270 [] (_______)
|
||
/ \ [] [] ../ o o o o \..
|
||
/ \ [] FAX# (714)599-5045 [] (_______________)
|
||
/ (o) \ [] [] ~~~~~~~~~
|
||
/ \ [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] .............
|
||
-----------
|
||
Page 9
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Vangard Notes
|
||
|
||
I had the pleasure of meeting Tom at the 1987 Global Sciences
|
||
Congress in Denver. He is as fascinating in person as his writings
|
||
indicate. Tom has also written 2 excellent books, "How to Build a
|
||
Flying Saucer" and "Hyper-Space". We have kept in contact since
|
||
that time by mail.
|
||
|
||
You may write Tom at : T. B. Pawlicki
|
||
843 Fort Street
|
||
Victoria, B.C.
|
||
V8W 1H6
|
||
Canada
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
|
||
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard
|
||
Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your
|
||
consideration, interest and support.
|
||
|
||
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 10
|
||
|
||
|