101 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
101 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| File Name : TACHTIME.ASC | Online Date : 05/09/95 |
|
|
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : GRAVITY |
|
|
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
|
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
|
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
|
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
|
|
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|
|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
The following document speculates on the properties of time.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Path: news.cc.uch.gr!news.forth.gr!ecrc!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!
|
|
howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!
|
|
swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!news.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!a2319659
|
|
|
|
From: a2319659@athena.rrz.uni-koeln.de (Eduard Friesen)
|
|
|
|
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
|
|
Subject: Re: positron..a reverse time electron
|
|
Date: 6 Mar 1995 12:24:08 GMT
|
|
Organization: Regional Computing Center, University of Cologne
|
|
Lines: 25
|
|
Message-ID: <3jeut8$n4k@news.rrz.uni-koeln.de>
|
|
References: <3ja3ke$lse@lucy.infi.net>
|
|
Reply-To: a2319659@athena.rrz.uni-koeln.de
|
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpw1.rrz.uni-koeln.de
|
|
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
|
|
Xref: news.cc.uch.gr sci.physics:76137 sci.astro:58475 alt.sci.physics.new-
|
|
theories:3154
|
|
|
|
To speak of time "flowing" is misleading, as many have noted. Flow is change
|
|
with respect to *something else*, and so for time to flow, it would have to
|
|
change with respect to something else. What would that be? Some 'other' time?
|
|
Space?
|
|
|
|
The latter seems a more reasonable suggestion to me, but then you have the
|
|
problem of explaining rates of change in space, which in turn refer to
|
|
something else... i.e. time.
|
|
|
|
The simplest solution seems to be that the space and time aspect of events and
|
|
processes are not to be defined separately, but rather form a whole. i.e. you
|
|
have terms and relations that fix each other (space, time as terms, velocity
|
|
as one relation).
|
|
|
|
But on the question of tachyon time reversal...
|
|
|
|
Indulge my amateurish curiosity once more:
|
|
|
|
if the direction of efficient causality (the causality which matches our
|
|
everyday notion of 'causing') is reversed for tachyons, do they not
|
|
represent a way for the future to act on the past?
|
|
|
|
If so, consider this:
|
|
|
|
suppose that a German research institute were to develop a "tachyon
|
|
transmitter" in the year 2937. Who (or, better, "When?") would be able to
|
|
receive those signals?
|
|
|
|
Pretty damn implausible at this point, I realize...
|
|
|
|
Eduard Friesen
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vanguard Note...
|
|
|
|
The question is not so much WHO would be able to receive the signals, but
|
|
to WHAT POINT IN TIME would they go? Since vibration is associated with
|
|
'translation' to higher levels of being, then perhaps a means could be
|
|
produced to increase the vibration of a test mass, on a MICRO level, not
|
|
MACRO.
|
|
|
|
After all, isn't a tachyon a 'faster than light' particle? Just as a paper
|
|
straw can be run through a telephone pole without damage, so too could other
|
|
mass be moved, while remaining in a stationary position, to produce a
|
|
'shift' or translation. The nature of this shift remains to be seen, but
|
|
using phase conjugation, the wave might be reversible to some degree. See
|
|
the file DUALVELO on KeelyNet, where a theory is postulated which calls for
|
|
an INVARIANT MASS because the Lorentz transformation only applies to
|
|
VELOCITY.
|
|
|
|
It is my understanding that time exists only because of its association with
|
|
mass aggregations. The 'speed' or forward velocity of time is based on the
|
|
intensity of the 'gravity' flows into the neutral centers of all mass in the
|
|
region. Keely said 'time is gravity', possibly the most elegant and
|
|
accurate description of the 'dual' phenomenon ever uttered.
|
|
|
|
As a 'spook' aside, some psychics say they are told by discarnates that
|
|
there is no 'serial time' in the afterlife, because the spirit is not bound
|
|
to the 'earthly plane' by the forces that produce 'gravity.'
|
|
|
|
And one psychic claims that time is concurrent and can be accessed using
|
|
various techniques including pharmacopeia. The concurrency idea is
|
|
intriguing because this psychic says he can actually visit people in the
|
|
past because they still exist as frames in our 'time'. The primary link is
|
|
to LOCATION, in other words, you have to go to the place where past things
|
|
happened to be able to interface with 'past' events or personalities.
|
|
|
|
If this concurrency idea is correct, then it would be a 'Slider'/Incunabula
|
|
type of shift because quantum realities must link from some common
|
|
reference, i.e. location. ..................Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|