397 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
397 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
January 15, 1993
|
|
|
|
YORKUFE.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Warren York.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
SCALAR TECHNOLOGY
|
|
MASS VS. ENERGY
|
|
|
|
[ E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ]
|
|
|
|
UNIFIED FIELD EQUATION
|
|
|
|
When I first started writing articles on scalar technology in
|
|
Extraordinary Science three years ago I received phone calls asking
|
|
if I thought Einstein's equation E=MC^2 was wrong or somehow
|
|
incorrect? At that time I did not find fault with the equation and
|
|
said it was correct as is. Something did not look right, but I did
|
|
not know enough at that time to put my finger on just what it was.
|
|
|
|
Due to new developments in our research, we now feel we know what
|
|
was missing in the original equation. The original equation still
|
|
stands true but is lacking an in-depth description of factors that
|
|
up to now were taken as just understood or unrelated as the equation
|
|
stands alone.
|
|
|
|
Gravity is a curved flow of SPACE/TIME. That is to say gravity is
|
|
the geometry of space/time flow where Matter takes on a linear
|
|
vectorial motion known as Time. Since one is made up of the other
|
|
this now introduces two new factors to the equation. The one factor
|
|
known as TIME and is the whole basis of what relativity is formed
|
|
around. Maybe not actual time but more so its effect relative to
|
|
where one is viewing the event taking place at that instant of time.
|
|
|
|
Let me give a very common example of what I mean. When one looks at
|
|
a distant star, he or she is actually looking at a natural time
|
|
machine. The events of that light from that star may have taken
|
|
place thousands upon thousands of years before the observer actually
|
|
looks up and sees the light as it reaches earth. At 186K miles/sec
|
|
[distance/speed] that actual light has long passed and that star
|
|
might not even be in existence anymore.
|
|
|
|
An even more common example would be right here on earth in most
|
|
peoples livingrooms: the television set. Let's say, there are two
|
|
observers in the room. Observer A and observer B are both looking at
|
|
the same set at the exact same instant. Is it the wave property or a
|
|
photon particle property that strikes the eyes of both A and B at
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the same instant? It does not matter if it is the wave property or
|
|
the particle property [duality] that is taking over. The event will
|
|
always be different in time depending on where each observer is
|
|
sitting even though ever so slightly different.
|
|
|
|
If it were a wave property, the time would be almost undetectable
|
|
but still slightly different in a moment of time. If it were a
|
|
particle property then the photon that strikes the eye of one
|
|
observer cannot be the exact same photon that strikes the eyes of
|
|
the second and so forth. Now why is this so important? It introduces
|
|
TIME as a variable factor in our energy to matter or matter to
|
|
energy equation [E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2->].
|
|
|
|
Until now, this time factor has just been taken for granted and
|
|
thought of as understood. The problem with this assumption is that
|
|
at least three if not more, types of time exist:
|
|
|
|
1) Present time where a conjugate wave of light goes back on
|
|
itself to the source,
|
|
2) negative time where events are perceived in the past, and
|
|
3) positive time where events are predicted and take place in
|
|
the future.
|
|
|
|
The key to understanding Einstein's original equation E=MC^2 lies in
|
|
understanding what Einstein understood but others were only able to
|
|
speculate on. That understanding lies in just what is the process
|
|
called MASS. At what point does energy become MASS, and at what
|
|
point does mass become ENERGY? We all know that mass [solid objects]
|
|
are all made up of energy but what or where is the changeover point
|
|
from one to the other? We also know that supposedly nothing can go
|
|
faster than light [186K miles/sec]. If this is true then just what
|
|
did Einstein mean by C2 in his famous equation E=MC^2?
|
|
|
|
By definition C2 means C [186K miles/sec] times C [186K miles/sec]
|
|
which would equal 3.4596e+10 miles/sec. This would be much faster
|
|
than C as we know it. How can this be? What point are we missing
|
|
that Einstein understood? The following is an understanding of just
|
|
what Mass and time are as derived from scalar technology which may
|
|
shed light on this matter.
|
|
|
|
TIME is the linear motion of energy changing position from point to
|
|
point along its world line (Vector). The period in which energy
|
|
changes position is known as frequency.
