82 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
______________________________________________________________________________
|
||
| File Name : WHATISFE.ASC | Online Date : 10/15/94 |
|
||
| Contributed by : Steve Gantt | Dir Category : ENERGY |
|
||
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
|
||
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
|
||
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|
||
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
WHAT IS FREE ENERGY
|
||
by D.A. KELLY
|
||
(taken from The Manual of Free Energy Systems Vol. II)
|
||
|
||
The term " free energy"' , is considered to be the net EMF yield, or energy
|
||
differential between the input to an electromagnetic unit or system and the
|
||
output EMF produced by it.
|
||
|
||
Some electromagnetic machines produce an output "slightly" above unity, while
|
||
others have produced outputs of about three-to-one. Lately, the output ratios
|
||
have been rising, with a recent unit providing about five-to-one, The
|
||
prospects are quite good for a continuing and steady increase in these
|
||
input/output ratios.
|
||
|
||
The concept of electromagnetic "free energy" should not be considered to be
|
||
the same as natural free energy sources such as solar-wind, hyrdo or
|
||
geothermal energies, because these new E/M machines usually require an input
|
||
energy in order to obtain an increased energy output, which the natural
|
||
sources do not require.
|
||
|
||
Several years ago there were only a few ""free energy"" devices which appeared
|
||
to offer hopeful opportunities for development, but today there are AT LEAST
|
||
FIVE significant individual projects which are operating at varying degrees of
|
||
over-unity output.
|
||
|
||
While these various machines or devices in both rotating and solid state
|
||
classes are based on classic Faraday/Maxwell principles, they achieve their
|
||
over-unity output by the ENHANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTIVITY WITHIN THE UNIT
|
||
or system.
|
||
|
||
It must be noted that some senior physicists, in an attempt to discredit some
|
||
free energy researcher's projects are proposing the discarding of Maxwell's
|
||
mathematics with their new theories and operating machines. After a thorough
|
||
review of each researchers work it was found that rather than the discarding
|
||
of Maxwell's equation principles, these various machines actually supplement
|
||
or enhance the electromagnetic functioning in each case, based on Maxwell's
|
||
Second equation.
|
||
|
||
Since this attempted discrediting has occurred in two distinct cases it
|
||
appears to be a planned and contrived approach to putting down "free energy"
|
||
efforts.
|
||
|
||
One of the major reasons that establishment physicists resist the Concept of
|
||
"free energy" is that the tachyon field concept goes against the Special
|
||
Theory of Relativity which limits particle speeds to the speed of light. The
|
||
tachyon concept (fast particles) has been proven valid based on the findings
|
||
of Professor Gerald Feinberg at Columbia University in 1967. Several of these
|
||
new over-unity output machines have established the reality of the tachyon
|
||
field as witnessed by the individual researchers.
|
||
|
||
In addition to Professor Feinberg's findings on the fast particle concept, a
|
||
U.S. Naval research team which was running various experiments during the
|
||
1950's recorded a spot indicator moving across a CRT scope screen at a speed
|
||
of 202,000 miles per second, which could not be explained. These tests results
|
||
were noted as the interaction of particles moving at about 16,000 mites per
|
||
second.
|
||
|
||
Aware of the constant of 186,000 speed of light standard, these experimenters
|
||
rechecked their test setup, but again recorded the same results of the 202,000
|
||
mps particle speed. Since none could offer an explanation of these findings,
|
||
the test results just went into limbo and were noted as an unexplained
|
||
phenomena.
|
||
|
||
The result of the "Saganac Experiment" in 1913, also has never been
|
||
satisfactorily explained by contemporary physicists. In this experiment two
|
||
simultaneous light sources were sent in opposite directions around a closed
|
||
path, and photographic plates recorded the impingement of the light sources.
|
||
|
||
If the basic beliefs of relativity "were correct" both light signals would
|
||
have traveled these equal closed, circular paths (equal to the distance around
|
||
the earth's surface) in identical times. The results disclosed that they did
|
||
..not! We must conclude that a modification to Special Relativity is needed!
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|