265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
September 2, 1993
|
|
|
|
MIR1.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Steve Gantt.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following file was taken from
|
|
HIGH SCIENCE BBS - (713) 688-2030
|
|
(This is a pure 7 bit ASCII file 80 characters wide)
|
|
|
|
MIR1.asc
|
|
July 1993
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following excerpts are a summary of the research underway by
|
|
Nicholas Reiter. Nicholas is a graduate of Terra Technical College,
|
|
and is a professional research technologist for a solar cell
|
|
manufacturing firm. He about thirty years old and has been
|
|
interested in the UFO phenomena all his life. The following is a
|
|
brief of the summarization of his research as outlined in Dr. David
|
|
Gotlib's Bulletin of Anomalous Experience; "Magnetic Implant
|
|
Response" and "Magnetism, UFO Abductions and the Anomalous".
|
|
Nicholas does not belong to any large UFO group ( e.g. MUFON,
|
|
CUFOS, etc. ) and has been involved in this research for the past
|
|
three years. Some of the following "quoted" passages are directly
|
|
from sources listed above.
|
|
|
|
New observations which may well be some of the most significant
|
|
discoveries made in regard to abductions, UFOS and mind control were
|
|
first investigated in the Autumn of 1990. These tests and
|
|
experiments were performed by Nicholas Reiter and his colleague (AR)
|
|
in the Dallas area with confirmed abductees using a techniques that
|
|
can easily be duplicated.
|
|
|
|
The objectives of these two were;
|
|
|
|
1. Can the UFO abduction process be understood in the terms of
|
|
specific technology?
|
|
2. Can the abduction implant devices, recalled so often under
|
|
hypnosis, be objectively detected, studied, and possibly
|
|
neutralized by electrical, magnetic, or otherwise energy-
|
|
related means?
|
|
3. Can a system of defense be developed against the protocol ?
|
|
|
|
Assumptions for the research/experimentation;
|
|
|
|
1. There exists an intelligence, of unknown origin and nature,
|
|
which is currently carrying out an agenda of experimentation,
|
|
manipulation, and/or resource acquisition using the human race,
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or certain members thereof, as unwilling subjects.
|
|
2. The agenda given in assumption 1 is being carried out with the
|
|
use of highly advanced technology.
|
|
3. This technology appears to be, at least partially, based on
|
|
forms of energy, or energy-matter relationships, which are
|
|
currently unknown to, or unacknowledged, by classical physics.
|
|
4. The human race has the undeniable right to defend itself to the
|
|
best of it's ability, against the abduction agenda.
|
|
|
|
The first set of experiments involved trying to find a means to
|
|
elicit a tangible objective response from abduction implant devices.
|
|
AR first noticed a "weird" sensation in her volunteers when a large
|
|
( flux density measured at approx. 2000 gauss) horseshoe magnet had
|
|
been held up to the region of the volunteers head where, under
|
|
hypnosis, the volunteer had recalled aliens "doing something to
|
|
her". The sensation was extraordinary vivid and disturbing to the
|
|
volunteer. It seemed to be both mental and physiological in nature.
|
|
In nearest terms it was a "panic" response, a mental feeling of
|
|
terror or extreme apprehension, coupled with a verified rise in
|
|
pulse rate and perspiration.
|
|
|
|
The volunteer (V#1), said that the panic response seemed to
|
|
duplicate the feeling that she had been subject to in the past,
|
|
shortly before an abduction related event would occur. Over the
|
|
course of the following weeks several different tests were conducted
|
|
with the subject V#1.
|
|
|
|
1. A large electromagnet ( 1000 turns of #14 AWG wrapped around
|
|
an iron core) was substituted for the horseshoe magnet. This
|
|
coil was energized both with 110VAC and later with 6VDC, in
|
|
different tests. The response for both were smaller in
|
|
magnitude than the horseshoe magnet although the symptoms were
|
|
the same.
|
|
|
|
2. While using the horseshoe magnet a piece of steel was placed
|
|
between the poles to divert the magnetic flux away from any
|
|
external regions of the magnet. This test was performed to
|
|
determine if the actual flux lines were involved in the
|
|
response or whether the response was based on other "virtual"
|
|
effects of magnet.
|
|
|
|
3. The response (hereafter called the Magnetic Implant Response
|
|
or MIR) seemed to first appear when the magnet was moved
|
|
within 18 inches of the volunteer's response region (area of
|
|
the implant). From this distance inward, the intensity
|
|
increased.
|
|
|
|
4. The Tesla Coil Suppression Effect (TCSE) was discovered. This
|
|
will be discussed later.
|
|
|
|
Nicholas and AR then started testing other volunteers in Jan 1991.
|
|
Previous to this their research was being performed with the
|
|
assistance of V#1 only. On Jan 8, they tested another confirmed
|
|
volunteer. No communication was allowed between V#1 and V#2. The
|
|
symptoms experienced by V#2 were identical to those of V#1.
|
|
|
|
Over the course of the next few months, two other volunteers were
|
|
tested. V#3 showed a positive reaction with consistent symptoms.
|
|
V#4 however, felt no response or sensations.
