265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
April 20, 1994
|
|
|
|
TOD2.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Lee Trippett.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Jerry Decker
|
|
KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
Dear Jerry,
|
|
|
|
The enclosed copy is to keep you up-to-date on my activities with
|
|
regard to the capture of 'space energy'.
|
|
|
|
I started my work on the Bearden switching circuit in order to be
|
|
prepared when the critical semiconductor material is made available.
|
|
By much trial and error, my discovery, not invention, is only a
|
|
small introduction.
|
|
|
|
The content of the enclosed contains important correction and update
|
|
of my earlier releases.
|
|
|
|
Please call if there is any question or you would like an updated
|
|
complete copy of the circuit and description.
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
Lee Trippett
|
|
2025 Rogue River Dr.
|
|
Eagle Point, OR 97524
|
|
503-826-5175 with manual FAX
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
3/20/94
|
|
|
|
Hal Fox, Editor
|
|
New Energy News
|
|
P.O. Box 58639
|
|
Salt Lake City, UT 84158
|
|
|
|
Dear Mr. Fox,
|
|
|
|
Thanks to the advice of Dan Davidson, I recently went to Santa Maria
|
|
and met Walt Rosenthal. I have personally experienced the quality
|
|
of this man's experience and his reputation for being the final
|
|
authority on electrical and electronic measurements. With his
|
|
modern and high-tech equipment, he patiently and meticulously
|
|
checked every point of data on my version of Bearden's theoretical
|
|
switching circuit. (See "Current News on Current Gain", New Energy
|
|
News, Feb. '94, p.15.)
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every one of his measurements validated my data. In conclusion,
|
|
however, the circuit effects a large current gain but there was no
|
|
power gain. Walt's current probes and high resolution test
|
|
equipment were able to measure the input power during the short
|
|
pulse of the primary circuit. When this measured power is averaged
|
|
over the period of the complete cycle, it matched my calculations.
|
|
|
|
My calibrated analog dc milliammeters represented a true average
|
|
current value and so they represented the corrected ON time of the
|
|
primary circuit. My error was to apply ON time adjustment to the
|
|
"potential" source when the average measured current already
|
|
contained, in effect, that adjustment.
|
|
|
|
There are still rays of hope. Some "space energy" theory relates
|
|
directly to this circuit and its present performance. (See
|
|
supplement.) A couple of experienced "space energy" researchers
|
|
are puzzled by the circuit's non-conventional features. I and
|
|
others have gained much experience and knowledge. By the content of
|
|
this letter, the two supplements, and past correspondence (see also
|
|
KeelyNet files TOD*.*.), my "gain" has been fully shared with many.
|
|
|
|
When the required 'special semiconductor material' shows up, many
|
|
more people will now have an easier time in checking out Tom
|
|
Bearden's theory, method #2.
|
|
|
|
In the meantime, there is still much to learn. Why does this simple
|
|
circuit perform as a current amplifier? Why is the current
|
|
discharge so incredibly slow for an extremely low circuit
|
|
resistance? Why is there so little variation in the performance of
|
|
the circuit when the coil "collector" parameters are adjusted over a
|
|
wide range? Why is the high current gain limited to a small range
|
|
of on-off ratio and frequency? Why does the circuit not work with a
|
|
variety of power MOSFETs, even when listed by NTE as equivalent?
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your vote of confidence by publishing my earlier
|
|
experience with the Bearden circuit. It strikes me as a remarkable
|
|
coincidence that the coverage of space energy and a preliminary
|
|
investigation of Bearden's free energy circuit were in the same NEN
|
|
newsletter, and exactly one year after the release of Bearden's
|
|
"The Final Secret of Free Energy".
|
|
|
|
There is still a need to test the circuit with Bearden's mysterious
|
|
"degenerative semiconductor material" in the 'collector'. I have
|
|
found a source of gold ribbon alloy with 12% germanium. There is
|
|
another source for anodized aluminum foil for testing a capacitor
|
|
'collector'. Neither source is willing to provide enough sample for
|
|
test and the minimum order for both sources far exceeds my limited
|
|
budget.
|
|
|
|
I will keep you posted. Please let me know if there are any
|
|
questions.
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
Lee Trippett
|
|
2025 Rogue River Dr.
|
|
Eagle Point, OR 97524
|
|
503-826-5175 with manual FAX
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc: Tom Bearden Dan Davidson
|
|
Jerry Decker Bill Herzog
|
|
Ed Johnston Lester Larson
|
|
Dave Marsh Alexander Peterson
|
|
Chris Terraneau Ben Trippett
|
|
Dave Trippett
|
|
|
|
Inc: Space Energy Theory and Replication
|
|
|
|
The Bearden Circuit and the
|
|
View of "New Energy News" on Space Energy
|
|
|
|
I believe space energy characteristics are behind Bearden's simple
|
|
"free energy" switching circuit. Here are some NEN comments on
|
|
space energy which relate to my current version of Bearden's
|
|
theoretical switching circuit. All references are from the Feb.
|
|
'94 issue of New Energy News.
|
|
|
|
Space energy is fundamental in stabilizing all matter (pg. 3, col.
|
|
2, para. 1) and is all-pervading without regard to temperature or
|
|
vacuum. (pg. 4, col. 1, para. 4; col. 2, para. 3) It is from "zero-
|
|
point fluctuations of the background vacuum electromagnetic field".
