463 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
463 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
January 29,1994
|
|
|
|
TOD.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This SUPERIOR file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of fellow
|
|
researchers Lee Trippett and Dan Davidson.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Lee received a set of KeelyNet files several months back. After
|
|
studying various files, he decided to work with the concepts as
|
|
described in Bearden's paper on "The Final Secret of Free Energy".
|
|
|
|
The following description requires the schematic file TOD.GIF so
|
|
that you can also build and experiment with this apparent overunity
|
|
device (approximately 1:25 gain). We here at KeelyNet urge you to
|
|
please share your findings and resist the temptation to patent or
|
|
otherwise control free energy technologies.
|
|
|
|
Such devices have been discovered many times in the past and the
|
|
main reason we don't have them in practical use TODAY is because of
|
|
secrecy, greed and/or ego. Some were anomalous or unstable and
|
|
difficult to reproduce but would it not be to the world's best
|
|
interests that what IS known should be available to everyone so that
|
|
we could quantify and improve on it?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The Trippett OverUnity Device (TOD)
|
|
(Lee didn't name this, I did <g>..JWD)
|
|
|
|
written by Lee Trippett
|
|
|
|
My experiments with Tom Bearden's switching circuit theoretical
|
|
concepts seems to show a significant power gain. This is supposed
|
|
to be against all the textbook rules which are currently in vogue.
|
|
|
|
With the my version of Bearden's switching circuit it is easy to
|
|
show a dramatic increase in current through a fixed load, even while
|
|
the battery current decreases. This gives the impression and
|
|
calculation of a power gain but there are other considerations.
|
|
|
|
Many major national suppliers of electrical conducting wire have
|
|
been called and not one had any wire with a specification relating
|
|
to relaxation time, i.e. the time it takes for electrons to start
|
|
moving after a potential is applied. (This is not the same as the
|
|
time for a signal to travel along the circuit.)
|
|
|
|
The "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1993" and "McGraw-Hill
|
|
Encyclopedia of Science and Technology" were checked, without
|
|
success, for a listing of relaxation times for various conducting
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
materials. Therefore, I tried to simulate a delay by placing
|
|
silicon diodes or a very long wire between the battery, switch, and
|
|
'collector'.
|
|
|
|
These two 'delay items' were placed in a synchronized flexible
|
|
switch circuit which was developed according to the Bearden circuit
|
|
requirements. (See Bearden's KeelyNet file 'FREENRG4.ASC' method 2,
|
|
datum 1-214-324-3501. This is a free BBS. Other related files are
|
|
Sweet*.*, ZPE*.*, Reply*.*, & Polarize.*)
|
|
|
|
A sharp (20 nanosecond rise/fall time) ON switch pulse of 1 to 5
|
|
microseconds is directed to a power MOSFET (Q2) between a battery
|
|
(V2) and 'collector' with a following synchronized ON pulse directed
|
|
to Q3 which is up to 10 times greater than the time constant between
|
|
the 'collector' and load. (See schematic.)
|
|
|
|
Data has been plotted for the current, voltage, and time of carbon
|
|
zinc batteries. These are cheaper and quicker to run down for
|
|
measuring energy loss.
|
|
|
|
Bearden's theory requires very fast switching times. Anything less
|
|
than one microsecond is very expensive. This is where I decided to
|
|
try Mr. William Price's suggestion of 1500 feet of solid copper wire
|
|
(see KeelyNet file 'RELAX1.ASC').
|
|
|
|
This length should give a delay of 1.5 microseconds. The first
|
|
observation was a reverse in the direction of current in the load
|
|
circuit (mA3) and it (this reversal) was much more than the battery
|
|
current (mA2).
|
|
|
|
Regardless of the switching rate, on/off ratio, capacitor
|
|
'collector' size, or presence of diodes the 'energy loss' curve for
|
|
these 9V batteries is remarkably consistent when the average current
|
|
is held constant. (40ma for a 9V carbon zinc battery seems optimum
|
|
for an energy curve that is consistent and can be seen in a short
|
|
time of 20 to 30 minutes.) For a wire 'collector' the energy drain
|
|
for the battery (V2) is considerably less for a 40 ma 'load
|
|
current'. (See chart.)
|
|
|
|
For a wide range of on/off ratio and frequency the current in both
|
|
loops is always the same when any size ordinary capacitor is used as
|
|
the 'collector'. This is for fixed resistor loads of 1, 2, 4, 12,
|
|
33, and 190 ohms.
|
|
|
|
For Bearden's portion of the circuit, the computation of 'power in'
|
|
by V2 x mA2 x (on time)/(on plus off time) is always greater than
|
|
the computation of 'power out' by mA3 squared times load resistance.
