265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
||
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
||
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
||
PO BOX 1031
|
||
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
||
|
||
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
||
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
||
files on KeelyNet!
|
||
|
||
May 2, 1991
|
||
|
||
GRAVITYA.ASC
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
This article is from the now defunct FLYING SAUCERS magazine of
|
||
April 1965. Courtesy of Ron Barker, Co-Sysop of KeelyNet.
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
UFO PROPULSION?
|
||
by A. Steel
|
||
|
||
------- ------- -------
|
||
reproduced from "Orbit", The Journal of the Tyneside UFO Society,
|
||
41 Deanham Gardens, Fenham, Newcastle upon Tyne, 5, England
|
||
------- ------- -------
|
||
|
||
One of the many subjects frequently discussed by ufologers is the
|
||
method of propulsion used by our interplanetary visitors in their
|
||
flying saucers, cigar-shaped craft and various other shaped craft
|
||
so often observed. The members of TUFOS are no exception and
|
||
frequent discussion on the subject produces many interesting
|
||
theories.
|
||
|
||
The following speculation is the result of talks with committee
|
||
members and it was felt in presenting the theory - via ORBIT - that
|
||
much criticism and comment would be invited from conventional-minded
|
||
ufologers.
|
||
|
||
Flying saucers are not conventional craft, therefore it is felt that
|
||
an UNCONVENTIONAL APPROACH to them AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT should be
|
||
made.
|
||
|
||
Flying saucers apparently do not use rocket motors or other obvious
|
||
forceful methods of propulsion. Briefly, these craft can accelerate
|
||
without apparent limitation, frequently disappear, are sometimes
|
||
silent and have been heard buzzing or humming.
|
||
|
||
They can remain perfectly stationary in high winds and seem
|
||
unaffected by heat friction or gravity problems.
|
||
|
||
If these craft then are not motivated by propeller, jet or rocket
|
||
what does that leave use to consider?
|
||
|
||
I consider gravitational repulsion/attraction to be the only
|
||
possible method but - and a big BUT - not using gravity as
|
||
theoretically expounded by Newton and accepted by our more
|
||
conventional friends.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page 1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
In pursuing this theory of UFO propulsion, I consider it most
|
||
important to TAKE A NEW VIEW of planetary and solar energy fields
|
||
and I would advance for your consideration the following theory.
|
||
|
||
It is my contention that gravity is NOT A PULL from Earth but a
|
||
PRESSURE FROM SPACE.
|
||
|
||
The atmospheric pressure of 17 pounds per square inch which is the
|
||
result of an external Earth field force ORIGINATING FROM THE SUN.
|
||
(more precisely...14.7 PSI at 32 degress F at sea level...Vangard)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Consider the following. Evidence from very high flying aircraft and
|
||
space capsules indicate extremely low temperatures, low pressure or
|
||
gravity and less light than on the Earth's surface.
|
||
|
||
The higher one goes (into space), the less obvious is heat, and
|
||
gravity pressure, which to my way of thinking can ONLY mean that the
|
||
Earth's field OR ATMOSPHERE is responsible for PROVIDING light, heat
|
||
and pressure by CONVERGING SOLAR ENERGY wavelengths INTO these three
|
||
conditions. (interference with lower frequency spectra resulting)
|
||
|
||
This retained-filtered-modified energy wavelength is known as the
|
||
gravitational field with a propounded pole directional force
|
||
indicated by a compass needle.
|
||
|
||
The Earth is cocooned in a self made energy field with the lines of
|
||
force going polewards and EVENTUALLY ESCAPING at the 'holes in the
|
||
poles'. What are the 'holes in the poles'?
|
||
|
||
The Earth, we are informed, is travelling around the Sun at a speed
|
||
in excess of 66,000 miles per hour and revolves around its axis at
|
||
approximately 1,000 mile per hour. (1,020 at the equator)
|
||
|
||
Compare the Earth to a ball on a jet of water, the water
|
||
representing the energy force of the Sun. The ball will be
|
||
suspended at a certain distance from the jet depending on its mass
|
||
or weight and will absorb the impact, revolving as it does so.
|
||
|
||
The ball in revolving retains a film of water on its surface and the
|
||
water jet does not actually strike the ball but strikes the film of
|
||
water which is constantly being renewed and replaced and so it is
|
||
with the Earth.
|
||
|
||
Solar energy pressure will therefore be acting AGAINST the
|
||
ATTRACTION of mass FOR mass. The equatorial region of the earth
|
||
field RECEIVES THE FULL IMPACT of energy from the Sun, the energy is
|
||
converted and deflected to the slower, axial moving poles and the
|
||
energy is pushed or escapes off into space.
|
||
|
||
An American satellite which was launched northwards shot off into
|
||
space, drawn off by this energy leak hole and - as a result - Earth
|
||
satellites have since been launched so as NOT to fly off at the
|
||
poles.
|
||
|
||
Now, back to flying saucers. In considering the above theory, I
|
||
have reached the conclusion that the method of propulsion possibly
|
||
adopted by flying saucers would be to DUPLICATE, WITHIN the Earth
|
||
planetary-field, the conditions found outside it, i.e., NO HEAT, NO
|
||
|
||
Page 2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PRESSURE FORCE and, as a result, NO LIGHT, a field barrier around
|
||
the craft excluding the natural Earth field.