|
|
(pg. 3, col. 1, para. 3)
|
|
|
|
Space energy can be tapped without limit (pg. 4, col. 2, para. 3)
|
|
from an accelerated frame of reference. (pg.9, col. 1, para. 2)
|
|
Electric current through a coil exhibits an aligning effect upon
|
|
space energy. The process of modifying the alignment of space
|
|
energy couples space energy into electrical coil thus inducing an
|
|
electric current. Electric induction can therefore be attributed to
|
|
changes in the alignment of space energy. (pg. 9, col. 2, para. 1)
|
|
|
|
Solutions for Measurements and Replication
|
|
|
|
This version of Bearden's switching circuit presently shows very
|
|
little power capacity but a significant current gain (now up to
|
|
200). This is without the use of semiconductor material or the use
|
|
of a super high speed switching rate, i.e, 10E-19 sec. And so we
|
|
are only at the beginning of our potential! Even though there is
|
|
presently a small current in the primary loop (the ideal is none),
|
|
the switching circuit demonstrates a large current gain when there
|
|
is a sharp pulse (at least on the trailing side), a switch ON of a
|
|
few microseconds to a wire "collector", and a low circuit resistance
|
|
in both the primary and secondary loops. The "collector" needs to
|
|
be at least 30 feet of 22 gauge. Longer and larger is okay.
|
|
|
|
The ideal measurement tool is a low level DC current probe and a
|
|
digital scope. When using series in-circuit milli-ammeters, they
|
|
need to have less than 2.0 ohms internal resistance. These are not
|
|
common. And so add a shunt to quality low level m icro or milli-
|
|
ammeters. However, low resistance DC ammeters have difficulty
|
|
reading the low current values in the primary loop. Determining
|
|
these low values is critical for proper calculation of gain.
|
|
|
|
Caution: A pulsed DC current is not the same thing as an AC signal.
|
|
Many RMS meters are for common AC or AC on DC patterns. Many
|
|
digital ammeters do not take a fast enough sample or take enough
|
|
samples to integrate a one microsecond pulse that is ON only 0.2 of
|
|
1 percent of the time. A little arithmetic and a simple series DC
|
|
circuit with an electronic switch will provide ample demonstration.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start with a low frequency and an ON OFF ratio of one. Apply the
|
|
meters and gradually increase the frequency and then gradually
|
|
increase or decrease the ON OFF ratio. This will verify and provide
|
|
a calibration for the meters.
|
|
|
|
When there is a very short ON time of a DC pulse relative to a long
|
|
OFF time and when the values are very low on the scale, an extreme
|
|
ON OFF ratio can factor a major significance in determining current
|
|
or power gain. However, the meter scale can be calibrated by
|
|
substituting a known resistor in the "collector" position. The
|
|
fixed and known voltage of the Bearden circuit primary loop divided
|
|
by the resistor value times the ON/(ON+ OFF) time will establish the
|
|
correct current value for the scale.
|
|
|
|
Calculation of power out is by the current squared times the load
|
|
because the high impedance of voltmeters prevents them from
|
|
providing an average value with the same relative reference. Low
|
|
resistance analog electromechanical DC ammeters can provide a
|
|
reasonably accurate average current value. This is proven by the
|
|
meters indicating the same current in both loops when using a
|
|
capacitor "collector over a wide range of frequency and ON OFF
|
|
ratios. This is also proved by a consistent battery time-energy
|
|
drain curve for the same wide range of frequencies and ON OFF
|
|
ratios. This is for the situation of a load in the secondary loop
|
|
when compared to the same load on a direct battery connection.
|
|
|
|
However, there is a limit and be sure to note the caution above.
|
|
|
|
In addition to measurement problems, the lack of replication of a
|
|
current gain appears to stem from substituting components with high
|
|
internal resistance, slow switching rate capability, or not matching
|
|
impedance to maintain a sharp pulse. Even a small signal general
|
|
purpose high frequency FET in only the inverter stage degrades the
|
|
performance. There are chips and boards especially designed for
|
|
driving power MOSFETs. And still yet to be tested are those power
|
|
MOSFETs which have a hundred times less internal resistance.
|
|
|
|
A recent KeelyNet file called ZPETEST offers additional insight and
|
|
improvements. (KeelyNet is a free BBS, datum 214-324-3501.) This
|
|
file suggests my circuit is similar to a conventional flyback
|
|
converter. The circuit is similar but not equal. There is no
|
|
evidence of current or voltage leaking from either of the batteries
|
|
into the load.
|
|
|
|
The circuit will support additional parallel "Bearden portions" with
|
|
practically no additional burden on the switch and inverter stage.
|
|
|
|
Questions?
|
|
|
|
Why does this simple circuit perform as a current amplifier? Why is
|
|
the current discharge so incredibly slow for an extremely low
|
|
circuit resistance? Why is there so little variation in the
|
|
performance of the circuit when the coil "collector" parameters are
|
|
adjusted over a wide range? Why is the high current gain limited to
|
|
a small range of on-off ratio and frequency? Why does the circuit
|
|
not work with a variety of power MOSFETs, even when listed by NTE as
|
|
equivalent?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|