|
|
(I have no means for measuring average voltage for a complex
|
|
waveform.)
|
|
|
|
With a dual trace scope on the 'source' of Q2 and Q3 one can see
|
|
clearly the synchronized switching action and the charge-discharge
|
|
curves. The 'energy' drain on the battery (V2) is always directly
|
|
related to the average pulsed current in the battery circuit. This
|
|
is equivalent to the energy drain for the same current in a directly
|
|
connected non-switched load to the battery.
|
|
|
|
For a wire 'collector' and a rather narrow range of pulse width and
|
|
frequency (see schematic notes) the current in loop Q3 reverses
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
direction and can be more than 40 times the current in loop Q2.
|
|
(I've measured as much as a 60 to 1 ratio.) Note: The wire does not
|
|
need to be in a coil form.
|
|
|
|
The circuit represents a 'current (and power?) amplifier' for a wire
|
|
'collector' and a 'power control' for a capacitor 'collector'. This
|
|
conclusion is based on a measured 1 ma, 8 volt value in loop Q2
|
|
which calculates as 8 mw.
|
|
|
|
The corresponding values in loop Q3 can be up to 40 ma through 1 ohm
|
|
which is 1.6 mw for a significant power loss instead of a gain.
|
|
However, when the input power computation is adjusted for the actual
|
|
'time-on' for the battery (V2) there is a computational show of
|
|
power gain by as much as a factor of 25.
|
|
|
|
However, actual current flow is not only determined by the voltage
|
|
and load but also by:
|
|
|
|
1) pulse width for both loops;
|
|
2) time constant for both loops; and
|
|
3) on-off period (frequency).
|
|
|
|
For a dramatic visual demonstration of a 'current gain', do this:
|
|
|
|
set a specific value of pulse width and frequency for an
|
|
ordinary 1 uf metal film capacitor 'collector' so that current
|
|
in both the Q2 and Q3 loops is 4 ma.
|
|
|
|
When a wire coil of 40 ft. #22 solid magnet wire is substituted
|
|
without changing anything else the current reverses direction in the
|
|
Q3 loop, the current in loop Q2 drops to 1 ma, and the current in
|
|
loop Q3 increases to 40 ma.
|
|
|
|
How can 40 ma (10 times more output current with 4 times less input
|
|
power) be pushed through exactly the same load by simply (and only)
|
|
replacing a capacitor with a chunk of wire?
|
|
|
|
Because a 1 ohm load for a 9 volt source should theoretically allow
|
|
9 amps. It is the switching characteristics, time constant, and
|
|
frequency which have a greater control on the resulting current than
|
|
does the load or supply voltage.
|
|
|
|
The attached battery energy drain curves look like a very promising
|
|
'power gain' but can be easily misinterpreted for the reasons just
|
|
stated. (By the way, the current in mA1 remains unchanged in this
|
|
switch of passive nonlinear 'collector' components. This current is
|
|
about 10 ma and could probably be much less by using a small signal
|
|
FET inverter stage. This current is the same without any connection
|
|
to the two FET's Q2 and Q3.)
|
|
|
|
When using a wire 'collector' the current ratio increases as the
|
|
voltage for V2 increases. This seems to confirm Bearden's
|
|
theoretical discovery but the surprising results I assume are the
|
|
result, in part, of an autotransformer effect by means of self
|
|
induction. The current ratio decreases as the load increases.
|
|
|
|
The current ratio increases as the 'coil collector' resistance
|
|
decreases. The load current increases as the period of the on/off
|
|
cycle decreases.
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two experienced electronic engineers are convinced there is
|
|
something wrong with the circuit or instruments and that it is
|
|
impossible to have a power gain. They are unwilling to admit that
|
|
the vacuum of the universe is indeed a plenum full of energy.
|
|
|
|
It will be hard for many to realize that it is impossible to have a
|
|
'closed system' with the new insight of reality as summarized by Tom
|
|
Bearden.
|
|
|
|
Lee Trippett,
|
|
2025 Rogue River Dr.,
|
|
Eagle Point, OR 97524
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following is the description for components used in the circuit
|
|
TOD.GIF.