|
|
|
|
MASS is the counter-rotating birotational (nonlinear) motion of
|
|
energy which must be considered a matter particle at this point
|
|
without respect to a world line (Nonvectorial). Mass experiences
|
|
time and gives up energy as it travels through space, but inherent
|
|
time is cancelled within itself by the positive and negative aspects
|
|
of BIROTATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM as a singularity.
|
|
|
|
Interaction with energy, loss or gain, produces frequency
|
|
oscillations and thus time for mass because it produces change in
|
|
the mass particle. As a particle of mass decays, it returns energy
|
|
to the energy cycle. Therefore, mass may be thought of as energy in
|
|
a "semi-frozen" oriented form or as a multi-dimensional hologram.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ Summation symbol sub L = 0 ]
|
|
|
|
ROTATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM [1]
|
|
|
|
No TIME exists within the matter particle itself.
|
|
(No Change) (Photons added/subtracted = change = time)
|
|
|
|
This now means that E=MC^2 has a hidden variable which till now has
|
|
been overlooked as a real tangible factor known as TIME. To indicate
|
|
this factor the symbols [ * ] meaning rotational and [ <-> ] meaning
|
|
birotational or CW & CCW rotations-[vectors].
|
|
|
|
That would make the equation E=MC^*<-2-> but we would rather it be
|
|
displayed as [E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ] so as not to detract or take
|
|
away in any manner from the great work of Albert Einstein. His would
|
|
be the simplistic and our equation would be the scalar form giving
|
|
the extra dimension known as time. This now opens up Pandora's box.
|
|
This means TIME is a real variable and may be engineered the same as
|
|
matter to energy and the counterpart which is still unproven but
|
|
known to exist, energy to matter.
|
|
|
|
The following are postulates derived by experimentation and study
|
|
done into plotting the fields in scalar technology. Pay close
|
|
attention to the wording.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
VER 2.02 JD92365
|
|
|
|
*Postulates from York's New Unified Field Theory*
|
|
|
|
1. Energy to mass stages
|
|
|
|
a. Motion produces an arc ->
|
|
arc produces a vortex ->
|
|
vortex produces polarity ->
|
|
opposing polarity produces charge->
|
|
charge produces lattice ->
|
|
lattice produces structure ->
|
|
structure produces form
|
|
|
|
2. Orientation between Maxwellian and basic time continuum
|
|
|
|
a. Mass [birotational energy] normally has oscillatory
|
|
motion in nature.
|
|
|
|
* Ex: Electrons in motion in an antenna. [RF radiation]
|
|
|
|
* Ex: Energy with oscillatory motion would be a laser or
|
|
[photon] oscillatory motion.
|
|
|
|
b. Energy [linear] normally has bilateral rotational motion
|
|
in nature.
|
|
|
|
* Ex: An electron [mass particle] is an example of energy
|
|
[photon particles] still unaccepted but our
|
|
interpretation of the makeup of an Electron itself.
|
|
|
|
* Ex: Of mass bilateral rotation would be a Tesla coil
|
|
producing longitudinal waves. [RC] - Reciprocating
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Mass vs. Energy
|
|
|
|
a. Counter-rotating orbital rotational energy = MASS
|
|
|
|
* In our equation[ E=MC^2 :: E=MC^*<-2-> ].
|
|
Note: This is what C^*<-2-> represents.
|
|
|
|
b. Electrons may consist of counter-rotating orbital photons
|
|
|
|
* The upper rotating cluster [direction of electron flow]
|
|
has more photons than the lower counter-rotating cluster.
|
|
The true form is that of a Chaotic Streamline guided by
|
|
the Hopf Ellipse. [2]
|
|
|
|
c. * The force on the poles of the counter-rotating orbital
|
|
photons is at 45 degrees to the magnetic pole of the
|
|
electron which they make up, a part of the optical
|
|
property of photons.
|
|
|
|
d. * Photons have orbital motion in a magnetic field and just
|
|
spin as a singularity.
|
|
|
|
4. Maxwellian vs. Einsteinian
|
|
|
|
a. Free electrons = electrostatic field
|
|
|
|
b. Orbital electrons = space/time displacement = WEAK Force
|
|
|
|
c. Alignment of space/time displacement [orbital
|
|
electrons] = STRONG Force
|
|
|
|
5. Gyroscopic action
|
|
|
|
a. Gyroscopic action fixes/sets re-orientation of
|
|
space/time within one relativity consisting
|
|
of at least four dimensions.