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas and AR started researching the nature of the abductions
|
|
experienced by all volunteers. They found that V#1, V#2 and V#3 were
|
|
"classical" abductees, though their specific experiences and ordeals
|
|
were different. Each recalled, during either their regression, or
|
|
waking memories, the phenomena most often experienced by those who
|
|
have been repeatedly abducted (e.g. Grey entities, quasi-medical
|
|
protocols, possible implant insertion, etc.). V#4's abduction
|
|
experience were quite "non-standard" and may involve different
|
|
phenomena.
|
|
|
|
It was decided that the research should then continue. The second
|
|
phase of experimentation continued. AR reported the following; V#1
|
|
was placed in a chair, and was tested for MIR. Results were
|
|
positive. An 18 inch tall Tesla spark gap coil was set up in front
|
|
on V#1. The coil was turned on and allowed to operate for several
|
|
minutes ( then coil's power was adjusted to produce a 4 inch
|
|
discharge at the secondary. Exact construction details are available
|
|
from Nicholas Reiter).
|
|
|
|
V#1 was then checked for MIR and the results were negative. The MIR
|
|
had vanished. V#1 was checked again 24 hours later and the results
|
|
were still negative. The nullifying effect lasted for approximately
|
|
six days. When it DID return it was at a much diminished magnitude.
|
|
From this observation it was inferred that the MIR had not been
|
|
eliminated, but had been in some way deadened or temporarily
|
|
stunned.
|
|
|
|
V#2 was similarly tested with the Tesla coil and the results were
|
|
identical. The MIR ceased for a period of time.
|
|
|
|
Another interesting effect was noticed by V#1. She was given the
|
|
Tesla coil to take home with her. On several occasions, specifically
|
|
on certain evenings V#1 would get the feeling that unseen entities
|
|
were nearby. She found that by switching on the tesla coil, the
|
|
sensation would vanish, as though the coil was disrupting or driving
|
|
away the invisible force.
|
|
|
|
This concludes the studies performed by Nicholas Reiter in
|
|
conjunction with AR.
|
|
|
|
Nicholas has continued his research. Lack of volunteers prompted him
|
|
to start research in a slightly different vein. He started testing
|
|
subjects randomly, business associates, friends, family, and people
|
|
on the street were tested with some surprising results.
|
|
|
|
The subjects were told that some people have the ability to "sense"
|
|
magnetic fields for unknown reasons and that he (Nicholas) would
|
|
like to determine if they ( the volunteers/subjects) can detect them
|
|
as well.
|
|
|
|
The volunteers were placed in a comfortable chair. A galvanic skin
|
|
response indicator was placed on the second and third fingers of the
|
|
left hand. The volunteer was then shown the magnet (similar to the
|
|
one used in the original experiments). The volunteer is asked to
|
|
verbalize any feelings or sensations which they might experience
|
|
during the test. The subject is then blindfolded and a few minutes
|
|
are allowed to let the galvanic skin response monitor to "settle
|
|
out".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point, the magnet is then moved slowly and randomly around
|
|
the head. Spacing is kept at two inches at all times from the
|
|
subjects head. Sensations, feelings and GSP monitor response are
|
|
observed and recorded. When the test is completed the volunteers are
|
|
thanked and released. If permitted the age, sex, occupation and
|
|
names were recorded.
|
|
|
|
Out of the first 24 subjects tested 5 showed a positive response to
|
|
this procedure. One or more of the following characteristics were
|
|
noted in each case;
|
|
|
|
1. A feeling of apprehension or panic.
|
|
2. A sensation of pressure or tightness
|
|
3. A feeling of disorientation
|
|
4. Dark, formless shape moving against closed eyelids.
|
|
5. Uncontrollable finger twitching
|
|
|
|
None of the five random positive response cases were totally
|
|
identical in symptom. However, the following characteristics were
|
|
common in all five cases;
|
|
|
|
1. The feeling was weird or unpleasant.
|
|
2. Extreme nervousness and anxiety was present
|
|
3. The effect was vivid and definite.
|
|
4. The GSR monitor tone increased, indicating increased bodily
|
|
perspiration.
|
|
5. The response occurred at a single, definitive location on
|
|
each subjects head.
|
|
|
|
The areas included were;
|
|
|
|
Case #6 - behind and below the left ear.
|
|
Case #2 - left temple ( in front of, and slightly above left ear)
|
|
Case #3 - "above nose, somewhere between and behind the eyes.
|
|
Case #13 - Left temple
|
|
Case #21 - Above and slightly behind left ear
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The above test results were obtained during 1991 and published that
|
|
same year. further testing is being done at this time. Nicholas has
|
|
designed some electronic equipment dealing with a "security" system
|
|
or abduction prevention equipment. The description and plans for
|
|
these devices and being processed into files which may be downloaded
|
|
from HIGH SCIENCE (713) 688-2030. Or may be available from the BBS
|
|
carrying this file.
|
|
|
|
This is the first of these files and subsequent files are being
|
|
processed.
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Reiter may be contacted at;
|
|
Nicholas Reiter
|
|
541 W. Stone St.
|
|
Gibsonburg, Ohio 43431
|
|
|
|
OR c/o High Science BBS
|
|
(713) 688-2030 (modem)
|
|
9600 baud 24 hours/day 7 days/week
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The reproduction of this information is courtesy of
|
|
HIGH SCIENCE (713) 688-2030
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|