|
|
|
|
Part Part Part Radio Shack Estimated
|
|
Designation Type Number Number Cost
|
|
|
|
TL555 CMOS Timer TL555 276-1718 $1.39
|
|
Q1-Q3 Power MOSFET IRF510 or 511 276-2072 1.99
|
|
R1 Potentiometer 10,000 ohm
|
|
R2 Potentiometer 5,000 ohm
|
|
R3 Potentiometer 5,000 ohm
|
|
R4 Potentiometer 5,000 ohm
|
|
R5 Potentiometer 5,000 ohm
|
|
R6 Potentiometer 5,000 ohm
|
|
C1 Capacitor 0.1 or 0.68uf
|
|
|
|
Potentiometers R1 through R6 should be set at the following
|
|
approximate values and should be adjusted for the maximum gain for
|
|
your circuit, they adjust the on/off time of the 555 timer :
|
|
|
|
R1 - ~7K resistor
|
|
R2 - ~100 ohm resistor
|
|
R3 - ~470 ohm resistor
|
|
R4 - ~190 ohm resistor
|
|
R5 - ~190 ohm resistor
|
|
R6 - ~2.2Kohm resistor
|
|
|
|
(These initial values may vary depending on the Qn MOSFETs)
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The Power MOSFETs are used as high speed switches.
|
|
|
|
The Load is a 1 to 4 ohm fixed resistor. Greater resistor values
|
|
will reduce the current ratio when using a wire coil as a collector.
|
|
|
|
Current is always a function of the settings for R1 and R2. Adjust
|
|
the frequency to about 3kHZ with a pulse width of about 2
|
|
microseconds for a current amplification of at least 40 to 1 which
|
|
translates to a 25 over-unity gain in power out.
|
|
|
|
The "collector" is a wire coil. Coils which give similar results
|
|
are ;
|
|
|
|
(1) 500 foot coil of solid core, 12 gauge copper wire,
|
|
(2) 100 foot coils of 22 gauge solid hookup wire, and
|
|
(3) 40 foot coils of #22 magnet wire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The important thing to note is the inverter should be setup so Q2 is
|
|
ON and Q3 is OFF and vice versa and the pulse shapes are preserved
|
|
as much as possible going into Q2 and Q3. The MOSFETs must be
|
|
REALLY OFF or parasitic current losses will occur.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The following is an excerpt removed from the file FREENRG4.ASC as
|
|
written by Tom Bearden.
|
|
|
|
(2) The second way is to "trap the electron gas electrons" in a
|
|
separate collector, feed "current-free potential" to the
|
|
collector from a primary battery or other source of
|
|
potential, and collect a bunch of excess energy
|
|
(potential) in the collector's "penned up free electron
|
|
'horses'" waiting to carry the excess energy to the load and
|
|
dissipate it there, once they have been released.
|
|
|
|
Then, one switches the primary potential source away from the
|
|
collector, while the "energy-loaded horses" are still trapped
|
|
and straining at the bit, so that no work can be done __ by
|
|
those agitated horses when they stampede out of there __ on
|
|
the internal resistance of the primary source, to destroy or
|
|
reduce it.
|
|
|
|
In the same switching action, the collector with its
|
|
"snorting but still trapped electron horses" is switched
|
|
across the load to form a totally separate circuit with it,
|
|
having nothing at all to do with the original primary source
|
|
of potential. Then, the agitated horses are released, and
|
|
thunder out through the load, scattering their riders (excess
|
|
energy) in all directions in the load, producing work/heat
|
|
and powering the load. They will also charge on around
|
|
to the reverse side of the collector, and kill its charge
|
|
separation (kill its potential) as well, just as does any
|
|
ordinary circuit.
|
|
|
|
The major disadvantage of method 1, as we presently have seen
|
|
it done (however, check Barrett's demonstration that Tesla's
|
|
patented circuitry is capable of doing it by circuitry
|
|
alone), is that time-reversed electrical energy is produced.
|
|
|
|
So Method 1 has some serious drawbacks. "Time-reversed energy
|
|
stuff", which should stay in the atomic nucleus as Newtonian
|
|
3rd law reactions and 3rd-law energy exchanges, is dragged
|
|
out.
|
|
|
|
Unusual effects on biological systems can occur. Antigravity
|
|
effects can occur. Other hidden processes in the universes,
|
|
that affect the atomic nucleus, can be gated into the
|
|
external circuitry, causing disaster. Monopoles can be
|
|
deposited in the magnets, causing them to explode like hand
|
|
grenades. Most of the new "massive time-reverse energy"
|
|
phenomenology is still unknown.
|
|
|
|
One cannot at this stage of ignorance adequately guarantee
|
|
human safety. I presently don't see just how this kind of
|
|
energy can pass an Underwriter Laboratories' testing and
|
|
certification, until a lot more exhaustive work is done to
|
|
understand the new phenomenology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method 2, however, yields ordinary, garden-variety, positive-time
|
|
electrical energy. The method presented in the paper is my own
|
|
discovery. No unusual time-reversed phenomena are involved. It
|
|
would appear to be eminently practical to produce and certify power
|
|
units based on Method 2. The phenomenology and risks are the same as
|
|
for ordinary, time-forward power systems.