|
|
|
|
* Orbital rotation is gyroscopic action.
|
|
|
|
6. Constants vs. non-constants
|
|
|
|
a. The speed of light is not constant.
|
|
|
|
* We are limited to the detection of events at the speed of
|
|
light in our relativity. EX: Take a wide flat rubberband
|
|
and mark one inch on it to represent 186K mps [speed of
|
|
light]
|
|
|
|
b. The distance of a speed of light is constant relative to
|
|
its frame of reference.
|
|
|
|
* Now stretch the rubberband and mark on a flat piece of
|
|
paper the new length of the DISTANCE of the speed of light.
|
|
The new extended line is still the distance of the speed of
|
|
light, but the speed relative to the unstretched line must
|
|
be FTL because we are still using the line from our
|
|
original relativity. [4D]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Energy/Mass/Time/Space
|
|
|
|
a. Mass traveling at or near the speed of light does not
|
|
actually become infinite but only SEEMS to from the view
|
|
of the observer [A] and nothing has actually changed from
|
|
the view of [B] the observer doing the motion except [DSL]
|
|
the distance of the speed of light.
|
|
|
|
* Special Relativity is not needed to explain this action.
|
|
The observation of mass reaching infinity by [A] is due to
|
|
space/time being stretched and bent around [B] the
|
|
traveler.
|
|
|
|
b. All matter stretches [alters] space/TIME [the distance of
|
|
the speed of light] as one passes through the other.
|
|
|
|
* The time is what is altered [stretched] not the amount of
|
|
space itself. This process is known as time lensing. This
|
|
is also known as perception. [To perceive you must have
|
|
change]
|
|
|
|
c. Light-shift/frequency-spectrum is due to the SLUSH effect
|
|
of space/time [lensing].
|
|
|
|
d. Frequency = Angle of bent space/time
|
|
|
|
* Bent space/time acts as a prism for color separation
|
|
|
|
8. Mathematical assumptions in true relativity
|
|
|
|
a. In more than one relativity [4D] Mathematically, actions
|
|
are NOT ADDITIVE but are a PRODUCT of each other.
|
|
Ex:C^2 In relativity [singular or one set of 4D] actions
|
|
are mathematically additives except for the speed of light
|
|
itself.
|
|
Ex: [C' + C'] Note: C'= one set distance of the speed of
|
|
light within one singular or prime relativity.
|
|
|
|
9. Gravity - Unification field
|
|
|
|
a. Gravity is a PROCESS not a particle. A push-pull force
|
|
[pump]. It is more of a PUSH than a pull force.
|
|
|
|
* This is part of the distance squared law. If you are at
|
|
the arc of the field flow it is a PUSH and if you are in
|
|
closer to the mass you are in the counter-rotating flow and
|
|
it is a PULL force. [ButterflyField-Pattern]
|
|
|
|
We feel these postulates are the basic building blocks of our
|
|
fundamental particles. We do not feel gravitons or quarks exist as
|
|
sub-particles and no such evidence has been brought forward beyond a
|
|
shadow of a doubt to prove the QCD concept. The photon itself has
|
|
pre-energy levels which is beyond the scope of this paper at this
|
|
time. The postulates and concepts are far from being finished and
|
|
work is currently advancing in a positive direction.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES
|
|
|
|
1. Laboratory Manual, Physics and experimental Science by H.E.
|
|
White, D.H. White, Mauri Gould, 1968
|
|
|
|
2. Nonlinear Dynamics of Structures, by R.M. Kiehn, "Compact
|
|
dissipative flow structures with tgopological coherence,
|
|
embedded in eulerian environments" 1989 IUTAM meeting on
|
|
Topological Fluid Mechanics
|
|
|
|
December 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
By: Warren E. York
|
|
[915] 581-3931
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Charlotte Geier
|
|
[915] 581-0581
|
|
|
|
* INFO/NET, 7101 N. Mesa, Suite 133, El Paso, Texas 79912 *
|
|
|
|
END
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|