2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

199 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 6, 1991
TIME2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Tom Albion.
Tom operates the THC Online System at 604-361-4549.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Playing fast and loose with time:
a new study suggests that time travel is not quite impossible.
by William F. Allman
Time travel has popped from the annals of science fiction into the
realm of scientific respectability at least in theory, that is.
By combining two well-established principles originally outlined by
Albert Einstein nearly a century ago in his theories of relativity,
three theoretical physicists have proposed a novel scheme that
appears to permit a limited sort of time travel.
The scientists' result is not anything close to a blueprint for
building the sort of time machine that science-fiction heroes are
forever leaping into to explore the lives of cave men or peek into
the future. But it suggests that either Einstein's equations are
wrong or that the universe is governed by some very different
principles from what physicists have long assumed.
The notion that the causes of an event taking place in the present
could be eliminated by traveling into the past and changing history
has always made physicists (not to mention stock speculators and
newspaper publishers) squeamish about the idea of time travel.
Physicists have thus held that there must be laws that provide a
kind of "cosmic censorship" that prevents moving through time, and
thus any tampering with the sequence of events. Various theoretical
scenarios for time travel have been cooked up in the past, but in
each case physicists have found physical laws that blocked it.
The new study, however, appears not to violate any known physical
laws. "We're asking, if you take Einstein's equations far enough,
will they get you in trouble?" says Michael S. Morris of the
University of Wisconsin, one of the co-authors of the new study.
"We're suggesting that maybe they will, because at some level we may
have to abandon either Einstein or causality" - the basic principle
of physics that one event Time flies.
Page 1
The authors' hypothetical time "machine" starts with Einstein's
famous, and apparently paradoxical, discovery that time is not
constant throughout the universe, but rather varies depending on the
velocity at which the timekeeper is traveling.
While to an astronaut, a clock on board a speeding spaceship will
appear to tick at a normal rate, to a stationary observer on Earth,
the clock will appear to be marking time very slowly. This apparent
slowing of time applies not only to clocks but to everything in the
spaceship, including the astronauts, and has given rise to what is
known as the "twin paradox":
When the speeding astronaut returns to Earth, he will
have aged LESS than a twin brother he left behind.
This bizarre time-slowing effect has been demonstrated by
researchers who synchronized two highly accurate atomic clocks and
then flew one of the pair aboard a high-speed jet for hours. When
the two clocks were reunited, the airborne clock had fallen slightly
behind its stationary twin.
The second Einsteinian principle that goes into the time machine is
the warping of space by gravity. This idea is often explained by
analogy to a worm crawling over a sphere. To the worm, the world is
flat.
Crawling from one spot on the sphere to another in what seems to be
a straight line, the worm doesn't realize that it is actually
tracing out a path that curves in three-dimensional space to follow
the sphere's contour. The worm also doesn't realize that it could
take a shortcut by burrowing through the core of the sphere.
Similarly, what appears to us as three-dimensional space is,
according to Einstein's theory of relativity, bent in dimensions
that we cannot easily imagine, and a "wormhole" could connect two
seemingly distant points in space.
To turn a wormhole into a time machine, say the physicists,
technicians in some "arbitrarily advanced" civilization could
harness the gravitational forces necessary to make one end of the
hole move back and forth at extremely high speed while keeping the
other end stationary.
Like the astronaut in the twin paradox, this rapidly moving end of
the its stationary counterpart. By entering the "older" end of the
wormhole and coming out the "younger" end, a person could
theoretically travel from the present to the past.
Keeping the door open. While the physicists' calculations suggest
there's nothing to prevent all this from happening, they admit that
no one has actually ever seen a wormhole.
Calculations by Morris and co-authors Kip Thorne and Ulvi Yurtsever
of the California Institute of Technology imply that a wormhole can
be kept open only under some strange and exotic physical conditions.
Phenomena that under normal circumstances exist only in
infinitesimally small particles for infinitesimally short periods of
time would have to exist throughout the wormhole for as long as it
remained open.
Page 2
Even if a wormhole time machine were possible, it wouldn't permit
the kind of time travel fancied by H. G. Wells and others who have
mused on the possibility of traveling far into the past or future.
Even though members of an advanced civilization might be able to
cause one end of a wormhole to age less slowly than the other, at
best they would only be able to make time stand still at the instant
the tunnel was created, not move it back any further into the past,
and they couldn't move the other end ahead into the future.
There's at least some circumstantial evidence that the more far-
reaching kind of time machines envisioned by science fiction writers
will never be created, even by the most technologically advanced
civilization imaginable.
If such a machine were ever to be built, a traveler from the future
probably would already have shown up here by now.
Further information on time travel can be found
in TIME1 on KeelyNet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3