|
||
|
||
This may be the answer as to why flying saucers seem to glow, then
|
||
disappear as they accelerate. In duplicating the conditions found
|
||
outside the Earth magnetic fields, the saucer-created field EXCLUDES
|
||
HEAT, PRESSURE FORCE and the REFLECTION OF LIGHT WAVES.
|
||
|
||
By subjecting the flying saucer to the downward Earth-produced
|
||
pressures, the saucer moves down, by REJECTING this pressure in
|
||
REPRODUCING THE EARTH-FIELD CONDITION the saucer moves up and
|
||
similarly by subjecting or rejecting the N.S. or S.N. Earth pressure
|
||
field indicated by a compass needle the saucer moves in either of
|
||
these directions.
|
||
|
||
Flying saucers are often traced as moving in straight lines and many
|
||
maps have been produced indicating this behavior. I suspect that
|
||
the saucers have been moving along these magnetic force lines and
|
||
then shooting off at a 90 degree angle by SOME METHOD OF REJECTION,
|
||
i.e. bouncing off sideways.
|
||
|
||
A similar method of propulsion could be employed out in space by
|
||
reproducing around the craft an Earth pressure field and BECOMING IN
|
||
FACT A MINIATURE PLANET with a magnetic field subject to the solar
|
||
energy pressure and being REPELLED or ATTRACTED by this energy
|
||
WAVELENGTH.
|
||
|
||
The occupants of the flying saucers will, of course, not suffer any
|
||
discomforture at these high speeds and manoeuvres. They will be
|
||
contained within their own pressure field and not be subject to
|
||
external forces and changes of direction.
|
||
|
||
A simple example of this protective force field can be observed
|
||
in the following experiment.
|
||
|
||
If a glass jar is completely filled with water, a fish placed in the
|
||
jar, and the jar tightly capped, the fish can be said to be
|
||
contained within a pressure force field.
|
||
|
||
Violent movement of the jar in any direction will have no effect on
|
||
the fish, it will not be bumped from side to side OR up and down
|
||
because it is carried along SUSPENDED and PROTECTED in this field
|
||
and is not subject to external pressures or directional change.
|
||
|
||
In the same way, the occupants of the flying saucers are obviously
|
||
capable of retaining a constant state of non-gravity!
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Vangard Notes...
|
||
|
||
Mr. Walter Wright is the modern proponent of PUSH GRAVITY as he
|
||
calls it. He has NEVER been disproven in his contentions and
|
||
has dozens of very excellent models to illustrate the PUSH
|
||
GRAVITY principle. The models use magnets to provide a
|
||
repellent force equivalent to that of a repelling field.
|
||
|
||
We first met Walter at a 1989 Global Sciences Congress in Denver
|
||
and have since maintained a correspondence with him. He showed
|
||
a special video tape made up just for Global Sciences and
|
||
clearly demonstrating the PUSH GRAVITY idea.
|
||
|
||
Page 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Walter gives credit for the initial impetus to investigate the
|
||
PUSH GRAVITY concept to his son TOM. Tom was only 6 years old
|
||
when he told his father that he did not believe that the Moon
|
||
created the tides. When Walter asked him why, Tom launched into
|
||
his idea of a pushing force which created pressure waves to move
|
||
the water.
|
||
|
||
The idea so intrigued Walter that he began investigating the
|
||
possibility. As a result he is totally sold on PUSH GRAVITY and
|
||
his models and presentations are so convincing that we can only
|
||
urge you to CHECK IT OUT!!
|
||
|
||
Walter has a very good book, "GRAVITY IS A PUSH" which you can
|
||
purchase from him for about $15, as well as a complete series of
|
||
video tapes showing his various models, about $10 per tape. At
|
||
last count the video tapes exceeded 29. They are narrated and
|
||
will blow you away if you choose to see them. He also has a
|
||
PUSH GRAVITY museum of his models which is open to the public.
|
||
|
||
Walter makes nothing from duplicating the tapes, he just wants
|
||
to get his work out to the greatest number of people. We found
|
||
Walter to be SUPER COOL, intelligent, thoughtful and persistent
|
||
as hell. He has spent tens of thousands$ to promote the idea.
|
||
|
||
Walter also thinks he has discovered ANOTHER PLANET in our solar
|
||
system which he named TIOM after his two sons, Tim and Tom. He
|
||
has some of the most interesting explanations for a variety of
|
||
phenomena and which have not been successfully explained by
|
||
modern science.
|
||
|
||
Walter has openly challenged scientists, physicists, engineers
|
||
and teachers to disprove ANY of his PUSH GRAVITY theories,
|
||
NONE HAVE ACCEPTED!
|
||
|
||
We suggest that you write Mr. Wright at the following address :
|
||
|
||
Walter C. Wright
|
||
732 Ohio St.
|
||
Fairfield, California
|
||
94533
|
||
(707) 429-0598
|
||
|
||
Tell him you heard about him from Vangard Sciences through the
|
||
KeelyNet BBS. He will get quite a kick that you thought enough
|
||
of his work to make contact. You can't lose, BELIEVE IT!
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
||
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
||
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
||
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
||
|
||
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
||
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
||
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Page 4
|
||
|
||
|
||
|