|
|
|
|
Method 2 has another unique characteristic: as a system, all the
|
|
subsystems are already in the literature and validated. They have
|
|
just not previously been put together in this fashion. So
|
|
development of the system really represents an "integration" problem
|
|
only, after one first does a little development of a proper
|
|
degenerate semiconductor material (DSM).
|
|
|
|
In other words, one first develops (and tests) the exact doping
|
|
materials and percentage, to get a DSM material that is still a good
|
|
conductor but has a relaxation time of __ say __ one tenth of a
|
|
millisecond. One builds the wires from the battery to the collector
|
|
out of this new DSM material. If one uses a capacitor for the
|
|
collector, the plates must be made out of the new DSM material, not
|
|
out of normal "pure conductor" material.
|
|
|
|
Then one develops a switcher that switches in one tenth (or less)
|
|
the relaxation time of the DSM, or in this case in one hundredth of
|
|
a millisecond. That switching time, of course, is easy for any
|
|
decent electronic technician or electronic engineer.
|
|
|
|
One also develops a timing circuit that will
|
|
|
|
(1) sense the status of the discharge of the collector energy
|
|
through the load, and
|
|
(2) trigger the switching at the correct times so that a smooth
|
|
two-cycle (collect, discharge) process results. Note that
|
|
the lengths of cycle one and cycle two are not necessarily
|
|
equal at all. One may use multiple collectors/loads
|
|
simultaneously, cascaded collectors/loads, etc. Hundreds
|
|
of variations are possible and feasible.
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to do anything with this discovery in a normal
|
|
manner. I would dearly like to be economically independent, so I
|
|
could work full time in my efforts on free energy, antigravity,
|
|
extended EM healing, cancer, etc.
|
|
|
|
Many orthodox scientists will also fiercely resist this upstart
|
|
notion of "overunity" electrical machines to the bitter end. When
|
|
powerful economic interests realize one has such things for real,
|
|
one is certainly going to be stopped, jailed, or killed, or he may
|
|
just "mysteriously vanish" and never be seen again.
|
|
|
|
So I just freely released and distributed my discovery of method 2,
|
|
in the paper "The Final Secret of Free Energy". It is deliberately
|
|
targeted toward technicians, junior engineers, and educated laymen.
|
|
(The principles and definitions raised, however, can be debated to
|
|
the nth degree by knowledgeable foundation scientists).
|
|
|
|
The paper has already been distributed worldwide. Now the principles
|
|
and definitions are available to everyone. If they are in error,
|
|
shortly that will be proven in spades. If they are correct, that
|
|
will also be established shortly.
|
|
|
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who wishes can develop and patent a particular application.
|
|
There's no longer any way to stop this information from being
|
|
disseminated and utilized. I hope that a flurry of development and
|
|
patenting activity will result around the world.
|
|
|
|
Get cheap, clean electrical energy to everyone. Bring on the
|
|
electric auto, clean up the noxious auto exhausts, get rid of giant
|
|
oil spills, and clean up the biosphere.
|
|
|
|
Tom Bearden, March 12, 1993
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Note
|
|
|
|
The above information relates to Bearden's observation that
|
|
potential can be trapped in such a way as to avoid the flow of
|
|
current. It is easy to think of this in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
Current flows on the surface of conductors, not on the interior.
|
|
When voltage is applied to a conductor, it must "fill it up" from
|
|
the inside out. That voltage "filling" effect is where the
|
|
circuit is coming to unity with the voltage source and so, in a
|
|
manner of speaking, is creating a "well" or hole that must be
|
|
filled.
|
|
|
|
There is no current actually passed OVER the surface UNTIL the
|
|
conductor has filled FROM the inside TO the outside. At that
|
|
point, the voltage "translates" into current.
|
|
|
|
It is at this point, that the voltage (potential) must be removed
|
|
from the circuit, that is, BEFORE current actually can flow. The
|
|
relaxation time of the conductor is thus how long it takes the
|
|
conductor to fill up.
|
|
|
|
The circuit must be timed so that the potential fills up the
|
|
"collector" (coil of wire), then is rapidly switched INTO the
|
|
load where it dissipates in the form of heat or work. The
|
|
collector is then switched back to again "fill up".
|
|
|
|
All of us here at KeelyNet look forward to future exchanges of
|
|
information or research results and we wish you success in your
|
|
experiments.
|
|
|
|
You can print the TOD.GIF circuit by using Windows Paint, or
|
|
download VUIMG.ZIP from KeelyNet.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|