199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet!
|
|
|
|
March 8, 1991
|
|
|
|
ZPE2PT2.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Part II of Review and Outlook
|
|
|
|
Another modification concerns the definition for the term "vacuum"
|
|
in physics, as documented by a paper in the American Scientist,
|
|
March-April 1980, titled "Is The Vacuum Really Empty?" by Prof.
|
|
Walter Greiner, Univ. of Frankfurt, BRD, and Prof. Joseph H.
|
|
Hamiliton, Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN.
|
|
|
|
The authors conclude that a neutral vacuum is by no means as "empty"
|
|
as the previously claimed in our textbooks, and suggests a new
|
|
definition as follows:
|
|
|
|
"The vacuum is the lowest stable state that a region of
|
|
space can have WHILE BEING PENETRATED BY CERTAIN FIELDS".
|
|
|
|
Because of the tremendous time lag in our educational system, many
|
|
research projects and their ensuing experimental data have been
|
|
withheld from public scrutiny. The scientific community tends to
|
|
have a vested interest in preserving the system it created and of
|
|
which it is a part. It responds to new situations through the
|
|
coloration of this attachment.
|
|
|
|
A case in point are the carefully conducted experiments of T.T.
|
|
Brown with charged bodies in a high vacuum, as described in mt
|
|
booklet Ether Fields (1977). These experiments suggest the actual
|
|
presence of certain fields in vacuum, whether we call them
|
|
gravitaional field, tachion-field, ether field, neutrino or Fermi-
|
|
sea, etc. is of secondary importance at this moment. Although Brown
|
|
spent, reportedly, more than $200,000 of his own funds over several
|
|
decades on such experiments, he was nevertheless unable to have the
|
|
results published in the scientific media of America.
|
|
|
|
Things are even worse when it comes to experiments conducted abroad,
|
|
which often tend to confirm disregarded experimental results on this
|
|
continent, as we shall see shortly. To highlight the wide
|
|
discrepancies between orthodox (and obsolete) dogmas and actual,
|
|
physical realities pertaining to the true subatomic structures as we
|
|
know them to be today, let us briefly review the structures of the
|
|
matter:
|
|
|
|
A molecule is the smallest division of a substance. Further
|
|
division would cause it to cease being a substance. The smallest
|
|
true molecules can be illustrated when we use the globe of the Earth
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for our standard. If a single drop of water were magnified until it
|
|
was as big as the Earth, each molecule would be about the size of a
|
|
tennis ball.
|
|
|
|
On the next step down, an atom is the unit which makes up the nature
|
|
of the molecule, consisting of the nucleus and the surrounding
|
|
electrons to render the atom "stable". An atom of hydrogen contains
|
|
one proton and one electron to balance or neutralize the proton.
|
|
Matter then is divisible into electrons and protons.
|
|
|
|
But - and here comes the rub: Between electrons and protons are
|
|
spaces so vast, in comparison with the masses of each, that, if the
|
|
proton in the carbon atom were the size of a golf ball hanging from
|
|
a ceiling of the great hall at Pennsylvania Station in New York, its
|
|
electrons would be represented by six small wasps winging in a
|
|
little knot against the four walls of the gigantic structure of the
|
|
building!
|
|
|
|
In effect, one could claim there is a little final solidity of
|
|
substance to anything: The Universe consists of "emptiness"' charged
|
|
with electrical energy! If we translate the above to the
|
|
measurements and terminology of the physicist and "magnify" the atom
|
|
mathematically, with all its distances and dimensions kept in
|
|
proportion so that the orbit of the electron would have a diameter
|
|
equal to that of the Earth about the Sun, approximately 184 million
|
|
miles, the diameter of the electron itself would only be 2000 miles,
|
|
and the diameter of the nucleus, where mass and weight of the atom
|
|
are truly concentrated, can be taken as 2 miles only.
|
|
|
|
We thus obtain a picture of a central mass with a diameter of 2
|
|
miles (nucleus), another object with a diameter of 2000 miles (the
|
|
electron in the case of the hydrogen atom) at a distance of 92
|
|
million miles away from it, orbiting the nucleus. Evidently, there
|
|
is plenty of room inside this system. And "room" is not a vacuum,
|
|
it is not nothingness, but space itself, spatial energy, a field
|
|
which can be identified with the ether of the past - and the future.
|
|
Nobel prize winner, Max Planck, during a lecture in Florence, Italy,
|
|
once made a truly remarkable statement which describes the problem
|
|
facing the physicist today:
|
|
|
|
"As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-
|
|
headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as
|
|
the result of my research about the atoms this much:
|
|
'THERE IS NO MATTER AS SUCH!"
|
|
All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force
|
|
which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds
|
|
this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must
|
|
assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and
|
|
intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter".
|
|
|
|
This cosmic matrix is needed if we want to explain "action at a
|
|
difference"' lines of force, stresses, a magnetic field and so on.
|
|
When the concept of the ether was abandoned, it had to be replaced
|
|
by the concept of "space" instead. In reality, we merely switched
|
|
terminology.
|
|
|
|
We used to say that "ether fills all space". But "filling" is no
|
|
exactly the descriptive word to use. Perhaps we should rather
|
|
define it: "Ether is a condition of space in which electrical
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
manifestations for the atomic construction of material is possible".
|
|
This primordial energy is "free" or in an uncondensed state. It
|
|
exists in interstellar space but remains unrecognizable until it
|
|
begins to coagulate or gets into a vortex pattern.
|
|
|
|
The claim of our textbooks that the Michelson-Morley experiment
|
|
"disproved" the existence of the ether is incorrect. It merely
|
|
disproved the existence of a noticeable ether "drift" or "drag". As
|
|
an analogy, if someone would postulate that the absence of wind
|
|
disproves the existence of the atmosphere around our planet, the
|
|
fallacy of this postulate would be immediatly apparent to all.
|
|
|
|
"Michelson and Morley centered their attention on the Earth's
|
|
orbital velocity (30 km per second). They had no knowledge of the
|
|
existence of galaxies; of motions of galaxies in relation to each
|
|
other; of the motion of our solar system in our galaxy.... Their
|
|
negative results are explainable on the basis of pre-1900 classical
|
|
mechanics, so provide no proof of the absence of ether or Louis de
|
|
Broglie's 'subquantic medium'.
|
|
|
|
Thus, the limited information to Michelson and Einstein is
|
|
emphasized by recent findings, particularly in astrophysic", writes
|
|
Dr. H.C. Dudley in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jan,
|
|
1975, under the title "Michelson's Hunch Was Right". And Dr. Dudley
|
|
continues: "In fact, 1929 saw Michelson still attempting to
|
|
experimentally demonstrate the ether, which his intuition and
|
|
reasoning told him ought to be present".
|
|
|
|
"Today most persons are largely unaware that the ether concept began
|
|
to be seriously reexamined by two of physics most notable laureates.
|
|
The ether is now being called the "neutrino sea" by astrophysicists,
|
|
and has been characterized as an energy-rich particulate, subquantic
|
|
medium. A rather voluminous literature on the subject is
|
|
accumulating as indicated by a recent review, The Cosmic Neutrino,
|
|
with 655 references covering only the period 1965-1972.....
|
|
|
|
It appears that an open-minded reexamination of this area of physics
|
|
is long overdue in order to open up new avenues of approaching to
|
|
this pressing problem.
|
|
|
|
END OF PART II
|
|
CONTINUE TO PART III
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|